Germain Greer is a Cunt (And a Whore) Part II
After writing my original article entitled Germaine Greer is a Cunt, I did some research on the dear lady doctor. After all, I did come at “Dr.” Greer like a venomous Ferrari (I’m sure I’m not the first — if you know what I sexually mean), and I didn’t want to sound half-cocked. I’m a man. If I’m going to sound anything it’s going to be all-cocked and I want to know about it first.
Not only did I discover that I was completely right in saying Germaine Greer is a cunt and also everything else I say about women not being as good as men, but I also found that Germaine Greer is even cuntier than I implied.
And she’s a whore.
Before I get into that, let me just say for the record that Germaine Greer has a nose like the cartoon version of Laurel from Laurel and Hardy. On a man it looks humourous, whimsical, and occasionally mischievous; on a woman, however — especially one as old and turkey chinned as “Dr.” Greer — it looks trashy and whorish, which she obviously is.
No woman has ever gotten to be a feminist without whoring the fuck out of herself for a good six or seven years prior. That’s why they turn into feminists. Five guys in one night, five guys at a time; your average feminist has fucked every combination she can count too and Greer is no exception. That’s why feminists (and specifically Greer) say they’re so comfortable in a world built by men for men. It’s because they’ve most likely fucked the sexual tension out of any situation.
Sounds like a pretty wild allegation doesn’t it? Well I have man proof. That’s the best kind of proof.
During her college years in like 65 BC, “Dr.” Greer joined a student acting troupe. I don’t know about you, but where I come from the only reason women join acting groups is because they want to sit on the casting couch. Whoring and attention whoring are pretty much the same thing anyway. I’ve man-proven elsewhere women can’t act anyway, so let’s just agree to agree and call that Exhibit A.
As Exhibit B, I present this anecdotal remark on a younger student Greer from one of her lady professors:
Germaine was explaining that there could be no liberation for women, no matter how highly educated, as long as we were required to cram our breasts into bras constructed like mini-Vesuviuses, two stitched white cantilevered cones which bore no resemblance to the female anatomy.
I’ve heard a lot of come-ons in my day. I’m a man after all and I wear a tie. That means women are coming on to me all the time. Try it for yourself. Fuck, wear a tie to the beach — just Speedos and a tie. You’ll need a lifeguard just to keep you from drowning in women. Actually, women are most likely coming on to you all the time anyway. As a man you just don’t notice because you’re too busy thinking of shit that matters, like getting a job or keeping a job by not fucking up. Women don’t have that option; thinking or not fucking up.
Do women look at your eyes or specifically avoid your gaze? Those are both classic female come-ons. Another classic female come-on is constantly ranting and raving about their breasts. Are they too big, are they too small? Do you not care for them, could they use a lift or a stuffing? Do you love them? Can they be aptly or cutely described by a volcano metaphor a fucking ten year old might concoct on a bad day?
There’s no better way for a woman to get attention from men than by talking about her tits. Just ask the America’s Women’s World Cup team — or Germaine Greer the student.
That’s strike one and strike two. In the whore game, that’s all you get. That’s a good thing too because Exhibit C is Greer’s own quote from a 1971 interview in the New York Times confessing that she was once a traveling unpaid sex toy for any and all bands; a period she calls her supergroupie phase. As a man, I am naturally more skilled than “Dr.” Greer at not inventing words where perfectly applicable ones already exist. That’s a waste of fucking time. In this case wanton, promiscuous slut seems appropriate.
Naturally, exhibits D through F are Greer’s advice to young women in Sex and Destiny to give up celibacy, monogamy, and finally to drink their own fucking menstrual blood — I assume that’s her homeopathic method of checking for STD’s.
And you thought the clitoris/penis thing was bad.
Germaine Greer is the real-life nightmare of every filthy, drugged up, and well abused whore who’s ever been typecast. She has no business speaking.
Related Articles:
September 20th, 2006 at 10:19 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
I’m just curious, but is there anyone who doesn’t feel pretty much the same about Female at this point?
My own attitude toward her varies. On a good day (pretty much any day she doesn’t post), I have a tiny amount of sympathy for her as a psychologically stunted loser with an unhealthy fixation on this Web site. On bad days (pretty much any day she posts) I become enraged at her blatently evil views.
September 20th, 2006 at 8:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7ce740f985e58
I pity her and many women for their short-sighted and hypocritical viewpoints on both life and the universe.
-Strength and Honor-
September 20th, 2006 at 11:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: ecf72d58bf105
No gwallan, here is the real drill.
1. Not acceptable to threaten another person. Do it again or do anything which I can prove is illegal and you will be held accountable.
2. You miscontrued my words, what a surprise. Things like that tend to happen when you are blinded by your own issues. I am hereby advising you not to post any comments to me whatsoever on this site or any other.
3. Dakota Smith - I didn’t want to get this upfront with you, but seeing as you don’t mind dishing it out to others, I’m sure you should be able to take what I am about to say to you.
You think I’m psychologically stunted? I’m not the one who stayed married to an abuser for 13 years; who has an ex with bipolar who failed to tell me when our relationship was over and who I repeatedly considered more sane than any other of her gender, but who I completely failed to see wasn’t taking her medication; who now has a plastic doll as a current love interest. Wake up to yourself.
September 21st, 2006 at 1:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
She’s far too fixated on this website. I never see her posts here; I guess Dick deletes them before I happen to load the page. I do occasionally see men replying to her.
Something in her is contrary and argumentative; that’s a negative. On the other hand, she’s not stupid, and, rather than evil, I think it’s more a matter of her having cheerfully accepted feminist babble as revealed wisdom for so many years, like so many in our culture. Clearly gwallan and she have arguments going on on other sites, so I shan’t touch that aspect with a 200′ pole.
-wolfe
September 21st, 2006 at 5:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
Very rarely have I deleted a post once it’s on a page. I don’t believe I’ve done so to Female in a year at least, if ever. All of Female’s posts, however, are moderated as she greatly enjoys posting manic nonsense.
As a child, Female regularly posts using thread-derailing nicknames. I’ve decided that from now on, none of her posts done in such fashion will clear moderation. For that reason, it’s possible you’ve skimmed over a post of hers without knowing it. If so, lucky you.
-Dick
September 21st, 2006 at 6:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: b54d2094ab463
Female said:”You think I’m psychologically stunted? I’m not the one who stayed married to an abuser for 13 years; who has an ex with bipolar who failed to tell me when our relationship was over and who I repeatedly considered more sane than any other of her gender, but who I completely failed to see wasn’t taking her medication; who now has a plastic doll as a current love interest. Wake up to yourself.”
female, while self centered women may not have the strength of character to want follow through with wedding vows. (remember, for better OR worse) As women tend only to want to be married for better and leave when things get worse claiming such ludicrous reasons as irreconcilable differences. Men face the worse head on, holding to their wedding vows for men know that relationships, like all things, need constant work and we are not afraid of such work. My hat is off to Dakota for showing such manly strength and refusing to give up against such odds.
Dakota is not, psychologically stunted as are you. At most he is guilty of being kind to dumb animals. Yet another manly trait.
- Oldone
September 21st, 2006 at 6:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 49c9ff889fded
well said oldone
September 21st, 2006 at 6:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 05bdcb82f843a
I’ve heard worse, babe, trust me. You can’t begin to phaze me.
Yep. And borderline evil venturing into just plain evil on occasion. Unlike wolfe, I’m no longer inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt. It took me a while to come to get to that point, but as you point out below, I’m a slow study with respect to women. It’s probably a character flaw common to men — biologically built-in to continue the species.
But I’m learning. Never cut a woman slack, she’ll just take it all and then demand that you make a longer rope.
Even lacking anything remotely resembling compassion (not surprising, since you’re a woman — compassion isn’t in your nature), there is some truth in what you say. However, I’d come to the conclusion that my choices needed some examining long before you said anything about it.
I’d say thanks, but since you obviously intended your words to be hurtful rather than constructive, such thanks would obviously be misplaced. But I can thank you for proving — again — that when confronted with an unpleasant reality about life, a woman will invariably resort to hysterics rather than accept it.
Well, to be clear, I’ve not made the purchase. I have, however, decided to reduce the value of a relationship with a woman to pros and cons, and I find that the cons massively outweigh the pros. Women bring nothing to a relationship but a certain level of sexual utility, and even that’s too low to make all the emotional chaos and financial devestation worth it.
However, I do realize that I have some needs that can’t be fulfilled by myself. I have emotional needs, but as I’ve already pointed out, women are too self-absorbed to be able to satisfy them. That being the case, the concept of obtaining emotional satisfaction from a woman should be immediately rejected.
However, it’s impossible to satisfy my sexual needs without either paying a prostitute (rather dangerous in this day and age and I lack the funds), engaging in a long-term relationship with a woman (emotionally and financially bankrupting in the long term), or turning to men (something I find revolting).
So … what’s left? Female simulations.
In fact, I’ve been doing some additional research, and I’ve discovered that for less than the cost of a new SUV, I could purchase an AndyDroid from a company in Germany called “First Androids.” When these guys start doing assembly-line work and go public, I’m going to invest every spare dime in them.
While still crude in many respects, these robots are probably the first that can correctly be called an “android” — or in their case, more correctly a “gyndroid” since they’re designed to appear female.
I’d urge you to go to the site and download the order form. The site is by native German speakers who clearly know little English, but don’t let that fool you. The list of features on the site is impressive, from the ability to simulate breathing and body heat to touch sensors and voice response AI (albeit limited).
Female, in another few years, you gals are going to have to clean up your acts and be nice to men for a change, or you’re going to find yourself without male companionship. When the folks at First Androids get the right AI software into these things and make them into real companions capable of fulfilling a man’s limited emotional needs, there are going to be a lot of men who wonder what they need you screeching harpies for.
And I, for one, am going to be the first in line to buy one.
September 21st, 2006 at 6:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: ecf72d58bf105
perhaps you also need to open your eyes oldone, because to me, someone who thinks a Real Doll is the answer to relationship problems is someone who quite frankly, is afraid of constant work.
Another thing, it seems probable that his ex-gf didn’t inform him she was no longer his gf, nor, that she had gone off medication because he tends to advertise loudly that insanity and irrationality cannot be tolerated, and only perfection will do. IIRC he mentioned 6 times on these boards that his gf was the only sane woman on the planet, so I can only imagine how many times he must have also said that to her face (probably about 350)…no wonder she couldn’t tell him when she was ‘being less than perfect and fucking having a breakdown’.
Perfection doesn’t exist sweetcheeks, so I guess it makes sense that rather than accept that and deal with it/her, you were left to find comfort in a synthetic vagina/ass/mouth, whatever.
September 21st, 2006 at 6:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: ecf72d58bf105
And Dakota, if you think I’m being less friendly to you now than I have been before, you would be correct in that assumption. Considering you are the one who started off calling me evil, stupid, insane, now you’ve got your wish. That is exactly how I will be towards you, seeing as that is the only way in which you can view me. Cause and effect, sweetheart, look it up.
September 21st, 2006 at 6:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: e26a3c9668cea
They’re already losing male companionship without us even having androids to fuck.
The secret is exercise man! Do some fucking cardio, get the endorphins flowing. This is not a bullshit myth. I’ve been jogging every day and eating “right” and taking vitamins and flax oil and my sex drive has plummeted. I still think of my ex constantly, but not desparate sex thoughts, just hate and regret that I ever involved myself with such a black souled cunt.
Look at the President. You think he ever has time to bang Laura? Doubtful. And he’s not some weak adulterer like Clinton. But he’s an avid jogger, and it shows in his demeanor and resolve.
September 21st, 2006 at 6:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Indeed, well said oldone.
@Dakota Not sure about the “your plastic pal who’s fun to be with” approach, but certainly a number of factors — mobility, technology, and a likely swing of the pendulum within the next generation — are going to apply some very nasty arbitrage-effects to the value of women. That could well be one of them.
-wolfe
September 22nd, 2006 at 3:17 am - IP Man-Hash: f0bc7c7dc0cca
You have been told numerous times that you are not wanted here. Just because the gate is open doesn’t mean you can disobey the keep out sign. If it requires deadly force to remove you then so be it. Like a dog that repeatedly bites you need to be put down with extreme prejudice.
No faeces face. I did not misconstrue your comments in any way. You are no different to numerous other feminists who will excuse a child molester because they have a cunt. I’ve seen the weasel words of that ilk before. You were attempting to mitigate the actions of paedophiles. That is what is not acceptable. That is what proves you to be the slime you are.
You are not wanted here. If it requires threats to get rid of your slimy, reeking, fat arse then so be it.
If I do ever knowingly see you I will treat you just as I would treat any paedophile apologist. You are an evil whore just begging to have your uterus extracted by way of your eye socket. One organ at a time exposed and roasted slowly with a blow torch while you watch with just enough life support to keep you in agony for an eternity.
You are scum.
September 22nd, 2006 at 3:42 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
So, are you gonna make good on the threat and apply hacking to female?
I wonder what odonell’s gonna say about that. Never did seem to get my addy that I pmed.
Oh, I get it now! Odonell’s female’s favourite dildo! Antropomorphism and all that.
September 22nd, 2006 at 4:57 am - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02
Fem, you stupid whore. There is a whole world of differnce between being perfect and being violent/abusive towards your partner at the drop of a hat.
Fuck off Female. For real this time.
September 22nd, 2006 at 5:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 05bdcb82f843a
Female, you can’t piss me off on this, no matter how stupid and abrasive you try to be, because you clearly have no fucking clue what you’re talking about. I actually laughed when I read this, because it’s just so stupid, inane, and yes, evil.
I mean, seriously, you’ve no conception of the amount of work I’ve put into my relationships. For you to make such ignorant statements is proof positive of just how evil you are.
Again, thanks for proving — for about the thousandth time — just how much better men are than women.
Again, as with your last post, there may be some slight truth to this — and I said so in my last conversation to her. I had said to her all along that I had enough neuroses in my life, and that one condition of us continuing to be together was that she continue to stay on top of her disorder. I think it possible that my explicitly making this a condition may have motivated her to conceal when she wasn’t making good decisions such as going off her meds.
However, what you have to consider is that I’m a father, as well. Any women I see is a potential step-mother to my children. Consequently, she must be someone fit for the task. I will categorically not bring a neurotic into my children’s lives. Period. The end.
And if you think bringing a neurotic into my children’s lives is a good idea, then you’re even more evil than you’ve proven yourself to be.
So yes, I will announce loudly and to the world that any woman I’m involved with must be psychologically sound, for the welfare not just of myself but of my children.
My children are more important than my girlfriend. If you don’t agree, then fuck you, cunt.
Again, I make no apologies for not wanting neuroses in mine and my children’s lives. That you are incapable of distinguishing why this is appropriate is another indication of just how evil you are.
Female, I don’t care if you’re less friendly or not.
Here’s the thing, Female: what you believe is evil. You’ve had this pointed out to you repeatedly and rather relentlessly for at least the year that I’ve been posting here.
You are utterly unrepentant, unable to be convinced of just how evil the things you believe are. Whenever it’s been pointed out to you, you instantly go into hysterics, defending whatever evil position you’ve taken. You’re incapable of rational thought, you just grab onto the most hideous position you can find, dig in, and attempt to defend it.
When someone does that consistently over a long period of time, eventually one has to conclude that there’s something about her that draws her to be evil. Perhaps you’ve just been brainwashed by the lies of feminism, perhaps you’re psychologically unstable, perhaps you’re a spoiled little girl incapable of appreciating her position in life.
Whatever the reason, after a while it just doesn’t matter. After a while, the evil you’re clinging to rubs off and she becomes it.
That’s what’s happened to you, Female. You’re evil.
So I’m not interested in being friendly with you — that doesn’t work. I’m not interested in debating you — you’ll never change. I’m not interested in giving in to your evil ideas — that way lies madness.
What’s left? Calling a spade a spade and allowing you to be what you’ve decided to be: my intellectual and emotional enemy.
I’m not nice to my enemies and they’re not nice to me. Such is the reality of life.
As you’ve so aptly proven in just the last 48 hours alone …
Again, you’ve not changed in the year or more that I’ve been here. What’s changed is my recognition of the depths of the evil things you believe.
I’m through being nice to evil. It achieves nothing.
September 22nd, 2006 at 6:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 3ec8f8fc912f7
mike: apparently you aren’t swallowing the feminist sludge without question. Report to a liberal college ASAP for reeducation.
“not perfection” in female’s terms = she can cheat, nag, cook shitty meals or none at all, and be a substance abuser and you should be greatful god gave you such a a betraying cunt to fuck.
September 22nd, 2006 at 7:50 am - IP Man-Hash: bdb2b567d985d
Before I make any further comments on the topics being dicussed, could any of you gentlemen please explain to me why this “Female” person hasn’t been banned? Her being allowed to post here makes the whole forum pointless, because getting away from this kind of feminine bitchicism is exactly the reason why most men post here anyway. I’m curious…
September 22nd, 2006 at 7:55 am - IP Man-Hash: bdb2b567d985d
Oh, I forgot to say that she’s an evil cunt, who thinks it’s ok to show pictures of naked children and to have sex with them, as long as they’re not female, because, and I quote:
“Most 15 year-old boys are sexual anyway, or at least they would be if they could.”
This arrogant and biased statement, in itself, should be enough to get her ass banned from the forum. It is exactly this kind of hypocritical double-standard, from feminist cunts like her, that makes my blood boil.
September 22nd, 2006 at 8:07 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
Actually, I don’t think it’s really a double standard. It’s more a pathology.
What drives women about sex is, I think, rather twisted. Mostly it boils down to jealousy of men. They’re jealous we enjoy sex and they don’t. They can see that we enjoy it, but they don’t — at least not in the same way. They don’t get what we think is so great about it, and it burns them up that we’re having such a good time when they’re not.
Furthermore, women are far more sex-obsessed with men, starting at an earlier age and continuing roughly until menopause. Actually, I’m told by my elders that they start to settle down once their children have left home, but until then they’re obsessed and it makes them nutty.
They’re obsessed for a different reason than we are: we’re trying to have a good time; they’re trying to reproduce. We enjoy it a hell of a lot and they don’t, no matter how hard they try. They feel driven to have sex, but they don’t enjoy it the way we do, and it drives them completely bat-shit crazy.
So when Female-pedophile justifies pedophilia, it’s largely projection. She’s jealous that we’re enjoying our sex and wishes that she could enjoy it the way we do. She’s been obsessed with it since she was a ‘tween, so naturally boys must be, too. Or want to be.
As I say, it all boils down to jealousy. They can’t enjoy themselves the way we do, and it drives them nuts.
Of course, in Female’s particular case, she’s an evil cunt with no scruples, so all bets tend to be off.