Germain Greer is a Cunt (And a Whore) Part II
After writing my original article entitled Germaine Greer is a Cunt, I did some research on the dear lady doctor. After all, I did come at “Dr.” Greer like a venomous Ferrari (I’m sure I’m not the first — if you know what I sexually mean), and I didn’t want to sound half-cocked. I’m a man. If I’m going to sound anything it’s going to be all-cocked and I want to know about it first.
Not only did I discover that I was completely right in saying Germaine Greer is a cunt and also everything else I say about women not being as good as men, but I also found that Germaine Greer is even cuntier than I implied.
And she’s a whore.
Before I get into that, let me just say for the record that Germaine Greer has a nose like the cartoon version of Laurel from Laurel and Hardy. On a man it looks humourous, whimsical, and occasionally mischievous; on a woman, however — especially one as old and turkey chinned as “Dr.” Greer — it looks trashy and whorish, which she obviously is.
No woman has ever gotten to be a feminist without whoring the fuck out of herself for a good six or seven years prior. That’s why they turn into feminists. Five guys in one night, five guys at a time; your average feminist has fucked every combination she can count too and Greer is no exception. That’s why feminists (and specifically Greer) say they’re so comfortable in a world built by men for men. It’s because they’ve most likely fucked the sexual tension out of any situation.
Sounds like a pretty wild allegation doesn’t it? Well I have man proof. That’s the best kind of proof.
During her college years in like 65 BC, “Dr.” Greer joined a student acting troupe. I don’t know about you, but where I come from the only reason women join acting groups is because they want to sit on the casting couch. Whoring and attention whoring are pretty much the same thing anyway. I’ve man-proven elsewhere women can’t act anyway, so let’s just agree to agree and call that Exhibit A.
As Exhibit B, I present this anecdotal remark on a younger student Greer from one of her lady professors:
Germaine was explaining that there could be no liberation for women, no matter how highly educated, as long as we were required to cram our breasts into bras constructed like mini-Vesuviuses, two stitched white cantilevered cones which bore no resemblance to the female anatomy.
I’ve heard a lot of come-ons in my day. I’m a man after all and I wear a tie. That means women are coming on to me all the time. Try it for yourself. Fuck, wear a tie to the beach — just Speedos and a tie. You’ll need a lifeguard just to keep you from drowning in women. Actually, women are most likely coming on to you all the time anyway. As a man you just don’t notice because you’re too busy thinking of shit that matters, like getting a job or keeping a job by not fucking up. Women don’t have that option; thinking or not fucking up.
Do women look at your eyes or specifically avoid your gaze? Those are both classic female come-ons. Another classic female come-on is constantly ranting and raving about their breasts. Are they too big, are they too small? Do you not care for them, could they use a lift or a stuffing? Do you love them? Can they be aptly or cutely described by a volcano metaphor a fucking ten year old might concoct on a bad day?
There’s no better way for a woman to get attention from men than by talking about her tits. Just ask the America’s Women’s World Cup team — or Germaine Greer the student.
That’s strike one and strike two. In the whore game, that’s all you get. That’s a good thing too because Exhibit C is Greer’s own quote from a 1971 interview in the New York Times confessing that she was once a traveling unpaid sex toy for any and all bands; a period she calls her supergroupie phase. As a man, I am naturally more skilled than “Dr.” Greer at not inventing words where perfectly applicable ones already exist. That’s a waste of fucking time. In this case wanton, promiscuous slut seems appropriate.
Naturally, exhibits D through F are Greer’s advice to young women in Sex and Destiny to give up celibacy, monogamy, and finally to drink their own fucking menstrual blood — I assume that’s her homeopathic method of checking for STD’s.
And you thought the clitoris/penis thing was bad.
Germaine Greer is the real-life nightmare of every filthy, drugged up, and well abused whore who’s ever been typecast. She has no business speaking.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 9 8 7 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All
My dislike for feminism has a specific cause. I had been a feminist all my life and frequented several feminist internet forums. Then I made the mistake a couple of years ago of admitting to some of my childhood experiences on a feminist forum. I was immediately subjected to attack from all directions. Among other things I was called a “fucking cunt”. I was called a liar. I was told I was “attempting to justify my own latent paedophilia”. I was then banned for “making the environment uncomfortable for the female members”.
When releasing The Boy in Australia Greer was interviewed on Australian radio. Her point was not about exploitation of the young. It was about her own lust for young boys. She quite readily admitted this. She freely admitted she believes there is no harm in women having sex with boys. She referred to “rivers of gushing sperm”. After hearing that interview I collapsed. I ended up back in the counselling I thought I’d successfully completed.
In my early internet days I did quite a bit of hacking. Part of this involved being a member of a group which consistantly provided information to a range of agencies about websites we suspected contained child porn. And now you, Female, tell me that I’m a hypocrite because I find “The Boy” offensive.
So here’s the drill Female.
I don’t give a fuck about any laws relating to internet harassment.
You come here again expect to be pursued relentlessly. You come anywhere near me my foot will be deposited so far up your clacker that you will be able to taste it.
You are a vile cunt. You are a defender of the dirtiest, filthiest scum on the planet. You deserve to be roasted slowly in the deepest pits of hell for all eternity. I will loudly applaud every misfortune you have ever, and will ever, experience. Seeing you eaten by cockroaches from the inside out would bring tears of joy to my eyes and tears of regret for the vileness the cockroaches endured.
No explanation, no mitigation, no retraction, no apology, no weasel words will change this. My hatred for you will outlast all of creation.
Nice one, wolfe.
Perhaps she means asshole loosener? That would fit with the homosexual comment.
-wolfe
‘mysogynist homosexual’. That’s like something right out of Monty Python’s the meaning of life.
You are a total asshole looser that has nothing better to do. I am convinced that you are a mysogynist homosexual.
Not really. I take it your’e married or in a relationship. Not all of us are. Man needs to spread his seed but a women is not required. There’s porn and realdolls or prostitutes for that. Study after study shows prostitution is cheaper than marriage.
The best way to understand women is to realize a basic truth about the female condition: a woman is the physiolgical/biochemical support system for a womb. That is basically it. The female brain included. The female brain is exclusively wired for “empathizing”. This means that it excels at reading other peoples emotions and at manipulating them. This comes at a necessity, because it is required for raising small children; but it is not only that. First and foremost, women have this ability because it is neessary for getting a man.
Even though they’ll deny it, the female brain has a single prime directive, which is constantly present in a woman’s sub-conscious:”Get a man to impregnate you, but only if he commits his time/resources/sexual and emotional loyalty to you.”. You see, as Shoppenhauer once said, a woman doesen’t need to understand how the World/reality/things work, beause she can get everything out of life by understanding a man and manipulating him. The point I’m making is that women never develped logical thinking skills, the ability for inductive and deductive reasonings, because these skills are used to understand impersonal reality, whereas the female brain understands and relates to everything on an exlusively persnal level. This is why women are so spiteful, vindictive, jealous and tend to hold grudges against people for so long. Oh, they are also intensely aware of other women, and their relative status in relation to each other. This is alien to men, who are usually indifferent to each other and under-concerned with other people’s opinions of them. But not women! Their specific brain type makes them almost “prisioners” of social judgements and interaction. Most men can stay completely lonely forlongs periods of time; women, conversely, consider loneliness to be the definition of hell itself. Look at how women will bitch about each other, become enemies, and then become friends again with the same women who talked behind their backs. This is not their fault: it is the female imperative to always seek social interaction and approval at all costs, even if it makes their lives hell - for them, the real hell is to not have social approval! This is also why women are so furiously trendy and obsessed with being exactly like one another. The point is that, even though men are infinitely superior to women, both physically and intellectually, it all means nothing at the end because the cunts will always manipulate men with, well, their cunts, and benefit from men’s intelligence/tenacity/creativity/strengh, etc. Quoting Shoppenhauer again, the saddest, most cruel fact of nature is that the inferior sex gets to enslave the superior through sexuality. Too bad for us.
and if stupidity hurt then we would hear even more of that BS akin to ‘women can handle pain better than men,’ but instead of using childbirth as their point of reference …
If stupidity hurt sonyad, it would be just one more excuse why most women could not do anything but sit and watch Oprah.
Go impale yourself, you dyslectic, idiotic cunt. If only stupidity hurt.
That’s it?! Considering how butch you feminazis are, I though you’d fight a little harder. I’m feeling a little like Hannibal after the battle of Cana: this was the quickest, easiest, most overwheming and thorough victory I ever had.
And like the Romans.. sooner than you think the grudge holding, vindictive femicunt will cut your throat as you rest.
i think we need to prove our manhood by tasting your own sperm. i just wanked off to some crap anal, only took about 10seconds and it tastes so good now i have reclaim my right to call yourself a man.
Funny how a male paedophile is never described as someone who “likes shock tactics to draw attention to issues”. He’s described as “a dirty old man”, or “in prison in Vietnam“.
And Germs proves that young people are vulnerable and sexploitation of them is wrong by paying them money to take their clothes off and be photographed for a book which she sells.
Next Fem will be telling us that the power of snuff movies is in the outrage you are able to feel about them and the challenge that then presents to your acceptance of murder… if you honestly don’t wish to be a hypocrite.
A man knows that that statement is stupid and wrong.
Part of the power of Greer’s book is that an intellectually and morally bankrupt ’70’s űberslut has turned into a dirty old woman who doesn’t mind damaging kid’s lives to let the world know the depths to which she has sunk if she can make a buck out of it.
But the really woman-tastic power of Greer’s book is that the guys on this site can use it as the defining proof of Law I.
-Big Al
His points didn’t need any bolstering from some want-wit woman.
It looks like someone just needed some attention.
-Dick
That’s it?! Considering how butch you feminazis are, I though you’d fight a little harder. I’m feeling a little like Hannibal after the battle of Cana: this was the quickest, easiest, most overwheming and thorough victory I ever had.
Thanks. Amd yes, I agree: we demean ourseles by even giving a reply to someone who is not merely a female, mind you, but also not one of the more intelligent ones - the average woman is an imbecile, but a few, the ones with the most brain power, are merely dull.
I second the motion. Oust Female!
Brilliant observation, P Coderch. I hold the same views with respect to feminists dictating what adult women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The assumption that women in porn are ‘exploited’ or ‘degraded’ by their actions is stupid - they [women in porn] get paid loads and back to your previous point - THEY CHOOSE TO DO IT!
Thanks. Too bad that their concern for “sexploitation” only applies to their own gender. Apparently, “exploting” the bodies of fifteen year olds is acceptable, as long as they’re not female. Because, and I quote:
“most fifteen year old boys are sexual, or at least they would be if they could.”
Her reply reveals: bias, arrogance, endorsement of illegality and gender discrimination. Shocking that someone who proclaims to be against gender discrimination endoses exactly the same thing. Apparently, the fact that teen boys are horny is some way relevant for them being allowed to pose nude! Appalling! The arrogance from her response comes from her saying that, not only should a fifteen year old boy not feel abused if an adult woman takes advantage of him, but he should actually feel thankful that a woman gave him the priviledge of allowing him to have sex with her! What an arrogant whore! She is traumatized about fashion shows and the like being legal, but thinks having intercourse with and displaying the nude bodies of underage males should be acceptable because “they want it”! Again: what a biased, arrogant, disrespectful cunt!
P Coderch
a bit like the myth of lemmings being suicidal - a complete Disney fabrication, but damned persistent.
this little lemming is out of here — DM can’t be far behind me.
Z.
Haha, true, very good point. I was deliberately referring to the popular version of the quote, since that too has seeped into our consciousness as a society, lo these many years. That said, it was sloppy of me not to point that out as well.
Cheers,
-wolfe