Germain Greer is a Cunt (And a Whore) Part II

After writing my original article entitled Germaine Greer is a Cunt, I did some research on the dear lady doctor. After all, I did come at “Dr.” Greer like a venomous Ferrari (I’m sure I’m not the first — if you know what I sexually mean), and I didn’t want to sound half-cocked. I’m a man. If I’m going to sound anything it’s going to be all-cocked and I want to know about it first.

Not only did I discover that I was completely right in saying Germaine Greer is a cunt and also everything else I say about women not being as good as men, but I also found that Germaine Greer is even cuntier than I implied.

And she’s a whore.

Before I get into that, let me just say for the record that Germaine Greer has a nose like the cartoon version of Laurel from Laurel and Hardy. On a man it looks humourous, whimsical, and occasionally mischievous; on a woman, however — especially one as old and turkey chinned as “Dr.” Greer — it looks trashy and whorish, which she obviously is.

No woman has ever gotten to be a feminist without whoring the fuck out of herself for a good six or seven years prior. That’s why they turn into feminists. Five guys in one night, five guys at a time; your average feminist has fucked every combination she can count too and Greer is no exception. That’s why feminists (and specifically Greer) say they’re so comfortable in a world built by men for men. It’s because they’ve most likely fucked the sexual tension out of any situation.

Sounds like a pretty wild allegation doesn’t it? Well I have man proof. That’s the best kind of proof.

During her college years in like 65 BC, “Dr.” Greer joined a student acting troupe. I don’t know about you, but where I come from the only reason women join acting groups is because they want to sit on the casting couch. Whoring and attention whoring are pretty much the same thing anyway. I’ve man-proven elsewhere women can’t act anyway, so let’s just agree to agree and call that Exhibit A.

As Exhibit B, I present this anecdotal remark on a younger student Greer from one of her lady professors:

Germaine was explaining that there could be no liberation for women, no matter how highly educated, as long as we were required to cram our breasts into bras constructed like mini-Vesuviuses, two stitched white cantilevered cones which bore no resemblance to the female anatomy.

I’ve heard a lot of come-ons in my day. I’m a man after all and I wear a tie. That means women are coming on to me all the time. Try it for yourself. Fuck, wear a tie to the beach — just Speedos and a tie. You’ll need a lifeguard just to keep you from drowning in women. Actually, women are most likely coming on to you all the time anyway. As a man you just don’t notice because you’re too busy thinking of shit that matters, like getting a job or keeping a job by not fucking up. Women don’t have that option; thinking or not fucking up.

Do women look at your eyes or specifically avoid your gaze? Those are both classic female come-ons. Another classic female come-on is constantly ranting and raving about their breasts. Are they too big, are they too small? Do you not care for them, could they use a lift or a stuffing? Do you love them? Can they be aptly or cutely described by a volcano metaphor a fucking ten year old might concoct on a bad day?

There’s no better way for a woman to get attention from men than by talking about her tits. Just ask the America’s Women’s World Cup team — or Germaine Greer the student.

That’s strike one and strike two. In the whore game, that’s all you get. That’s a good thing too because Exhibit C is Greer’s own quote from a 1971 interview in the New York Times confessing that she was once a traveling unpaid sex toy for any and all bands; a period she calls her supergroupie phase. As a man, I am naturally more skilled than “Dr.” Greer at not inventing words where perfectly applicable ones already exist. That’s a waste of fucking time. In this case wanton, promiscuous slut seems appropriate.

Naturally, exhibits D through F are Greer’s advice to young women in Sex and Destiny to give up celibacy, monogamy, and finally to drink their own fucking menstrual blood — I assume that’s her homeopathic method of checking for STD’s.

And you thought the clitoris/penis thing was bad.

Germaine Greer is the real-life nightmare of every filthy, drugged up, and well abused whore who’s ever been typecast. She has no business speaking.


Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

173 Comments in 173 threads.»

Pages: « 9 8 [7] 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-09-28 20:29:00

We always will prevail. It’s in our nature to overcome adversity. It just took many of us a while to fully appreciate the betrayal/backstabbing that is the priciple ideology of feminism.

-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-09-28 16:48:38

Well said, Aaron. That’s because you’re a man.

-Dick

 
Comment by Aaron
2006-09-28 16:25:19

Sandra, u dont get the point. Men arent equal to woman and laws adapting to that theory are ruining society. If you take away suffrage and assertive action we have a fast, more efficient and better moving society into the future. This is a hurdle for history, but as history shows, the male species will prevail.

 
Comment by sandra
2006-09-28 16:18:55

well thank you for actually answering. that SCUM manifesto article was interesting. see, i dont see feminism as the whole ‘women are equal to men’ belief [which is how it's defined...], but the belief that women are BETTER than men. so i wouldnt consider myself a feminist because i think men and women are equal. i know this one girl my age-ish, and she is by far the biggest feminist i know. reading ‘the awakening’ with her in my english class last yr. was the biggest pain in the … neck when it came to discussion time. oh the things she would blurt out every 5 seconds about men being this or that; she also told us she had a bf - we felt sorry for him.

 
Comment by gwallan
2006-09-28 02:28:09

sandra said:

im just wondering how you all would personally define ‘feminism’ ?…

I find it easier to define what feminism is not.
I go back to the seventies in terms of my active political involvement and worked with the women’s libbers of the time. That movement did stand for equality of opportunity. It correctly believed that we didn’t treat women as full adults. The libbers did believe that men and women needed to stand together to improve things for everybody.
Much of what they wanted was achieved in a very short time frame. At this point it fell prey to the same problem many political movements face when the primary goals are achieved. What now? Interest wanes among the membership and suddenly the rat bags, the extremists, are the only ones with the energy to keep pushing it along.
I pinpoint the introduction of affirmative action as the tipping point. This is the time when feminism moved from equality of opportunity to equality of outcome as it’s primary goal. This is the time when vengeance for the imagined wrongs of the past became part of the ideology.
Everything feminism has advocated since, even where the issues were genuine, has been grossly exaggerated at best and outright falsified at worst. It is incapable of acknowledging anything positve about men or anything negative about women. It plays the “strong woman” card when it suits but reverts to perpetual victim status at the drop of a hat. It defends the vilest of acts by women while demanding metaphorical lynchings of men who merely look at a woman the wrong way. It is the ultimate in passive aggression.
So what is feminism not?
The majority of people when hearing the word feminism mistakenly identify it with women’s lib. This belief is so embedded in our culture that anyone who speaks against feminism is automatically assumed by most to be anti-woman. Unfortunately it ceased being a movement for equlity many years ago.
So, sandra, here’s your homework.
1. What do you believe would happen if it came to light that 95% of the homeless were women? Or 85% of suicides? Would our society collectively shrug it’s shoulders or would it be screamed from the rooftops as symptomatic of the oppression of women?
2. Read the SCUM Manifesto.
As you do so consider the following:-
This version of the manifesto is published on a web site that claims to advocate against violence, DV and sexual abuse.
The manifesto and it’s author are held in very high regard by feminists throughout the world(See the blurb at the top).
The manifesto is required reading in almost all women’s studies courses.
If you can stomach the whole thing get back to us and explain why we shouldn’t consider feminism to be a seriously sick movement.
.
.
.
.
.
FEMINISM - THE FORTY YEAR TANTRUM

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-09-27 23:24:35

sandra said:

he already has. and yes- i know the definition. it’s just that some people interpret the word in a different way than someone else.

Classic woman-thought. Words mean specific things, sweetheart. They’re not your playthings.

-Dick

 
Comment by Aaron
2006-09-27 18:32:54

Dear Sandra, please get fucked
love Aaron

 
Comment by sandra
2006-09-27 18:28:09

he already has. and yes- i know the definition. it’s just that some people interpret the word in a different way than someone else.

 
Comment by Big Al
2006-09-27 18:23:36

sandra said:

im just wondering how you all would personally define ‘feminism’ ?…

Why don’t you just go here, sweetheart.

Before Dick tells you to fuck off his site.

-Big Al

 
Comment by sandra
2006-09-27 17:56:44

im just wondering how you all would personally define ‘feminism’ ?…

 
Comment by Aaron
2006-09-27 17:52:21

it seems that we have the numbers to form large unions against feminism

 
Comment by Aaron
2006-09-27 17:51:14

why cant we as men take our power back?

 
Comment by Chris
2006-09-27 16:59:59

wolfe said:

Indeed, well said oldone.

@Dakota Not sure about the “your plastic pal who’s fun to be with” approach, but certainly a number of factors — mobility, technology, and a likely swing of the pendulum within the next generation — are going to apply some very nasty arbitrage-effects to the value of women. That could well be one of them.
-wolfe

It’s already happening, Wolfe. Many of the feminists (or so they think until it comes time to paying the tab) I have to associate with for work complain about being lonely, undersexed (if sexed at all), and generally only able to date beta-males. I constantly remind them that they only have themselves to blame for this situation, and it will get worse as they get even uglier as they age.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-09-27 15:13:19

Aaron said:

i really really hate women, but i want to fuck them lol

That’s the way nature intended it.

-Dick

 
Comment by Aaron
2006-09-27 15:09:46

i really really hate women, but i want to fuck them lol

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-09-27 13:46:51

Female’s restraint in not posting here is the single greatest piece of wisdom I’ve seen from her.

@P Coderch, All CAPS is of limited use.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Luka
2006-09-27 13:06:20

Odd. From what you wrote above it almost sounds like you want female to post here?

 
Comment by P Coderch
2006-09-27 11:33:04

I find it disappointing that I defeated “female” so utterly that she stopped posting here. I guess even the female brain is capable of having logic nailed into it, if you hammer it really, really hard - as I did. Funny that my post on women being physiological/biochemical support systems for wombs got few replies; I thought more gentlemen would find it interesting and comment on it. Anyways, I’m not done with the bull-dyke femicunts yet: THE ARGUMENT MUST GO ON UNTIL SOMEONE GETS DESTROYED!!!!!! So, I proclaim:

DELENDA EST FEMINAZIS ET “FEMALE”!

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-09-22 10:48:34

That is hilarious, Dakota.

-Dick

 
Comment by Dakota Smith
2006-09-22 08:24:46

Hey, Female! check this one out!

And while you’re at it, this one, too!

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis