Women want the benefits of having a man do points 1-3 to them, while not having to accept 4-5. That is not equality, that is superiority.

Liam said:

How depressing this website is - a bunch of bitter, abusive loners who reinforce each others’ unbalanced views on women by pretending it’s humorous.

Sad

Humour has nothing to do with it.
People have a hard time with Dick because he’s not just some boorish idiot who goes, “Durrrr, women suck!”
He presents himself in a cool, calm, rational manner, as well as speaking and acting with integrity. He doesn’t fit the stereotypical mold for someone whos considered “prejudiced.” He says his piece and gives his reasons that deep down a LOT of people agree with, and it drives a lot of bulldyke feminists and pussy whipped men like you up the wall.

gwallan said:

Alex said:

Gwallan- I agree with most of what you said. I’d identify much more with women’s lib, then… equality of opportunity, not outcome. Women, as you said, were not being treated as adults and weren’t given a fair shot and the majority of it was corrected fairly quickly. With affirmative action… it’s a difficult subject. When women’s lib began, certain businesses probably wouldn’t hire a woman over a man even if she was more qualified, and affirmative action meant to ensure that women would be given a chance. Without affirmative action, would businesses still hire men over women regardless of talent/qualifications? The same question arises with regards to minorities. It’s hard to tell when affirmative action has outlived its usefulness, but once it does, it does become damaging to the previously advantaged party. It’s just hard to tell when that point is. I think that the original goals of feminism were noble, but the philsophy was merely taken too far.

Businesses are not charities. It is NOT in their best interests to employ lesser qualified people regardless of gender or anything else in order to “give them a chance”. It reduces their competitiveness and efficiency and in large systems adds to a shortcoming of bureaucracies known as the “Peter Principle”(which I will leave you to research on your own time).
Affirmative action ASSUMES discrimination where for the most part it did not exist. And if it did exist equal opportunity laws were already in place to deal with it. AA has already become damaging to it’s targeted beneficiaries because many already assume women and minorities are token appointments(or, as I’ve heard many times, “token titties”).
Basically AA came into existence because of feminist insistance that their grievances be fixed yesterday.

I do not employ women nor will i ever, business is great.

glandular problem said:

Hmmm, my ‘lot’ being who, exactly?

As for your obvious allegiance to der Fuhrer, wouldn’t that count as your lot proving me right?

Now, go join gwallen and sons of the sun in their bunker and await these fabulous dark ages you pine for. You can rant and rave about each other’s man-boobies between rousing bouts of hide the bratwurst.

Damn, now I have to apologize to the good Germans.

Amusing how this cunt implies Gwallan the athlete and I the veteran are fat fucks awaiting doomsday because we can’t get laid.

Little fucking whores like you eye fuck me every time I buy liquor, go to a party, or even the grocery store. The truth is you couldn’t make it into the bottom of my “who I’d fuck when blind drunk with a bad case of blueballs” list.

NursDoc said:

What is wrong with you? If you tell me, I will cure it.

Would you now? I doubt that. (In fact, what’s wrong with me is i really need a good shagging. It wouldnt change anything in my life but it would improve my ‘tude a lot, and thats a start.) What do you think of that, nursedoc?

glandular problem said:

Hmmm, my ‘lot’ being who, exactly?

As for your obvious allegiance to der Fuhrer, wouldn’t that count as your lot proving me right?

Your lot being crazy feminists. And you’re wrong, HEIL HITLER means saluting the fuhrer, SIEG HEIL is just ‘Hail (to) Victory’.

As for your obvious allegiance to der Fuhrer, wouldn’t that count as your lot proving me right?

Now, go join gwallen and sons of the sun in their bunker and await these fabulous dark ages you pine for. You can rant and rave about each other’s man-boobies between rousing bouts of hide the bratwurst.

Damn, now I have to apologize to the good Germans.

glandular problem said:

p.s. Apologies if you don’t take this as a joke. Seriously, it’s nothing personal, but you’re really asking for it.

Oh no need to apologise. It’s so fun when your lot prove us right. And Nazis over feminism? SIEG HEIL!!

gwallan said:

It is essential that men do prevail else our civilisation is lost.
A return to a dark ages culture is quite possible and it could happen very quickly.

I see.

With regards to you pending Dark Age, might I suggest that you avoid jamming your head up your arse in the first place? You know, as a preventative measure and all.

son of the suns said:

Ironically enough in the Dark Ages that women will create, there will be no central fascist power to gaurantee their “rights” in exchange for their votes.

So men win either way.

Correct me if I’m wrong and all, but fascism was never very pro-women (you know, that whole chasing women out of public schools, leaving domestic work or prostitution as the only means for survival thing).

In fact, neither was nazism (you know, that whole Kinder, Küche, Kirche thing). And yet, the term feminazi persists (damn you Larry Flint, you and your pathetic chicken raping ways!).

When, oh when will you boys learn? Reading comprehension is a virtue!
Anyhow, thanks for the laughs and all.

p.s. Apologies if you don’t take this as a joke. Seriously, it’s nothing personal, but you’re really asking for it.

p.p.s. Also, apologies for not commenting on the whole Dakota thing, but I don’t know you people, and am therefore not informed/interested enough to weigh in.

Another classic female come-on is constantly ranting and raving about your breasts.

Oh. Your breasts. Now I get it, all this vitriolic hatred. Despair no more young onions, if Subway Jarred can turn his life around so can you.
Unless that is, you are turned on by women ranting and raving about your man-breasts (although, were this the case it would not explain your frustrated hatred of women).

Anyhow, whimper on.

wolfe said:

If what you say is true, LW, why are you posting here?
-wolfe

because women and integrity mix as well as oil and water.

Since you cannot seem to make good on your threat/promise, I would suggest you try engaging in more rational discourse with the men here.

Yours Truly,

LW

Female said:

LW, I have already apologised to Dakota. I am not going to revisit our conversation. I also do not wish to get into an argument with a pregnant woman. I’m not sure why you are now appearing on this board, maybe you and Dakota are back together, but if not, then perhaps your desire is to make peace with him. I do not think that posting to this board is the ideal way to do that. I would suggest doing it directly.