Germaine Greer is a Cunt

Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.

The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.

Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.

Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.

On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.

The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.

It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.

Classy.

As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ‘sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.

Does that sound like sympathy to you?

There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.

Here’s another gem:

The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.

First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.

When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.

Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.

That has nothing to do with risk.

Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.

First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”

I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.

That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.

After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.

Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.

Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.

A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.

“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.


Related Articles:

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

RSS feed | Trackback URI

1,502 Comments in 1249 threads.»

Pages: [63] 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 531 » Show All

Comment by Saxton_Hale
2010-09-07 06:23:56 - IP Man-Hash: 391ebd86a83df

As an Aussie (And a man), I take my hat off to you Dick. To have some feminist witch insulting Irwin after his passing is not only cowardly, but pathetic. Irwin was an excellent role model for Australian masculinity and having some woman stomp on that is incredibly offensive.

Luckily, your voice still reaches the ears of those who’d listen, Dick. Men can’t back down an inch when it comes to the bullshit of some women. Thanks to people like you, men are still men.

 
Comment by J
2010-09-06 17:20:45 - IP Man-Hash: 6ac5442650816

To think that this is what passes for intellectual propiety is laughable if not completely sad. I am in the military, have done more manly things then probably most in here, and can get more girls then the average feminazi(read lesbian with cats) if I felt like it. I have travelled the world, am starting my own businesses, have done amateur MMA fights for money, speak a couple languages, can cook, sew, clean, polish my own shoes( a man who only shines half his boot is only half a man). I have hunted drug traders, slave traders, and was willing to risk my life to save women and children who in THE RARE case is actually sold. I did not get the chance to see combat, I am not fake, but I was in theatre, and willing to do so if called upon. And no, uberfeminist, I can still get dates with most any american chica I want, including perfect tens. Instead, I married a gorgeous, intelligent, independent..FOREIGN(sorry VAWA/IMBRA bitches) hotty, who not only works, but appreciates my care of her, and really takes care of me;) And respects the FACT, that I am a great father, even though his mother tries to frame me otherwise. We are having a kid;) And sadly, for you at least dude, you waste your time with these cold hearted psychochicks. Which means you will forever be tied to them. I had my fill, I understand what you are saying. However, your tactics are the same as theirs, your are borrowing from their playbook, rather then setting the tone, and pace for the discussion. Namely, by volunteering your service and promoting the male version of contraceptive, and its research, as well as promoting true feminists out there who actually recognize the double standard of third-wave feminists. I hate how I get treated in family court, but you know what dumbass?! I don’t feel that my sons, or a future daughter, should be entitled to, OR receive, the bullshit that feminists and their ilk have promoted unconstitutionally in what should be called “women’s court”! If and when we do have true equality between the sexes, should we then allow men to treat women how they treat us?! Or a male version of family court that favors men, not the answer either. I think your only pissed about the double-standards in favor of women, and that it is not reversed. For those of us who are truly in the trenches, your “death by friendly fire” of our cause is not warranted or needed. Of course with your small member being your brain you probably would assume that yes, we should. I can never get back the time with my son that his mother took from me. Destroying women, many who support us, is not the answer either. You claim to be an uber-man, when your pee-wee herman, pre-ass raped in prison by female prison guards with dildos and lesbian girlfriends at home. I’d tell you to grow up, but your too busy playing world of warcraft, and living with mommy to listen to my point of view.

 
Comment by hewyxx
2010-09-04 05:37:04 - IP Man-Hash: 00536d44f7b3b

Being serious.

Why Germaine Greer the cunt is no Liberal / Anarchist / Libertarian / Free Thinker, liberator or emancipator.

1) She’s an elite college toff

2) She is, by nature, a dictatorial, authoritarian, tyrannical person. (Incidentally, just like her description of her mother who she loathed .She lacks self – awareness.). Double bind, whatever that is? I‘m not a psychologist.

3) She hates anybody who disagrees with her. ( by corollary).

4) She succeeds and thrives on a socially organized world. Her great book / books got printed. She can smear her excrements on paper and ‘The Guardian’ will publish it. She gets on telly a lot. In an ‘ideal’ anarchist world, such organs of mass propaganda wouldn’t exist.

5) By corollary, her latest new opinion is always calculated to make an impression i.e. to shock. (She does change her mind a lot. Wonder why?) She demands a lot from her ‘true believers’. She plays safe and, to her credit, she’s good at it.

6) She loves the system. That’s not ‘Anarchy’.

7) She once claimed she was a Communist Anarchist. How oxymoronic is that? Anarchy under State control. Mind you, that probably is what she is in so far as she is anything.

8) She seeks and promotes social divisions at all times. (She thrives on conflict).That’s not Anarchy / Libertarianism.

9) Corollary, confrontation serves her purpose.

10) She’s a vainglorious, self – seeking narcissist

11) By corollary she’s an outrageous attention – seeker. Big Brother. She enters to proclaim she will donate to the cause of ‘slugs and snails’. Attention. She stirs up the house. Attention. She walks out. Attention. She castigates the show in her Guardian newspaper column. Attention. Wants it banned. Authoritarian, supremely pontifical, but attention. Moms or dads gatecrashing the teenage disco or what? It’s attention.

12) Finally, Germaine has intellect only. She’s incapable of caring and concern about anybody but herself, just like the mother she describes. Like mother, like daughter. She is arrogance, narcissism and insouciance incarnate. She is a cunt, a word she happens to like, so no offence caused there. She deserves only contempt.

 
Comment by hewyxx
2010-09-02 06:04:06 - IP Man-Hash: 00536d44f7b3b

Germaine is the Messiah of feminism. That’s why.

 
Comment by Alina - The crazy one
2010-08-31 03:56:55 - IP Man-Hash: fa105b9ae50e1

@ Fez- For a seemingly intelligent man you really don’t understand the female mind. We are not as stupid as you think, maybe we let you think your in the right to keep your ego quiet.

 
Comment by Fez
2010-08-31 02:33:28 - IP Man-Hash: b2896fed16b2e

@ Shannon- For a seemingly intelligent woman you really don’t understand the male mind. We are not as stupid as you think, maybe we let you think your in the right to keep you quiet.

 
Comment by Timmy the Book Burner
2010-08-28 21:11:14 - IP Man-Hash: be62f96bc4a6b

@Shannon

Oh shut it you dirty wide-hipped monkey.

Here have a banana monkey!

 
Comment by Jimmy
2010-08-28 18:59:25 - IP Man-Hash: bcb77137ffc4d

Dick,
My apologies, I forgot to comment on another point you’ve made: that the responses to your writings (as can be seen below) justify your philosophy. This too is quite entertaining.
Jimmy

 
Comment by Jimmy
2010-08-28 18:53:33 - IP Man-Hash: bcb77137ffc4d

Dick,
As usual, you hit the nail on the head. Well done. Your arguments are solid, and your intuition is spot on. Keep up the good work.
Jimmy

 
Comment by shannon
2010-08-28 12:55:58 - IP Man-Hash: cc02a9127e8a2

What fucking planet are you from? Kids being born without hips means women are inferior?

I hope Penis is able to assess what he has created here: a portal for men to demonstrate how intellectually feeble they can be. I believe DM is a covert feminist exposing a decrepit ruling elite (men). Smile! You’re on candid camera! And now the world knows you FUCKING IDIOTS actually exist. DM is making idiots out of you, don’t you see? He has a decent grasp of the english language so he can talk in circles, and you cheer at him if he’s preaching about lubing up his anus. He knows this! And he loves it! And he hates you as much as I do! That’s why he establishes this forum for lost, non-thinkers and lets them make complete idiots out of themselves and him. (I think he’s all about the self-sacrifice, traditional feminine trait, admirable really). DM thank you for making even the most radical lesbo feminist look like ghandi.

 
Comment by Timmy the HJ
2010-08-28 03:36:46 - IP Man-Hash: be62f96bc4a6b

Lets look at the other side of the argument here.

If Women believe they are equal or “superior” to men, then please explain why children are not born with big-gigantic hips that spand past their shoulders then?

Why has Nature not cursed children with the hideious big pelvis structure that women waddle around with today!!

Admit it! women waddle around like awkard groids.

Women arn’t inferior because they have cunts NO they are infeior because they are racially weird looking (big-hips , the odd one out)

:) Lets keep this site hateful guys.
.

 
Comment by Timmy the HJ
2010-08-28 03:35:56 - IP Man-Hash: be62f96bc4a6b

Lets look at the other side of the argument here.

If Women believe they are equal or “superior” to men, then please explain why children are not born with big-gigantic hips that spand past their shoulders then?

Why has Nature not cursed children with the hideious big pelvis structure that women waddle around with today!!

Admit it! women waddle around like awkard groids.

Women arn’t inferior because they have cunts NO they are infeior because they are racially weird looking (big-hips , the odd one out)

:) Lets keep this site hateful guys.

 
Comment by cocs
2010-08-25 09:40:43 - IP Man-Hash: bd49ee018d8cf

apart from pussies and negotiations every 28 days;what can a woman possibly offer?

 
Comment by Shannon
2010-08-23 10:44:12 - IP Man-Hash: 9cfabcb6bffc6

Your real problem with women is the fear and knowledge that you’re completely wrong about them – and you are. We make you pay dearly for being the dumb fucks that you’re willing to be and because you’re emotionally children, just looping inside a toddler’s emotional circuit instead of advancing onto adult rationality, you cannot stomach the power exerted over you by women. If men were better than women, would they find a use for a website called menarebetterthanwomen? Mere knowledge would truly be satisfaction enough. The concept is novel (rare because it’s stupid) so it needs a minor mindless cult to follow and fund it. I would actually rip this guy’s life apart in a battle of wits, but that’s irrelevant to those who already shared these corrupt views. A website like this means that men are necessarily not better than women. A man’s belief in these pseudo-ideologies is merely a need to believe in them because they genuinely having nothing besides penis to offer. To believe it their value is to define themselves valuable. Are you really too stupid to understand how sub-human this makes you? Penis’s arguments are founded on the assumption that his followers are so pathetic, weak, irrational, and childishly emotional that they are enthusiastic about the belief that their value is in their penis. It should be as offensive to men as it is to women. But it seems it’s just Penis and I who have recognized how brain dead superiority-complexed men can be.

 
Comment by Daniel Eriksson
2010-08-18 05:03:13 - IP Man-Hash: 0e7e84c24b6b0

I agree, but in these ” recent years” that you speak of;

1. Men have not suffered nearly even nearly as close to the same gradation of oppression in society and probably never will as feminist ideals promote EQUALITY and not the idea that women are better than men.

2. Society was totally patriarchal until 1960′s where some kind of idea that women have a voice was established.

Although it may not SEEM to be in the favor of men, women are still earning less than men, in lower ranking jobs and generally have lower influence in society.

Isn’t it interesting how there is no “womenarebetterthanmen.com”. Says so much.

 
Comment by Alina - The crazy one
2010-08-18 04:36:00 - IP Man-Hash: bf957940daf7d

“I urge you to consider the reverse of the situation, what if men were oppressed, wouldn’t you want emancipation and equal rights and opportunities for your son?”

Due to a lot of feminist ideals the reverse IS happening right now.

I agree with most of what you have said, and i think that anyone that takes these articles as actual truth instead of vague satire needs their heads checked.

BUT I urge you to actually look into the situation of rights between men and women, I think you will find it is not in mens favour of recent years.

 
Comment by The truth-seeker
2010-08-18 03:03:30 - IP Man-Hash: 0e7e84c24b6b0

This website is a disgrace. WOMEN ARE PEOPLE. They must be given equal rights and opportunities as men. The bible states that men and women are equal even though they may do different jobs in society or have different percieved roles. To claim that the male race is superior is a blatantly ignorant statement reflecting and utterly weak research and ridiculous logic. Additionally, the constant use of profanities on this website are atrocious and illustrates what is wrong with our society today; a lack of respect and restraint. I hope that you use this information to reconsider your ill informed chauvenistic ideals and see the truth. I wish you the best of luck. P.S. Germaine Greer did an enormous amount for women in helping them become confident in them selevs and achieve what they wanted to. I urge you to consider the reverse of the situation, what if men were oppressed, wouldn’t you want emancipation and equal rights and opportuinites for your son?

 
Comment by Cunt Cleansing
2010-08-11 19:19:20 - IP Man-Hash: 3b6e096086f4a

I love you Herald of Masterson. Won’t you come suck me off? I’m waiting on your bed with my legs open ;)

 
Comment by Harry
 
Comment by Herald of Masterson
2010-08-03 22:59:32 - IP Man-Hash: cc0c53673ae84

It is obvious by your hateful and slanderous post that you number among the Fat Cows of which Lord Masterson often warns his disciples.

As Lord Dick preaches in this post, creatures like you are unappreciative of the table scraps thrown at you by men, so you stomp your feet, make hateful posts, and demand more.

Yet, unlike an attractive woman, you cannot employ your vaginal talents to lure men in and coerce them to do your bidding, for no man fancies sex with a 430-pound behemoth who moonlights on Japanese sumo circuits.

And so you offer hateful protestations, taking breaths in between fistfuls of potato chips to fire salvos at His Lordship and making rude accusations of homosexual activity on the part of his many disciples.

You are a sick, hateful woman who most certainly could benefit from investing more time on a treadmill, and less time making militantly lesbianistic posts on a dignified blog.

Respectfully,

Herald Cenuij Mu

Mouthpiece, the Fellowship of Masterson
250 Paper Street, Masterson, Texas 79058