Germaine Greer is a Cunt

Steve Irwin “The Crocodile Hunter” died on Monday. It’s an incredible loss for the world and the MenAreBetterThanWomen.com card will be black in mourning this week.

The MABTW.com card will also be black in mourning for the loss of the last shred of dignity held by the feminist movement — bowel movement. We’ve all had a good laugh at women and their silly agendas, stupid, childish groups, and the milestones they’ve managed to cobble together out of the political table scrapings tossed to them by men. This time they’ve gone too far.

Now they’re going after a tragedy just to prove a point that no one cares about and no one can even figure out. I guess that’s to be expected. Tragedy is the only thing a feminist knows.

Germaine Greer is a woman, allegedly a doctor (though I could not find of what. I would guess proctology, but that usually entails extracting things from the butt, not lodging your own head firmly up it), and has been a virulent feminist most of her life. During my research I found the reason Dr. Greer originally entered the field of feminism is because her clitoris is shaped like a male penis and the trauma of being teased for it since she was sexually active at the age of 12 drove her into the insanity. Interesting to say the least.

On a completely different note, “Dr.” Greer wrote her millionth article in a row this week on the topic of “things I shouldn’t even be fucking talking about” for The Guardian. She called it, “That sort of self-delusion is what it takes to be a real Aussie larrikin”. The surprise is that it isn’t an autobiography. Nor is it a treatise on Australian women in general who are largely regarded as bitches and unimportant the world over. It’s about Steve Irwin and his untimely passing. I don’t give half a fuck what larrikin means. Self-delusion is quite enough.

The points Greer wishes to address in her article are irrelevant — just like everything women say unless it starts with a, “Do you think I should,” or a, “I’m so sorry. I fucked up and did something you said you didn’t think I should do.” And obviously proceeded by a blowjob. It’s enough simply to quote the following from “Dr.” Greer.

It’s really quite unusual for divers to be stung unless they are grappling with the animal and, knowing Steve Irwin, perhaps that may have been the case…Not much sympathy there then.

Classy.

As she is a woman, I find it humourous that “Dr.” Greer — who I would simply just refer to as The Cunt for the remainder of this article, but my man-prudence prohibits me from doing so — even relies on the word ’sympathy’ as a part of her female feminist vocabulary. It is not. These female feminists are the same creatures who fabricate most rape allegations in the hopes of making a stab at some mythical patriarchy.

Does that sound like sympathy to you?

There’s no such thing as a patriarchy, Dr. Greer, you stupid cunt. It’s called the Real World, where seven billion strangers are picked to live in a loft and find out what happens when saber tooth tigers start taking bites out of their asses while they’re trying to sleep. It turns out in this Real World, men get to do everything. They do everything and make all the decisions. Call it whatever you want, but what it’s actually called is the truth. Men are better than women.

Here’s another gem:

The only time Irwin ever seemed less than entirely lovable to his fans (as distinct from zoologists) was when he went into the Australia Zoo crocodile enclosure with his month-old baby son in one hand and a dead chicken in the other. For a second you didn’t know which one he meant to feed to the crocodile.

First of all, that is inappropriate. Secondly, I was never confused, but then again, I’m not retarded.

When Germaine Greer dies, largely unnoticed by friends and family, and which I bet will be soon judging by the God fucking awful picture I found of the old hag on the internet — she looks like a fucking beige batting glove left in the sun with a wad of stringy doll’s hair stapled to the palm — you bet your ass I will be the first one shooting her little clitoral-penis problem out of the old Man-Mouthcannon. That’s called what goes around comes around. That was invented by men too.

Thirdly, let me say that if you have any problem whatsoever with Steve Irwin holding his infant son in his arms whilst feeding crocodiles raw chickens, you are not only wrong, but you are also not a man.

That has nothing to do with risk.

Let me give you a simple man test you can use on any anonymous parties to see if they are a man, woman or some kind of broken computing machine. Actually, strike that last one. If an unknown party gives a response that could only be arrived at through a cluster fuck of malformed logic, just assume it was a woman. Not even men could build a Touring machine that ran on crazy.

First of all, let’s say there’s something called risk. Now say that socially, we all accept a certain amount of risk and that stepping over that line incurs criticism from said society. The question then becomes, “How do we establish the risk of blank?” If you have a vagina, no matter how empowered it is, the answer is, “Well how do I feel about blank?” That is fucked and stupid. The correct and man-answer is, “Let’s ask an expert.”

I’d say someone who built a multi-billion fucking dollar business on the dealings and doings of blank would be a bonafide fucking expert. I would also say that this expert dangling his own fucking son over blanks while doing blank is a bonafide fucking testament that blank is not as risky as you think if you know what the fuck you’re blanking.

That’s just it. Women don’t ever know what they’re blanking so they have to rely on their shitty instincts at all times. That’s why feminism is backwards. It’s puts a small amount of power in the hands of people who have no fucking idea what they’re doing ever — that’s women.

After reading Germaine “Boy’s Name” Greer’s article on the untimely passing of one of the mannest man men to ever walk the Earth, I was saddened by her callous remarks in light of the family Irwin has left behind. Then it hit me: all feminists are insensitive cunts who have no family for that exact reason. They embarrass and shame their parents until they’re ostracized. They embarrass their friends until wallowing into the self-loathing circles of hags who will accompany them through menopause. They have no children because no man in his right mind would fuck a feminist and even if one was drugged into it, Jesus would step in and perform the world’s first immaculate abortion.

Feminists have no right to families. They are horrid and miserable abortions of women and they will rot in hell. Not the biblical one. I’m talking about the one women enter when they hit 35 and don’t have children.

Every creature he brandished at the camera was in distress. Every snake badgered by Irwin was at a huge disadvantage, with only a single possible reaction to its terrifying situation, which was to strike. Easy enough to avoid, if you know what’s coming. Even my cat knew that much.

A cat, huh? What a fucking surprise. Fuck feminists.

“Dr,” Greer Weighs in Heavily
A Female Eunich? What the Fuck?
A Proper Send Off. Written by a Man Instead of a Cunt.


Related Articles:

1076 Responses to “Germaine Greer is a Cunt”

Pages: « 147 48 49 [50] 51 52 5354 » Show All

  1. Dick Masterson Says:

    Elizabeth said:

    Although Germaine’s remarks about Steve Irwin are untimely, some her points have merit. I have also watched him holding up squirming snakes and cringed because I felt empathy for them.

    Then you are also a cunt and a whore. Fuck off my website.

    -Dick

  2. wolfe Says:

    [quote]I was also surprised to learn that Steve Irwin, as a committed conservationist, was not a vegetarian. This seems to represent a double standard. Surely the concern for all animals should be paramount to an animal lover and conservationist. Modern methods of rearing and killing animals for food is inhumane.[/quote]
    Perhaps he was not a vegetarian because he had an IQ greater than five, and cared about animals.

    You are aware that being a vegetarian results in a net increase of animal deaths? Indeed, if the entire US were to become vegan, it’s estimated an extra 1.8 billion animals would die?[1]

    Modern methods of rearing and killing animals for food may or may not be inhumane, but this has little to do with being vegetarian.

    -wolfe
    [1]Davis, S.L. (2001). “The least harm principle suggests that humans should eat beef, lamb, dairy, not a vegan diet.” EurSafe 2001. Food Safety, Food Quality and Food Ethics. Proceedings of the Third Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics. pp 449-450.

  3. Dick Masterson Says:

    wolfe said:

    Perhaps he was not a vegetarian because he had an IQ greater than five, and cared about animals.

    You are aware that being a vegetarian results in a net increase of animal deaths?

    Informative point, wolfe. I didn’t even read the second half of that poor woman’s post.

    -Dick

  4. Revenge Says:

    Elizabeth said:

    Although Germaine’s remarks about Steve Irwin are untimely, some her points have merit. I have also watched him holding up squirming snakes and cringed because I felt empathy for them.

    I was also surprised to learn that Steve Irwin, as a committed conservationist, was not a vegetarian. This seems to represent a double standard. Surely the concern for all animals should be paramount to an animal lover and conservationist. Modern methods of rearing and killing animals for food is inhumane.

    I don’t know if this bitch is serious or not, ummm… firstly, have u been given permission to speak, secondly, why are you speaking openly and finally, where is my dinner? Can somebody plz try and block miss empathy from this site; her presence makes me feel utterly dirty and less than perfect

  5. Elizabeth Says:

    It’s a shame you people can’t have a discussion considering both points of an argument, without being offensive, and that you don’t want to interact with any people other than those who share your viewpoint.

    I really resent your personal attacks on me; I am not a b…., or a c…, or a w….., but am a married woman with three children who happens to analyse what she reads and looks at both points of view.

    I too have great admiration for Steve’s passion for wildlife, but I believe that he is a bit misguided. I am not a supporter of any animals being kept in captivity, unless they are sick, injured or at risk. Therefore, I do not support zoological institutions that are merely provided for the entertainment of the human species. Please read Peter Singer’s book “Animal Liberation”.

  6. Dick Masterson Says:

    It’s a shame you idiot women can’t read.

    NO WOMEN ALLOWED!

    What the fuck is so hard to understand about that? Fuck off my website.

    -Dick

  7. Female Says:

    You sound mad D. Is it because there is something wrong with your blog network server and you don’t know what it is? I know a woman that could help you fix it. But then, I don’t really want to help you out.

  8. Dick Masterson Says:

    The last person who called me D was 300 pounds and had a beard. History repeats itself.

    -Dick

  9. Billy Says:

    Elizabeth said:

    It’s a shame you people can’t have a discussion considering both points of an argument, without being offensive, and that you don’t want to interact with any people other than those who share your viewpoint.

    I really resent your personal attacks on me; I am not a b…., or a c…, or a w….., but am a married woman with three children who happens to analyse what she reads and looks at both points of view.
    .

    Why would that be a shame? There is not shame in avoiding trouble makers. And that is what the majoirty of women are. Here is another point of view for you. Fuck you!
    We don’t come here asking for some dipsey bitch to come along and argue with us. We are making a point and that point you may disagree with. But there is not argument for we men know without a doubt that Men are better than women.

  10. Elizabeth Says:

    Dear Dick
    If you don’t want to read my comments, don’t do it. I think your website is sad. I have never visited a misogynist’s website before (did not even know such a thing existed); I was merely searching for a contact for Germaine Greer to query some of the comments she had made about Steve, but felt I had to respond to the one sided viewpoints.

    Unfortunately, your website is encouraging men to hate women, which brings many problems for society and for families. We are all part of the same species, so why this binary divide? Surely you could be using your time more productively.

    Why don’t you want women to comment on your website? Surely, to hear only one viewpoint is very boring and does not assist with the development of the mind or the growth of a person. Or is it that you only want to hear from people who agree with you?

  11. wolfe Says:

    Elizabeth said:
    Unfortunately, your website is encouraging men to hate women

    Not at all. It’s encouraging men to understand that men are better than women, hence the title of the site.

    We are all part of the same species, so why this binary divide? Surely you could be using your time more productively.

    Possibly there is a divide because men are different from women.

    Why don’t you want women to comment on your website?

    Because (amongst other reasons) he cares about the well-being of women, and knows they will be hurt if they comment here.

    Surely, to hear only one viewpoint is very boring and does not assist with the development of the mind or the growth of a person.

    That is perfectly true, which is why we hear a myriad of viewpoints here.

    It’s a shame you people can’t have a discussion considering both points of an argument, without being offensive

    I’ve responded seriously to your comments on vegetarianism/veganism, which you’ve then ignored. I’ve responded seriously now. In neither case have I been offensive. The fact that you’ve chosen to engage and think only about what you find offensive is rather revealing, don’t you think? It certainly says something about you; it may also say something about women in general. Even people in general, perhaps.

    Please read Peter Singer’s book “Animal Liberation�.

    Ah yes, another crazed leftie Aussie professor. Just what the world needs. Singer’s the chap who argues that a baby is morally equivalent to a monkey or a dog. That argument alone is enough to persuade me of the merits — or lack thereof — for his positions.

    -wolfe

  12. Dick Masterson Says:

    Elizabeth said:

    Unfortunately, your website is encouraging men to hate women, which brings many problems for society and for families. We are all part of the same species, so why this binary divide?

    No it isn’t and you didn’t need the word binary in that sentence. Like most women you use the few large words you know inappropriately.

    -Dick

  13. Revenge Says:

    Are we not presented with a classic example of a woman’s distorted common sense? I don’t really understand, if you ‘resent’ our well guided, appropriate comments, and you are aware that this is a male only forum; may I enquire as to why the fuck you are still here?

    Alright Elizabeth, the kids are crying, go and do your job, stop wasting your time where you are not wanted, not needed and certainly not intelligent enough to voice a reply, let alone an argument.

    P.S. My shoes are fading a little, polish them by tomorrow

  14. Big Al Says:

    wolfe said:
    Singer’s the chap who argues that a baby is morally equivalent to a monkey or a dog. That argument alone is enough to persuade me of the merits — or lack thereof — for his positions.

    At least you didn’t have to get to his views on bestiality - that “mutually satisfying activities” of a sexual nature may sometimes occur between humans and animals.

    Mutually satisfying? He must have asked the goat if she came.

    -Big Al

  15. Female Says:

    wolfe said:

    Elizabeth said:
    Unfortunately, your website is encouraging men to hate women

    Not at all. It’s encouraging men to understand that men are better than women, hence the title of the site.
    -wolfe

    wolfe, I don’t see how you can say that. The evidence here points exactly to what Elizabeth said. All this website is doing is encouraging most men to swear at women and feel vindicated in doing so. You may be an exception and possibly lukazs but that’s about it.

  16. sonyad Says:

    What’s that? He’s greer’s hapless plaything, you say?

  17. wolfe Says:

    Elizabeth: Singer is wonderful [except for the bestiality].
    Al: Mutually satisfying? He must have asked the goat if she came.
    Sony: What’s that? He’s greer’s hapless plaything, you say?

    That’s painfully funny.
    -wolfe

  18. Oldone Says:

    Female said:”wolfe, I don’t see how you can say that. The evidence here points exactly to what Elizabeth said. All this website is doing is encouraging most men to swear at women and feel vindicated in doing so. You may be an exception and possibly lukazs but that’s about it.”

    Yes, you are right, I can see it now. How dare a man make a men only website and then have the audacity to become upset when women; who by the way are not allowed, show up and post on this men only site.

    This site, as has been said before, serves to inform men of the lies of feminism and provides a place where men can vent to their peers. Actually this site would be much more productive, but for the insistence of those who willing ignore to rules of this site, the first being no women allowed. If not for those people (women) this site would be a veritable “well spring” of knowledge and wisdom. As it is now however we have to spend our time bantering with women whose lack of cognitive thought, only serves to strengthen the standing that Men Are Better Than Women.

    - Oldone

  19. diamatik Says:

    Oldone said:
    Yes, you are right, I can see it now. How dare a man make a men only website and then have the audacity to become upset when women; who by the way are not allowed, show up and post on this men only site.
    - Oldone

    Behold, ladies. Oldone has demonstrated the proper use of sarcasm. Cleverness, class, style, humor and man wit were employed for effective use of this tool of language. Do you now see why men get annoyed when women attempt to do the same? Because women use sarcasm as well as a baboon uses a bidet. So ladies, look and learn but, for goodness’ sake, do not attempt.

  20. sonyad Says:

    Indeed, manly kudos all round. Except for Female who’s a few threads from here rambling mindlessly about mindless ramblings.

Pages: « 147 48 49 [50] 51 52 5354 » Show All

Leave a Reply


Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis