G.I. Joke
I assume all the men out there have seen the pictures of that US army woman behaving atrociously in some terrible looking part of the world. I’m betting you have because unlike women, men read and watch the news.
You may have seen the woman and not realized it. Army Girl looks exactly like an adolescent boy. She is in fact a woman. If a closer visual inspection doesn’t sufficiently verify this for you, just take a look at her actions: avoidance of responsibility, child-like sadism driven by penis envy, and looks awful in pictures.
If that’s not a woman plain as day, then I just don’t know what is.
If there is a better case for why women have absolutely no business in the armed services then I would like to know about it so I can write an additional essay on that. The crux of the matter remains fixed, however. Women shouldn’t be in the army because they have absolutely no concept of war.
Men know that war is a simple progression of debate. Once a diplomatic solution won’t pacify the situation, differences will be resolved via a bout of fisticuffs — be it nuclear or regular-style. Then we are all done with it and both sides go home happy.
Women, however, think of war like a divorce. It’s their chance to stick it to the bad guy. They’ll stop at absolutely nothing to cause as much pain as possible, no matter who suffers for it: men, children — even other women. Can you imagine such a sick mentality? It’s completely true though.
Lynndie England has been discharged I’m pretty sure, but that’s not enough. No way, no how. All politics aside, it won’t be enough until every woman is booted out of the army completely, with nothing to show for it but a duffle bag with the word “ARMY” crossed out with a Sharpie.
You can think of a million reasons why women shouldn’t be allowed within ten miles of a government facility. Here’s one, they can’t keep track of anything for longer than ten seconds. It seems like a fundamental misunderstanding of the process, civility, and general manliness of war would be tantamount to all these.
Related Articles:
Pages: [4] 3 2 1 » Show All
As if you could possibly even know what war is all about Dickless. You never served, you and I both know. Yet you want to spew out all the answers. Suck a fat one Dickey.
You and your crew are riotous, sickening and down right absurd. Join the Forces before you say another word, will ya? Lazy witless wanker!
On the issue of “female child sexual abuse”:
Though I agree with the sentiments of this website as a general rule, I would have to strongly disagree with the web articles cited to promote the notion that this mode of psychosexual disorder is as prevalent as claimed. Having read the primary studies on this topic and subjected it to a broader peer review analysis, my own assessment is that this disorder is exceedingly rare, and is currently being grossly overreported by research teams who clearly appear to be motivated by sociopolitical agendas. Admittedly, in the past, it was significantly underreported.
Just to illustrate this, the criteria which have been used in some of the more inflammatory studies to indicate abuse are inordinately broad, such as: failure to supervise voluntary sexual activities, voyeurism, undressing (for whatever reason) in front of a minor, certain bathing activities, kissing, watching adult/pornographic movies with a minor present, and many other, at least superficially, innocuous activities which carry an unacceptably high degree of error and risk of misinterpretation.
In the self-report studies (which report the most outrageous figures), more than half of the cases of abuse seem to comprise voluntary sexual activities with adolescent females, such as baby-sitters, and a trivial age discrepancy (albeit over the age of consent), often with the act of coercion imposed by the minor. The majority of the remainder of “positives” are subject to overly diffuse or broad criteria which are highly subject to misinterpretation and error, as illustrated above.
By my own estimates, having read the primary studies and reviews, about 2-5% of all cases of confirmed child sexual abuse appear to be due to females acting alone, and in many of these cases associated with voluntary sexual activities with a minimal age discrepancy. There are a hardcore of truly disturbing cases (as you occasionally hear of in the media) but which are usually attributable to a clear causal aetiology, such as severe mental handicap, gender identity dysfunction, social isolation, severe psychological disturbance and past history as a child sexual abuse victim (often multifactorially).
The following link is a review of many of the key studies which attempts to address some of these concerns. Though, I don’t agree with many of the points in this article, and (being written by a woman) it does appear to be rather superficial and naive in approach, but it does illustrate with some clarity that not all is what it seems in this topic.
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume2/j2_4_1.htm
Hmmm, I see my choice of occupation may not be supported on here =S
Here is a prime example of a G.I. Joke. Go to a bookstore and browse a copy of a book written by Kayla Williams. The title is ‘Love My Rifle More Than You.’ It’s not worth spending a fucking penny to own this vaginal diarrhea, but an insight into the bitch mentality in a combat zone. You will see why women should be fired en masse post-haste from the military.
http://www.militaryink.com/books/2006/september/0393329224.htm
I just re-enlisted….passed my PT test, go for my medical and interview tomorrow…..and yes, I am Infantry, and I think most of this post is bullshit…
What about women’s right to be doctors, lawyers and politicians? Don’t you think those rights should rescinded if they do not serve their country? Also, there are other types of service that do not include front-line duties. In Germany, there is a thing called Zivildienst, where people do their National Service working in a hospital or other humanitarian area, not the military. This would be ideal for women.
Fuck no, I don’t want women in the draft (even though we’ll never have one). Christ, I can’t imagine what the Infantry would be like if we had cunts running around with us.
during an english class I read an essay by a woman demanding women be able to be drafted into the army. Since reading it I have done lots of research trying to prove that women should not be in the army period. She so much as compared U.S Women to Afgahn women saying that because we are not allowed to be drafted we have just as much rights as the women in Afgahnistan, which I find as an insult. I personally think women in the army is sickening. Speaking as a single mother, if I was to go to war who would be there to take care of my child? Who would take care of the families in the U.S. if women went to war. There would be no home to come Home to. It just makes me sick that women think they can do everything a man can do but don’t think men can do everything a woman can do. In reality women are better left at home doing what they do best, bitching and complaining, while the men go out and fight for the womens freedom to bitch and complain.
The new problem is women are getting in the military, then go whoring around to get pregnant, so they can then pop out a kid, get paid for it, then get a cushy desk job.
And yes, too many women lie about being raped. I just don’t get it. It is not rape if you go slutting around then someone finds out and you are embarrased about it.
Cheers
-man-space invader-
Wow, a woman lying about being raped? That NEVER happens. -cough-
WOMEN IN THE MILITARY LOVE SEX, THEN THEY TELL THE HIGHER OFFICERS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN “RAPED”
BULLL FUCKING SHIT.
I remember this one female in my unit, we secretly nicknamed her “Train” because every fucking person fucked that one female. There’s this one guy who fucked her but she didn’t like him much. She charged him with RAPE!! How fucked up is that!??!?
THAT FUCKING WHORE!!
MARINES, NAVY, ARMY, AIR FORCE, COAST GUARD, POLICE OFFICERS.
WOMEN SHOULD NOT JOIN.
Women complain that they need to be equal, yet they cannot get the job done in a Man’s world. Sure, they can do the secretarial work, but even Men are better in that field!!!
Just think of the political sausage they make in DC as well Sara. Not only should women not be able to fuck up the army, they should not be able to fuck up the police, fire and rescue forces (maybe as nurses or hospitality tricks.) And lord god help us when women decide to get off their asses and make their husbands help them get elected to office in greater numbers.
Eventually the chickens will come home to roost, turning the USA into a 3rd world rape hell hole because no men will defend the tiring bitches or men will wise up and rise up, putting women firmly back into their rightful places, the kitchen and the bedroom.
I agree 100%. Women should NOT be allowed in the armed services. My husband is a sniper of for the US Army (about as manly as you can get, in my opinion), and he’s told me countless stories about the women who sit and whine all day about being in the oh-so-scary country of Kuwait. NOTHING happens in Kuwait, but leave it to the women to play the victims.
That’s just pathetic. I say kick all women out of the armed forces and leave it up to the (better and more effective) men.
“Finally, there is an alarmingly high rate of sexual abuse by females in the backgrounds of rapists, sex offenders, and sexually aggressive men, 59% (Petrovich and Templer, 1984), 66% (Groth, 1979), and 80% (Briere and Smiljanich, 1993)”
funny my grandpa greatgrandpa and two of my uncles didnt have sexually abusive mothers…i guess though that they are special cases right?
Alex is correct in her arguments. I disagree with her conclusions, but she is entirely rationally correct in her arguments.
-wolfe
Wow im amazed to hear a reasonable woman’s point of view - especially on this site. Bravo, lady! You among millions other women, alone have got the picture. Think you’ll have any luck enlightening the other broads to logic? Good luck dear
And that probably means that righties are better than lefties (except perhaps at some sports).
Thats the statistics. Who knows if they have been contrived by some feminist bot who wish to hide the real gaps? Furthermore, IQ isnt really the greatest measure of intelligence(In my opinion).
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/negligible
I understand the definition fine; a 5 point difference in I.Q. is negligible. The I.Q. considered average is 100, with the standard deviation being 15. A difference of 15 I.Q. points or more is considered significant and would possibly affect a person’s ability. 5 points means nothing, there’s a greater difference between the average I.Q.’s of left-handed and right-handed persons than there is between the genders.
That 5-point “negligible” difference is what lets us men understand the word “negligible”.
-Dick