You and your crew are riotous, sickening and down right absurd. Join the Forces before you say another word, will ya? Lazy witless wanker!

http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume2/j2_4_1.htm

Though I agree with the sentiments of this website as a general rule, I would have to strongly disagree with the web articles cited to promote the notion that this mode of psychosexual disorder is as prevalent as claimed. Having read the primary studies on this topic and subjected it to a broader peer review analysis, my own assessment is that this disorder is exceedingly rare, and is currently being grossly overreported by research teams who clearly appear to be motivated by sociopolitical agendas. Admittedly, in the past, it was significantly underreported.

Just to illustrate this, the criteria which have been used in some of the more inflammatory studies to indicate abuse are inordinately broad, such as: failure to supervise voluntary sexual activities, voyeurism, undressing (for whatever reason) in front of a minor, certain bathing activities, kissing, watching adult/pornographic movies with a minor present, and many other, at least superficially, innocuous activities which carry an unacceptably high degree of error and risk of misinterpretation.

In the self-report studies (which report the most outrageous figures), more than half of the cases of abuse seem to comprise voluntary sexual activities with adolescent females, such as baby-sitters, and a trivial age discrepancy (albeit over the age of consent), often with the act of coercion imposed by the minor. The majority of the remainder of “positives” are subject to overly diffuse or broad criteria which are highly subject to misinterpretation and error, as illustrated above.

By my own estimates, having read the primary studies and reviews, about 2-5% of all cases of confirmed child sexual abuse appear to be due to females acting alone, and in many of these cases associated with voluntary sexual activities with a minimal age discrepancy. There are a hardcore of truly disturbing cases (as you occasionally hear of in the media) but which are usually attributable to a clear causal aetiology, such as severe mental handicap, gender identity dysfunction, social isolation, severe psychological disturbance and past history as a child sexual abuse victim (often multifactorially).

GeorgeWatson said:

WOMEN IN THE MILITARY LOVE SEX, THEN THEY TELL THE HIGHER OFFICERS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN “RAPED”

BULLL FUCKING SHIT.

I remember this one female in my unit, we secretly nicknamed her “Train” because every fucking person fucked that one female. There’s this one guy who fucked her but she didn’t like him much. She charged him with RAPE!! How fucked up is that!??!?

THAT FUCKING WHORE!!

Here is a prime example of a G.I. Joke. Go to a bookstore and browse a copy of a book written by Kayla Williams. The title is ‘Love My Rifle More Than You.’ It’s not worth spending a fucking penny to own this vaginal diarrhea, but an insight into the bitch mentality in a combat zone. You will see why women should be fired en masse post-haste from the military.

http://www.militaryink.com/books/2006/september/0393329224.htm

kak said:

during an english class I read an essay by a woman demanding women be able to be drafted into the army. Since reading it I have done lots of research trying to prove that women should not be in the army period. She so much as compared U.S Women to Afgahn women saying that because we are not allowed to be drafted we have just as much rights as the women in Afgahnistan, which I find as an insult. I personally think women in the army is sickening. Speaking as a single mother, if I was to go to war who would be there to take care of my child? Who would take care of the families in the U.S. if women went to war. There would be no home to come Home to. It just makes me sick that women think they can do everything a man can do but don’t think men can do everything a woman can do. In reality women are better left at home doing what they do best, bitching and complaining, while the men go out and fight for the womens freedom to bitch and complain.

What about women’s right to be doctors, lawyers and politicians? Don’t you think those rights should rescinded if they do not serve their country? Also, there are other types of service that do not include front-line duties. In Germany, there is a thing called Zivildienst, where people do their National Service working in a hospital or other humanitarian area, not the military. This would be ideal for women.

And yes, too many women lie about being raped. I just don’t get it. It is not rape if you go slutting around then someone finds out and you are embarrased about it.

Cheers
-man-space invader-

BULLL FUCKING SHIT.

I remember this one female in my unit, we secretly nicknamed her “Train” because every fucking person fucked that one female. There’s this one guy who fucked her but she didn’t like him much. She charged him with RAPE!! How fucked up is that!??!?

THAT FUCKING WHORE!!

WOMEN SHOULD NOT JOIN.

Women complain that they need to be equal, yet they cannot get the job done in a Man’s world. Sure, they can do the secretarial work, but even Men are better in that field!!!

Sarah said:

I agree 100%. Women should NOT be allowed in the armed services. My husband is a sniper of for the US Army (about as manly as you can get, in my opinion), and he’s told me countless stories about the women who sit and whine all day about being in the oh-so-scary country of Kuwait. NOTHING happens in Kuwait, but leave it to the women to play the victims.

That’s just pathetic. I say kick all women out of the armed forces and leave it up to the (better and more effective) men.

Just think of the political sausage they make in DC as well Sara. Not only should women not be able to fuck up the army, they should not be able to fuck up the police, fire and rescue forces (maybe as nurses or hospitality tricks.) And lord god help us when women decide to get off their asses and make their husbands help them get elected to office in greater numbers.

Eventually the chickens will come home to roost, turning the USA into a 3rd world rape hell hole because no men will defend the tiring bitches or men will wise up and rise up, putting women firmly back into their rightful places, the kitchen and the bedroom.

That’s just pathetic. I say kick all women out of the armed forces and leave it up to the (better and more effective) men.

funny my grandpa greatgrandpa and two of my uncles didnt have sexually abusive mothers…i guess though that they are special cases right?

Alex said:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/negligible

I understand the definition fine; a 5 point difference in I.Q. is negligible. The I.Q. considered average is 100, with the standard deviation being 15. A difference of 15 I.Q. points or more is considered significant and would possibly affect a person’s ability. 5 points means nothing, there’s a greater difference between the average I.Q.’s of left-handed and right-handed persons than there is between the genders.

Alex is correct in her arguments. I disagree with her conclusions, but she is entirely rationally correct in her arguments.

-wolfe

Candi said:

YES!!! i am a woman and proud army wife….it boils my blood to see those little girls in the uniform!!! they do it to pay their way through college or to get a big bonus…and they endanger ALL of our service men!!! i agree with you 110%! another essay you can write is about how they made Jessica Lynch a “war hero” after it was HER fault they got ambushed….there is a quote from her that says, regarding the ambush “i didnt fire 1 round….i just dropped to my knees and prayed” THIS MADE ME FURIOUS!!!! If my husband would have died due to her not being able to handle the pressure of war - then i’d have killed her myself!

Wow im amazed to hear a reasonable woman’s point of view - especially on this site. Bravo, lady! You among millions other women, alone have got the picture. Think you’ll have any luck enlightening the other broads to logic? Good luck dear

Alex said:

5 points means nothing, there’s a greater difference between the average I.Q.’s of left-handed and right-handed persons than there is between the genders.

And that probably means that righties are better than lefties (except perhaps at some sports).