Anyone But Hillary 2008 Campaign Posters
As a man, I like to start things off right and in a hurry. That means three things:
1. Make things manlier — which I’ve done by challenging you all to my 2008 Man Challenge. I’ve already completed four out of five. Better dust your balls off and get to work.
2. Watch out for any bullshit on the horizon.
3. Take it easy.
God didn’t create the universe in six days and then take it easy on the seventh. He did it in two and then took a permanent vacation. Mondays He left for men to get to work and start building civilization. Monday is the manliest day there is. That’s why women hate them.
The following are promotional posters I created to keep an eye on the biggest storm of bullshit on the horizon since the ending scene of Terminator: Hillary Clinton running for president.
Related Articles:
January 4th, 2008 at 3:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 3bdbb85f8b2b6
Tonight, when not only Barack Obama pummeled Hillary but John Edwards nudged past her by half a percent to add insult to injury (which seems just given that Hillary has been an insult and injury to the world of politics) and put her in third, I poured myself a glass of brandy, sat back and contemplated over if there really is some kind of objective good and evil in the world and if good will always prevail like it has tonight.
January 4th, 2008 at 5:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 6d3bb32787b07
I said it before and I will say it again. If you are an american, VOTE any other way by HitLERy Clinton. If you are a man, the above statement stands all the more true.
January 4th, 2008 at 5:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 7b2d081a727d6
What is wrong with the ending scene of Terminator II?
P Coderch
January 4th, 2008 at 5:34 am - IP Man-Hash: 3bdbb85f8b2b6
I think he’s rightfully insinuating that a Hillary presidency would not be unlike a playground consumed by a nuclear holocaust.
January 4th, 2008 at 6:40 am - IP Man-Hash: 8e9c228aa7a22
If you’re a professional woman, it doesn’t matter how smart you are, how much money you make, how many men you turned into sawdust to get to the top, Hillary is smarter, earned more, and mashed more men than most woman have. that bothers most woman i think.
woman themselves are with “penis envy” of hillary, therefore even the woman themselves wont vote for her.
on another note:
who cares,
men will always kick ass.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:03 am - IP Man-Hash: cde4d6da17a7a
i feel rather badly admitting it, but i am not at all comfortable with the idea of a woman as president- especially that one.
alas, i feel there are no really appealing candidates and that we’re going to hell in a handbasket no matter what.
i wonder which of the five man challenges Dick has yet to complete? i think it’s three- i hope so anyway because while not caring what people think of you is to some extent cool and manly, behaving in the sort of loutish way that would get you kicked out of places really isn’t.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 5acb8d5dc39dd
I’m down with Obama. I sooner vote for a moron(literally) over Hillary.
Then again, Hillary might be good in the short run. After she fucks up America, we can start telling women systematically to leave the boardroom.
January 4th, 2008 at 9:42 am - IP Man-Hash: de5b8a05f2bc3
Personally I decided after the 2000 election I was never, ever going to vote again since they called the state I live in 3 hours before the polls closed. I figured what’s the point. However, I am scared because there are too many stupid people in this world that Hillbillery actually has a chance at being the president. I see myself voting for anyone else, haven’t decided yet.
I really don’t understand how she became a New York senator..I mean wtf New York people…WTF. Lenin is gone, this bitch is trying to emulate him. She does understand the Leninist concept of aquireing, accumulating, and maintaining political power at any cost. And there are too many split-tails out there with the right to vote that this is a possiblity.
January 4th, 2008 at 10:14 am - IP Man-Hash: 53ae57b8bc6b0
Don’t worry, this is normal. Nature didn’t design women to lead, never mind lead entire countries.
January 4th, 2008 at 10:16 am - IP Man-Hash: c7d23fcc862e5
Hillary is the biggest threat to the free world present today. Bin Laden is a child playing with firecrackers compared to her socialism. She would sell out her country’s lifestyle to further her political gain as I am sure she is smart enough to realize basic economics such as taking from achievers and giving to nonachievers only results in downfall of the entire state. This is happening anyway but Hillary will speeden the course. When Democrats tell me how corrupt the Republicans are i merely state that true corruption is selling out your country for self gain by someone who surely understands basic trickle down economics. Worst thing is that she could win and we all realize that putting women in charge of anything results in disaster. Also since women are first to snap- first to strike in domestic disputes etc she is likely to nuke someone if they piss her off.
January 4th, 2008 at 11:15 am - IP Man-Hash: 91a84da2b048e
So I heard Barack won the primaries. This made me happy, and I went drinking with my fellow men at a Hooters in celebration [well we were gonna go anyway, this just adds to the fun]. So saying no to Hitlery [I liked that one] is the way to go. Fuck yeah!
January 4th, 2008 at 1:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7b2d081a727d6
That is not the ending scene of Terminator II. the ending scene is Arnold diving himself into molten steel to destroy the chip inside his head.
P Coderch
January 4th, 2008 at 1:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: c4d026b819ad4
The ending scene of Terminator 2 is Sarah Connor driving into the mountains in a Jeep where there is a huge fucking storm brewing. We are lead to believe that there is real trouble on the horizon.
-Dick
January 4th, 2008 at 1:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: adb99796489a1
Not only is she a woman, which the most unstable thing in this world. Matter and anti-matter get along better than women and…. even other women!
But, she can’t even satisfy and keep one man. How the hell is she going to keep a whole country satisfied?
January 4th, 2008 at 1:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3bdbb85f8b2b6
Okay. Well, then, I would like to insinuate that a Hillary presidency would not be unlike a playground consumed by a nuclear holocaust.
January 4th, 2008 at 2:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: 43d7ca226add8
Fuck Fish Slap!
January 4th, 2008 at 3:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: cde4d6da17a7a
is that for me?
fuck fish?
i like it.
January 4th, 2008 at 4:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7b2d081a727d6
No, that’s the ending scene of Terminator I…
P Coderch
January 4th, 2008 at 4:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: c4d026b819ad4
Of course you’re right.
-Dick
January 5th, 2008 at 9:57 am - IP Man-Hash: 42564df2b177d
“She would sell out her country’s lifestyle to further her political gain as I am sure she is smart enough to realize basic economics such as taking from achievers and giving to nonachievers only results in downfall of the entire state.”
Absolutely, could not agree with you more. I ask you, however, to please refrain from talking about economic policy unless you know its finer points. There is no excuse for spreading political minutia no matter how much you believe it to be true. The fact is, both parties have failed us.
Whether “it” be republican or democrat, there is one overwhelming reality that history of the has proven over and over again. Politicians are always willing to whore themselves out to the highest bidder. Taking them at face value is like spending a drunken night with Billy Bob’s sister. The night before it may seem fun; the next morning when you realize you forgot to make her wear a bag, not so fun. Added to a hangover; need I go farther?
The point is, my good fellow whether it talks out of the left ass cheek or the right ass cheek, it is still talking out of its ass. The system is falling to pieces, and both parties have played their fair share in it. Trickle down economics is a political platform, it has nothing to do with sound economic policy. Much as The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 has nothing to do with protecting the environment, both policies are too short sighted and simplistic to ever see the problem in its entirety.
Socialism in its purity can never work, that has been proven over and over again throughout history. On this, you score a very good point. Laissez Fair did not work either. Trickle down economics is Laissez Fair economics. Both system are systems by which the few subjugate the many. Does it matter whether that subjugation is achieved through the dominance of private corporations or the government? The answer is most definitely no.
Subjugation is hardly an American ideology my friend. Our forefathers founded our nation on the principle of the right of the individual to be free from the tyranny of both the minority and the majority. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (The Declaration of Independence).
Need I continue? Blindly following any political platform with out question is highly illogical and irrational. One of the greatest virtues of man is our ability to stop and smell the bullshit.
Both democrats and republicans are full of it.
Respectfully yours
BigBen
January 5th, 2008 at 11:09 am - IP Man-Hash: 42564df2b177d
Absolutely, could not agree with you more. I ask you, however, to please refrain from talking about economic policy unless you know its finer points. There is no excuse for spreading political minutia no matter how much you believe it to be true. The fact is, both parties have failed us.
Whether “it” be republican or democrat, there is one overwhelming reality that history of the has proven over and over again. Politicians are always willing to whore themselves out to the highest bidder. Taking them at face value is like spending a drunken night with Billy Bob’s sister. The night before it may seem fun; the next morning when you realize you forgot to make her wear a bag, not so fun. Added to a hangover; need I go farther?
The point is, my good fellow whether it talks out of the left ass cheek or the right ass cheek, it is still talking out of its ass. The system is falling to pieces, and both parties have played their fair share in it. Trickle down economics is a political platform, it has nothing to do with sound economic policy. Much as The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 has nothing to do with protecting the environment, both policies are too short sighted and simplistic to ever see the problem in its entirety.
Socialism in its purity can never work, that has been proven over and over again throughout history. On this, you score a very good point. Laissez Fair did not work either. Trickle down economics is Laissez Fair economics. Both system are systems by which the few subjugate the many. Does it matter whether that subjugation is achieved through the dominance of private corporations or the government? The answer is most definitely no.
Subjugation is hardly an American ideology my friend. Our forefathers founded our nation on the principle of the right of the individual to be free from the tyranny of both the minority and the majority. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (The Declaration of Independence).
Need I continue? Blindly following any political platform with out question is highly illogical and irrational. One of the greatest virtues of man is our ability to stop and smell the bullshit.
Both democrats and republicans are full of it.
Respectfully yours
BigBen
January 5th, 2008 at 11:59 am - IP Man-Hash: 2490e8775b914
Trust me, I am not proud to be from New York due to this, nor did I vote for her.
I fully support these hilarious ads and will always vote a man over a woman. No matter what.
January 5th, 2008 at 3:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: 55548152be297
Lady XX has actually managed to impress me.
January 5th, 2008 at 8:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: f74c6e3022877
All of the men that have commented on this post are obviously neither interested in politics, nor the well-being of the United States. Policy should be the decision-maker in a Presidential race, with complete disregard for gender. Are you honestly trying to argue that if there were piles of dust running against her, that you’d vote for the debris? If any of you were actually patriotic and thoughtful, you’d pay no attention to the sex of the candidate.
I have proven my point.
January 5th, 2008 at 8:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 55548152be297
I, ‘Hillary Supporter’, am a Marine and patriotic to boot. While her policies may strike interest into the minds of some due to her husband schooling her in the field of politics, one comment that was made destroys your entire argument. ‘If a woman cannot even please her Man, how should voters expect her to please an entire country?’ I rest my case. Besides, one menopausal fit of rage and we’ll have World War 3 on our hands. I certainly don’t want that woman being my Commander in Chief. Chesty would spin in his grave if it were to happen, which of course will never happen because too many people hate her. I have more respect for persons that can lead America’s troops in the right direction and have good foreign policy. You tube has a wonderful video of Hillary visiting the troops in Iraq and talking about her assistant’s hair rather than addressing the issues that were blatantly in front of her. This tells me her assistant’s hairdo is an issue she would rather discuss rather than my Marine Corps brothers dying of IED explosions and a country in turmoil.
Seriously, fuck of Dick’s site.
January 5th, 2008 at 9:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 42564df2b177d
Not really; the fact that you seem to single out the “alleged” men on this site, just proves you do not believe what you are saying. You jumped to conclusions based upon nothing more than a whim and then proceeded to single out those you assumed were male. In fact, by doing this you have proven Dick’s point; men are better than women.
Sincerest regards,
BigBen
January 5th, 2008 at 11:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7cd5e0b902f7c
@ Hillary Supporter: Who the fuck cares? Women shouldn’t be involved in politics.
January 6th, 2008 at 3:43 am - IP Man-Hash: 963798bb4c10b
While I wish it weren’t so, the sex of the candidate does play a major role. No matter how qualified a woman is to be president, some areas of the world are unable to take female leaders seriously. Particularly because of the United States’ involvement with the Middle East, plenty of people (women included) are probably very hesitant to support Hillary Clinton in this election. Until sexism has waned a bit more, a male president may be best.
January 6th, 2008 at 4:23 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Let me clear this up for you. When women live in the real world like men, then maybe a chick could be considered. Not seriously of course.
The one person in charge of the entire US military should never be a woman. That is unless women are eligible for the draft to.
While your at it throw in start paying alimony and being sentenced like men for the crimes you commit.
An entire gender can’t expect to get special treatment for everything. Then turn around and actually expect to lead the fucking country.
January 6th, 2008 at 4:41 am - IP Man-Hash: d9438fe1c6108
@Sgt. Reyes - Since I’m not a marine, I won’t say Hoo-rah; I will say Amen.
Accusing others of a lack of patriotism probably really is the last refuge of a scoundrel. What makes you think the men of this site haven’t carefully considered her policies, and then shuddered in horror and had to go take a shower?
I’m fine with a female leader. There just aren’t many, because men are better than women.
If the Republicans nominated a pile of dust against Hillary, yes, I would definitely vote Republican, as long as the dust qualified under the constitution to take office, and they ran another pile of dust as the V-P candidate. (Otherwise the 25th amendment might cause problems).
If the other Democrats were piles of debris, I’d strategically vote for Hillary in the primaries so the Mommy Party would nominate her and lose to the Man Party running its pile of dust.
Given that the dust would be unable to sign any bill coming out of Congress, we’d need roughly two-thirds majorities to pass any new laws. That sounds like a libertarian’s (or man’s) dream.
That said, it’s possible that the Republicans could nominate something much worse than a pile of dust, like, say, Mike Huckabee. (Apologies to any of his supporters, but I’m not a fan. You can find out why on my blog).
No, we’d look first at the candidate’s background — which includes gender — and achievements, and then at his or her proposals.
A slobbering crack addict who had a lengthy felony career but said all the things you wanted to hear would not be a suitable candidate. Background matters. Similarly, looking at Hillary’s background, which of course includes gender, indicates that she is not a suitable candidate… at least not vs. a pile of dust.
No, you’ve argued in circles, proven yourself to be a scoundreless who impugns others’ patriotism, and shown yourself not to have a clue about how politics works.
You’ve also helped demonstrate that Hillary is inferior to a pile of dust as a presidential candidate.
You’re a living example of why the 19th Amendment was almost as bad an idea as the 18th.
Thanks for playing.
-wolfe
January 6th, 2008 at 4:54 am - IP Man-Hash: c91238cd8e20b
Aye!
January 6th, 2008 at 11:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 42564df2b177d
Precisely what I was thinking. Thank you for reiterating.
Sgt. Reyes I thank you for being a true patriot and defending my rights as well as the rights of our compatriots. Keep up the good work my friend, your selflessness and sacrifice make me proud to be an American.
January 7th, 2008 at 6:54 am - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
I’m just curious. Has anyone noticed that Billy and Hilly kinda resemble each other in subtle yet peculiar ways? They’re not from Hillbilly town are they?
January 7th, 2008 at 7:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 829be8a41e45b
Off topic but I’m sure Dick could have a field day with this one. Enjoy.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=IWHVYNEWVM1LJQFI QMFSFF4AVCBQ0IV0?xml=/news/2008/01/03/ngay103.xml
-Solomon
January 7th, 2008 at 7:47 am - IP Man-Hash: 55548152be297
It’s the pleasure of all of our Men in uniform to serve this country and to give (if need be) our lives to it. Even though I am now reserves and work a civilian job, I would be happy if I had to be called back in and serve again. It’s always good to hear that someone appreciates it. Notice one woman came on this site bad - mouthing military (I believe her screen name was KL). Probably one of those spoiled college brats that were seen outside a University holding signs that read ‘Thank God for IED’s and dead soldiers’!!! I personally wanted to go down there and give some of those kids a piece of their own mind/brain. That is one thing I won’t stand for.
January 7th, 2008 at 8:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 2f854bed461cf
Sgt Reyes, you are a fucking patriot and don’t you ever let these dumb ass womymn get you down.
I may not be American but I have a hell of a lot of respect for Americans, marines and soldiers. In my opinion, college brats holding signs like “thank god for dead soldiers” should be shipped to the frontlines.
January 7th, 2008 at 8:28 am - IP Man-Hash: 2f854bed461cf
This was written by a woman: Notice her illogical line of argument that is also common amongst the women who post on this site?
i am a woman and I don’t drive, so how could I be the worst? my gay roommate, Josh, is an excellent driver… why just last week we drove to connecticut. there were no accidents and he maintained a safe and even pace the entire trip.
you should re-think these types of articles before printing them. they are offensive.
& another :
All this study does is show us how prejudiced and sexist psychologists are and give those that hold these kind of prejudices about one another, a new stick to beat each other over the head with. Any woman or homosexual man who claims that this kind of thing doesn’t bother them are just assisting those who wish to perpetuate these prejudices.
Now… what if this was an article that was written in support of women and in condemnation of men? What a bunch of fucking hypocritical bitches. Fuck those PC whores.
January 7th, 2008 at 8:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 6d3bb32787b07
The above were women comments on the website that Big Ben cited. Manstatic.
I like this post: Demonstrating several matters:
1. It still isn’t safe to criticize women, the feminists will go bonkers.
2. Navigating and driving can be confused.
3. If one doesn’t like the results, the “science” is “junk.”
4. If one doesn’t like the results, the scientist’s specialty and nationality are fair targets for abuse.
Well, guess what women…? Here we are critcizing both women and feminists. Don’t like it? Bugger off because there is nothing you can do about it - You have spent 5 decades blocking out the truth but you can never destroy it.
January 7th, 2008 at 9:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 74821b213f2f0
Sgt. Reyes: not all women will demean you or the military! I am a daughter and daughter in law of military men (yep…a Brat!), a widow of a Special Forces military man during Vietnam and the wife for 29 years of a man who was Air Force. There are other women like me who also have such a background and completely understand AND respect the work, the sacrifice and the patriotic stand you have taken. And, we KNOW we are able to go on with our lives because of strong, courageous and intelligent military men who have stood on the lines for us and our families. I salute you, sir.
January 7th, 2008 at 12:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 47a0662de2cf6
Big Ben (4) Says:
January 5th, 2008 at 9:57 am - IP Man-Hash: 42564df2b177d
“She would sell out her country’s lifestyle to further her political gain as I am sure she is smart enough to realize basic economics such as taking from achievers and giving to nonachievers only results in downfall of the entire state.”
Sell the country’s LIFESTYLE?!? This woman would sell your ORGANS if she thought she could get a good price and get away with it. People are just tools or meat to Bill and Hill, just look at the body count from the ’90s, the conviction rate, hell, just the people under buses in and around their campaigns and administrations.
January 7th, 2008 at 2:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 31f02c012946b
I can hear Hillary right now. “BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW I LOST IOWA TO A BLACK MAN AND SOME OTHER GUY BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW!!!!”
January 7th, 2008 at 2:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: d9d62f3ddbea6
Anyway, about the military.
Both my parents were [are] in. My father was in before my birth, and when he got out, my mom got in. She’s still in.
The military is a very tough life, and to those who do this job, I salute you, for you are truly men of honor.
January 7th, 2008 at 3:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 55548152be297
Without armor or training.
– Sgt. Reyes
Why thank you. Sincerely.
- Sgt. Reyes
January 7th, 2008 at 5:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: cde4d6da17a7a
“I’ve got God’s shoulder to cry on. And I cry a lot. I do a lot of crying in this job. I’ll bet I’ve shed more tears than you can count, as president. I’ll shed some tomorrow.”- George W Bush
January 7th, 2008 at 9:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 42564df2b177d
Note the quotation marks. This is not my statement it is a quote from TheHammer, who was speaking about economics and Hillary, not her dictator like mentality. Try to get this straight, I have not nor ever will support Hillary.
Of course she would sell my organs if she could, she is a politician and a self proclaimed feminazi. I stand by my statement, however. If their is one thing politicians have proven over and over again it is their willingness to whore themselves out to the highest bidder.
Sincerest regards,
BigBen
January 8th, 2008 at 9:04 am - IP Man-Hash: c7d23fcc862e5
My upfront disclosure is that I am a Libertarian.
Hillary has just played the race card, gender card, and age card all in the last 24 hours. She told Obama he was no MLK backhandedly bringing out his blackness by herself making this association. Bill said he couldn’t make her taller, male or older thus pointing out she is not male to use the gender card to get the women vote and trying to get older votes by the large senior citizen “nothin better to do then vote” contingent. Have they (the Clintons) no limits and do people not realize this corrupt use of psychology.
January 8th, 2008 at 2:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: be16849f93df5
Remember men, most woman don’t want fairness or equality they just want MORE; so sometimes its useless to argue. I could probably put together a logical, honest and true argument for why I wouldn’t want Hilary as President, but (some) women (who love to throw around that equality word), would not accept it because……I have a dick. Thats right, I must be wrong, I have external genitals. Thats why I find it funny when woman on this site complain about the guys on here. If you haven’t noticed honey, your being just the same. You have a problem with guys on here not liking you because you have a vagina, how about you DONT use “You have a dick” as an argument.
Bravo mike5150 for bringing up some solid points. If you want to be equal ladies, that means taking responsibility for the shit you make and or do.
Getting to the whole woman and gay men driving thing posted by Solomon. Men hunted, woman gathered. We all know this, so why is it a surprise for you that IN GENERAL men are better at things like driving which requires spatial skills that we developed because we were hunters for most of history, and yes poorer at things like talking about our feelings because we cant make noise when we hunt.
Just accept it women……as men we keep hanging these things over your head not because we are bastards (well maybe), but mainly because you all get on your high horses and bitch, whinge and moan. If the article said that most men have poor colour matching skills or think with their dick…..would you grab your feminist banner and wave it in our defence, would women say it was sexist…..fuck no. Most men wouldnt even disagree with it. Men dont mind admitting to our faults as a species, its about time you put your money where your mouth is, accept what equality means, and admit your faults as women.
January 8th, 2008 at 10:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7b2d081a727d6
Hillary Clinton is a homosexual.
P Coderch
January 9th, 2008 at 12:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 59419be21c336
While I am truly upset over this win for Hillary today in NH, some pals do bring up a very fine point: If she somehow defeats Obama, it shall be pretty easy for the Repubs to whoop that blubbering piece of shit come November.
January 9th, 2008 at 12:20 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
I agree. Of course you had to know NH was going to go her way. Did you ever notice how far out their people on the east and west coast are?
January 9th, 2008 at 10:02 am - IP Man-Hash: fb1de3c77ad9c
Well this whole ‘reaching out to women’ thing is bullshit. I think… yeah, I think if she actually wins I might consider moving to another country for a little while. I’ll be damned if I’ll be a citizen of a nation that would consider her noble of running our country. Hopefuly it won’t have to get that far though, but I’m pretty pissed with the turnout in NH.