Women: Homewreckers From Birth
It’s a commonly accepted fact that women ruin most marriages. At the moment, the worldwide divorce rate is somewhere around 50%. If it isn’t, I don’t care. The point is, in addition to being loud-mouthed and lazy, today’s modern woman doesn’t know how to compensate for her shortcomings in marriage by shelling out any respect. Women also have opinions these days instead of chores. That’s stupid.
What about when divorce isn’t a woman’s fault? It’s unlikely, but since I’m a man, I’ll be the first to admit when women are not to blame.
Science, unclouded by my male compassion, disagrees, and points the blame at daughters. The Little Women.
Gordon Dahl and Enrico Moretti have compiled a scientific paper that includes the following man-ass blowing statistics:
Parents of girls are 5% more likely to divorce.
Parents of three girls are 10% more likely to divorce.
Single mothers of girls are completely fucked.
Apparently, women are poison to relationships no matter what their age! Whether they’re making ten cents on the dollar neglecting their children at some stupid Barbie Dream Job, or just being ten and playing with their Barbie Dream House, women ruin marriages. There’s no arguing with statistics. The figures are black and white.
When I first found out about this study, I was appalled. Little girls are even smaller and more helpless than women. They know even less and need more assurance and assistance than their larger and more opinionated counter-parts. Maybe, I decided, that’s why they’re such a strain on marriage.
Little girls cost way more to raise than little boys.
Men (and therefore boys) have something called imanginations. It means they can turn a cardboard box into a spaceship or a racecar or an outhouse at a construction site. Little boys don’t need constant fucking babysitting and they don’t need a bunch of expensive clothing and shiny bullshit. Fuck the nickel and dime shit, today’s modern little girl needs to have her wedding and college financed! That’s the dollar double dip that broke the marriage camel’s back!
Little boys wig the fuck out at divorces.
As a woman, would you want your bedroom furniture burned or your teenage son to be banned from public school transportation? No way. There aren’t enough hours in the week for a woman to deal with something like that. That’s called, ‘boys incentivize a happy marriage’.
No one wants a daughter.
It sounds harsh and that’s why women are banned from reading all of this, but while everyone loves their daughters, no one ever wanted one. Cindy Crawford loves her mole and Owen Wilson probably loves his fucked up nose, but at some point both were catastrophes. What’s a daughter going to do? Get married to a billionaire? That’s some big fucking achievement. A son might start IBM or join the Marines. There’s no telling what kind of excitement lay ahead.
In conclusion, just like keeping a full-sized woman, having a baby girl involves a lot of charity. If you find yourself in the predicament of having one and you also want to maintain your marriage, take a lesson from China: have a boy instead.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 8 7 6 5 4 [3] 2 1 » Show All
I see no reason why we beta males should “accept” less than everyone else.
If average women can easily get sex from all of the popular guys, and she can also get a good, dependable cuckold boyfriend/husband later … then why can’t average beta males have it this way also ?
If alpha bad boys can get as much sex as they want from all of the girls and also have a good girl princess who stays with them anyway/cooks cleans for them.. then again, I ask, why can’t the average beta males have it this way also ?
Equality is equality - right ?
Fuck off then if we’re like that. Or if not, then you love reminding us how we are. How fucking sensible.
Has Stallone shot you yet, Female? No? Pity.
Luka, don’t waste your time, the little boys here simply want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to have sex with all women (but can’t) and also want the moral and pure girlfriend (who knows better and avoids them).
These men are stupid, outrageously, boringly so.
Women’s parasitism cannot be stopped by the smarter men alone.
There’s a whole flood of immigrants coming to the West daily who do not know the ways of the wicked witch of the west, and are easily manipulated. And after the Witch gets her spawn, like a mantis she can eat her male alive and get on the State tit. Which is why women overwhelmingly support mass immigration and multiculturalism. Racist traits are more prevalent in feminity than anything else, but overiding those traits is the survival by parasitism trait.
In conjuction with marriage strikes, there must be all out destruction of welfare statism and powerful cultural taboos against it.
So basically it’s corruption all round in today’s feminist-shaped society, beta-males-unite? I would say so too. But men are getting smarter. If marriage and childbirth go out of fashion in a big way, then the “stick” you refer to could be taken from women. They will actually have to earn their money and status, like every man does. If marriage and childbirth disappear, the feminist gravy train will disappear. That’s when the shit will hit the fan.
Ahh, but that’s where feminism comes in once again to save the day: once the carrot is old and used up, out comes the stick.
There is no need to be “wanted” when you can force men to take care of you via culturally mandated chivalry (feminist cultural manipulation of men into relationships/marriage with ugly, old, fat, slutty, used up women) and/or government mandated support (welfare, child support, etc).
This shit will only end once they are made to bear some type of personal/political/cultural/economic cost for such behavior. As long as they are allowed to have their cake and eat it too… they will continue to stuff their faces and shit in ours.
Besides, who says that women set the moral standards? Do you really think men are that immoral that they need a woman to dictate their morality for them? Again… you are giving away a man’s morality to women.
How can you claim that women are so immoral (some here even state that women are incapable of morality) and then state that women set the standards for morality? Complete contradiction. If women are so damn immoral, it makes no sense to expect them to set the standard for male behaviour to follow. If men have a sense of morality “bred to the bone” why are they looking to women to define these morals, shouldn’t they be acting on these morals anyway?
You are just using nature to completely excuse male behaviour. Nature is not to be ignored as a factor, but to use it as an attempt to excuse the way in which men choose to behave is ignoring the fact that men are capable of controlling their own behaviour and making their own decisions. You are just turning men into female sex-toys, women don’t do that, you are doing that, this is because (as I said before) you keep giving women this power on a golden platter.
Yes women do go out to pubs, clubs and bars with the intention of getting laid too, that can also be explained away by nature, and it is often used by feminists to excuse female behaviour in much the same way that you are doing so now. Women want to have sex because it is in her nature to have babies, it is in her genes and maybe she wants to have as many babies as she can? It is a natural urge to wish to procreate, women own this urge as much as men, albeit in a different fashion - perhaps a woman is no better than controlling her urges any more than a man can? If that is a case it would make sense to excuse her behaviour if you are so willing to excuse male behaviour based on the same rationale?
So it poses this series of questions: are men and women incapable of controlling their urges or is it a case that both men and women have some degree of control over their biological instincts to make decisions on how they are going to behave? Or is it a case that one gender owns more self-control than the other? Which do you think is the case?
Yes I do. Men are biologically design to have sex with basically everything he can - he may not necessarily want it or like it but that’s the biological design. So if he goes into a room full of women who have no respect for themselves and are drunk on the power of their “sexuality”, he will not do anything but try to fuck them all. Apply this “room” to society as a whole. Women set the moral standard and level of promiscuity; men simply respond.
Also - since women are such arrogant whores these days men just accept that and go along with it. They don’t expect any more from them but to be disposable sex objects, which young women are quite happy to be.
I notice so many women out in pubs, clubs and bars who are there for the sole intention of picking up a man in order to get laid.
Women are sluts, and feminism has raised that sluttishness to intolerable proportions for decent men.
That’s assuming that is what men want, Luka. And you’ll find more often than not it’s not what they want. Today men have to deal with inconsiderate sluts of women who use their bodies as a commodity.
Yet I notice so many men out in pubs, clubs and bars who are there for the sole intention of picking up a woman in order to get laid. It is a meat market for both sexes, and frankly it is disgusting, which is why I don’t go to those places anymore.
I wouldn’t go so far to say that ALL men want easy sex, but I don’t think it is unfair to say that a majority of men want that and enjoy getting it. If men didn’t want easy sex how can so many women be so “sluttish” and still have men sleep with her despite (or because) of her “rep”? Unless of course a woman forced or manipulated men to have sex with her - which, although not impossible, I see as highly unlikely.
I don’t think that men are by nature rutting, out-of-control sexual beasts, nor am I naming them as such - I actually view men as human beings with the abilities to think and make their own decisions, especially when it comes to their own behaviour, be that sexual or otherwise. Hence why I don’t accept that women have all the power - I don’t deny that women have sexual power - but I think although men cannot be held responsible for women’s behaviour, they still choose and have control over their own behaviour.
Right on the money, wolfe. Widespread sexual promiscuity and total lack of moral absolutes, as endlessly promoted by the media, is nothing short of a social experiment. It may turn out to be very detrimental to the structure of our society.
Regarding who should feel “shame” about this, Luka, it is women. You see, you decide who has sex and in what fashion. We are only responding to your lack of respect for yourselves when we have casual sex with you. If women in general decided to be less promiscuous, we would not be able to have sex with you and the whole culture of promiscuity would change immediately. It is you who are to blame and should feel shameful. Not us.
Heh, but this can be flipped so easily upon its head. Don’t men have any decisions to make with regards to his sexual behaviour? Can he not make a decision that he does not want that kind of relationship with women?
Don’t you see that the only reason that men don’t have the power in sexual relationships with women is not simply because women wield it by nature, it is also because men give it away? Every time a man acts as if he has no control over his own decisions (through biological impulses or so on) is effectively handing that power to women on a golden platter. Sure, such biological impulses exist and are powerful, but don’t men still own some degree of control over their behaviour and decision-making?
No, I am not here to state that men bear all responsibility, I am just pointing out that it does take two to tango. However, the nature of such a ‘dance’ (as it were) would fall apart if only one party decided that he/she refused to participate in it. Some gentlemen here state that men don’t want that kind of relationship with women - so why are a lot of men making decisions that gets him involved with women on a casual basis? Do you really think he is “duped” into it by the seductive power of a woman?
I’d wager he wanted to get laid, and accepted what came his way, maybe he even chased the situation himself. He didn’t have to accept it, or go out for it and I think that if a man did not want that kind of situation to occur, he wouldn’t let it happen.
If you want to sit back and allow women to take all the responsibility for a man’s decisions and behaviour, be my guest. That is effectively what you are stating.
That’s assuming that is what men want, Luka. And you’ll find more often than not it’s not what they want. Today men have to deal with inconsiderate sluts of women who use their bodies as a commodity.
Right on the money, wolfe. Widespread sexual promiscuity and total lack of moral absolutes, as endlessly promoted by the media, is nothing short of a social experiment. It may turn out to be very detrimental to the structure of our society.
Regarding who should feel “shame” about this, Luka, it is women. You see, you decide who has sex and in what fashion. We are only responding to your lack of respect for yourselves when we have casual sex with you. If women in general decided to be less promiscuous, we would not be able to have sex with you and the whole culture of promiscuity would change immediately. It is you who are to blame and should feel shameful. Not us.
But the reality is most young women are exhilarated by the immense sexual power that they wield. Women equate sexual power with real, earned power.
The thing is, this sexual power which women love so much in their youth fades rapidly as they get older. And then who wants you? No-one. You are a used slut, who will spend the rest of your life confused, wondering why you can’t manipulate people with her body any more.
And Female Please get off the site. I (tried to) read some of your comments and they are utter incomprehensible drivel. This is a man’s website, you are not welcome here. You only get in the way of the discussion and waste our man-energy. Do you not get the message when you are told “FUCK OFF”.
The woman who allows herself to be fucked is either stupid or evil - she is allowing herself to be fucked by an enemy/competitor of her male tribe (fathers, sons, brothers, male friends, male coworkers, etc) thereby also allowing them to be collectively fucked.
The man or men who do the fucking of the woman are strong, smart and masculine ; they are fucking/degrading/punishing the dumb/evil woman and her dumb/weak male tribe at the same time.
son of the suns said:
The true nature of life is cold and dark. Unless you’re a stupid cunt who can fuck your way to power.
So, are you calling a woman a “stupid” cunt for being able to fuck her way to power, or in spite of being able to fuck her way to power? Which is it? If it’s the former, then there are some men that are doing the fucking so they must be gullible and equally “stupid” pricks. If it’s the latter, then she can’t be too stupid, because she ends up with power.
It would take a woman to see that. A man would see the pain in a father’s heart as his daughter slips away and loses her soul to materialistic feminist propaganda.
I don’t agree with the word he uses, but it’s one word in a cogent statement on her evolution and seduction by Mammon.
-wolfe
The true nature of life is cold and dark. Unless you’re a stupid cunt who can fuck your way to power.
Yes, sandra, you’re right. What “londog” wrote about his daughter is extremely cold-hearted!
and that’s your own daughter that you are talking about. i’m guessing you hate all women?.. but have you no love for your own flesh and blood? a lot of you have talked about women being ‘cold’/'cold-hearted’ or what not.. but no one thinks that what this man said was cold-hearted? at all?
-sandra