Women: Homewreckers From Birth
It’s a commonly accepted fact that women ruin most marriages. At the moment, the worldwide divorce rate is somewhere around 50%. If it isn’t, I don’t care. The point is, in addition to being loud-mouthed and lazy, today’s modern woman doesn’t know how to compensate for her shortcomings in marriage by shelling out any respect. Women also have opinions these days instead of chores. That’s stupid.
What about when divorce isn’t a woman’s fault? It’s unlikely, but since I’m a man, I’ll be the first to admit when women are not to blame.
Science, unclouded by my male compassion, disagrees, and points the blame at daughters. The Little Women.
Gordon Dahl and Enrico Moretti have compiled a scientific paper that includes the following man-ass blowing statistics:
Parents of girls are 5% more likely to divorce.
Parents of three girls are 10% more likely to divorce.
Single mothers of girls are completely fucked.
Apparently, women are poison to relationships no matter what their age! Whether they’re making ten cents on the dollar neglecting their children at some stupid Barbie Dream Job, or just being ten and playing with their Barbie Dream House, women ruin marriages. There’s no arguing with statistics. The figures are black and white.
When I first found out about this study, I was appalled. Little girls are even smaller and more helpless than women. They know even less and need more assurance and assistance than their larger and more opinionated counter-parts. Maybe, I decided, that’s why they’re such a strain on marriage.
Little girls cost way more to raise than little boys.
Men (and therefore boys) have something called imanginations. It means they can turn a cardboard box into a spaceship or a racecar or an outhouse at a construction site. Little boys don’t need constant fucking babysitting and they don’t need a bunch of expensive clothing and shiny bullshit. Fuck the nickel and dime shit, today’s modern little girl needs to have her wedding and college financed! That’s the dollar double dip that broke the marriage camel’s back!
Little boys wig the fuck out at divorces.
As a woman, would you want your bedroom furniture burned or your teenage son to be banned from public school transportation? No way. There aren’t enough hours in the week for a woman to deal with something like that. That’s called, ‘boys incentivize a happy marriage’.
No one wants a daughter.
It sounds harsh and that’s why women are banned from reading all of this, but while everyone loves their daughters, no one ever wanted one. Cindy Crawford loves her mole and Owen Wilson probably loves his fucked up nose, but at some point both were catastrophes. What’s a daughter going to do? Get married to a billionaire? That’s some big fucking achievement. A son might start IBM or join the Marines. There’s no telling what kind of excitement lay ahead.
In conclusion, just like keeping a full-sized woman, having a baby girl involves a lot of charity. If you find yourself in the predicament of having one and you also want to maintain your marriage, take a lesson from China: have a boy instead.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 8 7 6 5 [4] 3 2 1 » Show All
“I think you could stand to read more about JFK. You could start with Chicago in the 1960 election, who won his Pulitzer, and move on from there.”
Yay someone with some fucking reality about this over rated fuck. Who are these sheep who have propelled JFK into Sainthood? The same scum who wish to amend the constitution to let Clinton rule for life?
CHICKENHEAD, the “false alphas” you’re railing against, JFK was one of them. A pretty boy elected by women who never invented anything and fucked around on his wife regularly. A real class act Northeasterner getting by on looks and Daddy’s money. Ted is the worst. An obese body and fat mouth fit for a Roman senator being carried around by slaves while eating grapes, who got away with letting some pathetic power coveting female drown in his car.
Yes, if we only had more Kennedys.. the Republic would be returned to it’s former glory. Or how about we ban the whole fucking family from holding office. Female obsession with the nubile Kennedy is what got him elected in Nixon’s(true alpha) rightful victory and what made him go batfuck crazy by the time was actually elected and what made him hate demoncrats with passion. Every time Nixon commited a war crime he was saying “FUCK YOU LIBERAL PUSSIES AND YOUR HARLOTS”
I think you could stand to read more about JFK. You could start with Chicago in the 1960 election, who won his Pulitzer, and move on from there.
There’s a lot I could say to that, but it’s Christmastime and I shall refrain.
I don’t buy it. A fascinating theory though, and, succinctly summarized. It’s too reductionistic and it divides men up digitally, when there’s really a rather complex multidimensional spectrum.
Plus, most of the ‘nerds’ — highly inventive, intelligent, creative — men I know are very much alpha males: leaders, more likely to be happily married, etc. (Maybe we have a definition problem here?)
That’s not to say there isn’t a lot of truth that even I acknowledge in what you’re saying. Just that I don’t think it’s the whole truth.
That said, as I interpret most of your post 65, I agree with what I think you are saying. Feel free to comment/correct.
A good man is more with a good woman than he is without. The converse is also true — in spades. Problem: there appear to be a lot more good men than there are good women.
And here’s where there’s a huge nugget of truth in BMU’s entire argument.
Even the ‘lowest’ young woman gets a lot more attention from men (albeit some of it unwelcome) than the nominal nice guy beta male gets from women.
-wolfe
Luka,
Have you ever considered that “getting laid” means more to men that we usually (and dorkily) let on ?
To a man, receiving sex is much more than simply an orgasm - it is female approval of our masculinity and our being - a very strong emotional need.
After all, we could simply masturbate for the same orgasm - for men there is very little difference between the intensity of an orgasm achieved via sex with a real woman, or one achieved via masturbation to porn (some men would say that masturbation to porn allows them to achieve an even more intense orgasm .. some even become addicted because of this very reason).
When we don’t receive sex or attention from real women, we feel rejected and neglected - and often act out in the only way men are “allowed” to express their feelings (or else be called a fag by women) - with anger, aggression and violence… especially if other men around us are receiving far more sex than we are. We feel as “low” as a girl may if none of the guys look at her, pay her attention, ask her on dates, etc.
-BMU
So your excuse for not being a Ghandi is because in doing so you cannot get laid? Have you ever considered that the reason such men are great is because they don’t base their own motivation and sense of worth on whether or not they get to fuck the prom queen?
SotS - pretty much correct. To re-summarize my theory: just like high school, violent dishonorable thug/jock/outlaw types are the true alphas in women’s eyes, and nerds and good guys are betas who evolved brains to compete .. brains capable of creating honorable systems .. from this brain civilization resulted. However, females still see things the original way, and their feminine values evolved to appease/free/make sexual contact with the masculine alphas (eg. slaves, thugs, criminals, warriors, gladiators, etc) they are truly sexually attracted to and empathetic towards. To females, the betas are just insecure/pathetic/vengeful nerds who have to have to use systems (armies, politics, religion, technology) to compensate for their lack of masculinity .. to “fight” alphas they’re too afraid of to fight “man to man”, and to capture/hold down women they could never attract with looks/charm/social skills.
“Bad boys, cock-holders, criminals…these are NOT FUCKING ALPHA MALES. Ok? Get that straight. These people are genetic waste. If they all happened to die tomorrow the world would keep on spinning, and life would continue. Nothing would change. “Alphaâ€? my ass. Not a single one of these gangsta-ass welfare kings got us to the moon, or discovered atomic energy or the fucking light bulb.”
BMU would say that the inventors of lightbulbs and moonwalkers are ectomorphic beta males, using their intelligence to fuel a society run by thugs and designed for thugs. Useful idiots in otherwords.
There’s one way to find out: kill welfare and let the bastards starve. If they’re alphas, they’ll find a way. If they’re useless scum.. it’s natural selection.
Is it “well” to tell someone to piss off and die, is it Oldone? I’ll keep that in mind.
Well said Chickenhead. :-)
-Oldone
Chickenlittle, do you think you are really being a nice guy, coming onto a website and talking trash to someone you do not know and have never conversed with before? What the hell am I, some kind of Feministic icon? Jebus H Christmases is right - talk about the blind leading the blind.
You have now demonstrated to me that you are just one more idiot who likes to talk trash. Now, if guys like you are the so called nice guys, I think I will turn gay.
FIRST OFF…let me say this:
Bad boys, cock-holders, criminals…these are NOT FUCKING ALPHA MALES. Ok? Get that straight. These people are genetic waste. If they all happened to die tomorrow the world would keep on spinning, and life would continue. Nothing would change. “Alpha” my ass. Not a single one of these gangsta-ass welfare kings got us to the moon, or discovered atomic energy or the fucking light bulb.
The problem? Women. Women go for these genetic wasteoids. Women are the problem. It’s not our fault–we, the so-called “nice guys” and workers and whatnot–we built this world. We shed our blood for this world. The criminals just happened to step in front, wave their tiny tatooed cocks, and the stupid fucking women fell for it the way they always fucking do.
We live in a thugocracy. DO you see any Ghandis? Any Kennedys? Any Jebus H. Christmases out there? Of course not. Why? Because women reward ASSHOLES. Women reward THUGS. We men–we’re pretty easy to figure out. We tend to go in straight lines. If being a fucking asshole thug is what gets us pussy you know what? We’ll happily be asshole thugs. Because that GETS US PUSSY. Why be a Ghandi if you can’t fuck the prom queen?
This is why there is nothing to believe in, my friends. YES, I fucking blame women. Any man still in possession of his BALLS will admit to this truth as well. Look around and see it.
And to “Female” and the rest: piss off and die. Take your neo-feminist bullshit and shove it up your bloody cunts. Enjoy wrecking what’s left of north american “society.” The rest of us men in possession of our balls are already finding wives and mates overseas.
.. We don’t invade your feminist forums, Female; that is, if you would allow a man to type as much as two words in the first place — MOST UNLIKELY.. Get off MABTW NOW
You’ve been told before Female: FUCK OFF. You are not welcome here. I cannot tolerate your feminine non-arguments and your totally unfounded statements on men’s personal sexual desires (e.g. principles - something that women are totally incapable of). If you’ve been told once, you’ve been told a million times… FUCK OFF…
See boys? More wasted energy on this estrogen-fuelled piece of shit.
Female,
For the most part I think that a majority of your posts are absolute bullshit, from an ego-centric mind. However, that won’t stop me from wishing you a Merry Christmas, and the hopes that you will eventually stop being so selfish in your viewpoints.
-Strength and Honor-
I disagree with much she says and I disagree with the comment that she is always polite. She has been rude to me and maybe with reason but still it’s somewhat impolite to be here against the rules.
As they say, “I am not prejudiced; I hate everyone!” … LOL!
I think I should start humansarebetterthanmenandwomen.com it would be a site that bans both men and women and welcomes only humans… wonder how people would react to that one….?
I hereby withdraw my “fat girls have to be nice” theory.
Experience last night with my cousins wife and her entire fat pig family ruined it. Fat girls are just as ugly inside and out.
The girls only give everything to alpha males - ie the most popular, bad boys - sex and relationships - as much as they want, whenever they want. They are like groupies for them.
Too many regular, nice, decent looking guys get neglected/rejected unfairly by women - no free casual sex, no relationships, no attention, no nothing. That’s bullshit. Equal is equal. If even the most unpopular girl can get sex and attention from guys whenever she wants, then the average (non rich, non criminal, non popular, non hot) guy should be able also.
Bzzt.
I see no reason why it was posted in the first place.
However it does give us the opportunity to contrast the styles of two regular female contributors.
Luka, we don’t cross paths often. Whether I agree or disagree with anything you say you are always polite. In my more misanthropic phases I tend to believe the human species consists of males, females and human beings.
Greetings human.
Well, men can and do have that. Many men sleep around a lot before settling down with a “good girl”. I think what Female meant is that men impose both those standards on each individual woman… they essentially want a virginal loyal angel who will also sleep with them immediately. I realize some men stick to one standard or the other, but women are often treated as if they’re a prude/waste of time if they’re not promiscuous, but a slut if they are.