I cannot tell a lie…because I’m a man.
Women are all liars. At least that’s what every man in the world thinks. Indeed I myself thought this for quite some time.
That’s when I realized I was wrong.
But not wrong in the way a woman is wrong whenever she opens her mouth or engages in any kind internal dialogue; wrong in way that is simply not right and not dangerous. Here’s the real scoop.
Women are as allergic to history as children who are allergic to bees are allergic to bees — this includes even their own history. Let’s turn to The History Channel for just a moment. We know the audience of the History Channel is predominantly male because all the commercials they run are for things like home ownership, stock investment, and local and national political agendas. These are things that women have about as much place in as a steering wheel on a toilet.
To us men, the History Channel is like a sweet, sweet nectar — a repository of precious facts and details about our world that we as men can leverage into solutions for the future. It makes us feel good about ourselves and it makes us feel positive about the future. Let’s take the gas crisis for instance.
Gas is running out, and prices are running up. That’s a serious problem, but as men let’s take just a moment and solve it. First, I will draw a parallel from The History Channel. I can easily remember one of many documentaries on what did General Dwight D. Eisenhower did when he faced many problems of equal or even greater severity during World War II. What he did was stop talking about it like a woman (when it was appropriate) and he took care of it. Problem solved thanks to the History Channel.
See, women are interested only in causing problems, not solving them. They do this to keep us men occupied while they play house and tea party and other such fantasy games of bullshit that involves spending your money on matching this to that and secretly fantasizing about the UPS delivery man. It’s the same all over the world.
To even a fully grown-up woman, this fantasy life of silliness and pretend is very much a reality. That’s why all women are not liars. Because they delude themselves into remembering the past as they wish and not as it actually happened.
Technically that’s not a lie.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 10 9 8 [7] 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
At least you arent one like some people.
Women don’t work full time. They get easy sit down jobs doing nothing and go home and pretend to be tired. Then they demand more pay and more off time for doing nothing. Then try to setup a special day to honor their lack of work..
If we wanted input from Mighty Mouth we would just surf to disneyworld.
I’m curious why would someone continue to post on a site where they aren’t wanted? Do you think that your ignorant thoughts will somehow make a difference?
Hey guys make her to stop, I’m starting to feel like a liberal leftwing lunatic. Oh how you wish…. Now bug off
it’s not so much that women think cooking is beneath them but you seem to be ignoring the fact that women also tend to work full time these days, yet you still seem to think it is perfectly okay for these same women to also do all the cooking and cleaning. This website should just be renamed chauvinistsRus.
That is because modern women don’t think about anybody but herself.
Most have discarded the Father for his paycheck and other possessions.
It’s the new stronger independent women era.. I can live without a man just send me his paychecks.
Destroy the Matriarchy - MOI
Yes. And being a regular part of the child’s life would be the best. Children raised by women are statistically much more likely to grow up to be violent, greedy, materialistic thuggish (or slatternly) brutes.
-wolfe
Yes she gets to be seen as equal in the workplace.. Do less for the same amount of money. Make that hubby of hers to more for her too.
Things are equal now.
Wolfe you left out Girly. Yeys boys raised around women act much more girly. Look at american idol. I have never in my life seen so many young boys cry when they win. Whayyy… I’m so happy and Mom is so proud of me..
Cut him a slit and call him Sue.
Maybe they all went to KFC cause the missis think cooking is beneath them.
- paul oakenfold - the way i feel featuring ryan tedder-nvs
lol
Oh. They’ve come visiting together. It’s all so clear now.
- Paul Oakenfold . Get Out Of My Life Now
Lol.Okay, you make sense, but you underestimate me. I like to be fair. He doesn’t have to cook everyday. And dinner can be cooked b4 the day arrives. Anyway, I said that i would like a husband that cooks. But only if he likes to do so, I ain going to force no one to cook if they don’t want to. Especially since I don’t like to.
It’s good that you want to be in the child’s life,for it seems that all the fathers are gone. Especially in the Caribbean
I do hope that teaching them grammar, style and spelling is not one of those responsibilities.
OK, so you’d like your husband to cook. Fair enough. Will you make sure you work overtime at your job if need be to progress up the career ladder faster? Will you accept a longer commute to your job so he has a shorter commute and can get back home earlier to get dinner started? Will you mow the lawn, and handle household repairs in exchange for his cooking?
Or is this “equality” simply him taking on more work?
Men already live about 7 years fewer than women do, and you want to burden your putative husband with more work, but not take on anything he does unless it’s to do with the children? Interesting attitude.
Yes. And being a regular part of the child’s life would be the best. Children raised by women are statistically much more likely to grow up to be violent, greedy, materialistic thuggish (or slatternly) brutes.
As for what you seem to mean by “the best”, you seem to be thinking mostly of things purchasable with money. Material things? They are transient, and ephemeral. All such is vanity, and vanity, thy name is woman.
-wolfe
So… beneath ladies of ’societal’ standing. God, I loathe that word.
I’m not a rich girl and I’m not high society.
Cooking and cleaning is so plebeian, all of a sudden, isn’t it? So… beneath ladies of ’societal’ standing. God, I loathe that word.
- Paul Oakenfold Vs Afrika Bambaataa & The Soul Sonic Force - Planet Rock (Swordfish Mix)
Of course, so long as it remains your legal prerogative to arbitrarily classify him as such or have the obsequious court do so on your whim, as per the now irrecognizable family code and case law.
It’s gotten to where ringing your wife’s bell before you get her a new prada purse might just be tantamount to marital rape.
- Paul Oakenfold Vs Afrika Bambaataa & The Soul Sonic Force - Planet Rock (Swordfish Mix)
all i saying is that if a man don’t want to take care of his child, is he business long as he does not interfer with me and my kid I’m happy. I think its women fault who get kids for guys who does not help they should know the dude well enough to figure out he is not ready to be a dad.
I only suggest to girls who want kids for guys like that should not care about the guy just look at him as a fun sperm bank
for those women who cus (in you skin! agood no one tell them to open they legs and if they never wanted the kid they could have well through it away.But then again most women whory now adays and evil
sorry guys hope it will ease up on u.
Also, why wouldn’t you visit the child, be friend him/her , and be a role model?
Scrap this statement.(Mis read the statement) Only if the man is like a criminal, then i would make sure he doesn’t see the child.
Wait, so…If I get a child with a man and the man doesn’t see the child he doesn’t have to pay child support? So, I’m suppose to bear the brunt by myself? And how does the logic even work, if you prefer women to stay home and work their, or get a lower paying job.
Wouldn’t you want the best for your child which you don’t see?Food,clothes,education…children cost money. Plus, if you were the child, wouldn’t you want to know that your father cares about you enough to help to support you when he doesn’t know you well.
Also, why wouldn’t you visit the child, be friend him/her , and be a role model?
lord u guys killing me lol lol
It’s absurd because when a woman says something like that it means she’s going to take ownership away from the father and then make him pay child support for a kid he doesnt even see.
why is it absurd? I like children and I would do the mothering yes, but I can’t expect the father to not part-take. So, if he cooks or does anyrhing extra, i’ll just reduce any child rearing instances which he does that stresses him out, and put them on myself. (When i say child rearing instances, I don’t mean things that he wants to do with them, their his children too)
….*dies from brain haemorrhaging from those few words because they’re so absurd*