If History is a Stage, Women are the Gum Under your Seat.
Some people will tell you that women played a minor role in history. They’re wrong.
Women played no role in history. Zip, zero, zilch, nada, and fuck all. If you add them all up they equal women’s contribution to history: absolutely fucking nothing.
I was listening to a Wild-Eyed Crazy talk about the early domestication of dogs in a documentary. I’m a man so I enjoy that kind of shit. Why a woman was on a documentary that wasn’t also a sex documentary and also didn’t put her in a bikini, I do not know. However, this wacky broad posed a non-interesting theory:
The early domestication of dogs required extreme empathy. Thus, women did it.
Wow. That’s a doozy.
This is an example of what I commonly refer to as the woman cycle of dumbness. Women and their suppositions and cyclical-logic are like fire hoses that no one’s holding onto. No one has any idea where it started, it’s flapping all over the place, and none of it matters because if you stand there and try to deal with it, you’re going to get a twenty pound nozzle in your fucking face — a metaphorical nozzle of course. These aren’t men we’re talking about.
The early domestication of dogs required empathy? Let me guess, lady, you’re a crappy parent. Naturally I’m right. I knew immediately because I’m a man and all men know all things about everyone two seconds before they even meet them. That’s why men are so good in business.
One of the many things I’ve learned about women over the years is that they should never have a lot of things on their own. Pink slips, checking accounts, screwdrivers; mouths; and dogs. I guess you could call that Dick’s Big Five: What Should Be Completely Off Limits To Women.
All women do is fuck up dogs. A dog raised by a woman for more than five weeks is like a cream pastry puff without any cream in it. Would it be better if it had some cream filling? Technically, yes, but in the metaphor you can see what I’m doing there. I don’t need to walk you through it by the man-hand.
Women didn’t domesticate dogs. Fuck, you know what women did is just bitched every time a primitive man’s man brought a mud-ridden wolfe-mongrel into the cave! I can hear the shrill cries of it echoing in my DNA, ‘No paw prints on the shinnies!’ It’s been the same for a million years.
I’m sure at some point a revolutionary development will rock the world of women and their wacky delusions. One of them is going to figure out how empathy is responsible for inventing the wheel. And then we’re all fucked.
Related Articles:
May 26th, 2006 at 12:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
To attempt to return the thread to sanity, Lukasz had it (and Dick did by implication).
In the case of dogs, the pack is nothing without an alpha male. Male dogs, bitches, and men know that. Too bad women don’t.
Like a child or a woman, a dog needs firm boundaries, best set by a man. Failure to provide those boundaries and insist upon them leads to kids that are criminals, dogs that are feral, and women that are crazed feminists.
BTW, on the OP from Dick:
I’ll take that spelling as a compliment.
-wolfe
May 26th, 2006 at 12:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 49c9ff889fded
In the case of dogs, the pack is nothing without an alpha male. Male dogs, bitches, and men know that. Too bad women don’t.
Same with a family, business, or most any organization. Someone has to fill that role.
The ironic thing about that women saying that women have empathy is really THEY DONT
I have found this to be more true than not.
May 26th, 2006 at 12:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: b39671b23df39
As you should, wolfe.
-Dick
May 26th, 2006 at 1:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: c57a33b939b03
The only thing I’ve ever seen women do with dogs is enslave and torture them with rediculous haircuts and unnecessary extra coats. As if they didn’t have a perfectly functional one in the first place. There is only one logical reason for this insanity:
Men befriend dogs while women selfishly use them for attention.
May 26th, 2006 at 4:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 27407595fc4d7
Empathy is not how you domesticate things. You domesticate things by establishing dominance. Women lack the ability to dominate things. What they do is bitch and moan until some man gets tired of it and shuts her up. We can’t “dominate” them in the same sense we can quadrapeds, so insted we merely content them with things they neither understand nor deserve.
Was this on the History Channel Dick? I may have seen it. In any case, such a moronic statement as the one from said woman in said documentary reminded me of another documentary on the customization of vehicles. One random woman said that men are attracted to cars because they think a nice car can get them a beautiful woman, and also that cars emulate women. What the fuck is that?
Men do this because we are interested in vehicles, and the satisfaction we receieve upon completion of creating something; something women will never understand or care about. Well maybe they would if they made an effort to understand anything beyond vanity, but as was covered by Dakota a couple articles back, women just don’t care. In this case, they are content to tilt their heads at the curious “unkita unkita” sounds eminating from a man’s vehicle, and wonder why said man put money into that vehicle instead of her metaphorical (and literal, in some cases) g-string.
May 26th, 2006 at 5:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: c45a69fff5c14
I totally agree with the above-stated Alpha Male perspective on raising dogs. As I’ve always had large dogs weighing 100+ pounds, I need to be damn well certain that the dog is well disciplined. An undisciplined large dog is a threat, and undisciplined “yappy dog” is merely a punting object.
Empathy my ass.
I think of it like bamboo. It is the restrictions (joints) within the bamboo that enables bamboo to grow as tall as it does. Those restrictons (discipline) strenghtens the bamboo. Without discpline, it’s just mulch laying on the ground… so much for empathy.
May 26th, 2006 at 6:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4ea5b60c84502
Interesting how dog is MAN’S best friend, and why is that, because even a dog knows that women only fuck shit up.
May 26th, 2006 at 6:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 84b7c2c8709bf
REFER TO THE INSPIRATIONAL STAIRCASE LADDER OF JESUS CHRIST FOR COMPLETE PROOF OF DICKS STATEMENTS - http://www.g0tjesus.com/theinspirationalstaircaseladderofjesuschrist.g if
May 26th, 2006 at 6:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 60b660aafc3e4
“The cave wife would have raised them very well and thus domesticated original wild animals.”
No, fem. More likely, the cave wife’s maternal instincts would have kicked in, and she’d end up reaping the benefits of overnurturing these dogs. Puppies are not babies.
Am I the only one who has observed that most dogs seem to respect the *male* of the home above anyone else? They seek him out for protection and/or attention. When they have a choice, they seem to prefer his company above that of the woman of the house.
May 26th, 2006 at 7:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
Hi Grump, long time no see. I have to say, puppies are babies, they are baby dogs. Of course they need discipline too but unless that is tempered by empathy, you’ll only end up raising conduct disordered ferals.
May 26th, 2006 at 8:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 794fefffe1145
Poodle, women style
May 27th, 2006 at 5:59 am - IP Man-Hash: 15d4421eb9848
’single mothers’.
now there’s a phrase that says alot.
you say men have empathy???
then why is there so many single mothers around this day and age???
because men used them for sex and deserted them-with,clearly,NO empathy for the woman or his child.
also,men fucked up the world with violence and war.
May 27th, 2006 at 7:51 am - IP Man-Hash: 6e3f802eb8de0
“johno said:
’single mothers’.
now there’s a phrase that says alot.
you say men have empathy???
then why is there so many single mothers around this day and age???
because men used them for sex and deserted them-with,clearly,NO empathy for the woman or his child.
also,men fucked up the world with violence and war.”
johno obviously has no testicles. Only someone without balls could make a statement so stupid. It is about time that scientists do a study showing the relationship between stupidity and the lack of cojones.
Well, the idiotic statement made about empathy and ’single mothers’ is all the proof needed to prove my statement. A woman can be a single mother for a variety of reasons.
Firstly, she could be an evil feminazi who is too bitchy to be able to keep a man, so she pretends she hates them
Secondly, she could have been too much of a whore and so she cant figure out who the real daddy is, and she cant fool a man like they did in the past because great men invented DNA testing (for this very purpose),
Thirdly, read Dick’s previous article on Heather Mills, who is now a single mother,
Fourthly, her husband could have died,
Fifthy, she could have been stupid enough to marry a known criminal or a current convict,
Sixthly, she could have had that ‘Murphy Brown syndrome’ and just decided to have a child quickly before her biological clock stopped ticking.
I do believe that it is a tragedy that there are single mothers on this earth. I cannot even begin to imagine how much better this world would be if there was a man/father in each household to stop women from fucking up the impressionable children’s minds.
In closing, there are many other reasons why there are ’single mothers’, but obviously if you dont have balls, then you dont have the sense to see that abandonment isnt the only reason, and that violence and war have nothing to do with why they have to raise kids on their own. There are far less single parent households in traditional arab and muslim communities. In those communities women know their place. It is rather unfortunate that the western world sometimes looks upon them as terrorists instead of taking onboard some of their better family values.
May 27th, 2006 at 8:45 am - IP Man-Hash: a8dc73b6dd800
This should say “because women used them (men) for sex and babies and deserted them-with,clearly,NO empathy for the man or their child.”
May 27th, 2006 at 8:47 am - IP Man-Hash: a8dc73b6dd800
I asume you are male going by your name johno? But your certainly not deserving of being called a man.
May 27th, 2006 at 11:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: 794fefffe1145
It’s just another feminasty.
You can always tell when the “let’s blame males for everything” mentality as taught at the “wommin’s studies” indoctrination classes headed by male hating feminists.
Amazingly, incapable of noticing that “women with child” is guaranteed every possible subsidy and monetary benefits from the Government “Father”.
A child is the golden egg, ensuring blood money for at least 20 years while some poor sucker having no say in the matter is driven into poverty and in most cases, suicide.
Notice also the memory loss concerning death and destruction. Maybe you should do a head count on all the “unborn children” that do not make it due to a single decision made by an individual to destroy it.
Women murder up to 2 million unborn every year, maybe not directly but it’s the same.
So for the last 10 years we have 20 million potential children, gone.Makes death through wars look a bit small in comparison does it not.
And you say we are the butchers. You really need to get off your high horse and sniff reality rather than screaming and mouthing that feminised brain-dead mantra that is now so immature and pathetic, it’s boring.
May 28th, 2006 at 12:37 am - IP Man-Hash: 2078756586c20
I agree with christianj, it is probably a feminazi using a male name (this also proves that men are better than women at disguises). Women are incapable to pretending to be man and posting in this or any other male forum. But Men can post in a women’s forum pretending to be a woman and be believed.
For a woman to convince us that she is a man would require her to post something with well thought out reasoning, logic, and plausibile theory; but women do not have that ability. On the other hand, men can post in a women’s forum because all he has to do is say something pointless, stupid and off-topic and his writing can be deemed that of a woman.
May 28th, 2006 at 5:35 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
Actually, that was poorly said and not well spotted by you at all Dick.
Steve, if you are going to insult me, at least try and spell your insults correctly, e.g. You’re = You are. Your does not.
May 28th, 2006 at 11:23 am - IP Man-Hash: d917ca6b1f977
Uh oh! Here comes the grammar police!
-Dick
May 28th, 2006 at 1:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: a8dc73b6dd800
How like a women to resort to pettyness.