Comments on: If History is a Stage, Women are the Gum Under your Seat.

By: reapers revenge apokolyptic mc gunslinger

reapers revenge apokolyptic mc gunslinger — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:35:22 +0000

i gotta take a big ass shit just lettin you know a big ass mother fuckin shit
a big shit

By: mysagonistizeramisn

mysagonistizeramisn — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:19:49 +0000

here here!

By: mysagonistizeramisn

mysagonistizeramisn — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:18:13 +0000

you are retarded. you didnt provide any form of an argument in that entire paragraph. you gave us nothing but your supposed opinions, which we all know are flawed as they are. Real men? you wouldn’t know a real man if he was pounding your fat ass raw. shut up and get your ass back in the kitchen and make a fucking sandwich.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 02:27:45 +0000

*i agree with Fantomina
not this write up

By: Sarah

Sarah — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 02:26:25 +0000

hahaha
agreed

By: Timmy the kid 卐

Timmy the kid 卐 — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:37:44 +0000

GOD! IM SO HAPPY IM MALE :)
Being a female is like being black.

By: The Professor

The Professor — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:50:28 +0000

Isabella:

When you think about humanity in the historical perspective…your list of female contributors is pretty sad.

By: The Professor

The Professor — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:45:05 +0000

Bob:

Point taken. If women are so empathic why do 50% of them cheat on their husbands? Then again, if they are so empathic why do they brutally murder and dismember 33% of their unborn children? If women are so empathic then why do wives end 80% of all marriages by taking the children and kicking their groom out to the street? Fact is, women are not empathic at all…they’re narcissistic and cold-hearted! And that’s just a sad fact of life!!!

By: Rurne

Rurne — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:55:29 +0000

And more importantly, after whipping them so bad they shit themselves, we turned their wild instincts into hunting *for* us instead of *against* us, or even playing guard duty for our dumber animals (sheep, goats, horses, etc.).

By: Watcher

Watcher — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:45:04 +0000

A long list of who’s nobody.

“Katherine Walker (1846-1931) – Lighthouse keeper at Robin’s Reef, New York, commissioned by U.S. Coast Guard.”

Mary Ludwig, this revolutionary heroine followed the Continental Army for more than 3 years, doing what was needed to free the colonies from the tyranny of England.

I wonder why she traipsed around after a bunch of soldiers?

LOL!!

By: Juliano

Juliano — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:57:33 +0000

You forgot to talk about how primitive dogs were wild, violent, and uncouth beasts who were out for blood and meat. While there is nothing wrong with that because a good man slap to the dogs face would show it who the pack leader was you forgot to mention that a woman could have never possibly with all her “empathy” controlled such a creature. It would’ve torn her fucking arm off.

Men obviously were the domesticators of these vicious beasts because we beat the shit out of them to show them whos boss, then took care of them, fed them, and cared for them to show them that we are noble bosses who have their best interests in mind. We did this being men. Not women.

MEN > women

By: Fantomina

Fantomina — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:40:24 +0000

These comments and thoughts are perfect examples of how far we still have to come as a society. You fascist, sexist, misogynistic men are disgusting. Just because you have a sharp tongue does not mean you have a keen mind. Women have contributed more to history that the given time line, it was an example Isabelle was giving, for those of you who made fun of her. Men like you are the reason that there isn’t more recognition of what women achieved. Women are the reason you’re even here, good luck carrying on the human race without one. which i hope none of you ever reproduce, and to the man who told that woman to get a dad; why don’t you get a mother, because i know you must have had a horrible one, because any self respecting woman would be ASHAMED to hear her son talk like this. You little boys need to think before you speak because i think this men are better than women thing is completely wrong. Neither one is superior. REAL men are absolutely equal with women, but i DO NOT see any REAL man’s opinion on this page, i just see a bunch of scared little boys who need to keep their thoughts to themselves. And i am more than confident that none of you have contributed anything to society, besides setting everyone else back a few hundred years.

By: Banderman

Banderman — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:40:39 +0000

What is it with women they are so convinced that men want to control them? What a manipulative bunch of wholesale crap. Men would simply like to ‘get along with women and have women act like an equal’. The problem is that it takes two and women are too busy bitching, moaning, complaining, spending his money – while keeping her own, whining, and plotting to control men to serve them and adjust their thinking to be a more wussified shell of himself. Women that try to rewrite history and turn around the facts are manipulative wenches. Women that try to control men in any and all manner of speaking (99%) are useless trolls.

By: Banderman

Banderman — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:35:21 +0000

“Actually asshole women mad a lot of history”. Isabella admits the painful truth, finally. At long last. Cheers for men. Sucks to be an ‘asshole woman making a lot of history’.

By: Banderman

Banderman — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:32:45 +0000

All we can say about that is it’s better to be pissed off than pissed on; most of the time anyway.

By: Banderman

Banderman — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:28:24 +0000

Huh? Psychological double-speak. Another reason men are better than women; we tell it like it is, not like you hoped it would be.

By: Banderman

Banderman — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:27:00 +0000

Isabella = not a genius; a pretty short list considering the planet has been inhabited and in existence for 2,009 + years. Now we’ll hear about how men held women down. Bullshit. Complete bullshit we say. If a woman allows herself to be held down, that is her problem, not men as a collective gender. Grow up; find a new argument. Some hide behind their gender, some hide behind their race – all weak and unable to cope with life in any other way than perpetual ‘victim hood’. No wonder some pairings occur more now than ever – misery loves company.

By: studioline

studioline — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:24:03 +0000

Hey there skooma,

Let’s start form the word you used “bridges”. It already shows, along with what you wrote, that you have been programmed in a wrong way, by the Social Matrix (abrv).

“Bridges” are built by women not you. That’s the first thing.

You as a man set boundries, not build bridges. But you insetad of setting boundries, built bridges.

Look at how young women act in a group. Women in a group act this way they set up boudries/ rules.

If a men does not set up boudries/ rules, a woman desn’t feel secure, safe, has no trust, has too much freedom and freeks out, cos doesn’t know what to do. It’s all unbeareable for her to the point that one day she wakes up and leaves.

When you set boundries, she builds bridges.

What I said here goes totally opposite to what the Social Matrix sais. Today both men and women are programmed to act in the wrong way.

It all starts going wrong, when a man starts chasing a woman.

But women’s incompetance could be very easly not our problem. If we only UNITE, and all together stop chasing women.

By: Abigail

Abigail — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:25:55 +0000

Skooma—in reference to TES4?

By: Bob

Bob — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:23:54 +0000

Women empathize with trees and cows and shit, not people. Especially not men.