Just Because You Suck At Math, Doesn’t Mean You’re Good At Not-Math
Men are better than women at everything. Just look outside. See all that shit? That “shit” is men kicking the ass of women up and down the court of science. Women aren’t to blame for a single brick.
Unless when you look outside you see a bunch of fat hookers or some broad who just crashed her car into a fence post while talking on her cell phone. You can blame women for both of those.
Men consistently outperform women in math and science. You know it, I know it, the ex-president of Harvard knows it; but what about the math we do with our words? What about something we call “literature”? A lot of idiot jackasses will tell you that girls test higher than boys on the battlefield of books.
“Boys are obviously smarter than girls in math and science,” says the idiot, “but because of their rampaging emotions and compulsive chattering — which somehow magically translates into improvement, girls are better than boys at reading, writing, and communicating.”
This pile of ill-reasoned shit could not be further from the truth.
What woman ever wrote the dozens of immortal works of William Shakespeare? And while I don’t know who invented more words, Shakespeare or Snoop Dogg, I know fo shizzle that it wasn’t a woman.
Your girlfriend’s obnoxious need to combine two words into one and then call attention to it like a puppy for lack of an actual personality doesn’t count as inventing a word.
Men are better than women.
Girls appear to score higher than boys in the literary arts because the tests schools use to gauge a child’s reading comprehension are pointless and a waste of fucking time. It’s like seeing if a dog is faster than a turtle by putting them both in a bathtub and getting stoned off your ass. What the hell is that going to prove?
Feel free to skip the following text because it’s the dumbest story you’ll ever read.
One day, Johnny was upset because he wanted a red ball and the store was out of red balls. It was his birthday too. He asked his mom why the store was out of balls on his birthday, but his mother told him to be patient and that maybe the store would have some in stock next week. Johnny was sullen for the rest of the day, even during his birthday party, until he got a very special present from his mother. Inside a poorly wrapped box was a red ball.
“This is the happiest day of my life!” said Johnny.
“I know,” said his mother. “And it’s all thanks to me.”
Please answer the following questions to test your reading comprehension.
1. Johnny was sad because:
A) He had no balls.
B) His mother drove his father away with her messiah complex — which all women have.
C) Who fucking cares? That is a stupid waste of time, contains nothing of actual value nor did it ever pretend to, and I didn’t read any of it anyway because I had better things to think about.
If you answered anything but C, you are a woman. Fuck off my website.
Academic tests on reading comprehension are meant for the minds of children. A real test on reading and writing is getting a law degree or figuring out how to hook up a DVD player. The part on the back of the TV where it reads “Audio IN” is where the fucking audio goes in. What’s the reading comprehension score for that brain buster?
Academic tests on reading and writing are as simple-minded as harlequin romance novels and as worthless as Oprah magazine. If you really want to test a woman’s reading abilities, give her a map and get ready to laugh your ass off.
Women have a gimmism about them called Delusional Dogma. Delusional Dogma is when a woman picks what a man is good at, and then gives herself credit for being good at the complimentary tasks by default — as if declaring herself so is somehow a miracle cure for the crippling incompetence which nature has gifted to all women. Holding a fork in one hand doesn’t mean you have a knife in the other. You might be holding a bent Alan wrench or a dildo; only one of which a woman knows how to use.
If a wife thinks her husband is smart or strong willed, she immediately credits herself as being creative and nurturing. Then she will compulsively flush 10 grand down the toilet in a poorly conceived attempt at buying her way into the arts. Or she’ll leave her baby in the car while she goes shopping. Way to nurture that kid into triple digit brain damage, trophy mom.
Source
Related Articles:
Dear, Crybaby Fuckwads
Satire.
As much as some of you dip shit self-proclaimed scholars like to flap off about how smart your aunt is (emotional crutch) and basking in your own mundane literacy, how quickly you’ve forgotten such a wonderful, thought-provoking, and hilarious genre of literature as SATIRE.
Wipe your eyes, wash your asses and laugh for Christ’s sake. You’re all the same people who forward emails to 10 friends in fear of being raped by a one-eyed ghost/never find your true love/whatever else keeps you flooding inboxes with spam and email viruses.
Die.
This article was fucking genius in every way. Even the title made me laugh.
You could even say that it was “da bomb da bomb,” fo sho.
Incoherence.
LMAO!!! Women don’t excel at ANYTHING - let alone “verbal skills”.
FACT:
Women speak an average/minimum of 5000 words a day.
Men speak 2000.
That’s right…. the world was built by shutting the fuck up.
Just because a woman TALKS more than necessary, doesn’t mean she “excels a verbal skills” - by a LONG shot. I payed attention to how many times women begin thoughts and sentences with the word –>> “IF”.
“IF”.
. . . . the most useless fucking word in the English Language. It accomplishes nothing. And WOMEN will contemplate - and yak about - “IF” and “IF ONLY” all fucking day!!
• “If I told you . . . .”
• “If the situation were different . . . .”
• “If you and me . . . ”
• “If you would only . . . ”
• “I wonder if . . .”
When I hear my woman use the word “IF” in a sentence,
I point it out to her that it is utterly POINTLESS to talk about “IF”,
and I recommend that she shut the fuck up. Or she can leave.
And guess what –>> it works.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
“..ever present negative portrayal of men in media (particularly advertising and comedy), blogspots or forums (not to mention feminist websites whose hatred cry out for the torturous eradication of the male gender altogether), and the wealth of imbalanced legislature and penalties for crimes which excessively favour the female gender.”
I’m glad you make that point. Boys have nearly no male role models to look up to in the mass media.
After reading several of your pieces, and the comments, I have come to a new perspective.
It is a fact that the differences between individual people are far wider than differences found between groups.
With that in mind, my new perspective makes no dent in my attitude.
Conclusion: Dick is right about women in many respects.
That is of no concern to me, because I know I work hard; I have met many people who lack the skills I have, men and women alike. I have lead fulfilling life, and found a good husband whom I care for emotionally, and finacially.
Any woman who becomes defensive on this site clearly feels threatened by Dick’s accusations, and I believe these women see in themselves something they do not like, and something they refuse to address. To you women, I suggest you investigate your eagerness to shoot Dick down. The comments made here, by infuriated women, are ridiculous. You further prove Dick’s point with out realizing it, and that is funny in the saddest way possible.
“Very little is needed to make a happy life; it is all within yourself, in your way of thinking”
Furthermore, as a former feminist, I know already that your reaction to this will be a feeling of betrayal. If so, then you fail. Use reason. For a moment, please, just use reason. Live.
Kain the only way your aunt got a masters in physics was clearly through sucking a lot of dick. It is pretty much the only explanation. Also, I find it hilarious when Lindsay almost gets it, and then veers into a big pile of stupid; “I thought it was a joke” actually made me laugh out loud.
How do you get fascism out of anything that was being discussed?? Please edify me on your reasoning.
Oh, I’ll take that a step further and say that men are, inherently, more industrious and less superficial. Hell, men inherently tend not to have to drag around Susan B. Anthony’s corpse everywhere they go to excuse their many shortcomings.
Man doesn’t get a job, as manhole says - nobody gives a shit. I forgot the ratio of male-to-female discrimination lawsuits, but I know that it just doesn’t make business sense to have a ’sexually integrated’ workplace if you’re just going to get shit from the girls. Not at all, you make more money and get more things done if you take that feminist business strategy and burn it in the furnace.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,953389,00.html
It is well known that teen-age boys tend to do better at math than girls, that male high school students are more likely than their female counterparts to tackle advanced math courses like calculus, that virtually all the great mathematicians have been men. But why? Are women born with less mathematical ability? Or does society’s sexism slow their progress?
In 1980 two Johns Hopkins University researchers tried to settle the eternal nature/ nurture debate. Julian Stanley — who is well respected for his work with precocious math students of both sexes — and Camilla Benbow had tested 10,000 talented seventh-and eighth-graders between 1972 and 1979. Using the Scholastic Aptitude Test, in which math questions are meant to measure ability rather than knowledge, they discovered distinct sex differences. While the verbal abilities of the males and females hardly differed, twice as many boys as girls scored over 500 (on a scale of 200 to 800) on mathematical ability; at the 700 level, the ratio was 14 to 1. The conclusion: males have inherently superior mathematical reasoning ability.
I suggest next time you resist your irrational, emotional impulse and look at the graph. Otherwise you are a fascist, and nobody likes a fascist these days.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:SAT_by_sex.png
Let’s see what the numbers say.
Men, statistically speaking, tend to care more about learning and studying more than women, who care - statistically speaking - about finding a man that deserves them and making good grades.
hmm….. now this one i couldnt resist commenting on. my aunt has a masters degree in physics, and is the second best mathamation that i know and many women i know are do well in math. im not saying women are better at math than men im saying it doesnt matter what sex you are. What matters is if you care or not. anyone can do good or math or reading comprehension if they care.
Oh, and Shut Up. You’re one of the reasons we get bad reps. Because you cannot shut your fucking mouth.
Fail, Lindsay….Epic Fail.
The Cult of Domesticity doesn’t change the fact that men thought women were idiots. They still believed education could damage a woman’s tender, little brain. Equality was lacking.
However, I agree that they were treated with plenty of kindness and respect. A friend once told me that she would give up the right to vote if men opened doors for her.
Tee hee. You said sex.
Seriously though, that’s because I’m a woman? I thought it was just because I’m a teenager.
Maybe he should charge membership fees. Who would pay money to read insulting things?
You are however, one of the few women whom actually do see the humour value in his articles. Albeit likely for reasons of condescension from your “superior” outlook on the world, rather than any belief in the validity of men having a forum such as this constituting a rare instance of equality in the face of the ever present negative portrayal of men in media (particularly advertising and comedy), blogspots or forums (not to mention feminist websites whose hatred cry out for the torturous eradication of the male gender altogether), and the wealth of imbalanced legislature and penalties for crimes which excessively favour the female gender.
You have me pegged! I am totally the future Supreme Dictator of the World.
The issues this site discusses didn’t exist in the 1800’s. People weren’t so precious about anything that might be remotely demeaning or insulting unless they were part of the grand old upper class. In which case it was a class issue, and affected both genders. But in the 1800’s the balance of laws was not weighted so heavily in favour of a single gender. Before you try tell me they were weighted in favour of men, I’ll point out the rule of thumb was a myth, women were expected to be respectable and treasured by their husbands, and motherhood was of such virtue as an occupation that pregnant women in England for example, were even permitted to urinate anywhere, with due decorum and respect - Even in a policeman’s hat!
Once again another woman proves Dick’s belief that women are juvenile and obsessed with sex, particularly the male anatomy.
This is why Dick has such a policy. No better way to get a modern and “empowered”[read entitled] woman to leave comments (inevitably proving the reality factors of the generalised sarcasm and wit of his humour), than to tell them they’re not permitted to or not welcome.
You are however, one of the few women whom actually do see the humour value in his articles. Albeit likely for reasons of condescension from your “superior” outlook on the world, rather than any belief in the validity of men having a forum such as this constituting a rare instance of equality in the face of the ever present negative portrayal of men in media (particularly advertising and comedy), blogspots or forums (not to mention feminist websites whose hatred cry out for the torturous eradication of the male gender altogether), and the wealth of imbalanced legislature and penalties for crimes which excessively favour the female gender.
I don’t type it often, but LOL. This website answers the question, “If people in the 1800s had internet access, what would they blog about?”
Come on. A male supremacy site headed by a guy named Dick? I thought it was a joke.
While I know there’s a “No Girls Allowed” policy here, I’m emailing a link to my friends. They’ll probably be upset, which will make the whole thing even funnier.
You know what, I don’t know what is going on in your guy’s minds when you agree with Dick-head. If you never want to get laid again, fine post as much shit about women as you want. Obviously women are sooo bad at sex, but wait a sec if they’re so bad then why do men want sex at all? It can’t be for the sake of keeping the human race going because that’s bullshit, they like it and if they didn’t like it, but wanted it anyways then how the hell does that make them smarter??? Men evolve faster, because they are just too simple. You guys must be compensating for something (like a small penis) but come on just because women won’t sleep with you doesn’t mean its because they’re the ones with the problem. Face it, hating women only leaves two other options, being attracted to no one (unlikely), or like Mr. Dick here, being attracted to men but thats fine. Hell maybe animals are your thing. All you over-compensation, UNintellegent pricks can have eachother, and us girls will find the pleasurable men that we seek (after having to endure your guys’ dull, and even painful, sex).
Look at Western culture pre and post feminism.
Ekwality is to civilization what ball cancer is to a pornstar.
Whats so wrong, and disgusting about equality? Why must there always be a weaker species, gender, race, ect.? Is it so hard to believe that YOU ARE NOT ANY BETTER THAN SOMEONE ELSE? You, and many others here, are suffering from a major jock-complex, you are not high and mighty and you obviously lack compassion. This is a perfect example of concrete thinking, which doesn’t help in real life. This is so horrible I could puke. I don’t even know how someone could act this way. Family life maybe? Also, I’ve looked on the comments on here and found so many spelling errors on simple words it makes me wonder if anybody here went to school past 5th grade. It’s sad to think all these illiterate people are here talking about how stupid everybody else is……
Men are, indeed, better than women at everything. Supposedly, men excel at math and visuo-spatial capacity, while women excel at verbal skills. But while the contention that men excel at math and visuo-spatial skills holds true, does that contention that women excel at verbal skills hold true as well? No, it doesen’t. The evidence? All of the greatest writers and poets have been male. Just because women talk more than men does not mean that they are more verbose than men. Most of what women say is irrelevant crap, usually social gossip, which means talking about other people’s lives behind their back. I’ll take Goethe, Dumas, Dickens, Shakespeare, Camões and Dostoievsky over the bitchy female any day.
P Coderch
[...] to test a womans reading abilities, give her a map and get ready to laugh your ass off." Just Because You Suck At Math, Doesnt Mean Youre Good At Not-Math And yea, I know. It just pisses me off _____________________________________ Censorship [...]
necroswordsman no i’m not in england i’m in Australia lol all the women in Australia are so so stupid
Twice as many girls than boys are illiterate.
See if you can read this, Alex: fuck off my website.
-DickDick great point and unfortunatly the education system is actully designed to teach women in the way they find best to learn and teach men the same way
Well said, welcome on board the site! Another great man to the great team at MABTW.com.
Sound’s like the English school system.
You in England?
…
no more late nights for me.
Sure why not lets go ahead and assume that you type too fast (by the way how fast do you type) you could always type slower so you don’t make typos. I know its a difficult concept to grasp but hopefully you can use your few brain cells to understand it. A simple understanding of basic grammar should have been taught to you in grade school, I’m sorry that you failed to learn it. I laugh every time this topic comes up in everyday conversation due in part to the simple fact that I am better than women at reading always have been. Also it is already known that Uli doesn’t speak English as his first language, in fact he never claimed to be fluent. i would quote you but unfortunately that would weaken my point. I look forward to you reading the rules of this site. wait lets see oh whats this rule number one perhaps you should read it? never mind i’ll type it out for you maybe repetition will make you understand, here straight from the F.A.M.Q:1. Are women allowed on this site?
No. Absolutely no women are allowed on this site.
Isn’t it amazing what reading can do for you? better reading comprehension my ass.
Amazing articles dick they are all of exceptional good quality. I am 13 years old but as i am currently attending school that alot of stuff is just a joke such as punishments are pathetic we boys are treated un fairly harsh. Education is unfortunatly based on women and the tests are designed to be easier for women.
ps.I am in year 8 and learning year 9 maths in a single sex math class while the rest of my classes are diffrent, my god the girls in the same class for girls are pretty pathetic in conparison to us
*median
Or medium.
This is a survey of things from my perspective, in response to Alex. People expecting a simplistic argument one way or the other will be disappointed.
True. Though as you say, no Shakespeares yet. And most female literature is, IMHO, godawful, especially if it’s infused by feminism.
Something you hadn’t considered, Alex: editors (of books) are disproportionately female. And you’ve only to look at any novel written by a woman with poor editing to know that editing matters a great deal. (See Patricia Cornwell. Or J.K. Rowling).
A number of well-regarded male writers in fact had enormous help from their wives.
Well, first, few would deny that there’s a high degree of anti-male bias in the primary educational system in the West. Second, you’re proving Dick’s point. Males don’t really care about most of these tests. I’m not saying it’s a good thing that they don’t, simply a fact. Option C, all the way.
And when you have an overtly feminized educational system, of course that’s going to happen.
Yep. More Shakespeare’s, more incapable.
Except when they don’t. For example, the SAT’s Dick linked.
My big objection though — and it’s a trap that Dick avoided — is the absolutely cretinous nature of the linked source.
The title of the table is “Average SAT by sex”. The legend says “Mean SAT by sex”. Good grief. I really hope whoever wrote that was a woman.
Not to grasp the difference between mean and average… good grief.
-wolfe
Thank you :)
Rightly said jy.
Hey ladies (who don’t belong here) …
You seem to blame women’s comparative historical lack of achievement on male “oppression.” But … if women were either equal or superior, men *couldn’t* oppress them. Yet in every historical and traditional society of any size (forget Margaret Mead, who was a liar) men have run those societies. It isn’t as if men have an overwhelming force of numbers. What men DO have is an overwhelming force of MIND.
You need to throw off all the wacko indoctrination and start looking at reality rather than the land where frogs have wings. Of course, you won’t do that. MEN do that. That’s why WE build everything important.
;-)
You are. I didn’t realise it was. But it’s ‘how many languageS’ just so you know.
Topnotch stuff what you said too.
Welcome to the site.
And i think you are the idiot. Nowadays everything is leveled by the bottom if you see what i mean (probably not you stupid cunt), education is adjusted to the lowest brain in class, slowing down all others. People with learning disabilities are just as capable as the others IMO (if they aren’t women) but the issue remains in the way to keep them focus on something interesting. There was a time where men were launching monkeys into space with calculators and women where still fucking up making apple pies, now most of us wouldn’t be able to do so. Why? because at that time, we had BOYS ONLY schools and GIRLS ONLY schools. You can hide behind some crappy social plies rhetoric, it is not the point here.
Considering english is not my 1st language, i think i’m doing pretty good. How many language do you speak?
I CAME….
Dick Masterson once again brings me to my knees into that particular sweet sweet agony only he can bring.
Always you hear of this false dichotomy between men and women, that for everything a man is bad at, the women will meet his faults, and be his hel…
Yep I remember what he thought about imagination and children. Terrific stuff.
Which “privleged men” were these?
Another piece of feminist dishonesty for gullible fools. Girls/women were never refused an education that was being granted to boys/men. Through most of western history the only folk able to gain an education were the children of the landed gentry and those in religious institutions. In fact among the wealthy the girls often got a more extensive education while the boys were stuck in the military.
Einstein himself said that his slow development helped him in creating his theories:
“The normal adult never thinks about space and time. These are thoughts that he has thought about when he was a child. But since my intellectual development was retarded, as a result of which I began to wonder about space and time only when I had already grown up. Naturally, I could go deeper into the problem than a child with normal abilities.”
-Albert Einstein
Also apparantly, Einstein used to daydream in class, and forget where he lived.
Can I just point out that his mother was trying to draw attention away from the joy of his birthday onto herself for having given him a gift?
You were wrong.
-Dick
As Kristina said, there’s a difference between not paying attention because the class is moving too slow, and having a learning disorder. Boys who are too far ahead of the class often get wrongly diagnosed with ADHD, which sounds like what you’re referring to. Boys have a higher rate of dyslexia (reading disorder), however, and that can’t be blamed on boys being bored and being wrongly diagnosed.
As for the SAT scores, that surprised me (although there was only a 7 pt. difference), but in state testing in elementary school, junior high school, and high school, girls consistently score higher on verbal tests (information obtained from my psychology class, unless my professor taught us incorrectly. And no, he isn’t biased, he points out gender differences in men’s favor when statistics support it).
No, that is false. They did have learning disabilities and some of them DID go to school. Einstein was a slow learner in elementary school and didn’t start talking until he was around 3 or 4 (and neither did the mathematical genius Ramanujan) and Edison and da Vinci both had dyslexia. Einstein, Newton, Bell and Picasso all went to college. The ones who didn’t go to college didn’t go because they DIDN’T WANT TO, not because they couldn’t.
http://www.dyslexiaonline.com/famous/famous.htm
I know girls like you. Haha.
Sent one crying to her mommy after causing severe mental damage.
By smart, do you mean exams? Tests?
I call that FUCKING SHITE!!!
Anybody can pass the exams and tests. Just read up stuff and you’ll speed through. Evenvif you have no idea what you’re writing about. That’s not proper testing. Yeah the system is fucked but meh.
And how do you know I’m smarter than you? Do you really think I’ll exert my brain power to talk to some odd person on the internet? Hahahaha
I use it for real life. I’m actually a social chameleon and everybody ends up liking me. Adults, businessmen/businesswoman, teachers.
:) Necro, you are missing my point. Yes I have made some bad typos, most of the time cuz i type too fast for my sticky keyboard(yes I know, most of you don’t believe me, ah well). And I never said I was the most perfect speller in the world. According to Dick, however, men are perfect beings who spell perfectly.
I was just pointing out that obviously if you can spell were where, then Dick must be wrong. Which, didn’t Dick also say somewhere that men are never wrong? And if they are, they admit it?
Please, Necro, just because I am smarter than you doesn’t mean you need to be jealous and call me an idiot.
You can’t talk bitch. You make some of the worst spelling mistakes Ever!
So you should get along well with him.
You are an idiot. Emily Dickinson, and Victoria Holt. Not to mention several others, who do not write on romance…
Not true. See this: http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/3/34/SAT_by_sex.png
…and this: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article558743.ece
So what? Leonardo da Vinci and Albert Einstein both had a learning disorder. So did Beethoven, Thomas Edison, Mozart, Van Gogh, Abraham Lincoln, Alexander Graham Bell(inventor), The Wright Brothers(inventors), Benjamin Franklin, Henry Ford, Picasso, and many others.
http://www.twicegifted.net/ld.htm
http://loveadderall.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/famous-people-with-learni ng-disabilities/
Correction, soundwave, some of those men didn’t have learning disabilities, they just didn’t get to go to school like more privileged men.
Were, not where, you idiot. If you had been paying attention while they were teaching you how to spell, like those “cunts”, then maybe you wouldn’t have misspelt that.
There is a difference between learning disability, not having the same privilege as others to go to school, and just not paying enough attention in school. Get it right.
You don’t have a learning disability, you are just an idiot.
I’ve had learning disorder. In fact it was just because the other half of the class was so fucking retarded that teaching became so uninteresting and i didn’t have to learn anything anymore and just live on my knowledge to still get good grades. Then someday it gets you back and you are diagnosed with a learning disorder because you’ve (i’ve) just spent my time drawing time machines while cunts where actually still learning how to spell “pussy cat”. But after a few hours of catching things back up, you’re back on track and you are ready to get bored again…
soundwave, you’ve done it again.
-Dick
Not true. See this: http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/3/34/SAT_by_sex.png
…and this: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article558743.ece
So what? Leonardo da Vinci and Albert Einstein both had a learning disorder. So did Beethoven, Thomas Edison, Mozart, Van Gogh, Abraham Lincoln, Alexander Graham Bell(inventor), The Wright Brothers(inventors), Benjamin Franklin, Henry Ford, Picasso, and many others.
http://www.twicegifted.net/ld.htm
http://loveadderall.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/famous-people-with-learni ng-disabilities/
Just like a woman. Arguing without even knowing the facts.
Worldwide?
-Dick
@ Dick- Worldwide? If so, it’s because certain areas of the world deny girls education.
Twice as many girls than boys are illiterate.
See if you can read this, Alex: fuck off my website.
-Dick
Women remember lots of words and talk a lot… but do very little actual application of the data they obtain.
If you think there aren’t any talented female writers, you probably aren’t very knowledgeable about literature. I’ll agree there haven’t been any female Shakespeare’s though.
Girls score higher on reading comprehension tests all throughout elementary school, junior high school, high school, etc. They score higher in reading, on average, on the SATs, which most would agree is a fairly accurate indication of ability. Boys suffer from learning/reading disorders at a higher rate than girls. No matter how you measure it, statistics always seem to indicate that boys are stronger in math and science on average and girls are stronger in reading comprehension/writing on average.
Men are better than women at reading and writing. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that one out. Hell, the only women writers there are is J.K. Rowling [whose last book's ending sucked horribly, to say the least] and whoever does harlequin [female porn] literature.
Magazines are not literature. They’re pictures meant to distract dim minds, much like a Jedi Mind Trick.
“but because of their rampaging emotions and compulsive chattering — which somehow magically translates into improvement, girls are better than boys at reading, writing, and communicating.”
Rampaging emotions means instability, lack of purpose. Lack of purpose prevents from great creations from being built, written, sung.
Girls are better than boys in writing, reading and communicationg, if all that exists and if all this art is defined by some ten page article about shiny red lipstick in the Cosmo maga-shit-zine, if all the communication is defined by what girls communicate: senseless ten minute babble about something which could be clearly and correctly said, even using emotions in 12 seconds…
Yea, girls are better in these things, if we let girls define what is “quality”…
And we all know how good women are in selecting quality…:
“My ex boyfriend was…….”