Katie’s Revenge? Or Man Revenge
If you pay attention to the news like a man does — and I know you do because you’re a man, then you’ve heard about the case of poor Anthony Stockelman.
Stockelman is serving a life sentence in Indiana, America for the molestation and murder of a 10 year old girl.
I can only imagine what would have become of him in a prison of women. He probably would have been taught how to knit or how to believe in Tantric yoga or some other bullshit where women just run their fucking mouths for hours on end and then give themselves a medal when they’re done. Stockelman was in a man’s prison though, so he was beaten and tattooed across the forehead with the words KATIE’S REVENGE.
It’s the kind of thing that makes you proud to be a man.
Women have no concept of justice; either making it or dispensing it. Have you ever seen the show Super Nanny? Not one single mother on that show knows what the fuck she’s doing and that is the standard fare when it comes to the household.
Let me ask you a question. Do you let the guy who builds your house decorate it? That burly man, man with the tool belt and the man ass crack? Do you let him or someone who looks like him tidy up after a party? Fucking no. Just because he built the house doesn’t mean he knows shit about cleaning or developing it. Same goes for women and children.
“But, Dick! On those shows it’s always the father not spending enough time at home.”
That’s true. I’m not going to argue with anyone who says men are better than women and that definitely says that. It is the man’s fault the little bastards are out of control. It’s his fault for making money to put food in their bellies instead of teaching them how not to hit. It’s his fault for setting the invaluable example of taking care of man business that makes him too busy to get some children dressed for fucking school. For fuck’s sake.
The point is no woman has ever enacted an appropriate level of justice on anyone who deserved it. It’s like women are missing the organ that tells them when something is cool and when it deserves a rubber-hose beating and forehead tattooing. That gland is either called the brain or the penis. I’m not sure which is funnier.
Whatever happened to that woman who molested all those 13-year-old boys? Debra Lefave? Did she get her forehead tattooed? No because women are cowards.
Related Articles:
May 29th, 2007 at 8:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: a195d2c8d4a47
I find it especially ironic that the evangelicals have no genuine concern about the jews, just the establishment of Israel (in fulfillment of “prophecy”). Beyond that, the evangelicals don’t give a rat’s ass about the jews.
Too bad for the rest of us that zionist jews control the preponderance of the media and largely control congress.
May 29th, 2007 at 8:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: bbe132f88b6ad
Religion is for women and the weak.
May 29th, 2007 at 8:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: a195d2c8d4a47
Something else we can agree on, sots.
August 24th, 2007 at 7:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 01ba709bc746a
Oh you all are so pathetic. You are lucky your mothers didn’t swallow you. Just a sidenote, I am a mother and my friends call me the lioness. I will tear you limb for limb and gut you if you touch my child in any innapropriate way. Then I’ll load my side by side double barrel Remington 12 guage and blow your brains into mush. How’s that for “justice”
August 24th, 2007 at 8:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 01ba709bc746a
oh, just so you know, I don’t have a penise.
August 24th, 2007 at 9:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0364a2b269277
Of course you dont. Thats why you write crap.
August 24th, 2007 at 11:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
Did you even read the original article?
I trust it’s manufactured post 1995?
-wolfe
August 25th, 2007 at 2:16 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Such estrogen fueled (f)ire! What’s the cetane rating on that?
A hearty belch from the bottom of my bosom goes out to her.
- Dash Berlin - Till the Sky Falls Down (Vocal Mix)
August 25th, 2007 at 5:08 am - IP Man-Hash: d49fcc969ca87
Yes Wolfe I did. This article claims that women are incapable of enacting justice with violence. I am ashamed of any women who would punish a child sex offender with knitting. The animal insticnt to protect the young belongs to the female. I am no femenist and I have a strong capable alpha male for a husband. But he and I both know who would enforce more justice when it comes to our child.
August 25th, 2007 at 6:42 am - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
No, it doesn’t. Read again, and read this site.
Then…
The implication is clear.
Women sometimes wildly under-react (the specific examples cited above), and sometimes wildly overreact.
In your case, you announced you would torture, vivisect, and then kill someone if you believed that individually had inappropriately touched (in your views) one of your children. Not raped. Not even molested. Simply touched, and in your view, inappropriately.
I’m all for protecting children, but your response precisely supports Dick’s point: that women are missing the organ that tells them how to respond appropriately. In your case, you wildly overreact with extreme violence.
As you say, torture, vivisection and murder for a touch that is, in your view, inappropriate.
No, the animal instinct for crazed irrational violence generally belongs to the female.
I have no difficulty believing you would indulge in far more violence, but I suspect your husband would engage in justice.
Make no mistake.
First, I believe that child molesters should be castrated. If they are female, then remove their reproductive organs. Certainly in the case of repeat offenders.
But we have to agree to this as a society as a punishment — or at the least as an unwritten code.
And yes, I would indeed consider shooting someone who molested a child/teen in my family.
But good God woman, I wouldn’t vivisect them.
That’s just plain sick.
You are the absolute proof of everything that Dick writes, above. And I’m astounded that you are incapable of seeing it.
I’m not trying to give you a hard time here, or insult you. I’m simply calling you on what you manifestly have shown yourself to be.
Regards,
-wolfe
August 25th, 2007 at 8:05 am - IP Man-Hash: 21b56e0c46781
Nice.
August 25th, 2007 at 9:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 8aab42ab48964
I think, Katie, the article claims that women don’t know which justice is appropriate, and when. And I would have to agree with Dick here. Think about how we raise our children.
For example, generally speaking, (I know there are exceptions. I’m not talking about exceptions; I’m talking about the rule), say a child misbehaves by, oh, maybe “borrowing” a classmate’s Gameboy, but forgetting to tell the classmate. Further say that your child says it was a gift from his or her uncle, by way of explaining where said Gameboy came from. And finally, say the child’s parents are divorced.
Scenario 1: Child lives with mother. How does mother deal with it? I say it depends on mother’s mood, what kind of day she had, how the child has been acting in the past week or so, lots of variables. I think you would have to agree that we really can’t say how she would handle the situation - it’s unpredictable, and probably inconsistent.
Scenario 2: Child lives with father. How does father deal with it? I say he doesn’t get emotional, and in handling the situation tries to teach the child a lesson about stealing and lying.
Again, let me stress that I am speaking in general terms here. I’ve said it before, men generally behave more rationally, are more likely to show mercy when appropriate, and are more likely to be unbending when appropriate. I would rather have a male judge than a female judge any day. I say this even though I know I would have more chance of being treated leniently by a female judge because I am a female, and am therefore “oppressed”. I would rather be treated fairly.
August 25th, 2007 at 9:28 am - IP Man-Hash: 8aab42ab48964
I meant to add, that what I stated above is the natural order of things, biologically speaking. In our current feminized culture, we teach men it is wrong to be “manly”, and we teach women that they must be “manly”. We are not really very good at acting against our natures, and we all fuck it up quite regularly.
August 25th, 2007 at 10:39 am - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
@KellyMac: What is glaringly absent from this site in re single mothers is: what is the solution? I mean for women raising boys whose fathers are not involved, and don’t want to be. The men who comment have nothing but vitriol (calling us whores), but nothing of substance to bring to the table. Hey, I get it already ~ kids need fathers. But….the fact is, there are good women trying to raise good boys to be better men than their fathers. How?
August 25th, 2007 at 10:59 am - IP Man-Hash: 8aab42ab48964
I do hear you that it is heartbreaking to raise your children on your own when the father doesn’t want to be involved. I nearly became a single mother myself (although I think my husband would have stayed involved with the kids), so believe me when I say I’ve taken the time to ponder this issue. In cases where the father genuinely doesn’t want to be involved, I don’t have a ready answer. Perhaps a male relative could help out? An uncle, grandfather, brother?
My problem is the cases where the mother won’t let the father be involved, for whatever reason. Be it child support disputes, or anything else. I talk to these men every day, men who would do anything to see their children. I know one who hasn’t seen his kids in over a year. I know one who has kids with two different mothers, and can’t see any of them. I have talked some of these guys down from suicide.
I think it is all too easy to divorce. In the past, before no-fault divorce, when people married, that lifetime commitment was something that was honored. Yes, I do acknowledge that there are certainly cases of abuse, adultery, criminal behavior, where divorce is justified and necessary. But when you look at those cases, compared to the actual cases of divorce, they are relatively rare.
I think the vitriolic comments you see here and on sites like this, at least in most cases, come from men who have been royally fucked by the system. You really can’t blame them for being bitter.
August 25th, 2007 at 10:59 am - IP Man-Hash: a41caf4a68abe
Z, everyone here knows you married an unfaithful douche deadbeat based purely on lust and breeding stock like a good she-male backwards abomination.
Your job and children should be stripped of you. You’ve never made a good decision your entire life and NASA as a whole is as much of a failure as yourself.
August 25th, 2007 at 11:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 8aab42ab48964
@ sots: Do you really know that? It seems to me Z was asking an honest question.
August 25th, 2007 at 11:27 am - IP Man-Hash: a41caf4a68abe
I know a great many things.
August 25th, 2007 at 11:45 am - IP Man-Hash: e36376410e1aa
Wrong and dumb. Fuck off my website.
-Dick
August 25th, 2007 at 2:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 23500eaac44c3
Son of The Suns said: “Religion is for women and the weak”
Religion perhaps, however what I have is genuine faith and I am neither a woman nor weak.
Sam Adams said: “Too bad for the rest of us that Zionist Jews control the preponderance of the media and largely control congress.”
Not sure how to take that as I am of the Jewish faith and I would say rather it is too bad that liberals control the preponderance of the media and largely control congress.
Katie said: “Just a sidenote, I am a mother and my friends call me the lioness.”
First, side note, two words. Second, in the lion kingdom the male reigns supreme and the pride does as HE says or they do not survive. Simple as that.
@DR_Z: I shall answer your question Doctor. Women cannot raise a boy to be a man, like wise a man cannot raise a girl to be a woman. That is why both parents are needed. Kelly Mac is correct a male relative is needed.
It is my belief that in a house hold; mothers are the caretakers and thus the “comforters;” While fathers are the givers of morality and justice. Men are supposed to be manly, brash; action oriented and take charge individuals. Men are beings of action and thus use actions to reinforce what we have stated. Women are verbally oriented and use many, many, many, many words to express who they are and what they feel. Women are supposed to be emotional, caring, feminine (not feminists) and comforting people. It is these inherent differences, these polar opposite traits that attract us to one another and thus bind us to one another. No woman can convince me that weak, feminine males are more attractive than manly men. It is impossible and would be a lie. A woman cannot teach a boy to be manly nor could most men teach a girl to be emotional. Feminism attempts to erase these differences and thus removes the attraction between men and women.
What most men here find so infuriating is that women (in general) will cry out; “Chivalry is dead, where are all the gentleman, where are the knights in shining armor, where have all the heroes gone?” Then they turn around and support feminism and or feminists, who are the biggest enemies to courage, valor, chivalry, honor, integrity, honesty and compassion. Women cannot desire to have men who hold these virtues to be true and at the same time support the movement which attempts to destroy those very same men.
With Much Respect,
Oldone