Katie’s Revenge? Or Man Revenge

If you pay attention to the news like a man does — and I know you do because you’re a man, then you’ve heard about the case of poor Anthony Stockelman.

Stockelman is serving a life sentence in Indiana, America for the molestation and murder of a 10 year old girl.

I can only imagine what would have become of him in a prison of women. He probably would have been taught how to knit or how to believe in Tantric yoga or some other bullshit where women just run their fucking mouths for hours on end and then give themselves a medal when they’re done. Stockelman was in a man’s prison though, so he was beaten and tattooed across the forehead with the words KATIE’S REVENGE.

It’s the kind of thing that makes you proud to be a man.

Women have no concept of justice; either making it or dispensing it. Have you ever seen the show Super Nanny? Not one single mother on that show knows what the fuck she’s doing and that is the standard fare when it comes to the household.

Let me ask you a question. Do you let the guy who builds your house decorate it? That burly man, man with the tool belt and the man ass crack? Do you let him or someone who looks like him tidy up after a party? Fucking no. Just because he built the house doesn’t mean he knows shit about cleaning or developing it. Same goes for women and children.

“But, Dick! On those shows it’s always the father not spending enough time at home.”

That’s true. I’m not going to argue with anyone who says men are better than women and that definitely says that. It is the man’s fault the little bastards are out of control. It’s his fault for making money to put food in their bellies instead of teaching them how not to hit. It’s his fault for setting the invaluable example of taking care of man business that makes him too busy to get some children dressed for fucking school. For fuck’s sake.

The point is no woman has ever enacted an appropriate level of justice on anyone who deserved it. It’s like women are missing the organ that tells them when something is cool and when it deserves a rubber-hose beating and forehead tattooing. That gland is either called the brain or the penis. I’m not sure which is funnier.

Whatever happened to that woman who molested all those 13-year-old boys? Debra Lefave? Did she get her forehead tattooed? No because women are cowards.

Man Action Committee

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

197 Comments in 197 threads.»

Pages: [10] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Teri Elliott
2008-06-16 02:36:18

stalkless blackguardry hematocytoblast duckfoot reem disgood undercarve wickerby
Rumela’s Web
http://www.lauriedaily.com/

 
Comment by Susie Brock
2008-06-13 10:42:59

stalkless blackguardry hematocytoblast duckfoot reem disgood undercarve wickerby
Cookie Art Exchange
http://www.sprintdownload.com/

 
Comment by girlgirl
2008-05-12 20:14:29

wow we have some messed up boys here…..its like they were raised by animals…….no wait if they were raised by animal they would be better off and cleaner………….get well soon boys

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-09-25 09:24:16

kristina said:

Obviously, She went to the wrong place. Where I live, everyone, man and women, beat the shit outta rapists and molesters, whether or not they are man or woman…

Not to mention rapists get the worst time n Prison.

If I ever go to prison, I’ll probably join in on beating up the rapist. Fitting in.

But what I hate is people being falsely accused of rape, then getting the treatment.

WHERES THE PROOF I TELLS YAH?!??!!

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-09-25 09:21:29

Female said:

I believe men do this more often than women do, so clearly this is one example where men are better than women at something.

Possibly. But then women are better than men at walking away AND taking everything from them including money, kids, dignity, and respect.

Besides, Female, I meant an actual case, not hypothetical..

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-09-25 05:21:07

kristina.
You’re a 17YR old MOTHER!!! This explains the attitude of your other posts.

The evidence isn’t conclusive, but it’s pretty damn convincing. Tell me if I’m wrong.

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-23 22:27:35

To what female is saying, I must admit, Ive seen BOTH! it goes back to what i said before, not everyone is the same in their sex. I have a male friend who isn’t going to be in his child’s life…and not because the female is pushing him away or doesnt want to be…but because HE doesnt want to be. Funnily enough, another man is willingly to be father to this child, not the real father. I’m sure both of you see only what you WANT to see. And neither of you realize that it is the same with both sides.

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-23 22:24:17

Obviously, She went to the wrong place. Where I live, everyone, man and women, beat the shit outta rapists and molesters, whether or not they are man or woman…
Please, not all women are alike Dick…Just like not all Men are alike…

 
Comment by mike5150
2007-09-18 04:58:47

Did Female actually say that judges don’t determine who gets the kid based on their sex? They grant it to who spends more time with them.

Well wouldn’t that mean that mom doesn’t work as many hours out of the house as dad does?

 
Comment by MansVoice
2007-09-02 04:00:39

Dont bother too much with deluded female. She’s a fucking hypocrite.

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-09-02 03:11:54

Female said:

All the single mothers I know have tried extremely hard to get fathers involved in their children’s lives.

Yeah, right. What fucking drugs are you on.

I see this both in my personal and professional life.

I have in fact consistently seen the complete opposite. One of us is lying. I’m prepared to bet my left testicle that it’s you.

It is overwhelmingly the case that fathers choose not to have contact with their children or to have extremely sporadic, irregular contact, which I might add is just repeated rejection and repeated damage to a child. I think women realise this and I therefore think that if they know a father can’t be responsible and consistent, then they decide to enforce consistency by making no contact consistent, bear in mind that children need consistency and routine - they are pretty much the fundamental rules I and II.

Besides that being provably false, how do you fail to see the glaring hypocrisy of saying that “(WOMEN)…decide to enforce consistency by making no contact consistent”? You admit it’s wimmin who purposely fuck up the situation and hurt the Mans children, but see nothing wrong with this calculating cuntlike behaviour. Great. As long as it’s consistent, right?

Oh yes…she had a reason so that’s why she did it. Well here’s a big fucking news flash to add to your personal and professional ignorance ; it’s not HER decision to make. Say that over a couple of times.

No wonder kids are all fucked up these days, if “professionals” like you are in charge of them.

 
Comment by MansVoice
2007-08-28 08:15:42

Female said:

If there’s a custody battle in place, then I can’t imagine there would be no drama. However regardless, the judge will determine who has been the more involved and main caretaker up to that point in time, and assuming no mental health or drug issues are evident, primary parental responsibility will be granted to that person, regardless of their gender. The words ‘custody’ and ‘access’ are no longer used but I may use them now and again because they are obviously less of a mouthful and easily understood. The Judge’s decision may be informed by medico-legal assessments submitted by psychiatrists, as well as expert and lay witness testimony.

As to your request to show you a case where there was no drama. Easy. When one of the parents just walks out on the marriage and children, only in that situation is there no argument. I believe men do this more often than women do, so clearly this is one example where men are better than women at something.

Yeah right, bitch. Custody is awarded…99.99% of the time to the mother and you know it. Men walking out on the marriage? I find that hard to believe when men are the responsible partner in (any and all) relationships. But then again, you are probably confused with YOUR life. We all know that the man in your life wants to walk out on you. This isnt an ad hominem. You know it yourself, bitch and we will all be clapping and rooting for the man once he does… because thats when he finally becomes a “man”.

 
Comment by Female
2007-08-28 05:34:54

Necroswordsman said:

I ask you to show me a case where there was no drama from either side.

If there’s a custody battle in place, then I can’t imagine there would be no drama. However regardless, the judge will determine who has been the more involved and main caretaker up to that point in time, and assuming no mental health or drug issues are evident, primary parental responsibility will be granted to that person, regardless of their gender. The words ‘custody’ and ‘access’ are no longer used but I may use them now and again because they are obviously less of a mouthful and easily understood. The Judge’s decision may be informed by medico-legal assessments submitted by psychiatrists, as well as expert and lay witness testimony.

As to your request to show you a case where there was no drama. Easy. When one of the parents just walks out on the marriage and children, only in that situation is there no argument. I believe men do this more often than women do, so clearly this is one example where men are better than women at something.

 
Comment by wolfe
2007-08-28 01:03:22

@Abaddon As our friend Ali G would say:
Respect.
-wolfe

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2007-08-27 20:55:17

I hereby post an apology to Dr. Z/zogmama for my previous comment. My sincerest and most profound apologies for a comment that was MY mistake. Many pardons.

-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-08-27 12:59:12

Female said:

(What she said)

And I’m sure the women didn’t put on a show. I’m sure, like the man, she was taking it in the face.

Slash sarcasm

Whether the final verdict goes to the father or mother, you can be sure in the majority, the man is always the evil rampaging monster who endangers the child.

I ask you to show me a case where there was no drama from either side.

 
Comment by e v i l e d d y
2007-08-27 12:56:21

Female said:

All the single mothers I know have tried extremely hard to get fathers involved in their children’s lives. I see this both in my personal and professional life. It is overwhelmingly the case that fathers choose not to have contact with their children or to have extremely sporadic, irregular contact, which I might add is just repeated rejection and repeated damage to a child. I think women realise this and I therefore think that if they know a father can’t be responsible and consistent, then they decide to enforce consistency by making no contact consistent, bear in mind that children need consistency and routine - they are pretty much the fundamental rules I and II.

Let’s not forget that the reason the father of the child left in most cases is because the mother was a complete hormonal bitch from hell and the child’s daily life is going to be filled with no consistency or routine other than the father attempting to visit which the mother feels she can jerk him around by changing pickup and delivery times to cause as much mental anguish as possible on the father because she was rejected and will indeed use her own offspring as an emotional weapon.

Plus it’s a man’s right to choose to not have anything to do the child.

Just like it’s woman’s right to abort, adopt or keep a baby.

It’s because the woman has no control over the man that this becomes an issue with them.

 
Comment by Risk
2007-08-27 11:47:15

Well maybe they shouldn’t have lied about being on the pill then.

 
Comment by MansVoice
2007-08-27 09:03:26

Lets learn something your years in education havent taught you. This is called “cause and effect”.

Cause: feminism
effect: hell

Who do we blame? The women or the ideology? What you are saying is…its the women’s fault and error of judgement. Not quite. The woman was heavily influenced by feminism to carry out her decision. You dont really think a women will just throw her husband out of the way, would you?

 
Comment by Female
2007-08-27 04:51:58

All the single mothers I know have tried extremely hard to get fathers involved in their children’s lives. I see this both in my personal and professional life. It is overwhelmingly the case that fathers choose not to have contact with their children or to have extremely sporadic, irregular contact, which I might add is just repeated rejection and repeated damage to a child. I think women realise this and I therefore think that if they know a father can’t be responsible and consistent, then they decide to enforce consistency by making no contact consistent, bear in mind that children need consistency and routine - they are pretty much the fundamental rules I and II.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis