Lesbians Are Faking It
Ask any gay person this and he’ll tell you the same thing: “lesbians” are all fucking faking it.
“Lesbianism” is like being an animal rights activist (and also being a woman). Are those Prada shoes made out of fake leather? Is that Ortho Tri Cyclen (AKA Super Whore Pills) not made of bear bile? Wasn’t Hitler a vegetarian?
If you thought about any of those questions, you just lost a hundred Man Points.
I’m not one to knock animal rights. I’m just talking about women doing it and women fucking it up. Also, animal rights is stupid.
Women at doing things are like trying to use bottle rockets to change the channel when your remote controller runs out of batteries. Can you imagine that? You tell the bottle rocket to hit the Channel Up button ten feet away, but you know exactly what it’s going to do. It’s going to go shooting off in flames wherever the fuck it thinks it wants to go at random levels of ferocity with no fucking point. That’s activist women for you: fucked. That’s also women when it comes to being gay.
Do you know how many women are not “lesbians”? The answer is: no women are not “lesbians”. Don’t bother asking them because all women lie about it unless they’re on the radio, but all women have had one or several experiences with a member of the same sex — or have had a fantasy about doing so and that makes you gay. That means all women are “lesbians” and also that no women are “lesbians”. That’s all the fucking proof in the world right there.
Another reason “lesbians” are bullshit is because women are obsessed with sex. When you get two women together in a relationship all that’s important is sex. Sex, sex, sex. What should we do tonight? How about some sex. What should we have for dinner? Well the sex sounds good. Should we go on a vacation this summer? Should sex go on a sex-cation this summer? Probably not because I don’t know what that is. The point is it’s not a relationship. It’s just a puppet show of carnality. How uncivilized.
Speaking of deciding where to go for dinner, I can’t even remember the last time I let a woman decide something in a relationship. That’s because it’s never happened. As a man, the first time you have sex is when your Man Point Man Meter starts ticking. If you let a woman make a decision before that moment (and you fucking did — you let one decide to get pregnant with you) it doesn’t count. Remember that. In a “lesbian” “relationship”, no matter how easy the question is, a woman has to answer it.
That is fucked. That’s also probably why “lesbians” are so fucking in love with mass transit systems. No relationship can be built on the decisions and thinking of women. Everyone knows that; even your government and the Bibles of all religions in history know that. Therefore I have disproved “lesbianism”.
Suck it “lesbians”.
Related Articles:
November 10th, 2006 at 8:21 am - IP Man-Hash: a9a8f6646b775
Hahah, 100% on target.
Dick points out the cold truth as usual, lesbianism isn’t about a purer relationship between “the emotional beings”… it’s about 2 whores getting eachother off all day for 7 years until the taboo no longer excites them and they go back to their families begging for forgiveness.
November 10th, 2006 at 8:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 891c83c8bc6d4
They actually include placebo’s in birth control because women do not know when to start & stop taking a fucking pill.
November 11th, 2006 at 12:43 am - IP Man-Hash: 4cff22868c995
i dont beat my wife because i am a man and i decide whether or not i will do anything. that is also why my wife is straight, and pregnant with my second son. women would be like chickens without their heads if it wasnt for us men.
November 11th, 2006 at 3:45 am - IP Man-Hash: bdbed41150a29
Interesting how women have a preference for bisexual sex. Cannot even stay committed to one or the other.
Also, the domestic violence rate amongst lesbians puts paid to their lies that women are not responsible for it.
Another feminist lie laid to rest.
November 11th, 2006 at 7:42 am - IP Man-Hash: 4af07c51822d5
oh yeah women fake being lesbians if thats so then men must fake being gay so that they get attention, men are just pathetic little attention seekers whojust mock women because they have nothing else better to do
November 11th, 2006 at 8:26 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Devilchild, why don’t you stop sock puppeting? As in, stop changing your appellative not at all, instead of every so often.
- Sasha Dith - Russian Girls
November 11th, 2006 at 11:17 am - IP Man-Hash: 6f7bbaec5652b
I have thought this for many years now. My father used to talk about this subject sometimes. He used to say “You never see a gay man go back to women, because men solve problems. But lesbians always turn back to the almighty man. They realize how much worse women are than men, because they can’t lie to each other and succeed.” Lesbians are a bunch of hypocritical misogynists.
November 11th, 2006 at 6:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f0331adb6577
thats a top post
November 12th, 2006 at 1:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: b9ea50cbb00cc
^ Indeed. Dancnsteve’s father was a good man.
November 14th, 2006 at 5:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 3deb053877684
in that case, why are so many men turned on by lesbian porn?
i’ve always wondered.
November 14th, 2006 at 8:13 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
because: double the pleasure - double the fun
Lesbian porn = twice the tits and ass
Men like seeing as many naked women as possible. Plus the logistics are wonderful too, because you don’t have to view another guy’s schlong (which is a major downfall of regular porn).
November 14th, 2006 at 9:31 am - IP Man-Hash: bf0ed187095ca
Diamatik, I used to think like that too.
I got so turned off by anything of lezzies after meeting many in real life. They are miserable creatures. I think men are making a mistake by encouraging young women to go bi.
Last week a dyke shot another 6 times down the street from me because one wanted to go straight. I knew the victims son. Lezbos can be very mean. Afterall its twice the PMS and two times the hard headedness of the average woman. Stats show more fighting among dykes than any other couples. Maybe they should start new compaign VADA (violence against other dykes.) More proof that women can be just as violent as…. No! It’s proof that women are more violent than others.
Most arguments in a family are started by a woman.
Women suck as people.
November 14th, 2006 at 2:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 68d10fcf978e8
what is wrong with you losers? i stumbled upon this site researching for an essay and i could not help but read. The comments I read on this page made me sick. You are no better than women, get over it and find something to do with ur life… Holy shit ur fucking pathetic…
November 14th, 2006 at 4:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5815c696b0b99
I’m amazed at Fuckallyouwomenhaters’ grammar, capitalization, and punctuation. I didn’t know ellipses were the proper way to end a sentence, I always thought they were a way of showing a desired thought by omitting words from a quoted paragraph, but I learn something new every day. And I thought “Ur” was a city in ancient Mesopotamia, but I’ve come to find out through people like her that it is in fact the correct way of spelling “your.”
In addition to all this new knowledge, I’ve also learned that you can just come on to a site and call successful individuals, many of whom are your intellectual betters “losers” and think it will actually accomplish something. Moreover, you’ve taught me that using foul language is a better way of proving a point than backing up your argument with reasonable evidence.
Fuckallyouwomenhaters, I certainly hope you consult “The Elements of Style” by Strunk and White (two of the wisest men of the last century) for your essay, because unless you are sleeping with your teacher, you will assuredly get no better than a D with your amazing command of the English language. I’m sure your high-school instructor will be pleased at your use of invective instead of hard facts to present your case.
If you want people to listen to what you have to say, present yourself as worth listening to. Most of the people who comment on this site can in fact read polysyllabic words, and many of them excel in their respective fields.
And there, Fuckallyouwomenhaters, I just did something with my life; I showed you how to not come across like a drooling moron. That’s my good deed for the nanosecond, because men are infinitely generous and we’re all about doing good deeds even for people who really aren’t worth our time. That’s why Jesus, Moses, Buddha, the Dalai Lama, and Ghandi were (and are) all men.
Dick is right on, as usual. Billy makes a good point, too.
November 14th, 2006 at 5:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 80751d385dd5c
How do you know for a fact that “Fuckallyouwomenhaters” is a woman? There are men who post on this site that have poor grammar and don’t capitalize or use proper punctuation. And if you men are so “infinitely generous and all about doing good deeds even for people who aren’t worth your time”, (what a GENEROUS attitude), you would not make ridiculing comments about someone coming across like a “drooling moron”. Also, if men were as “infinitely generous” as you say, a site such as this that makes fun of women and tries to make them feel bad about themsleves would not exist. Hypocrite!
November 14th, 2006 at 5:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: a0bd2fb809b91
@Iain Well said.
They tend to eschew pedomorphic invective, unlike ‘Fuckallyouwomanhaters’.
Ian’s a generous man. But then I repeat myself.
Au contraire, one would indeed do so, if one wished to help a person avoid such mishaps in future.
This is a fundamental difference between men and women. Men quietly point out a problem and how it may be corrected. A great many women, when seeing a mistake, have three modes of operation:
1. Snicker quietly if it’s another woman’s mistake;
2. Explode into a towering inferno of random rage;
3. Store up the error for use in a future attack; say nothing.
This appears to be a common misconception amongst the illiterate and women. This site does not exist to make fun of women, or to “make them feel bad about themsleves[sic]“. Please note the “Strictly off limits to ladies” and “No women allowed” notices scattered liberally throughout the site.
To the contrary, this site simply analyzes the myriad number of ways in which men are better than women. No more; no less.
-wolfe
November 14th, 2006 at 6:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 80751d385dd5c
wolfe, referring to someone as coming across as a drooling moron is not quietly pointing out a problem and how it may be corrected, it is being derogatory. There are more tactful ways to word things. I know that there are “No women allowed” notices in some places on this site, but alot of people do stumble on here accidently, by google or whatever, and not every page has “No women allowed” notices. This site serves to make women feel inferior and to make them feel ashamed of being female. No, not ALL women are whores, not ALL women are bad at math, not ALL women are illiterate. There are way too many generalizations on here. Men wouldn’t take too kindly to women saying that ALL men are rapists, child molesters, etc.
November 14th, 2006 at 6:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 001f30cc11e56
This site exists to make men feel good, not make women feel bad.
Follow simple directions “No women allowed.” and there wouldn’t be problems.
Yet you all persist.
November 14th, 2006 at 6:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 001f30cc11e56
Redtygrr, there is a 100:1 ratio of feminist sites to sites like these. Sites that say us males are rapists, pigs, war mongers, should be subject to ‘final solution’. Fuck off the site and look around the internet, or TV for fucks sake.
November 14th, 2006 at 6:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: 80751d385dd5c
I’m not saying that those feminist sites are right either! I think that they’re way out of line posting that drivel about men and think that they should also be banned!
November 14th, 2006 at 8:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: bf0ed187095ca
So you think!! But I bet you’ve never went on one of those sites
and actually acted like you had a piece of mind to give them. But you women go ballistic here when you read it from another perspective. No we men are tired of the incessant insults about men. The double standards and the constant bitching and complaining that most women do.
Well how about that. The shoe is on the other foot now. Do you women really expect every man to worship you worthless bunch of whiners?
November 14th, 2006 at 8:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2f2d948528fdf
i, like redtygrr, do not agree with women-bashing OR men-bashing sites. i just happened to find this site. i have no clue how many feminist sites there are out there. i think ive only seen one b/c the link was on here. but if a bunch of women were saying a bunch of negative things about men id tell it like is to them too.
November 14th, 2006 at 8:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: 80751d385dd5c
November 14th, 2006 at 8:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5815c696b0b99
I must say, considering that 51 percent of the world’s population is female, I don’t see why it’s such a big deal assuming that the individual in question is a she, rather than a he. I never said it was a fact, I went with an assumption based on statistical probability.
Oh wait, I know why it’s a big deal: I was insulting to someone who, based on global statistical probability, is a woman!
Yes I was insulting, but Redtygrr, you misrepresent the way I was and in so doing do a great disservice to my character. I insulted her behavior and presentation as part of a greater good, i.e., I was giving her advice on how to better herself as a human being. This technique has been used for thousands of years by great teachers, and it works for many people: a bruised ego can be a great motivator. I never once insulted her as an individual human being, despite the fact that she showed that lack of courtesy to the other commentators on the site. “Come across as” does not equal “you are.”
And wolfe, as always I appreciate your candor. Of all the comments, yours are usually the most enlightening.
As for banning sites of any opinion, Redtygrr, that line of thinking does not put you in the best of company as far as history is concerned. You might reconsider your opinion and accept the fact that speech should be completely free. I don’t agree with everything on this site, but then again I don’t even agree with everything I say either. I just enjoy throwing rocks at beehives sometimes.
November 15th, 2006 at 10:37 am - IP Man-Hash: 37609f3bcd3c7
YAda yada
so many women say these things its bullshit. Women desire to be able to stop men from doing the the same things . So many act just like feminist with teh same thought but then refuse to be called a feminist because it’s startgin to look bad too many.
When men decided the t-shirts that women were buying up needed to be protested(boys ae dumb, thorw rocks a them) the women folk said “It’s just a joke, get a sense of humor.”
I for one did got their sense a humor and returrn the humor with “Girls are dumb kick em in the bum.” The same women got all upset.
Women are farking retards with no sense of justice.
Full of double standards.
You can fug off now.
November 15th, 2006 at 12:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0363c503d25ea
im seriously not some “feminist in denial”…
November 15th, 2006 at 1:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 37609f3bcd3c7
So you’re not in denial? Just a full fleged feminuts then huh!
November 15th, 2006 at 3:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: c7a298151bcdd
haha, nah not me.
November 15th, 2006 at 6:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: ce020167ed4b1
Redtygrr said:
wolfe, referring to someone as coming across as a drooling moron is not quietly pointing out a problem and how it may be corrected, it is being derogatory. There are more tactful ways to word things.
-Tact, doesn’t work for many women Redtygrr, I also note the use of tact on Fuckallyouwomanhaters part as well. She was EXTREMELY tactful in her post. You call Ian a hypocrite and yet here you are being one. Think on that for a second if you can. Ian is by far walking the high road on that post. Also, I thought that it was rather well written and well played. -
I know that there are “No women allowed” notices in some places on this site, but alot of people do stumble on here accidently, by google or whatever, and not every page has “No women allowed” notices. This site serves to make women feel inferior and to make them feel ashamed of being female. No, not ALL women are whores, not ALL women are bad at math, not ALL women are illiterate. There are way too many generalizations on here. Men wouldn’t take too kindly to women saying that ALL men are rapists, child molesters, etc.
-We don’t Redtygrr, and for the last 30-40 years thats whats been said about us in a PUBLIC forum with our tax money (how hypocritical is that?), sooo why don’t you get off of your high horse, stop defending women that don’t need your “protection” and go do something about it with your “sisters”.-
-Strength and Honor-
November 15th, 2006 at 6:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: a0bd2fb809b91
And I serve as MABTW’s cheerful ambassador of tact. And I have always worded ‘things’ tactfully, except on those rare occasions I haven’t. But that’s my manly prerogative.
If a woman feels inferior because of this site, she has far more problems than where her browser points. Far more. And that is genuinely sad.
Indeed.
Poorly stated, but there’s an element of truth.
What you are missing is this: This site is not History. It is not Law (with a capital L) it is not Fact (with a capital F).
It is a first draft of all of these things.
First drafts inevitably simplify.
So be it.
And yet a great many feminist activists say just that — not merely on a website but in the public sphere. What say you to that?
Best,
-wolfe
November 15th, 2006 at 6:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 80751d385dd5c
abaddon_fff said:
I also note the use of tact on Fuckallyouwomanhaters part as well. She was EXTREMELY tactful in her post. You call Ian a hypocrite and yet here you are being one. Think on that for a second if you can. Ian is by far walking the high road on that post. Also, I thought that it was rather well written and well played. -
You are right abaddon, “Fuckallyouwomenhaters” was not at all tactful in his?/her? post. Good point. For the most part, I just wanted to point out to Ian not to automatically assume that because of the bad grammar and poor punctuation that “Fuckallyouwomenhaters” is female.
November 15th, 2006 at 6:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 80751d385dd5c
wolfe said:
And yet a great many feminist activists say just that — not merely on a website but in the public sphere. What say you to that?
I say that it is totally wrong. I don’t agree with male or female bashing.
Best back to you wolfe.
November 15th, 2006 at 6:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: a0bd2fb809b91
Red, I respect your statements rejecting bashing of men or women. Great.
Well, I think we’ve got a rather decent record here of estimating gender based upon posts, and we aren’t confined to bad grammar and poor punctuation as defining women.
Red, for example, has quite respectable grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Yet she seems female to me.
Abaddon’s (and my, and others’) points remain: why call Iain a hypocrite?
This seems highly indecent and uncharitable. Something a man here would surely never be.
-wolfe
November 15th, 2006 at 7:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 80751d385dd5c
The only reason I called Ian a hypocrite was because of his quote about coming across like a “drooling moron” and then stating that men (including himself) are infinitely generous. Retarded people exist, so when you refer to somone coming across like a drooling moron, in my estimation, that is like making fun of retarded people who can’t help their condition. Infinitely generous people wouldn’t make fun of those less fortunate than themselves.
November 15th, 2006 at 7:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: a0bd2fb809b91
Oh come on, Red, be honest, you’re reaching to defend yourself. Stop it.
You were wrong. You’re as aware as I that ‘infinitely generous’ was tongue in cheek. You’re not dumb.
Why not relax and hit the readers of this site where and if we merit it?
Or come read my blog (have a look through the last week or so and be pleasantly surprised). You can click on my name to find it at wolfe.mabtw.com. Women are allowed to speak freely there (unlike here), but you also have to be polite and respectful to others. Judging by your posts, you should have no problems.
MABTW is an oasis that lets men speak freely and intelligently. Precious few such things exist in our society. Sure, we can speak freely in a bar, but hardly intelligently. etc.
Take care,
-wolfe
November 15th, 2006 at 7:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: 80751d385dd5c
wolfe, I have already read parts of your blog. It looks very interesting, you did a good job.
November 15th, 2006 at 7:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: a0bd2fb809b91
Thank you. Comment away, as you will. I welcome your opinion. (different rules apply as you may have noted)
In any event I hold to my views: MABTW is an oasis for men to speak about manly men male topics.
Lady girly girl women are not allowed. I’m sorry, the cootie potential is just too high.
It could destroy the universe if too many cooties were permitted too close proximity to the truth and wisdom here at MABTW.COM.
Best,
-wolfe
November 15th, 2006 at 9:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5815c696b0b99
Redtygrr, I appreciate your concern as to being insulated from intelligent females, but I had one girlfriend who could write circles around me (and she’d have laughed hysterically because of my post). That and my mom is damn brilliant. I guess it’s really easy to make assumptions because some males on this site post sweeping generalizations, eh? How consistent.
I chose “drooling moron” solely for its contrast to the rest of my text. In most circles it’s a term long divorced from its roots as a direct insult to the disabled. Given that I’ve done (and enjoyed) volunteer work with a couple of young adults with Downs syndrome at a previous job, I know how the disabled are. Just so you know, “retarded” has come to be considered a very pejorative term by many in the greater disabled community. You may wish to consider better phraseology in the future, especially if you’re trying to malign someone as being uncaring towards their plight.
November 20th, 2006 at 1:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: b93fb87b17d4a
um… yea.. how about this one…
lesbians are worthless enough as it is.. let them waste their time on each other.. that will keep them from fucking up more things than needed. If they want to fantasize about each other, and get together to make cookies for 5 hours a day, at least they are staying in the kitchen where they belong.
thank you.
have a nice day.
Antifreke.
November 20th, 2006 at 2:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 44574a81e4416
Cookies disgust me.
November 20th, 2006 at 2:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: a5d80956a3e6c
I guess there is no pleasing some people ;-)
December 2nd, 2006 at 4:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 479ab57a00cdd
Feminism isn’t the cause - it’s the symptom. They have always felt this way and always will. The female brain evolved with the female value system to compete with and replace - not assist and coexist with - the male value system.
This is why arguing with women is futile. They dont see the world as we do - they view us as evil and illogical and a threat to “their” children and “their” world - therefore their own brand of evil is not only justified, but righteous and neccessary in their minds.
December 30th, 2006 at 10:55 am - IP Man-Hash: ac13d6adf9dda
Dear all
me my self cant understand why women become lesbians ?
are they too horny to mess it up
or blame men for being lame ?
or is it that the world is out of penis ?
this planet was built on one rule which is : PAIRS = MALE,FEMALE = + and -
using + and + nor - and - wont give any result, and based on my own experiance specialy with lesbians, YES THEY WANT THE PENIS,THE PIPE and they cant deny it.
women in general seek the weak,stupid man to take control of, thats their dream person, and seems that women started to turn lesbian because simply us men are refusing to allow that to happen! thats why they invented their new way of life and it is called : LESBIANS!
Cheers all and Dick Sir, all men are proud of you man cheers!
December 30th, 2006 at 10:59 am - IP Man-Hash: 27bf8cf10a805
You’re only half right.
“women in general seek the weak,stupid man to take control of, thats their dream person”
No. That’s their dream wallet. Their dream person is the thug and scumbag who can’t be controlled and will give her powerful offspring.(as defined by her unevolved mind)
December 30th, 2006 at 1:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 109bcf0dfd9d2
Here’s a writer that I’m sure you will love sots.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/12/29/1166895477178.html
February 17th, 2007 at 3:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 247f22bc5720b
Ok this is a load of crap man! Of course there are lesbians you dipshit! I am sure you lost your chick to one hahahahahah haha your chick left you for a dyke!
February 17th, 2007 at 4:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 07b4320364a68
What exactly makes you so sure?
February 17th, 2007 at 4:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Diamatik, what was that about competition over the puppet strings?
February 17th, 2007 at 11:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: e5e53f25d43f6
Never ceases to amaze me how many bullshit posts Female makes that I notice months after the fact.
Why the fuck would I care about some some bitches relationship advice to other dumb bitches?
I’m not the cad or dad you think I am you simple minded “black-and-white theory” of men slut. I am all things.
February 18th, 2007 at 1:09 am - IP Man-Hash: adc0a2c9dafc9
Who would hang out of a site where
A. Nobody likes her?
B. Nobody agrees with her?
C. Nobody cares what she talks about?
Only a deranged person.
de·ranged [di-reynjd] Pronunciation Key -
–adjective
1. insane.
2. disordered; disarranged.
3. also a female that lives down under.
February 25th, 2007 at 8:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4f280c718b503
tramadol…
news…
February 26th, 2007 at 6:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 06c268baa85fc
All the things you say on this site contradict itself.
Women hate sex…yet they are obsessed with it and thats all they ever think about and they have STD’s from being sluts?
February 26th, 2007 at 7:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
This site isn’t a contradiction, women are the contradiction.
Women hate sex, but they are obsessed with sex because they are dirty sluts who love using sex to achieve their sinister goals.
To women, sex isn’t about pleasure; it is about payment. This payment can be either monetary or in kind (and by kind I mean attention).
February 28th, 2007 at 4:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 7611d2e551981
Now you know why men do not understand fucked-up, laterally evolutionized thinking of women, Megan!
No, it makes no sense. They love to hate to love to fuck and maybe even have sex, right after that “Dawson’s Creek” marathon………..
Gents, pass the popcorn, I think some good porn just came on………fuck, women ALWAYS have to fucking call when me and Mr. Wang are about trade handshakes…………goddam women! Stop trying to sell me security systems! I am a man, I will just shoot the motherfuckers!
February 28th, 2007 at 8:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 6597403bb0b5b
You could compare it to nicotine addiction. If you’re addicted to it, and hate it, you can’t stop easily.
February 28th, 2007 at 8:51 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
You could compare it to nicotine addiction. If you’re addicted to it, and hate it, you can’t stop easily.
I shall beg to differ here. What evil motives do you have to achieve by smoking?
February 28th, 2007 at 6:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7611d2e551981
Smoking: My evil motive is to support my local, state and federal governments because they say I have no choice.
Only a woman would push for higher taxes on a truly good thing. Only men would create an awesome thing to do after a shitty microwave dinner and sex so bad you actually wonder why you even did it. (Assuming you even had sex with your wife this week)
Smoke all you want, if I don’t, my evil motives become extremley clear:
Kill anyone who is within range that bitches about smoking. (Proves addiction, ask Canada, ran by weak effiminate males, how banning worked for them. Oh yeah, it didn’t, since MEN started a kick-ass black market trade and shot people ov