Commander Scott said:

The notion that women are much more verbally gifted than men is a disgusting tissue of lies

I agree. In my experience, women basically communicate by stringing together cliches, even when those cliches don’t make sense in that context. It’s boring to listen to.

Commander Scott said:

osirisofthesun said:

Bryan M said:

Neil said:
That’s why women outperform men in verbal SATs.

This is a myth. You haven’t been following along.

Quite true. Men have always performed better on the traditional math and verbal sections of the SAT, but women did better on the new essay section.

Nonsense! Men not only have greater mathematical abilities than women, but also have greater verbal abilities than women as well. After all, how does one explain the fact that all of the world’s greatest literature was authored exclusively by men? Or that all of the world’s greatest orators were men?

The notion that women are much more verbally gifted than men is a disgusting tissue of lies; everyone knows that the SAT, as administered in the United States, was deliberately dumbed down by gender feminists in order to give women an edge in the educational system.

I have heard that too. I think that they just added new sections to try and “even out” the scores. Why is that necessary? I suppose that the feminists didn’t want to admit that girls didn’t perform as well in any section of the SAT. That’s why the entire test was revamped recently.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0883611.html

According to this link, women did considerably worse in math. They also had an average score of 502 in the verbal section, but men had an average score of 505. I believe the new “writing section” refers to an essay of some sort. Women scored 502 in this section as well, but men had an average of 491.

The grading for this section may be more subjective. In fact, the higher scores indicate that this section was deliberately added to give women an edge in some way.

osirisofthesun said:

Bryan M said:

Neil said:
That’s why women outperform men in verbal SATs.

This is a myth. You haven’t been following along.

Quite true. Men have always performed better on the traditional math and verbal sections of the SAT, but women did better on the new essay section.

Nonsense! Men not only have greater mathematical abilities than women, but also have greater verbal abilities than women as well. After all, how does one explain the fact that all of the world’s greatest literature was authored exclusively by men? Or that all of the world’s greatest orators were men?

The notion that women are much more verbally gifted than men is a disgusting tissue of lies; everyone knows that the SAT, as administered in the United States, was deliberately dumbed down by gender feminists in order to give women an edge in the educational system.

Bryan M said:

Neil said:
That’s why women outperform men in verbal SATs.

This is a myth. You haven’t been following along.

Quite true. Men have always performed better on the traditional math and verbal sections of the SAT, but women did better on the new essay section.

Sorry, ladies, but even if a woman is the “first female” to do something, her gender is relevant because women don’t accomplish as much as men in general.

The exception proves the rule: men are better than women.

bola said:

irlandes said:

Most sexism today is discrimination against men. and the only thing not done to men is kill them in large numbers which has been seriously discussed by feminists.

It’s true. Read about Lesbian Separatism.

From the article:

Some women talk about the possible need for violent confrontation with men to overthrow their power. For a few it has involved consideration of killing men in large numbers. I feel that this idea or fantasy has arisen from feelings of isolation connected with a ghetto lifestyle, a preoccupation with men’s violence towards women, impatience for change and the fear that merely separating off will not be enough to force it. It relies on an analysis which identifies men as the cause of all the worlds problems. This ultimate solution is linked to biological determinism which asserts that men are incapable of change.

An Irish woman writes, “the idea of killing and/or physically challenging male hatred of women is paralyzingly scary … I find it much easier to contemplate the idea of implanting all men with haemophilia or something . . . the process of violence could so brutalize women that we might use our power against each other . . . I think that having lived in Ireland, I’m very wary of traditional revolutionary tactics like bombing, kneecapping and the like and so I’m continually aware of the yawning gulf between theory and practice that seems to pervade my thinking.”

While I want to bump this to show new visiters how backwards women are, I also want to point out that that link doesn’t work for some reason.

Megan said:

You are truly disgusting. Amelia Earhart was a hero in her own right, I don’t see you doing anything close to what she accomplished in her short life. You obviously have some deep, deep emotional issues and I will pray for you. You need help, and I sincerely hope you will get it. Women have achieved so much, and contributed so much to society. So have men. We will never have a perfect, or even relatively happy society, if people like you keep spreading hate and dissension around the world.

Just out of a little personal interest, I have a few questions for you:

What do you think of Lesbians? What about gay men, and the gay community in general?

There were three seniors in my school last year, all girls that got perfect scores on their SATs. What did you get on your SAT?

I really am curious, and I hope you’ll answer me in a cordial fashion. Although, with your chauvinistic attitude, I don’t really see that happening.

Amelia Earhart’s greatest achievement was that she made herself disappear. Maybe one day female David Copperfield wannabe’s will Master the fine Art of how to re-appear :)

Neil said:
That’s why women outperform men in verbal SATs.

This is a myth. You haven’t been following along.

bola said:

It’s true. Read about Lesbian Separatism.

From the article:

… Two women I spoke to wanted a world without men and had contemplated killing them – but they feared women would not survive a direct confrontation. They also had reservations because a lot of women wouldn’t want it. One woman said, “If I want to exterminate them all, do I want to kill my father? I’d find it hard. One reason is I’ve had good times with him.” Both these women didn’t like the idea of killing anyone themselves.

Hahahahahaha!! This is probably the most hilarious feminazi quote I have ever seen. Essentially admitting that women are weaker than men; admitting that their sick ideology is confined to the margins and not taken seriously by most women; admitting that there is no actual reason for their agenda since it is possible to have “good times” with some men; and then finally, the crowning touch … “I don’t want to do it myself, can someone else do it for me?”