Measure Up…Which Women Don’t.
If women could be worst at anything (and they can’t because each new thing they do or repeat doing they are the new worst at) it would be measuring. Women are so bad at it, they couldn’t measure a ruler. That’s why if you ask a woman how big some random size is, she’ll either present her forearm or point to a football field. It makes absolutely no fucking difference what you asked.
I mean, six inches is huge, but not that huge.
That’s why Jesus was a man. Because he was a carpenter first and needed to know how to measure shit. He was also a man because eventually he had to know his ass from a petite size 8 hole in the ground. Only a man would know that and also that a size 8 is in no way “petite”. Dumbo was not a petite elephant. He was a lard ass.
I meant what I said earlier about women not being able to measure a ruler. It’s funny, sure, but so is everything about women. Big fucking surprise. They’re a walking, talking joke. When women look down at a ruler, they don’t see what you and I see: a series of numbers in sequential order indicating a distance of measure. They actually just see a bunch of gobbledygook that frightens and arouses them. What it doesn’t do, however, is remind them specifically of why they’re supposed to be looking at the ruler — to figure something the fuck out.
That’s how it is with women. If you’re not over their shoulder at all times “figuratively” smacking them on the back of the head when they’re about to careen wildly into philandery, you’ll end up with nothing to measure anyway.
Who gives a shit about measuring though? How long has it been since I’ve measured anything? I’ll tell you how long it’s been. About three seconds.
Everything in life takes a metered output. The gas pedal, opening a door, a pinch of salt. Women are so atrocious at everything they do because they can’t measure themselves subconsciously like men do.
Remember that table of obnoxious women at the restaurant chowing down on a five course appetizer meal and saying “Eureka! It’s a diet!” That was a probably of volume measuring. The woman that cut you off in traffic or who slammed on the brakes and almost hit the postman? That was so many different kinds of measuring problems that I don’t even know where to start.
The point is, it’s not the specifics of the doings and the dealings that drive women indoors and away from the big scary civilized world. It’s that they’re operating on two of ten cylinders. They’ve got no motor or critical thinking skills. They can’t weigh.
Imagine living your life permanently drunk on a quart of whiskey. Now take about how hilarious you’d be. That’s what it’s like to be a woman.
Related Articles:
July 11th, 2007 at 2:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 369bfee4084ad
But Alex, think about it. If women weren’t the way they are, feminism wouldn’t have caught on. It was created by women, for women. And their men allowed it , because they loved them. You would be amazed at what a man will do for love. And you’d be amazed at what he’ll put up with and still love you. Are women like that? In a word, no. We are not. We want attention. And if the one we’re with doesn’t treat us with all the attention we think we deserve, we move on to the next one. Do you ever wonder why women think “nice guys” are boring? Logically, they’re the best choice – stable, loyal, loving, tender, treat you very well. But most women would rather have a man who is pretty much the opposite of that. He’s way more exciting. That’s an emotional choice.
Generally, men operate from a sense of honor. Generally, women do not. Women are far more likely to be promiscuous and have affairs. What is that statistic? 20% of men are screwing 80% of women. Generally, women make decisions based on emotion, where men make decisions based on logic. Because of this, generally, female leaders and bosses are less predictable or more likely to try to get rid of you because they don’t like you, or promote you because they do like you. If a man is in charge, he takes that very seriously, and tries to be fair to everyone. Disagree? Who would you rather have for a boss, a man or a woman? Who would you rather have for a friend, a man or a woman?
Men don’t understand women, Alex, because they can’t get their minds around how our minds work. They’re angry and frustrated, and justifiably so. But they don’t hate us. Well, most of them don’t, anyway.
Of course there are exceptions to all of this. That’s why I stressed that it’s generally so. But I tend to operate more from my logical side, and even so, I’ve been blinded by emotions more times than I can count. I have to really concentrate sometimes to keep the logic circuits going. Take a woman who doesn’t care to do that, which is most women, and further take away any accountability for her actions, and tell her she’s a goddess just because she has a pussy, and you get what the men on this board and others are fighting.
July 11th, 2007 at 3:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
you’re a fucking joke, kelly. have you ever even studied women’s history? ever read a book by any single feminist? do you know when feminism even started? or do you even know when the women’s suffrage movement started? i HIGHLY doubt it. you remind me of those lame ass country women who are brainwashed by their men folk. most women do not share your sentiments - the highly intelligent ones, anyway. your blanketed statements are highly insulting.
July 11th, 2007 at 3:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: 160e0041dcad8
AWESOMENESS!
July 11th, 2007 at 5:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a56dd6cc1b45
Erm.. Do I point out now that Chantal didn’t address a single thing that Kelly said, opting to make invalid points and insult her instead, or do I do that later..?
July 11th, 2007 at 5:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: e36376410e1aa
I didn’t say women shouldn’t have the right to vote. I said women don’t have the right to vote, idiot.
-Dick
July 11th, 2007 at 5:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
@ Dick- You said something along the lines of that you don’t censor women’s comments because they’re entitled to their opinion. You then said this only applies to words, and that women shouldn’t have the right to express their opinion in the form of votes.
@ Kelly- The way you stereotype your own gender is laughable. A woman should know that many, many women do not fit the mold. No, I don’t go after the “exciting” type of man, I have only dated and would only date “the nice guy”. I don’t crave attention. I’m hardly promiscuous and have a sense of honor. I’m usually pretty logical. Many women I know are the same way.
Also, men “allowed” feminism to happen? Equal rights (which is what feminism started out as, I’ll agree it’s gone too far and is now impeding on men’s rights) is an inherent right that is not men’s to give. Men could have stopped it, I suppose, but it would have been wrong. Women should have the same legal rights as men (right to vote, to own property, to have equal opportunity in the workplace, etc.) I should hope you agree with at least that.
As a college student, from what I have seen, amonst the young, anyway, men are far, far more promiscuous. It’s hardly even close.
You also miss the point. This site viciously attacks women. No matter WHAT a woman’s lifestyle or behavior, she is condescended to at best, and at worst she’s completely degraded. Slurs against women are constantly used. If you read the comments, people literally have advocated killing and raping women/feminists. People have suggested that women’s bodies are unnatural and deformed. You technically are not even permitted to speak here. If you want to support MRA sites through your blog, that would be an admirable way to bring men’s rights issues to attention, but this is not an MRA site. This site attacks the entire female gender. Supporting it is bordering on self-loathing.
July 11th, 2007 at 6:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fd634f6ed1ed
That’s called Feminism 101.
July 11th, 2007 at 6:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
@Kellymac thanks for a well-written and detailed response. I’ve also had a look at your website; I quite liked your post on “Etiquette For Ladies”. Overall, an interesting read, and I shall be returning. You seem to feel about MABTW much the same way I do.
I like your ‘unplugging’ metaphor. Not original to be sure, but the first time I’ve ever heard it applied to beliefs surrounding feminism. Unplugging for me — and yes, I was one of those foolish men that was a feminist — was a less painful process than for you, though in my case it took some years and came entirely from within.
I apologize for treating you with suspicion, especially given that Dick asked you to blogroll him.
I think this helps a great deal. Simply listening to colleagues, I note that many women seem to become quite troubled as they start seeing the world through their sons’ eyes. I don’t suggest that it’s a requirement, but it’s certainly helpful.
You’re welcome to check out my blog. It’s eclectic and small. In part like you, I write because some people read me.
Cheers,
-wolfe
July 11th, 2007 at 7:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 45a19a6365772
As in every rule, there is an exception. Kelly lives in the pragmatic world, and therefore does not find herself screeching like a molting harpy whenever she encounters free speech. She puts forth logical, well-educated (and insightful) statements, and is a fine example of those few women who actually get over the fact that their breasts can attract unwelcome attention and make something worthwhile. Hence the numerous contributions to the world dwarfed only by the feats of man.
But the fewer there are, the greater the honor.
July 11th, 2007 at 8:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: d24dd61108133
Thank you, Chantal! That is a perfect example of an emotional response.
Ok, to answer your questions:
Yes, I have studied women’s history. It is a subject that has fascinated me for a very long time. In fact, I own a copy of “A History of Their Own”, and it was a fascinating read. I’ve devoured books about famous women - Harriet Tubman, Hatshepsut, Abigail Adams, Amelia Earhart, Nellie Bly, Dorothea Dix, Boudica, Anne of Cleves, Eleanor of Aquitaine, you get the picture. Kind of interesting, too, how many of those women became famous and accomplished great things without the help of feminism.
Have I read a book by any single feminist…I guess that book I just referred to was written by feminists. “The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood gave me chills. A truly scary vision of our future. “The Mists of Avalon” by Marion Zimmer Bradley, along with the sequels. I read one about a woman of the Kung tribe, “Nisa”; it was located in women’s studies. That’s all I can think of off the top of my head.
Do I know when feminism started…I’m familiar with the women’s movement generally from the Susan B. Anthony days.
When the women’s suffrage movement started…didn’t Susan B. have something to do with that? Women federally got the vote around 1920, without looking it up. Several states had already granted women the vote.
I am a recovered feminist, although I do have to say I was never hostile about it. LOL @ brainwashed country women. How much intelligence does it take to learn a set of tenets by rote, internalize them, and hate half the human race?
Let me ask you one or two questions.
Do you have any idea how many women accomplished great things before the advent of feminism? Have you read the SCUM manifesto, which calls for the annihilation of men? That was written by a feminist, I believe. Have you ever read a book by Christina Hoff Summers? Did you know Germaine Greer has a fascination with adolescent boys? Did you know that when most women couldn’t vote, neither could most men (except for the landowners)? Did you know that when women didn’t have access to education, neither did most men (except for the clergy and the wealthy)? Did you know that it was ONLY extremely wealthy women who didn’t work outside of the home? Did you know that there was NEVER a “rule of thumb”?
If your deliberate ignorance and mindless regurgitation of feminist made-up propaganda is an example of this so-called “highly intelligent” group of women you speak of, I think I’ll pass, thank you.
July 11th, 2007 at 8:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 160e0041dcad8
PWND!!!!!!11111111one
July 12th, 2007 at 4:31 am - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
That’s a rather good turn of phrase, doubt. Nicely done, good sir.
-wolfe
July 12th, 2007 at 6:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 5fd634f6ed1ed
Thank you, Chantal! That is a perfect example of an emotional response.
Ok, to answer your questions:
Yes, I have studied women’s history.
But apparantly she hasnt!
July 12th, 2007 at 11:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 9fc3e396dc030
Hi
women still won’t have sex with me. Therefore I don not like them.
August 1st, 2007 at 6:57 am - IP Man-Hash: e13e8557edb62
you’re a fucking joke, kelly. have you ever even studied women’s history? ever read a book by any single feminist? do you know when feminism even started? or do you even know when the women’s suffrage movement started? i HIGHLY doubt it. you remind me of those lame ass country women who are brainwashed by their men folk. most women do not share your sentiments - the highly intelligent ones, anyway. your blanketed statements are highly insulting.
-”Highly intelligent women”, now there’s an oxymoron.
It’s astounding how you’ve used the two words “intelligent” and “women” in the same sentance.
-Banzai
August 1st, 2007 at 7:09 am - IP Man-Hash: f618d3a941f24
Well take it from someone who has had plenty of sex. You will still dislike them long after the sex is over. They will make sure of it.
September 2nd, 2007 at 12:09 am - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
wow so you learned about feminism from a forum. yay you. any woman who would ridicule another woman for no reason is beyond me.
September 25th, 2007 at 9:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: 697b4a44c8648
Sweetness, I learned about feminism before there was an internet.
September 26th, 2007 at 2:40 am - IP Man-Hash: 422940479a69d
You must have been scarred horribly
*pat*
September 26th, 2007 at 6:00 am - IP Man-Hash: 6d3bb32787b07
KellyMac, that post was beautiful. It summed up the gist of why men are better than women. Chantal emotional outburst just exemplifies that. We men think and do things by logic. We live by an ancient code; honour.
If men were so horrid, they wont be doing the things that Kellymac mentioned: giving so much aid to women in the forms of affirmative actions etc. You be surprised what men do for love and how women misuse that love…