Men Are Man-Prettier Than Women
Here’s one of my least favorite Shit-A-Myths. It’s so sneaky and seemingly fucking harmless, I don’t think there’s a man on Earth who hasn’t said it without a second thought.
“Men are big and ugly while women are graceful, beautiful, and attractive.”
Women are none of those things. Women are clumsy, monkey-lipped, and gross.
I don’t know who the fuck started this myth. It was probably some 17th century Mangina — which just proves how awesomely powerful men are. Even when firing on only half their cylinders, Mangina men can fabricate lies that last through the generations. That’s manly!
There’s just one thing. It isn’t true.
Women are not better looking than men. Women are not better or as good as men at anything. Watch me unfold this like a deck of cards. You ladies out there — who shouldn’t fucking be out there and who are frothing at the mouth right now with anti-homosexual and anti-Semitic epithets for yours truly — be prepared to go fuck yourselves because I took all the Jokers out of the this deck.
Proof #1
The male of every other species on Earth is the more attractive one; from flora to fuck-off insects and fish. How about male peacocks — nature’s pimp? They look completely awesome. They look so incredible and man-jestic they should all just have sex with each other until nature figures out a way to get rid of those dumpy looking female peacocks.
Ever heard of a lion? Fuck off.
Proof #2
I can count the number of classical works of beauty and art of the highest antiquity that feature women on my penis. One. There’s only the Mona Lisa and as everyone knows that’s not even really considered all that great a painting. It’s just famous because of that book.
Michelangelo’s David, Van Gogh’s Self Portrait in a Grey Hat, da Vinci’s Man in the Circle Thing; each one an unforgettable masterpiece and all featuring men. If women were so fucking attractive, you think they could at least make a cameo in the art history of an entire species? Is it laziness or ugliness? When women are involved, it’s always both.
Proof #3
Women are so embarrassed at the idea of touching their own ugly asses, they won’t even admit it. Fuck, I admit that at least once a day. There could be no other possible reason for that shame.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the myth stated at the beginning of this dissertation requires clarification. It should not read, ‘Men are big and ugly while women are graceful, beautiful, and attractive,’ but should instead probably say something like, ‘Women will believe any excuse you tell them to get laid because they’re whores, even if a lifetime of mirrors is telling them the exact opposite.’
That even rolls off my man-tongue better; probably because I’m not choking on bile.
Related Articles:
August 27th, 2006 at 11:27 am - IP Man-Hash: fe7a06f831651
Douglas Adams is manly humor at its finest, in a world where humor is sadly lacking.
August 27th, 2006 at 11:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
What could those ‘women’s studies’ type 300 pound lasses chop off Dave nature hasn’t already long before?
August 27th, 2006 at 2:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0ccd0615aa7bd
First of all, I have not bothered to read any of the posts that you have made (if any) in response to me. I no longer have the energy or enthusiasm to confront you that I have had in droves recently. Please don’t kid yourself into thinking this is because of your arguments, it is because I have become so disappointed that people like you exist that feel I can no longer warrant spending time here.
I am aware that you will probably reply to this with comments along the lines of ‘looks like we proved him (or her) wrong’ etc… and to be honest I don’t care, if you want to kid yourself into this then please be my guest.
If you read back to one of the posts on this site you will see a surprisingly good quote ‘Many, but stupid’, this describes the whole sexist movement and this site in general perfectly. I am ashamed to call myself male if this is what being male involves. I personally believe that your feelings are rooted in either upbringing or rejection, either of these cases are tragic but do not warrant this despicable behaviour.
I’m not going to be checking this site again, although I have told a few of my friends about you and I’m sure you’ll get a few more messages.
I sincerely hope that you can get some perspective soon and realise that your attitudes are nothing but degrative to society. Have a go at considering other peoples opinions, even if just once, you may be surprised to realise they could have a point.
Goodbye
(P.S. ‘Spear Chucker’, if you eventually manage to find me and enclose on me from the four points of the compass and two vertical orientations, please point yourself out to me first, I will happily take the pleasure beating you down from your perch with a huge smile on my face)
August 27th, 2006 at 4:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: d564d810fdbc6
Josh I know you’ll read this.
See my post a couple up from here.
You have totally failed to grasp what is going on here.
August 27th, 2006 at 11:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4d84ec709d3bf
Not that it at all matters to anyone here what josh thinks,
But SPEAR-CHUCKER is a crude and racist remark for Black Africans.
I dont know how he expects to take the moral high ground in any argument with anyone, ever, by admitting his own base failures so crudely.
August 28th, 2006 at 12:49 am - IP Man-Hash: d564d810fdbc6
John that is a very disappointing effort. How do you know I’m not a black african myself?
Very few people of any colour, nationality, race, gender, religion or age on the entire planet have even SEEN a spear let alone thrown one.
FYI I am called The Spear Chucker by quite a number of my friends, relatives and acquaintances. And for quite a good reason. There’s a very good chance I’ve done more of it than just about anyone on the planet. Apart from others who have thrown javelins for twenty five years that is.
To be honest, John, an African who did use a spear, rather than a gun as most do, might rightfully find YOUR use of the expression in this context quite bemusing. They might wonder why YOU think there is something insulting about it.
Now, as I suggested to your tag-team buddies, go and have a look at the links I provided in post #45 above.
August 28th, 2006 at 6:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
Thanks for the info, John. I did not know that. What did that whore (because Josh is a woman in ‘disguise’) really think she was trying to prove anyway? The only thing she did prove is that women stories have no point and that they should stay away from places like these.
August 28th, 2006 at 6:46 am - IP Man-Hash: 8c517aff00db2
Big surprise, feminists are also racists. If they hate men, why would you expect them not to hate other races as well?
Dick proved this long ago in an article.
August 28th, 2006 at 9:52 am - IP Man-Hash: 5950bb08d3016
whoah whoah whoah whoah
Is a scientific article really necessary to point out the MOST OBVIOUS FACT in Nature, and that is that in the species hom sapiens the males are physically stronger?
Only a moron with an IQ lower than 75 would even argue that.
TESTOSTERONE builds muscles, men have WAY MORE than women.
The average male is WAY MORE muscle than the average women.
The average male is FASTER at running
The average male has better hand-eye coordination
A man lifting his own body weight is no incredible feat, a woman lifting 1/2 her body weight is extraordinary
Ever look at a man and woman standing next to each other, which one is bigger and has more muscle?
Are people that big of idiots that they actually are brainwashed into believing it is otherwise?
Why do women expect lower standards on physical tests? If they were just as strong or stronger then they wouldn’t need them
Why aren’t there any female NBA players? It is a feat when a woman dunks, yet most boys highschool freshmen teams have at least 1 guy that can.
There are plenty of women at 6′ tall yet barely any of them can even come close to dunking.
Men at 5′9 can dunk the ball.
On a side note
Seriously the manginas here need to go befriend Rosy Palmer and her five sisters because even feminists want Real men.
Sadly I don’t know why the manginas still haven’t learned what women are attracted to. 30 years of brainwashing will not change 6 million years of the female biological drive, try as you may.
Josh do you notice how women walk all over you and you never get laid, do you honestly think that being more of a pu$$y will get you more?
August 28th, 2006 at 12:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4f1ba61bc2fe3
Only a woman could claim they are as strong as a man.
Women lie constantly.
August 28th, 2006 at 1:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: d4c0d5b77a99f
Lukasz I mostly agree but you got a few things wrong.
Feminists do want a REAL man because as you said you can’t propagandize nature.
But usually after their urges take are relieved and the passion has subsided, the guilt from years of devastating, godless lies reemerges and they leave. Can’t allow themselves to be held back by the patriarchy of a loving, hardworking alpha male can they?
Ironic.. feminism doesn’t even allow women to do the only thing GOD ever made them good at.
August 28th, 2006 at 1:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 109bcf0dfd9d2
I wouldn’t be blaming everything on feminism, sobs. Sorry, sots. Whatever.
Sure you can pass the buck to whoever you like but if you are a mean, selfish , stupid bastard, then it’s pretty much guaranteed you’ll get no respect and your partner will run off. That’s called logic, not feminism.
August 28th, 2006 at 2:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5950bb08d3016
Good point suns, once the feminists meet their urge for children, the feminism comes back, they get fat and divorce you. Hence why every man needs anti-feminism ManDar.
August 28th, 2006 at 3:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4b756bd3aa59d
I agree except I’m still trying to determine what you are talking about on that last comment. Ok I’ll bite, what did God make them good at?
August 28th, 2006 at 4:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Female, don’t you have someplace to be we’re rudely keeping you from?
August 28th, 2006 at 4:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: e2ec66dd82ad8
Once again Female you make assumptions about a male on this site you have no idea about.
I wouldn’t know because I’ve never seen a fat ugly cow who ALSO had a shitty abrasive personality, but maybe every man has treated you like dirt because you were his last resort?
August 28th, 2006 at 6:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4b756bd3aa59d
Are maybe it’s because don’t jsut don’t give into her every desire.
I’ve seen younger women and some older ones that act this way because they expect everything. They just can’t act like ladies anymore.
August 28th, 2006 at 6:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
I can only assume that Billy and sob dropped out of school in year 6 because they have obviously never heard of cause and effect. IIRC both appeared on this website and immediately started slandering me. I have refrained quite well from responding in kind to their disgusting remarks as I am too much of a decent person to stoop to their grade school “intellectual” level, not to mention the fact that my manners are generally impeccable. As such, if that is the way you kiddies want to behave towards me, then don’t expect me to be a lady towards you. Now or ever.
August 28th, 2006 at 10:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4d84ec709d3bf
Gwallen, You are correct, in that I dont know if you are a black african. Nor do you know if I am a black african. Nor does it matter. Regardless of YOUR hobbies and color, SPEAR CHUCKER has historically always been a crude racist comment. Its derived from the belief that slavers, who use guns and rifles, are superior to african “spear Chuckers”, thus clearing their conscience ( such as it was ) while hunting and selling them.
That being said, IF you are a black african, and IF your hobbies are olympic level javelin throwing, and IF you choose to use spear Chucker as a nickname ( like black americans using Ni***r to take back the word) and IF Josh is also black, and IF he is your friend on or off this board, then it might be appropriate. But thats a lot of ifs, and not a likely train of thought to reach. I wasnt really commenting on YOUR posts, I was merely remarking on the inappropriateness of Josh’s Comments, in the context that they appeared in this thread.
August 28th, 2006 at 11:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
John, your view of slavery is pretty messed up.
No, it wasn’t a matter of Europeans wandering in with guns and viewing themselves as superior to natives.
It’s important to look at these things honestly so we know what to despise, and why.
Slavery, throughout the Mediterranean, west Africa, and east Africa was lead by Arabs with the general connivance of local African chiefs.
It wasn’t a question of firepower; it was a question of economics.
Call it mercantilism in its rawest and most brutal form.
To their staggering and eternal shame, the Europeans blundered in, and joined in a disgusting system. A system, which, by the way, enslaved Europeans throughout the southern med, until the Royal Navy and the US Navy put an end to it. (it being all forms of slavery west of Gibraltar. Sadly, slavery has never been extirpated).
When I see you giving “permission” to gwallan to speak as he wishes, under certain conditions, and basing it on a pretty twisted and racist version of history, I’m troubled.
Of course Josh’s comments are trash. That doesn’t make other people’s comments trash.
And your approach of twisting history to some apparently dark, racist ends, is gravely troubling. You seek to conceal the origins of slavery: why? Why would someone do that?
Is it because someone wants slavery to continue in the 21st century?
I don’t know. I hope that’s not your motive, but your words are deeply disturbing.
Regards,
-wolfe