Killing Me Softly

Since the beginning of time, man has sought to cheat death by doing the dirty deed himself. Yes, that’s right. I’m talking about suicide.

While I don’t personally think suicide is the way to go, I understand the mantality of it — a mantality that can be expressed as simply as, “That’ll show the bastard.” It’s the way we men have lived and loved since Mother Earth felt her first Five Across the Eyes in the form of plowshare and a patch of turnips.

“Herd be damned,” said primitave man. “Because of my mighty mangenuity, this is where I’m living from now on. Right where I planted these turnips. And if I so chose, this is where I’ll be dying, by lifting a massive boulder and then dropping it on my head.”

You have to respect that.

Men are four times more likely to successfully commit suicide than women.

Women are three times more likely to unsuccessfully attempt suicide than men.

Typical. Of course you could replace the word “suicide” in the above text with absolutely whatever the fuck you wanted and it would still be accurate.

Men are four times more likely to successfully commit to a monogamous relationship than women.

Women are three times more likely to unsuccessfully attempt to balance a family and a career — or a simple fucking checkbook — than men.

We all knew where that was going. Men get the job done, plain and simple. Be it for reasons of gambling debts, desperate loneliness, or simple oldness; men know how to do everything with their lives, including end them, while women just know how to fill out credit card applications, adopt another cat, or keep draining the system until it’s as dry as they are — respectively.

So why are the success rates so wildly different? It seems obvious, that women who overdose on pills or try to tip a vending machine on top of themselves are just crying for attention, but is that the case? Maybe, but what if it’s something else?

What if women just don’t know how the body works. Here’s an example: if you ask a man how to get in shape every single one will tell you the exact same thing, “Eat less, exercise more.” It’s the miracle diet that has kept men in their primes for thousands of years. Ask a woman the same question, however, and you’re likely to hear some fancy sounding bullshit.

“Resolve your emotional issues with your mother by taking a class at the learning annex.” Wherein she means snacking on Doritos in the back of a Religious Studies seminar whilst learning about the prevalence of angels and fairies and other mystical shit.

“Carbs are the devil.” Right. Too bad we’ll never know what the effect of a woman not gorging herself on carbs is; seeing as how none of them can keep the fucking sugar loaded coffee drinks and snack foods out of their gaping maws.

And then comes the mother of all fitness fuck ups: “Yoga”.

My point is, women are so lousy at suicide because they actually don’t know how the fuck the human body works. It seems simple enough to us men; put a bullet in the brain and it stops working, however, the same principle of put a donut in your gut and it gets bigger is completely lost on women. They just don’t understand cause and effect like us men do.

Then again, maybe it’s a little of both: attention whoring mixed with women and their rampant dumbness. There’s only one thing we know for sure, and that’s no man has ever killed himself while he was pregnant. Sadly, the same can’t be said for women.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

56 Comments in 56 threads.»

Comment by Commander Scott
2008-07-11 15:18:17 - IP Man-Hash: f0b0bc078845e

I love you said:

Dick, I’m a woman, but I love you. Seriously, most of the things you say are true, and when stupid women call your voice mail, they’re basically proving your point.

I love you!

Piss off with your false professions of devotion; women are devoid of love. Only men possess the capacity to truly love another human being unconditionally.

 
Comment by I love you
2008-07-11 15:05:51 - IP Man-Hash: c8140528d5c69

Dick, I’m a woman, but I love you. Seriously, most of the things you say are true, and when stupid women call your voice mail, they’re basically proving your point.

I love you!

 
Comment by jarbrain
2008-05-17 17:19:46 - IP Man-Hash: 062703d978411

Some men light ‘Monica cigars’ over what women fucked up that day to find their balls in their pants-
Other men know there are balls in their pants, and light their cigars over huge piles of profit.
You can not be both.
Do you know where your balls are?

 
Comment by jarbrain
2008-05-17 17:15:30 - IP Man-Hash: 062703d978411

Female said:

Esther said:

Ahhhhh, back to the name-calling, gender-questioning, 3rd grade antics. What adolescent predictability!

Man Law, what are we up to now? 11?

Man Law 11. Men are oblivious. It’s so obvious.

So…you learned how to construct the outline of an argument, like, on the high school debate team (or something)-yet-it has absolutely no substance or understandable content to it whatsoever.
blabhabhalbahbha -dust- blabahblhblahalhbbahb -dust- balbahhbalhblahbhl -brain- balbahahbhab -Doritos-

For those coming in late, in Man Law 1, we learnt that men cannot see. This is not to say they are completely blind and live in a world of dark (Dick, being the one and only exception to this) but rather, men cannot see inanimate objects, unless those animate objects are shiny and/or new.

As soon as an object becomes >5 weeks old with a layer of dust on it, it loses shine and then becomes invisible to mancrap vision. You might think that if the dust was cleaned off an object that it would regain its shine and men would be able to discover it again, alas, this is an impossible fantasy because in order for the dust to be removed, a man must be able to see dust.

And as we know and as scientists have proved, men cannot see dust. The men on this board have admitted this themselves, perhaps in an attempt to absolve themselves from cleaning. Feministic conspiracy theorists have taken on the Dust, can men actually see it? debate and tossed in the argument that men can see dust, but they deny this due to not wanting to be seen flipping about like a ballet dancer with a feathery pink duster in their hands. I can’t say I blame them.

Getting back to the topic, men can’t see their special things lost under layers of dust and so to them shit constantly goes missing. Ergo, their constant questioning of women for the directions to the location of special missing object. For example, their brain.

 
Comment by Jacq
2008-05-08 16:58:52 - IP Man-Hash: 3f6a0f6796fab

Agree or disagree with this dude, but he does have the right to express his opinions. Looks like you’re sick and tired of feminism, my man.

 
Comment by KL
2008-01-26 10:32:57 - IP Man-Hash: 704442c4e98b2

You’re proud that you can kill yourself. Good for you, nice accomplishment.

 
Comment by Hilary
2007-12-17 19:33:52 - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c

So now men are better as killing themselves?
You are quite proud of that aren’t you, why don’t you test that….
The taking of one’s life is a serious matter and you are bragging about it?
Kind.
And tell me where you get these statisctic?
It’s just great that you are able to make these things up and people will believe you, but that is only because they believe anything you say, it’s quite funny that they hold you as a sort of God

 
Comment by babies come out of VAGINAS
2007-08-25 19:27:28 - IP Man-Hash: 8bb483569c600

ooooo statistics =P

 
Comment by wolfe
2005-12-26 12:20:09 - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00

Merry Christmas, Christian, and Happy Christmas/Hannukah/New Year to all, even the women.
-wolfe

 
Comment by Christian J
2005-12-24 01:12:14 - IP Man-Hash: aaf6cf4dca88f

The bitch is just an attention whore.

Merry christmas to all Men.

 
Comment by Esther
2005-12-23 06:38:21 - IP Man-Hash: 0e2f2db43d2f0

I agree Dan, but her name says it all. Women can not reason their way out of a wet paper bag and when it comes to thinking objectively…well, I think you know where this is going.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-23 05:11:15 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

Do you know what I really like about clown shoes, I like the way the advertising of them is just so clowny. Normally when you want to buy shoes, they are positioned perfectly responsibly in an upright manner, sometimes you see both, but usually you just see one. It’s not like you need a second shoe there for the other one to be interacting with in any way. They’re both the same, one picture is enough, thanks for asking.

This of course does not apply to clown shoes. Their colour and style is simply not enough to indicate the sheer craziness of their character and they must be positioned at strange and illogical angles to each other to get the message across.

http://www.clownsoport.com/InStockMain2.htm

Another interesting fact about clown shoes is that they are a right fucking rip off, but not to worry, if you can’t afford $500 buck for a pair, you can just get all clowny creative and make your very own. Joy!

http://www.clown-shoes.com/shoe-best-value.shtml

 
Comment by Dan
2005-12-23 01:10:36 - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0

You’re correct in saying that it is a waste of my time to rebut her statements. Where I think you’re wrong is when you think she’s somehow formulating these statements just to get a reaction. She posts them for the reaction, but the beliefs are truly hers.

 
Comment by Grump
2005-12-22 17:33:07 - IP Man-Hash: 60b660aafc3e4

Dan, do you really believe that female cares about whether her conclusions are rubbish? She doesn’t. I doubt she’s serious about most of the things she writes here. She is merely here to punish you and anybody else who even remotely agrees with Dick. So..why waste your time giving her any sensible rebuttal? You are only playing into her hands.

Female, my dear, I’m not here to entertain you. You are here to entertain me. Thank you

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-22 03:59:27 - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f

I’m afraid I do not shop where you and Ronald do.

http://www.clownsoport.com/InStockMain2.htm

 
Comment by Dan
2005-12-22 03:39:13 - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0

And as we know and as scientists have proved

What in the fuck!? “We” have proved? I don’t know which logical fallacy to start with. 1) You’re not in a group that would be considered scientists and 2) even if there were a “we” they would have proved nothing. This is because your conclusion is absolute rubbish. I’ve reserved this term for only the most egregious of offenders, and I certainly have no problem saying that you are a joke…fucking clown shoes.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-22 03:21:16 - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f

Esther said:

Ahhhhh, back to the name-calling, gender-questioning, 3rd grade antics. What adolescent predictability!

Man Law, what are we up to now? 11?

Man Law 11. Men are oblivious. It’s so obvious.

For those coming in late, in Man Law 1, we learnt that men cannot see. This is not to say they are completely blind and live in a world of dark (Dick, being the one and only exception to this) but rather, men cannot see inanimate objects, unless those animate objects are shiny and/or new.

As soon as an object becomes >5 weeks old with a layer of dust on it, it loses shine and then becomes invisible to mancrap vision. You might think that if the dust was cleaned off an object that it would regain its shine and men would be able to discover it again, alas, this is an impossible fantasy because in order for the dust to be removed, a man must be able to see dust.

And as we know and as scientists have proved, men cannot see dust. The men on this board have admitted this themselves, perhaps in an attempt to absolve themselves from cleaning. Feministic conspiracy theorists have taken on the Dust, can men actually see it? debate and tossed in the argument that men can see dust, but they deny this due to not wanting to be seen flipping about like a ballet dancer with a feathery pink duster in their hands. I can’t say I blame them.

Getting back to the topic, men can’t see their special things lost under layers of dust and so to them shit constantly goes missing. Ergo, their constant questioning of women for the directions to the location of special missing object. For example, their brain.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-22 02:34:06 - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f

Grump said:

It’s interesting how you misconstrue my words.

It’s boring that I have to see your words.

 
Comment by Esther
2005-12-21 14:13:58 - IP Man-Hash: 0e2f2db43d2f0

Ahhhhh, back to the name-calling, gender-questioning, 3rd grade antics. What adolescent predictability!

 
Comment by Grump
2005-12-21 14:13:17 - IP Man-Hash: 60b660aafc3e4

“Grump, one minute you love me, the next you hate me. Make up your borderline personality disordered mind (no offence to any other BPDs reading this site)”

It’s interesting how you misconstrue my words.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-21 02:07:15 - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f

Yes, I hope that’s the last time I have to read another of your pathetic whines for me to leave. You’re not KingofMisogyny by any chance?
Maybe just his transgender boyfriend then.

 
Comment by Esther
2005-12-21 02:03:51 - IP Man-Hash: b522825ecb752

Female, please, the door is right over there. No one is impressed by any of your (what I’m sure you believe to be very) witty retorts. All you do is reaffirm what we already know about your sad, sad gender. Tell your boyfriend we’re all sorry for him. Goodbye. (Hopefully for the last time)

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-21 01:34:04 - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f

Where is your police station geezer? Are you “on the beat” or a desk jockey?

 
Comment by Oldone
2005-12-20 19:20:39 - IP Man-Hash: c9f3d64ff5217

Hiding behind it, never, proudly displaying it, most certainly and most mantastically. Now why would her boyfriend wish ill of me, as I have no quarrel with him and if her boyfriend is indeed in law enforcement officer, then there can be no quarrel for not only are we men, but part of a brotherhood as well. If it is my comments about Female that he is unhappy with, then perhaps he should keep her off this site.

 
Comment by FemaleMark2
2005-12-20 18:57:43 - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333

Oldone, as an officer of the law I mean no disrespect to you when I say that it probably wouldn’t be considered mantastic to hide behind your badge. I think Female also mentioned her boyfriend was going to the beach to do some target practice, so perhaps he is also in law enforcement?

 
Comment by Oldone
2005-12-20 15:07:02 - IP Man-Hash: 620db7e22a363

Female said “Says he’s going down to the beach to get some target practice, then he’s coming for you. Have fun!!1!1!11″

Typical, a woman gets herself into trouble and requires a man to bail her out. Also you might want to inform your “boyfriend” that it is not a good thing to threaten to do bodily harm to an Officer of the Law. Though, I see by the fact that he is with you, his Man-judgement is some what gone.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-20 13:17:15 - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f

“So, rather than threatening him, I and perhaps all men here should give a moment of silence for a fallen man, caught by Female. Let us all bow our heads.”

*snort* ROFLMAO. Don’t worry, he loves it. LOLZ

 
Comment by Arielle
2005-12-20 12:42:44 - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d

Grump loves you the way I love the Darwin Awards.

 
Comment by Oldone
2005-12-20 10:56:22 - IP Man-Hash: e2d025f19e31f

Indeed Dick, perhaps there is still hope for him, all may not be lost.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2005-12-20 09:53:44 - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3

No wonder Female hates this site so much. If her boyfriend ever got ahold of it, he would exorcize the shrew.

-Dick

 
Comment by Oldone
2005-12-20 09:36:40 - IP Man-Hash: e2d025f19e31f

Female said: “So, what you are saying is that I am wrong in saying that men are better than everything? and Dick, you agree with Dan on this? So simple, why the hell didn’t I use reverse psychology in the first five minutes on this site!!!! ”

I can answer that Female, it is because you know not what reverse psychology means. In fact i am sure you learned this term recently from either your own psychological therapist, or perhaps on Oprah or some other equally absurd woman’s show.

Now as for your threats pertaining to your boyfriend, as with most other things in your pathetic excuse for a life. I am of the belief, that he is just as imaginary as the rest of your friends. Either that or he is locked in the same psych-ward as you. There is of course the possiblility that said boyfriend, was caught in the coils of your serpent like tentacles and the life and manliness were subsequently drained from him. Thus allowing his truly un-manly decision to be with you. So, rather than threatening him, I and perhaps all men here should give a moment of silence for a fallen man, caught by Female. Let us all bow our heads.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-20 03:18:19 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

wolfe said:

…it shows your lack of reading. And breeding.
-wolfe

Pfft. Could you get any more snobby?

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-20 02:16:34 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

Female said:

“How come I have now tried several times to post a reply to the man who has named himself after a wild dog and these posts do not appear?”

When it says “Your comment is being held for moderation� what it actually means is that your comment is being held for moderation. Try using your eyes and your brain at the same time. Oh wait, women are shit at multitasking.

-Dick

That comment about my post being held for moderation did not appear dick, if it had I would have seen it because remember I do not have substandard man eyes. Maybe you should create a FAQ section, call it FARK, if you want to sound tough and manly and put in a disclaimer about whether it is better to use IE or Firefox when viewing this site.
We do not all see the same things obviously.

Esther, truly awful name you’ve picked for yourself there. Are you a fan of Madge?

Grump, one minute you love me, the next you hate me. Make up your borderline personality disordered mind (no offence to any other BPDs reading this site)

Dan (oh looky Dan, this is my xmas present to you),

Female said:

Man Law 1 in action. The word was “everything� you idiots!!1!11

You won’t be happy if I stay? Promise?

Dan said:

My orginal statement stands. “Men are better than everythingâ€? doesn’t make any sense either. It was the idea of the statement, not the semantics, that made it incorrect.”

So, what you are saying is that I am wrong in saying that men are better than everything? and Dick, you agree with Dan on this? So simple, why the hell didn’t I use reverse psychology in the first five minutes on this site!!!!

 
Comment by Esther
2005-12-19 16:10:32 - IP Man-Hash: 0e2f2db43d2f0

Is she gone yet? Can the adults continue our conversation?

P.S. - Yes, I’m of the male persuasion, but Esther is a hilarious name.

 
Comment by Grump
2005-12-19 15:10:09 - IP Man-Hash: 60b660aafc3e4

“Men are better than everything. Happy?”

What she means is that your towering intellects are too much for her to grasp. She is exasperated, afraid, and utterly confounded.

‘then he’s coming for you.’

female, I, too, can fake a threat. Your boyfriend would not receive death, but extreme pain until I’m finished with him. I’d have to immobilize him first, but that shouldn’t be too difficult. Doesn’t that sound funny to you?

First, I’d get that muzzle and wrap it tightly around your head…

“(You won’t catch me hanging around much longer, don’t worry about that. You truly are all a bunch of absolute arseholes).”

Oh, promises, promises…

we’ll see if you can resist…

but really, female, what did you expect? You’re such a hypocrite.

 
Comment by Dan
2005-12-19 10:59:03 - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0

Female said:

Man Law 1 in action. The word was “everything” you idiots!!1!11

You won’t be happy if I stay? Promise?

My orginal statement stands. “Men are better than everything” doesn’t make any sense either. It was the idea of the statement, not the semantics, that made it incorrect.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2005-12-19 09:07:41 - IP Man-Hash: a0c7c73d83830

Female said:

How come I have now tried several times to post a reply to the man who has named himself after a wild dog and these posts do not appear?

When it says “Your comment is being held for moderation” what it actually means is that your comment is being held for moderation. Try using your eyes and your brain at the same time. Oh wait, women are shit at multitasking.

-Dick

 
Comment by wolfe
2005-12-19 07:51:41 - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00

It’s so cute to see Female use words and hysterically fly into all caps. Sadly, Female, words have meanings and those words do not mean what you think they do.

I’ve only seen Dick edit you once — he did eliminate one glorious post of yours that used eight quote indents and was unreadable. I was actually slightly sad he did so, since it indicated your spectacular skill at posting, but it was admittedly a blatant grab for attention on your part.

As for wild dog man, amusing, but you have internal causality backwards, and it shows your lack of reading. And breeding.
-wolfe

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-19 04:14:36 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

Thanks E, I responded to you before, but of course that wasn’t allowed to be displayed. Dick likes to edit what I can and cannot say. It is nice to see a normal male here for once. I hope you decide to stay for a while.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-19 03:52:04 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

O well. Wild dog man, this reply is to you.

This
“I am aware of my own fallibility”
and
“I do not suffer from compound ignorance.”

M U T U A L L Y
E X C L U S I V E

Shall I also say the H word?

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-19 03:48:49 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

Stranger and stranger. Methinks a little creative editing is going on here dick. How come I have now tried several times to post a reply to the man who has named himself after a wild dog and these posts do not appear?

 
Comment by E
2005-12-19 03:13:45 - IP Man-Hash: d3afe86c48783

I’m a guy and having analysed your blog, all I have to say is: Who let you out?
Seriously, when it comes to “stupid factor”, your blog reall takes the cake.
Ladies, I advise you not to waste your words on this fool. Use your time more constructivley and let the idiot rant and rave for all he’s worth.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-19 02:30:46 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

“Not being you, I am aware of my own fallibility”
“… and do not suffer from compound ignorance.”

Mutually exclusive

http://www.hardcoretruth.com/Hypocrisy/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrite

I would quote you but it seems I have been banned from quoting LOLZ.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-19 02:28:18 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

wolfe said:

[blockquote removed]

Language is fun.

-wolfe

It sure is.

wolfe said:

[blockquote removed]

I am aware of my own fallibility…..
-wolfe

Hmmmm

wolfe said:

[blockquote removed]
….. and do not suffer from compound ignorance.
-wolfe

In the words of dick, “those two sentences are mutually exclusive”
Tsk Tsk,

and don’t forget to drop by this site on your lunch break

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-19 02:19:14 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

wolfe when I want your opinion I’ll ask for it. Don’t hold your breath.

 
Comment by wolfe
2005-12-18 11:21:01 - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00

Esther said:
I could bring up the fact that “meant” is not a conjunction …
I hope you take my mean’ing.

Language is fun. Thanks for a ray of sunshine, Esther.

And Female, I believe Esther is male, though I could of course be wrong on that. Not being you, I am aware of my own fallibility and do not suffer from compound ignorance.
-wolfe

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-18 00:31:48 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

Christ. You’re back are you? In response to your post all of it is shit except the first sentence. You tell me I’ve “copped” out on explaining for the men the reasoning behind my initial post. Well, sorry to tell you this Esther, but I’m sure they really couldn’t care less about that. As they already think they are better than everything, why would they waste their time reading what a female thinks? As they’ve repeatedly made clear, we have nothing to teach them and are purely only allowed here for their entertainment (You won’t catch me hanging around much longer, don’t worry about that. You truly are all a bunch of absolute arseholes).

However Esther, that I know that the men here already think they are better than everything is not the reason I did not deconstruct my statement. Why I did not do that is because my post wasn’t to the men here, it was a reply to Arielle, and in case you haven’t heard I have previously advised her that I do not wish to converse with her. So why would I bother going into an extended dialogue with her? Pretty simple really, I wouldn’t.

Now, sorry to disappoint you (again, obviously) but I do not wish to argue/debate or fight with you. So if you do reply to my post with venom, I shall simply ignore it.

 
Comment by Esther
2005-12-17 06:39:14 - IP Man-Hash: 0e2f2db43d2f0

Female, it’s like you’re not even trying anymore. To be petty, I could bring up the fact that “meant” is not a conjunction, but pettiness is a chore better left to women. I could then go on to say that “I won’t start explaining….commence.” is nothing but typical cop-out bullshit that women use to insinuate that men cannot reason analytically and “switch off” when forced to do so. The very statement itself resembles that exact behavior: The female instinct to replace rational thought and reason with smoke and mirrors, all while trying to make the other person (often a man) appear to be the one unwilling to engage in the conjecture.

I *could* say those things…but then that would just encourage another junior-high response out of you and I don’t know how much more of that I can take. I hope you take my mean’ing.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-16 23:33:28 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

You have no idea what I mean’t, so how can you doubt that I did not mean one thing over something else? I mean’t what I mean’t. I won’t start explaining though cause men switch off when analytical deconstructions commence.

 
Comment by Arielle
2005-12-16 20:51:37 - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d

You know, I have to say I’d rather have my husband and son than anything else. To me, they are better than everything. ;) Of course, I very much doubt that is what Female meant!

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-16 17:09:31 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

He says you’re a dead man walking. hee hee.

Says he’s going down to the beach to get some target practice, then he’s coming for you. Have fun!!1!1!11

 
Comment by Oldone
2005-12-16 16:31:04 - IP Man-Hash: e616b9a6becce

Do you have a boyfriend Female? I would like to buy him a christmas gift, a muzzle for you.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-16 15:55:42 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

Man Law 1 in action. The word was “everything” you idiots!!1!11

You won’t be happy if I stay? Promise?

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2005-12-16 15:53:52 - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3

Dan, you beat me to it.

Men are better than anything? I would be surprised if that didn’t remind me of every single argument with a woman I’ve ever had.

Stage 3: The Spouting of Jibberish.

-Dick

 
Comment by Dan
2005-12-16 15:46:03 - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0

“Men are better than anything” doesn’t make any sense, but you not making sense is nothing new. And no, as long as you continue to post here no one will be happy, truly.

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-16 15:41:13 - IP Man-Hash: dc6df4d5c25ad

“Men are four times more likely to successfully commit suicide than women.”
LOLZ

It’s called unconscious natural selection.

You know what, I am tired of beating my head against your empty ones.
Men are better than everything. Happy?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It