Anyway, the reason i am writing, is that i am not sure that the reason women unsucessfully commit suicide more often than males, are that they do not understand the human body. I believe it is more based on attention. Atleast in Denmark (where i live).

Here, the damn whores will do suicide attempts, planned to be unsuccessful of course, to get the pity from the people that has either “Done her wrong” or made her feel overlooked. Basically, one of the most dirty tricks for attention and pity that you can imagine. And it IS true, at least here in Scandinavia, you could almost call it a trend, it is frequently done by teenagers and adults alike.

I am wondering about your thoughts on this, since it, from my own experience of course, seems alot more likely than women not knowing how to kill themselves.

And by the way.. i suppose just.. Greetings from Denmark, Dick!
Good to know that even in the US, which i have often seen as overly political correct, they are people who knows a woman’s place!

Regards

Stefan Jermyn

I love you said:

Dick, I’m a woman, but I love you. Seriously, most of the things you say are true, and when stupid women call your voice mail, they’re basically proving your point.

I love you!

Piss off with your false professions of devotion; women are devoid of love. Only men possess the capacity to truly love another human being unconditionally.

I love you!

Female said:

Esther said:

Ahhhhh, back to the name-calling, gender-questioning, 3rd grade antics. What adolescent predictability!

Man Law, what are we up to now? 11?

Man Law 11. Men are oblivious. It’s so obvious.

So…you learned how to construct the outline of an argument, like, on the high school debate team (or something)-yet-it has absolutely no substance or understandable content to it whatsoever.
blabhabhalbahbha -dust- blabahblhblahalhbbahb -dust- balbahhbalhblahbhl -brain- balbahahbhab -Doritos-

For those coming in late, in Man Law 1, we learnt that men cannot see. This is not to say they are completely blind and live in a world of dark (Dick, being the one and only exception to this) but rather, men cannot see inanimate objects, unless those animate objects are shiny and/or new.

As soon as an object becomes >5 weeks old with a layer of dust on it, it loses shine and then becomes invisible to mancrap vision. You might think that if the dust was cleaned off an object that it would regain its shine and men would be able to discover it again, alas, this is an impossible fantasy because in order for the dust to be removed, a man must be able to see dust.

And as we know and as scientists have proved, men cannot see dust. The men on this board have admitted this themselves, perhaps in an attempt to absolve themselves from cleaning. Feministic conspiracy theorists have taken on the Dust, can men actually see it? debate and tossed in the argument that men can see dust, but they deny this due to not wanting to be seen flipping about like a ballet dancer with a feathery pink duster in their hands. I can’t say I blame them.

Getting back to the topic, men can’t see their special things lost under layers of dust and so to them shit constantly goes missing. Ergo, their constant questioning of women for the directions to the location of special missing object. For example, their brain.

Merry christmas to all Men.

This of course does not apply to clown shoes. Their colour and style is simply not enough to indicate the sheer craziness of their character and they must be positioned at strange and illogical angles to each other to get the message across.

http://www.clownsoport.com/InStockMain2.htm

Another interesting fact about clown shoes is that they are a right fucking rip off, but not to worry, if you can’t afford $500 buck for a pair, you can just get all clowny creative and make your very own. Joy!

http://www.clown-shoes.com/shoe-best-value.shtml

Female, my dear, I’m not here to entertain you. You are here to entertain me. Thank you

http://www.clownsoport.com/InStockMain2.htm

And as we know and as scientists have proved

What in the fuck!? “We” have proved? I don’t know which logical fallacy to start with. 1) You’re not in a group that would be considered scientists and 2) even if there were a “we” they would have proved nothing. This is because your conclusion is absolute rubbish. I’ve reserved this term for only the most egregious of offenders, and I certainly have no problem saying that you are a joke…fucking clown shoes.

Esther said:

Ahhhhh, back to the name-calling, gender-questioning, 3rd grade antics. What adolescent predictability!

Man Law, what are we up to now? 11?

Man Law 11. Men are oblivious. It’s so obvious.

For those coming in late, in Man Law 1, we learnt that men cannot see. This is not to say they are completely blind and live in a world of dark (Dick, being the one and only exception to this) but rather, men cannot see inanimate objects, unless those animate objects are shiny and/or new.

As soon as an object becomes >5 weeks old with a layer of dust on it, it loses shine and then becomes invisible to mancrap vision. You might think that if the dust was cleaned off an object that it would regain its shine and men would be able to discover it again, alas, this is an impossible fantasy because in order for the dust to be removed, a man must be able to see dust.

And as we know and as scientists have proved, men cannot see dust. The men on this board have admitted this themselves, perhaps in an attempt to absolve themselves from cleaning. Feministic conspiracy theorists have taken on the Dust, can men actually see it? debate and tossed in the argument that men can see dust, but they deny this due to not wanting to be seen flipping about like a ballet dancer with a feathery pink duster in their hands. I can’t say I blame them.

Getting back to the topic, men can’t see their special things lost under layers of dust and so to them shit constantly goes missing. Ergo, their constant questioning of women for the directions to the location of special missing object. For example, their brain.

Grump said:

It’s interesting how you misconstrue my words.

It’s boring that I have to see your words.