Women Hate America.
If you’ve been watching the Dr. Phil “House of Judgment”, you may have noticed that the first problem Dr. Phil has with my views is that I have a book to sell. Well it’s true, fellows and gentlemen, I am a filthy capitalist. I am a low-down, dirty capitalist who is out to make money by providing you with something that is both manlightening and hilarious for a nominal cost.
And unlike women in the army, this is comedy you can choose whether or not you want to pay for.
How dare I.
I would also like to note that my book is worth its weight in gold. It will teach you how to shut women the fuck up. Silence is golden.
Let’s talk about capitalism. You may already be familiar with it as the thing that brought you everything you know. Imagine Santa Claus with a school bus full of girls gone wild on his back, a Super Soaker full of gin in his hand, and a Viagra-induced boner that could win a home-run derby in the other. That’s capitalism.
Women hate capitalism.
Men love capitalism. We spend money on things we love, and when we’re out of money, we go get jobs we love to make more money to buy more awesome things. To men, capitalism is like jerking ourselves off twice at the same time. It’s a religious experience.
Women buy things they think they need, but don’t. And when they’re out of money, they have to do something they hate to get more of it: fuck. That’s why women hate capitalism. All roads lead to Rome; and all purchases lead to a woman getting on her back.
It was no surprise to me that on a show geared toward women, the biggest alleged “flaw” in my views was that people are willing to pay to hear them. That’s like calling Penicillin a “quack remedy” because it doesn’t grow on the sides of rocks. Just because it’s got a price tag, doesn’t mean it won’t cure your syphilis.
Manpitalism
Women hate success through hard work. They hate rewards for good behavior because it means none of them will ever get anything for free again. And they hate heaps of money falling on men with bright ideas because it means they have to recognize a bright idea in the first place in order to fuck themselves a place in line.
According to women, anyone who lifts a finger to help themselves should get a kick in the teeth and a placard that says, “Congratulations! You just adopted a thousand starving kids somewhere feminism doesn’t give a fuck about — or is there some other reason feminism launches bullshit ad campaigns promoting girls in science when little girls halfway around the world don’t have enough water to live?”
Maybe feminism just doesn’t care about black people.
Opportunity Cost
The more money you spend on the things you like, the less opportunity you have to give your money to women.
Economics — and capitalism — is founded on opportunity cost. I know there are a lot of young men reading this, so I’m going to give you a one sentence primer on money management that could very well save your life.
Everything costs something.
That smart girl with the big jugs in your chemistry class? She costs something. In fact, she costs about one zero more than the flatter girl on her right. Who gives a fuck how smart either of them are? That’s called an opportunity cost.
Women never have to sacrifice anything to get what they want. They just change what they want. If a woman is fat, she wraps velor around her love handles and marries poor. If she’s obnoxious, she becomes a lesbian or gets really into wine. Either way, women work in reverse. They don’t run the race, they just draw the finish line wherever God dropped them.
Take a reasonably hot woman to a bar and see how long she’ll go thirsty because a guy won’t buy her a drink. Fuck, light her on fire. She’ll burn to death before dropping six bucks on a glass of Chardonnay. Women consider any market driven exchange to be unsavory and beneath them.
Capitalism is why women hate strippers.
Lawn Darts
Women are like lawn darts. All the good ones were made in the 50’s.
To a woman, accepting capitalism means accepting that her self-worth as a whore follows the trajectory of a lawn dart. It starts in your hand, high in worth and full of potential. Then you chuck it in the air. Halfway through, everything becomes dizzy and confusing. Panic follows, and as the dart comes hurtling downward, responsibly is abandoned in the name of self-ass-preservation. Who knows where this thing is going to end up, but one thing is certain, someone is going to have to pay when it goes through the hood of your neighbor’s car. That someone will probably be you.
That’s called divorce.
No matter who they are or what they do, women always have the opportunity to whip out their vagina and rake in a quick Divorce Pay Day. That’s what it is to be a woman. Duplicity is your Plan B. Capitalism is a reminder of how much that Plan B is worth.
The Lottery Mentality
The reason women embrace marriage and alimony as if they were life rafts of shit, is because women live by the Lottery Mentality. No woman can achieve through brains and brawn. Those are manly things. Women need to win the lottery; a lottery like a rich internet mogul who mistook her insecurity for shyness and friendship while in college, or a TV producer who was coincidentally left by his wife the same day the lottery winning starlet landing on his casting couch.
Ka-ching!
Women cruise through life waiting for their ship to come in, and they hate anyone who doesn’t see life through the same set of opaque Chanel glasses. However, the lottery is not a form of commerce. It’s a commerce for idiots. The lottery is Sarah Jessica Parker to capitalism’s Nicolas Cage.
Women Hate America
Women hate everything that makes America great.
America was once called the “Great Melting Pot”, because a bunch of cultures from all of the place all got together and had sex with each other until awesome things like pizza and Brazilian bikinis were born. Women don’t mix well with others. They cling to their catty friends in little clumps and give all new comers the stink-eye. Little girls ostracize other little girls into committing suicide. That’s un-American.
If it were up to women, free speech would have its dick cut off and shoved into it’s ear holes. Then the playing field would be even and capitalism would die a slow, retarded death.
Money is how men keep score in the game of life. If you don’t like that, then you can take your vagina back to Venus. Money is manly as shit — literally.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 25 … 13 12 11 10 9 [8] 7 6 5 4 3 … 1 » Show All
You know, all you do is boast about what other men have achieved. One of those achievements happens to be science, this is the science you boast about yet push aside when it doesn’t suit you.
And MansVoice, please do elaborate on this conspiracy about neurologists lying to everyone. I’m intrigued…how do they do it? And why are they spending so much money on it? If they were going to do that in the first place wouldn’t it be more logical for them not to do the study in the first place? Gee, these men mustn’t be real men at all huh? Doing all this research, spending years upon years at Uni, all that money, all that studying just to make girls happy*tsk tsk* there must be an even more devious motive. It seems you have it figured out…Why MV? Why? :P
Now I understand, Clair. By neo-cortex you mean vagina, and by problem solving you mean how can the “neo-cortex” be used to milk a man for all he is worth. Makes more sense now.
*D3C*
Yeah, us men can’t problem solve for shit. There are plenty of “facts” that prove men aren’t better than women, such as men invented the telephone, the combustion engine, efficient power generation, everything whereas women and their problem solving neo-cortex have fucking squat next to their name. Sounds like a good correlation between your research and the real world doesn’t it Clair.
*D3C*
All those research and facts were put there to make women feel good. Men are better than women; if you live in the real world, that stands true 99% of the time.
Call him Dazza…it sounds better.
How the hell can it be biased research?! My god, the machine isn’t rigged to only show certain activity in mens brains. God, grow up and stop being such sook. Oh no, there may be research and FACTS out there that shit all over your ‘men are better then women at everything” shit, handle it. Don’t sit there and cry….”*sniff* the machine is rigged. It’s bias. *violent sobs*”.
@ Dazed. Aptly put. Men dont need women at the workplace. They just tolerate them to be politically correct - Why else would we want incompetent workers doing jackshit in the best positions to have? Why “best”? Because women demand the best share of the pie even though most dont belong there.
I think 99% of men would agree with me. But unfortunately only 20% will say so because of social prejudice when a man lets his concerns be known. If a man complains to his boss that a woman colleague isn’t good enough for the job, you can bet your bottom dollar that he will get the sack and possibly worse if any woman finds out about it.
There is a world outside your biased research, Clair. Its called the real world and men built it. You just can’t handle that simple truth.
*D3C*
Point out the propaganda in that post. Please, show me the light.
If you are so independent then why are you here wasting our time when you are not wanted? We don’t need you and you are independent.. So prove it by leaving..
Reverse psychology? Or just being an ass? Either way, I think your an idiot. So really, any advice you give me isn’t worth anything.
Not really Clair. I fully agree with Dazed observations. Sure it is politically incorrect but it is the fucking truth!
There is a world outside your own dazza.
I know many, many women and many, many men. I also know that in comparison to the men, those women couldn’t problem solve their way out of a wet paper bag. That is real observation, not some biased research.
*D3C*
You’re very mean
That’s divine intervention. Even God is at his patience end with reading your arguments.
*D3C*
Women better at remebering land marks -http://www.exn.ca/brain/
women are less likely to develop schizophrenia in their early adult years -
women use both hemispheres of their brain to communicate -
http://members.shaw.ca/hidden-talents/brain/116-sexes.html
http://www.singlesexschools.org/research-brain.htm
http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/talktoyourbaby/gender.html
http://www.relationship-institute.com/freearticles_detail.cfm?article_ ID=151
http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/talktoyourbaby/gender.html
“We said that girls tended to be more left-brained and boys more right-brained. Oxford Brookes University neurologist Professor John Geake’s latest research reveals that, in fact, language activity occurs in both hemispheres. The left side tackles the mechanics of grammar and speech production, while the right hemisphere tackles meaning and the speaker’s actions and feelings. ”
Thats a tad more complex then just lidtening. Girls are not only listening but interpreting your body language, tone and pitch ect.
That would be a good theory, if we didn’t know better.
From a very young age females are reading and learning body language, facial expressions, deciphering the pitch and tone in peoples voices, (as are young boys, but not to the extent of that of girls), dose this not set females up to be experts in this area?
I haven’t heard anything against it. I’d like it if you could show me something that disputes it if you could. I’d very much like that.
I like it.
Basically, they can play with your emotions at will, quite easily.
limbic system= emotions, neo-cortex = whats the best way to deal with problem? This is what we’ll do
Women combine the two - They work it, learned to use, “finer tuned” if you will
limbic system= emotions, r-complex= what fucker did this?? I’ll kick there ass, limbic system+ r-complex says “shut the fuck up neo-cortex”
Men combine the two
(put very simply)
I’m talking about things such as theory of mind, umm, social conscience, complex thought structures, empathy ect
About a year ago, Scientific American released a special edition called The Rise of Being Human, or something like that. If you like I can find my edition and give you the actual title and edition so that you can backorder it. It is very interesting.
So are mine. Look around and observe human interaction…you’ll see it and laugh. Humans are so predictable.
Dakota….I just typed out a entire response….but it didn’t post….I feel like crying…*sigh* I’ll retype it. It’s coming….*sobs*
Clair or is it Phil? You believe to much propaganda.
You know you are lying right? If you are so independent then why are you here wasting our time when you are not wanted?
We don’t need you and you are independent.. So prove it by leaving..
Clair you’ve oubviously been defeated by the man-brain of Dakota Smith. I suggest that you stop posting on this site from now on, please do not embarass yourself any further.
Men are just better, just accept it and move on.
I noticed how you never replied to my last post, Clair. That is good, because the argument was over a long time beforehand. But moving on.
How is remembering land marks useful? OK, even if that statement is true(unlikely), you have a good memory. So what? It helps in no way to be an abstract thinker and solve problems. Life is all about solving problems.
We use one hemisphere of our brains and still come out on top in any area of problem solving or critical thinking. Says a lot for the female brain doesn’t it. Women don’t empathise, they ostracise.
You say all these big words, Clair, but I am yet to actually hear proof you know what you are talking about.
Also, you say woment excel on tests that measure the ability to recall words. Again, that is a useless test. What should be tested is the ability to balance a cheque book or operate a computer. They are life lessons and I guarantee that men would take the gold in those.
Women tend to be better at identifying matching items quickly and performing certain manual tasks. Yes, they are good at identifying matching items because of the millions of years spent in a shopping centre matching handbags and shoes. Women are good at “certain” manual tasks? Which ones? Oh yes that’s right, putting makeup on. But the problem with those skills is they don’t apply to the real world, so they are in fact useless.
*D3C*
Proof, please.
Proof, please.
Proof, please.
An unprovable theory, even assuming that you can provide proof for the statement. There’s an alternative theory (again, assuming that the initial statement is true):
In my line of work, computer science, the brain is analogous to the motherboard of a computer. In the early days of computing, all processing was handled by the CPU. However, as technology progressed, it was discovered that overall speed and functioning could be enhanced by off-loading work from the CPU to specialized processors — the most notable of these being the graphics processor.
All the complex work of screen rendering on a modern computer is performed by the graphics processor, leaving the CPU free to deal with the workload of actually performing calculations.
Using this as an analogy, one can theorize that (again, assuming you can provide proof of the statement) if women utilize both hemispheres of the brain and men only one, it may be because women’s brains are less developed than men’s and less specialized.
Where men have a part of their brain that is a specific “language processor” and all the work of communication is off-loaded to it, women don’t have such a specialized processing area. They are therefore required to use more of their brain’s general processing to perform the same task that a man’s brain performs in only one area.
Again, one must understand that any such theory (yours or mine) is highly speculative and cannot be proven at present. The obvious reason is that such proof requires live human subjects willing to have their brains subjected to significant invasive experimentation — obviously not something a competent individual is likely to accede to.
More theorizing, unprovable even assuming the initial statement is true.
I would grant you that women appear to experience emotions more intensely than men — this would certainly be consistent with my experience and I expect the experience of most men. However, just as male behavior is largely driven by the presence of testosterone, female behavior is largely driven by estrogen. Estrogen, among other things, is responsible for the degree to which one experiences emotion.
Therefore, an alternate theory to explain what women consider “empathy” would simply be the presence of much larger quantities of estrogen in the bloodstream, and brain functioning is heavily influenced by hormones.
I would, however, object to the notion that women empathize better than men. Women feel more intensely than men, but as emotion is highly subjective and largely egotistical, this doesn’t translate into empathy. Women may believe that strong emotion and empathy are identical, but they aren’t even remotely the same.
Wild speculation, I’m afraid. It’s neither supported nor even indicated by the initial statement.
Furthermore, it’s not supported by the large body of noted psychologists and psychiatrists, most of whom have been male. If women were biologically predispositioned to have a better understanding of the psyche, then these fields (both of which have largely come of age after the women’s movement) would be dominated by women experts. They are not.
Please be more specific. I’m not clear what you mean by this statement.
Proof, please. Also, what do you mean by “finer tuned”? I’m unclear how that term applies to either the neocortex or the limbic system.
Proof, please. Also, what do you mean by “driven by” in this context? I’m particularly unclear how women can be “finer tuned” to their limbic system, yet men are driven by it.
I suppose that depends on your definition. The terms you’ve been using are highly subjective and scientificially imprecise.
It’s certainly true that the structure of the neocortex differs dramatically between primates and other species, but I’m unaware that anyone has made a definitive study defining a relationship between the structure of the neocortex and what specifically sets humans apart from other primates.
Certainly there have been no studies that offer a conclusive relationship between the neocortex, the human experience, and the way different sexes interpret that experience.
What one really must understand is that the human brain is the most complex computing structure in existence. While neuroscience has made great strides in recent decades, it’s still very much in its infancy — the problem consistently being that there are no living humans willing to subject their brains to the kind of intrusive study necessary to understand its functioning.
What information is available is largely gleaned from cadavers or individuals with known neurological disorders, which is far from the controlled environment science needs in order to make great strides.
The overwhelming number of medications on the market designed to treat neurological disorders don’t actually alter the functioning of the brain. Rather, they stimulate or suppress certain kinds of hormones known to impact brain function in specific ways.
But again, as good as the advances have been, the science is still in its infancy. To make anything other than some very generalized statements at this stage is to make assumptions in a near vacuum of facts.
No, unlike the vast majority of your examples (which are at best speculation and at worst wishful thinking), my examples can be borne out by simple observation.
The next time you take your car in to be serviced, note the number of male mechanics versus the number of females. And by “mechanic”, I mean the persons actually working on cars in the bay, not the clerical workers.
I can guarantee that the overwhelming majority will be male. In fact, I would be willing to bet that there will be no female mechanics at all, simply because there are so few in existence.
In my own subjective experience, I noted a single female mechanic at the place I take my car to be serviced the last time I was there. The reason I noted it is because it was the first time I’d ever seen a woman actually working on a car. In 42 years.
Empirically, I would expect any study to show that at least 99% of car mechanics worldwide are male. I don’t know of any such study, but subjectively the presence of female mechanics is so highly aberrational that I would expect the number to be essentially inconsequential.