The Heart of Darkness Should Have Been Called Golden Girls
This is going to be one of my most controversial articles to date. I say that because I don’t even agree with it. In fact I’m disgusted by it; but that’s the burden of being a man. Even if you don’t agree with the truth or if you’re disgusted by the big fat obligation you have to keep shucking out the dough for, you do it. You do it and you shut your mouth.
Or in some cases you open your mouth in order to speak the truth. And then sometimes your mouth is a metaphor for fingers, which can do writing unless your hands are cuffed behind your back for some reason. In that case, the mouth can still be just a mouth. You understand.
Recently a woman in Philadelphia, America tried to set the new style record for Pulling a Bobbitt. You can read more about it by following the link at the bottom of this article. For those of you unfamiliar with the term I just fabricated, Pulling a Bobbitt, it involves extreme male genital mutilation and should never ever be discussed by anyone ever for any reason.
In fact the only people who do openly talk about it are women who will never be married or have children because they have Erection Killing hardwired into their system like a region encoded DVD player. How’d you like to watch a DVD of Baliwood’s finest? Well I certainly wouldn’t, but I also can’t because my DVD player is set for Region 2. So go fuck yourself, darling.
Monica “The Claw Cow” Randolph is MenAreBetterThanWomen.com’s Honorary Man of the Month for the month of May.
I know what you’re thinking.
“Has Dick lost his fucking man-mind!? There’s no way that crazy bitch should be given the highest accolade this site has to offer! What the fuck!”
What the fuck indeed. I only have one thing to say in my defense. Does this raving and vindictive banshee not embody everything that is woman?
Let’s look beyond the female hysteria for a moment — and also the “charges” of domestic assault, battery, rape, and I guess the illegal super-adhesive glue from the future that kept her feet from walking her ass out the door before resorting to such grotesqueries. Let’s look at what makes a woman.
A woman is a collection of mindless impulses and instincts. That’s why they don’t ever know what the fuck they’re doing. They just can’t understand. God, or chance, or your subconscious — or whatever the fuck you believe in didn’t give women the powers of logic and brains like He/It/You did to us men. He gave them only a foul instinct of mistrust and a temper like a possibly broken firework. Is it going to blow at any second now? Absolutely no one fucking knows, but if you want to find out, I suggest bringing a big stick.
Being a man means being true to yourself. That’s called integrity. Men have the power to adapt themselves sure, but women don’t. That’s why Monica “The Claw Cow” is MenAreBetterThanWomen.com’s Honorary Man of the Month — because she’s true to her gender. If she were a man, that would be a mark of only the highest integrity.
By the way, the article on Monica below is full of snide, anti-male remarks written (likely) by an unmarried miserable shrew of a woman.
UPDATE
I was so disgusted by the candor of the author in the above story, that I emailed Miss DiFilippo (difilid@phillynews.com) the following:
Dear Miss DiFilippo,
I assume you are a Miss because the kind of male-hatred and general human malice you demonstrated in your attempt at “humor” in the recent article “A Genital Reminder” would certainly disqualify you as a potential mate for any man.
I found the article’s light-hearted nature to be inappropriate at best. Your indifference to a major suffering, not only in one man’s life, but also in the life of a possibly abused and mentally ill woman is alarming, disturbing, and disgusting — especially for a woman who has luckily found herself in the position of a potential role model for any local girls who may have realized that Paris Hilton is a whore.
Frankly, I’m offended. Thankfully, however, I am not surprised as this is exactly the kind of behavior a man is to expect from a woman; a vile, vindictive, sort of un-aimed desperation that cheapens life.
It made me sick,
-Dick Masterson, http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com
I suggest everyone do the same.
UPDATE 5/24/06
The always cordial Miss DiFilippo responded to my email with biting personal criticism!
uh, and i suppose you’re married? i feel sorry for that poor woman …
Dana DiFilippo
Reporter
Philadelphia Daily News
(215) 854-5934
I responded in kind.
You wouldn’t be if you knew how incredible I was in bed. How’s that for a fortune, cookie?
-Dick Masterson
http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/monica-randolph-fuck-you/
Related Articles:
May 25th, 2006 at 5:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
Who’s Ghu? Kidding.
I don’t need professional help. Seriously. I just don’t like it when I see people being bullied that’s all. And, considering you yourself have been the victim of abuse, I am kind of surprised that you engaged in that kind of behaviour.
May 25th, 2006 at 7:05 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
No it wasn’t; no it can’t. To slightly misuse Aristotle: A is A.
As a sidenote to Dakota’s comment (directed at Fem): I don’t even think my statement concerning VOR’s writing was an insult. I think irrational stupidity is an accurate and fair characterization of her or his approach. I’ve not yet formed a final opinion as to VOR’s gender, so Fem can’t even rationally accuse me of bias against women as she also did.
RAP said:
In this narrow case, I’m sadly forced to agree. Nicely said, RAP.
-wolfe
May 25th, 2006 at 7:57 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
No, it couldn’t. It can only be ambiguous if one doesn’t understand the meanings of words.
I used to have the exact conversation with the skank — sorry, my ex — all the time. Prime example:
One night we got involved in a discussion that ended with her shrieking the words, “Just living in the same house with me, you’re telling me that I’m inadequate!!”
As this had come rather out of the blue, and because I wanted to be sure of what I was actually hearing, I asked:
“Wait. Stop right there. You’re telling me that if I just sat in a chair — I did nothing but just sit there — that I would be telling you that you’re inadequate? Just the act of sitting in a chair? I would’t have to say or do anything, just sitting there would be communicate that I thought you were inadequate?”
She thought for a second about it, and then said, “Well … yes.”
There obviously wasn’t any farther to go with that conversation.
A few weeks later, we had our last marriage counselling session. I told the therapists that she’d said this to me. She denied ever having said it. I halted everything at that point, and said, “Wait — you don’t remember saying it? You don’t remember my explicitly asking if you really meant it, and then the conversation pretty much ending?” She continued to deny that it had ever happened.
When the therapist asked if she felt like I was communicating her inadequacy to her, she took him on a long, wild goose chase to say “yes” by virtue of skirting it every way that she could.
When, much later, I brought up what she’d said again, she admitted that it occurred, but said that I had misinterpreted her, that I’d twisted her words around to mean something she didn’t intend.
And I told her that words only have one meaning, particularly when they’re strung together a certain way — and most particularly when the listener explicitly stops to ask if that’s what the speaker really meant.
I can’t tell you the number of times I told the skank, “Words mean things.”
It’s just another example of how women are apparently incapable of grasping that simple fact. Words mean things.
May 25th, 2006 at 8:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
Words have meaning. That is true.
Yet it is also true that some words have more meanings than others, and that even if the words are clear, the tone of voice, the context and even the body language of the person speaking can create words that hold a completely different meaning altogether.
If I were to comment on your tie, “Dakota, nice tie.” you might take what I say literally (Enya likes my tie), but what if I had a heavy note of sarcasm in my voice, or what if I pulled a face as I said it? These extra cues indicate that actually I do not like your tie at all.
On a comments section such as this one you may think that meanings are obvious because the words are clear and you can read them over again in the context to understand the meaning.
Yet this is not always so. A simple typo or grammar mistake can be enough to lead to a misunderstanding sometimes. Often we do not get the contexual cues of our voices, facial expressions and body language to help us.
They say that a lot of communication between people is non-verbal so you can imagine how much information we miss when using this medium.
In this context though Wolfe’s comments were not that hard to understand, I think somewhere before I have said that at times when there is a misunderstanding the problem can be a result of three main things.
A. the person communicating (wolfe’s intentions).
B. the message (the content of the message)
C. the recipient (fem’s understanding)
I do think you have overreacted to Wolfe’s comments, Fem. I don’t think what Wolfe said was ambiguous, I understood it fine - so did the other guys here. The question is, why didn’t you?
May 25th, 2006 at 8:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 920fbe879a674
When you posted one of your comments, the resulting page said, “This comment is being held for moderation.” That means your comment was being held for moderation. That’s what happens when you post more than one link. I have to make sure it’s not spam.
Female, on the other hand, gets all her comments moderated. Not because she’s a woman, however. She’s just a certifiable nutcase who shouldn’t be allowed to say whatever she pleases without censor. I won’t be responsible for a second mental breakdown on her part.
-Dick
May 25th, 2006 at 8:39 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
Well … here’s a possibility …
May 25th, 2006 at 9:55 am - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
Right. I will keep that in mind for the future, Dick.
May 25th, 2006 at 10:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
Who is being bullied, Fem? If you were referring to VOR, I would say he/she was less of an underdog than the dog that just bit the ass of each and every poster on here.
May 25th, 2006 at 2:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
Dakota, you’ve just inferred that I’m a psycho hose beast. So that you understand this, that is abuse. That is what you were calling VOR on for doing. That therefore means you are a hypocrite. You can look it up.
wolfe - your exact words again:
Your second para: Where VOR is coming from is complete irrational stupidity.
Now, I disagree that the comment above can only be read in one way.
It can either be read as “your second paragraph is stupid” or “where VOR is coming from is stupidity.”
Now, when you consider what my second paragraph actually was, see below:
Dismounting from my high horse this one and only time, I would like to say to VOR that I do understand where you are coming from, and for anyone wondering, no VOR is not me.
Therefore, if I have just said I understand where VOR is coming from, and then wolfe says, well that place VOR is coming from is irrational and stupid, then I must also infer that he is applying those terms to myself.
So either way you read his ambiguous comment, it still results in a personal attack on myself.
Then, wolfe, you tried to deny this with the following comment.
“Didnt call you stupid. Said your second paragraph was stupid. Also said your last one was good.”
It doesn’t matter that you say that you didn’t call me stupid, because by saying my second paragraph was stupid, you have already called me stupid. Just in case you are still confused by what I mean, I maybe should have added the following words in brackets to my paragraph, “VOR, I do understand where you are coming from (that being - outraged indignation, because I myself experience that reading these boards on a daily basis)”
May 25th, 2006 at 2:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
Enya, you have failed to consider context. VOR is opposed to the premise of this site and therefore every poster on it, except me, therefore HE OR SHE is the underdog. Now I don’t believe that you don’t understand that because you yourself started off posting from the same perspective as VOR, ie, you were abusive. So for you now to imply that you don’t understand that HE OR SHE is the underdog, is frankly BS.
May 25th, 2006 at 9:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8f5fa079b338a
Fair warning:
I assume what you’re really trying to do, Fem, is yank my chain with regards to having been abused, right? You should be aware that this is one of those things that if it were my site would get you very aggressively banned. But since it isn’t, I’ll just tell you that since you’ve taken off your gloves, mine are off, too.
Oh, I’m sorry, I should have been more specific. I didn’t mean to infer you were a psycho hose beast. I meant to flat-out say so.
So, just so there’s no misundersting or taking my comments any other way:
Fem, you’re a Psycho Hose Beast. Get help. Seriously. Professional help. Tomorrow, if possible. I’m not being sarcastic, I really mean it. Get professional help.
I’ve tried every nice way I know to say it, and it never works. See a shrink, Fem. If you need a referral, let me know, and I’ll see if my father can find an organization in your area that does referrals.
Sometimes when being nice has had no impact, you just have to call a spade a spade.
Huh? I wasn’t calling VOR on anything. VOR was a complete idiot, and I took a few posts to yank her chain, just because it was fun. But, like any activity that devolves to teasing a dumb animal, the novelty wore off, that’s all.
No need. I know the word. And besides, there’s always Miriam-Webster’s if I forget a spelling. You know, like obfuscate …
May 25th, 2006 at 9:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
No, he implied you were. There is a difference.
Indeed.
I mean no disrespect in picking on the difference between infer and imply, but it is a pet peeve.
Female, go to this site. Note the discussion around “If the introductory phrase preceding the colon is very brief and the clause following the colon represents the real business”. Note that I capitalized the clause after the colon. Note the relation between “remember” and what comes after the colon. In no case is the second clause implying that that’s all one should remember!
In the same fashion, I am not implying your second paragraph is “irrational stupidity”. Grade 8 English used to teach this; I can only assume they’ve abandoned this outside of North America.
I cannot believe I am wasting time on this: giving (OMG I used another colon) grammar lessons to Female.
Awesome. You used infer correctly.
No it bloody well doesn’t. If you get a personal attack from me, you’ll know it.
No, I don’t weasel about.
Except I said nothing of the kind.
I’ve no confusion about where you’re coming from; I simply think that VOR is not a voice you should be associating yourself with. I think you’d feel the same way if you really looked at what s/he is saying.
-wolfe
May 25th, 2006 at 10:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8f5fa079b338a
Honestly, I don’t know why I’m going to bother with this, except that it’s late, I’m awake, and I have nothing better to do.
Fem, suppose I put this mathematical relationhip to you:
Given:
A = 5, B = 4Then:
A > BMathematically, this means “A is greater than B.”
Questions:
Since A is equal to five and B is equal to four, this is a mathematically accurate statement, yes or no?
Do you believe that making mathematically accurate statement that “A > B” includes an inherent emotional statement about the relative importance of B with respect to A, yes or no?
Understand that I’m not trying to trick you into admitting anything about men and women. I understand that from your perspective, the statement “Men > Women” is not accurate, and I’m not trying to debate it. I just want to know the answers to the two questions I’ve posed. They can be answered in one word each, without debate.
May 26th, 2006 at 3:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
Fem, sorry but you are really starting to get on my nerves. Why can’t you just leave the issue? Why can’t you just accept that there was a misunderstanding and move on? Why does this have to become some kind of emotional drama where people have to keep explaining things to you.
I will attempt to do so one more time and then afterwards I am leaving this issue, because frankly this is a waste of my time and everyone else’s on this board. So here goes:-
This is the definition of underdog -
underdog
Function: noun
1 : a loser or predicted loser in a struggle or contest
2 : a victim of injustice or persecution
Now, considering that VOR came on this site willingly (his/her choice) and started insulting everyone there is no way I can consider him/her of being a victim of injustice. VOR knows exactly what he/she is doing, he/she is aware of the premise of the site and made the decision to go into the site to shit-stir. If you start attacking people, guess what response you will receive?
If VOR is attacked, it is not because he/she is a victim, frankly he/she was asking for it. Reason: he/she attacked first.
So, on this basis is it right to then give VOR a pat on the back simply because he/she agrees with your premise? I don’t agree with the premise that men are better than women, but that doesn’t mean I agree with VOR’s approach.
Sadly Fem, it is YOU that is failing to consider the context. This is a site with the premise that men are better than women - that is the context.
Within that context there are certain individuals (myself included) who disagree - but the bottom line is - this is Dick’s site and Dick’s rules. It is true that his rules are giving us a place of ‘unfair disadvantage’… In this sense we are underdogs, but we are knowingly putting ourselves in this position. We do not have post here, we do not have to put ourselves in this position - but we do - so we have to accept the consequences of our actions, be they fair or unfair.
Your complaints (although legitimate in any other context) are disregarding this context completely. In much the same way that you cannot jump in a pool full of jellyfish and then cry victim because you got stung; you cannot go onto a site like menarebetterthanwomen.com insulting people and expect a warm reception with equal treatment. It’s like going to a cigarrette machine, putting the money in, and complaining because you got a packet of cigarettes. Its called cause and effect.
For the record, Fem - when I first arrived on this site I had quite an attitude, I did a few silly things - but I don’t believe I was ever abusive. I don’t think I attacked people personally, if I attacked anything it would be the premise of the site.
May 26th, 2006 at 8:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
wolfe, you said:
But you also said:
Is it any wonder I get confused?
May 26th, 2006 at 9:03 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
Fem, sorry but you are really starting to get on my nerves.
If my comments annoy you, there is a simple solution, don’t read them. Am I standing behind you with a gun to your head forcing you to read them and get annoyed? No, so don’t blame me for doing something that is going to tic you off. And don’t whinge at me for it, I find that annoying when other’s pass the buck and blame other people for something that they themselves had control over. It’s called not being accountable.
Do you think I am enjoying have to pull semantics apart? I am not leaving the issue because I believe there is confusion that needs to be clarified, it’s called reaching an understanding. To walk away would leave everyone involved wondering what it was all about. I find that half-assed.
See above. I guess I don’t like misunderstandings too much. I like to get to the bottom of issues and understand things. It’s called learning. As a teacher, I thought you would understand that. Maybe not.
It’s no emotional drama for me, no matter how much Dakota wishes to project.
May 26th, 2006 at 12:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1dbb3512e97cb
No there is not any wonder at all.
May 26th, 2006 at 1:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
I don’t know. I think you abused things in taking on several id’s. Is that “abusive”? Dunno.
I certainly interpreted you as doing so; in one case correctly; in one case incorrectly [I think]. I fired back at you twice IIRC, and withdrew the second attack and apologized once you’d explained.
A little odd, you’d agree, given that you’d decided to post here. NB- I’ve no issue with you disagreeing with — or even attacking — the premise MABTW, but that’s distinct from attacking the premise of the site. (Granted, that’s getting a bit into meta-analysis).
I’ve no argument with (and strongly agree with most of) the rest of what you write, and write the above only to convey my views.
I suppose not.
Really there’s not much I can say without running the risk of you taking umbrage.
-wolfe
May 26th, 2006 at 2:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8718cafff887c
Wow Buddy, You have definitly met the wrong women if you think all this crap about them. Oviously, you have been dumped or hurt by women in the past, but just because that one girl made you pissed, doesn’t mean EVERY single girl is like that. This Website is either a cry for attention and a joke just to see all the lame ass people that would respond, or you (no offense) have no life sinse you devoted all your time to this. Actually, the last one is oviouse for both the Catagories.
Now, I’m a man and actually have the balls to admitt that girls are better than us. I’m not saying they can just cook and look damn sexy, but they are better at everything. The only reason some of them dumb themselves down by acting ditsy is probably because they want men to think they are smarter, so they feel like they have one thing that they are better than women at. I really want women to stop this, because my god, we already know they’re better, dont dumb yourselves down just to make us happy.
Kid, I seriously think the real reason you made this site is because your insecure about being a man, so you thought typing all this shit would stop women from being dominante. Well man, STOP TRYING, it’s not possible kid…. They are better and they’ll always be better and making messed up sites aren’t going to help anything.
Grow Up Kid,
O by the way, my Girlfriend read your posts,
She was laughing so hard…. She said she knows a Kickass psyciatrist and she can hook you two up.
haha,
-Ed
May 26th, 2006 at 7:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 794fefffe1145
They never stop trying this bullshit do they………
Let me see, when was the last we had a similar post from another follower of the “feminastiedopecycle”.
You have the wrong website !
For a better explanation of your behaviour, here is your link….