MySpace is Full of Sluts and Whores

Does everyone know of this thing called MySpace? Apparently it’s a website for young girls to practice their whoring skills from the comfort of their own home. This service is provided for free.

Jesus Christ, it sickens me.

It sickens me beyond the garish colors and wildly blinking tags of text. Nay, that’s merely a sickness of stomach. MySpace, however, sickens me straight to the core of my morality.

This is my point today: when left to their own devices, men construct things out of other things. We build friendships out of people; we make wheels from slabs of rock; we make one long straw out of several other straws. Women, on the other hand, get their whore on.

Go browse through the MySpace listings for a while. Especially if you have a daughter. Then you’ll definitely want to go punch a few little bastards’ names into their search engine-ing box.

I culled a few of the profile headlines in a span of about three minutes to demonstrate my point (maximizing for whore factor), but I’m opting not to print them here as the content made even me sick. And the girls look to be under 18.

Despicable.

There’s a classic story about a man who turns himself invisible somehow. He was a scientist. I don’t remember who wrote it because that’s not what’s important about books. What’s important is the message. Learning and memorizing the names of authors and syllabi and whatnots is the stuff for feminist studies classes.

The Invisible Man (as I will call him) embarked on a series of nefarious acts with his new-found invisibility. Things like stealing money and killing people. It’s an exciting tale about the heart of man and the effect of “invisibility” on the psyche.

And that’s exactly my fucking point.

When invisible — when completely anonymous, men seek personal gain. Unsurprisingly, that avarice happens to be the very fucking engine of the free market economy. Perhaps you’ve heard of the free market economy. It did build the whole of Earth and everything awesome upon it. Take an introductory economics class if you don’t agree with me, but first go and fuck yourself.

Men also seek to gratify their deepest inner desires. How is that bad?

It’s isn’t because it’s something men do. Take any charity for example. It’s just something some man gave of himself because he wanted to do it — he wanted to feel good about it. That’s completely selfish. It was a desire of his that he fulfilled. Filling desires, even when invisible, is not a bad thing.

Women, however, when lounging behind their little veil of privacy called the internet, just try to look as easy as possible. And by easy, I mean easy to fuck.

It’s as simple as this: men are built for progress in their cores; women are built for sex. If you have a problem with that, take it to MySpace.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

183 Comments in 179 threads.»

Pages: « 9 8 7 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Billy
2007-04-02 23:35:41

HH you are being a bit hard on dogs. There are many ways in which dogs are bettter than women. Most dogs can be trained. They do many things to please their master. Dogs have actually saved lives and are fearless in the face off death. Ever known a woman to do any of those things?

 
Comment by Heinrich Himmler
2007-04-02 13:38:21

Why women hate this site and even tried to shut it down: Cause men are right. Dick is right. Cynical, slightly overblown at times, but absolutely right for the most part.
Re the post, i already know what its like to be invisible. Im a white male in America who only makes $40,000 a year. Try to get a job, try to get laid, try to change anything about your own stupid, drone, work-slave, tax paying lifestyle and DING! youre invisible!! Its like you are not even there.
Growing up in my family we had two dogs over the years. (im going somewwere with this shit). The dogs only paid attention to my dad. They recognized him as the dominant one and nothing the rest of us ever did for them was of any importance to them. Meanwhile they followed my Dad around as a dog-god and ignored the rest of us. The point is that women are exactly the same as those worthless dogs we had. Just watch them. (The women, not the dogs damnit, the stupid dogs are dead of course). The moment a woman lays eyes on you, her minimal intellect kicks in and she is simply evaluating what you might do for her. In 5 seconds she makes a decision as to whether she will be a dad-follower dog and lick your ass, or just shit on the floor and ignore you. To prove my theory, if you want to, go up to some female receptionist or clerk somewhere dressed in your best suit, driving a high end car and act all high falutin. And contrast that with how they normally act toward you. The point - WOMEN THINK EXACTLY THE SAME AS DOGS DO! Except they are much more reluctant to hump your leg.

 
Comment by diamatik
2007-03-13 20:06:38

Right you are, Billy. His poor raging hormones are getting the better of him. Someday he will have sex, and he will be screwed over by the evil ways of women. Baptism by fire. It is sad, but hey, at least we tried to warn him.

 
Comment by Billy
2007-03-13 19:43:28

adam said:

oh god… find something at least interesting to write about.
we are guys, we love girls period.

That’s because your still young and haven’t realized the evil of women. In time, in time. You’re blinded by lust and women count on that.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-13 18:14:24

adam said:

oh god… find something at least interesting to write about.
we are guys, we love girls period.

You don’t like Shakespear?

 
Comment by adam
2007-03-13 16:32:18

oh god… find something at least interesting to write about.
we are guys, we love girls period.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-10 04:54:27

Jon91zX said:

Jane, I am also in the IB program. I have a strong disdain for you assumption that knowledge of Shakespeare, literature, etc. will get you any credit towards appearing intelligent.

I actually think someone who has actually read Shakespear and other famous writers is quite smart considering todays world.

 
Comment by Jon91zX
2007-03-07 22:28:12

Jane, I am also in the IB program. I have a strong disdain for you assumption that knowledge of Shakespeare, literature, etc. will get you any credit towards appearing intelligent. To be frank, pulling random IQ’s off of the top of your head will most likely do the opposite. I hope you enjoy your five figure salary as a high school English teacher, I’d rather be apt at a subject that is actually valued by society.

Go fuck yourself. We are not disillusioned misogynists, we are just anti-misandrists vehemently seeking refuge from the ball smashing feminist regime.

And furthermore, it is impossible to have a cumulative GPA of 5.0 in the IB program. PIB classes are not weighted so your freshmen and sophomore years you could at best have GPAs of 4.0 and 4.333 respectively–if taking AP History and in accelerated math.

 
Comment by Billy
2007-03-07 20:53:37

son of the suns said:

Jane, the ability to suck cock for good grades hardly makes you a Bhuddist.

No. But she may get extra grade points for extracurricular activity!

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-07 15:46:51

Jane said:

I don’t know why I even bother to waste my time trying to lead some ignorant misogynist out of his disillusions. Good luck on your journey to find happiness and truth, and I wish nothing for you but everlasting internal peace and enlightenment.

*buzzer sound* wrong answer. A true buddhist would not call people an ‘ignorant misogynist’. And not using the word ‘delusions’.

You missed the point of Buddhism completely. No surprise though.

Happiness AND truth in this world? HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Thats as funny as saying Bush actually knows what he is doing.

 
Comment by mean_jake
2007-03-07 14:53:34

Women are whores…
just fucking accept it.
who cares how GAY myspace is. when you need a hot little whore with no class that will give it away cheap, just remember myspace serves a purpose.
As for men and the selfish nature blah blah blah bullshit…your fucking right on the money.
Hey jane your pretty good at using that mouth wanna go out sometime?

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-07 14:16:36

Jane, the ability to suck cock for good grades hardly makes you a Bhuddist.

 
Comment by ebombs
2007-03-07 13:03:19

your absolutly right! myspace is just a portal for these little girls to put half naked pictures of themselves and be little whores safe in the comfort of there own homes, it sheads light on the real problem, these woman need attention and dont care where it comes from so they dress like whores and do it on the internet cuz they think they have more control but really they dont and its not any better than the bar sluts or plain whores at parties or whatever, just becuase you control what people look at? you still just putting yourself out there for the attention and that makes you no better than the bar slut or whore that really are “whores”.

 
Comment by jon
2007-03-06 11:39:36

nikki said:

i think your lil article is a bunch of bull shyt!!!
Maybe all the chicks youve came across on there, are all sluts and hoes but ths one… I dont think you should categorize people like that… if anything categorize ya self u homo!!!!!

Slut slurp my nuts!! hows that for homo lMAO

Jane said:

Admittedly there are a lot of whorish-looking teenage girls. There are also a lot of dull and drunken teenage boys. I also realize that many of the responses made to this article said in defense of females came out sounding rather… well… young (to put it lightly)… but then again, the type of girls who come to a website called menarebetterthanwomen.com (clever url, by the way) can’t be trusted as a reliable representation of the entire female population. I stumbled across it myself quite by accident while working on my extended essay for high school. I am an International Baccalaureate student, by the way, a member of the world renowned educational program geared towards only the most intelligent students of the entire world (hence the word “International”). My IQ is a respectable 140. I’ve won numerous awards for my prose and poetry. My GPA is actually a 5.0 (imagine that!) which is only possible to achieve by being an honor roll student in either all AP classes or in the IB program. Give me any passage of any book and I will tear it to shreds with my analysis; I could write for pages on any five lines of any Shakespeare play. My point is: there are dull whorish girls. But one must also remember the oafish teenage boys; what with their drinking parties and limited vocabularies (mainly consisting of “shit, dick, bitch, umm, like,” and, on a day they’re feeling particularly well-rounded in their vernacular, “fucking whore”).

I don’t know why I even bother to waste my time trying to lead some ignorant misogynist out of his disillusions. Good luck on your journey to find happiness and truth, and I wish nothing for you but everlasting internal peace and enlightenment.

Find joy. Best wishes, Jane.

Stop talking like a buddist because you dont know anything about enlightenment. Guys dont show half of their penis’s on myspace girls have their thongs on to their pubic area, and 2/3rds of their breasts are hanging out. Thats just SLUTTY!! get over it bitch.

 
Comment by jon
2007-03-06 11:37:23

nikki said:

i think your lil article is a bunch of bull shyt!!!
Maybe all the chicks youve came across on there, are all sluts and hoes but ths one… I dont think you should categorize people like that… if anything categorize ya self u homo!!!!!

Slut slurp my nuts!! hows that for homo lMAO

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-02-08 09:37:13

abaddon_fff said:

Indeed, honestly I think that inattention is by far the worse of the two. It allows children to get away with things that two parents would’t. The simple fact of the matter is that the government encourages this. Single parent house-holds are by far the leader in felons, suicides, and other social ills.

The system itself is to blame along with a mentality that you can “have it all”. The system is adversarial, and I think that its built this way for a reason. Everyones “fighting” for something that in my view is as much an inalienable right as the freedom of speech. Your children shouldn’t be objects to be “fought” over like toys. We need to focus on a system that encourages cooperation instead of legal warfare.

-Strength and Honor-

You should know better than anyone that the cunts can’t be cooperated or reasoned with.

The only reason it’s “legal warfare” instead of bloody war to the death is because apparently the right to raise their children isn’t as an inalienable right as some men say.

Cooperation and legalese bullshit is the weapon of the enemy fembot and sadist homosexuals in elected office trolling for votes, they mastered that weapon long ago and good men can’t compete on “their turf”.

If more men wake up conquest and unconditional surrender and power will be given to us, as the power of fat mouthed feminists and their rich gay cuckolds who hold office lies in the pen, not the sword.

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2007-02-08 08:28:59

Indeed, honestly I think that inattention is by far the worse of the two. It allows children to get away with things that two parents would’t. The simple fact of the matter is that the government encourages this. Single parent house-holds are by far the leader in felons, suicides, and other social ills.

The system itself is to blame along with a mentality that you can “have it all”. The system is adversarial, and I think that its built this way for a reason. Everyones “fighting” for something that in my view is as much an inalienable right as the freedom of speech. Your children shouldn’t be objects to be “fought” over like toys. We need to focus on a system that encourages cooperation instead of legal warfare.

-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by Wolfe
2007-02-07 16:45:57

@Jane and Abaddon: well said.

I doubt Jane will return, but one never knows. Abaddon, as your first paragraph suggests, the feminization of society and the rise of the female-parented family have created a huge collection of slutty girls and oafish boys. In turn, their antics have altered society, generally considerably for the worse.

Finally, I will reiterate that this site is not about misogyny.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-02-07 04:42:25

Jane said:

I don’t know why I even bother

Most of your kind never do.

Jane said:

What a quick wit we have.

Oh again, your lot on this site (Apart from Luka) do far worse than that. I mean, goddamn its hard to change our ‘misogynistic views’ when we’re getting proven right all the time.

 
Comment by Billy
2007-02-07 00:10:06

You don’t expect a woman to learn anything other than what the books and mags tell her?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis