MySpace is Full of Sluts and Whores
Does everyone know of this thing called MySpace? Apparently it’s a website for young girls to practice their whoring skills from the comfort of their own home. This service is provided for free.
Jesus Christ, it sickens me.
It sickens me beyond the garish colors and wildly blinking tags of text. Nay, that’s merely a sickness of stomach. MySpace, however, sickens me straight to the core of my morality.
This is my point today: when left to their own devices, men construct things out of other things. We build friendships out of people; we make wheels from slabs of rock; we make one long straw out of several other straws. Women, on the other hand, get their whore on.
Go browse through the MySpace listings for a while. Especially if you have a daughter. Then you’ll definitely want to go punch a few little bastards’ names into their search engine-ing box.
I culled a few of the profile headlines in a span of about three minutes to demonstrate my point (maximizing for whore factor), but I’m opting not to print them here as the content made even me sick. And the girls look to be under 18.
Despicable.
There’s a classic story about a man who turns himself invisible somehow. He was a scientist. I don’t remember who wrote it because that’s not what’s important about books. What’s important is the message. Learning and memorizing the names of authors and syllabi and whatnots is the stuff for feminist studies classes.
The Invisible Man (as I will call him) embarked on a series of nefarious acts with his new-found invisibility. Things like stealing money and killing people. It’s an exciting tale about the heart of man and the effect of “invisibility” on the psyche.
And that’s exactly my fucking point.
When invisible — when completely anonymous, men seek personal gain. Unsurprisingly, that avarice happens to be the very fucking engine of the free market economy. Perhaps you’ve heard of the free market economy. It did build the whole of Earth and everything awesome upon it. Take an introductory economics class if you don’t agree with me, but first go and fuck yourself.
Men also seek to gratify their deepest inner desires. How is that bad?
It’s isn’t because it’s something men do. Take any charity for example. It’s just something some man gave of himself because he wanted to do it — he wanted to feel good about it. That’s completely selfish. It was a desire of his that he fulfilled. Filling desires, even when invisible, is not a bad thing.
Women, however, when lounging behind their little veil of privacy called the internet, just try to look as easy as possible. And by easy, I mean easy to fuck.
It’s as simple as this: men are built for progress in their cores; women are built for sex. If you have a problem with that, take it to MySpace.
Related Articles:
December 17th, 2006 at 8:47 am - IP Man-Hash: cea452fc1a758
You’re gay and so is your article you homo.
December 18th, 2006 at 11:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0c7fc34f7dcbe
this is totaly unfair to alot of females yes some females do turn into little sluts and whores but that’s not everyone or all females i’m a female and i certainly don’t do that just look at my page it’s myspace.com/hotcocoa22189 and tell me if there’s any slutty pictures of me and i’ll let you know ahead of time that you’re going to feel stupid because there aren’t any thank you very much!! and by the way you men suck and are a bunch of losers and asholes!!
December 19th, 2006 at 2:09 am - IP Man-Hash: 6c8f8add62547
Native american? That must be a typo.
Truly I’m embarrassed for you.
December 19th, 2006 at 6:35 am - IP Man-Hash: b9b7e9fe9772b
And you want us to respect women after you’ve called us all that? Fuck, talk about hypocrisy. You just proved to us we’re right(in a twisted way, but I’m twisted meself)
Attention Seeking Whore. 3 perfect words for her type
December 19th, 2006 at 7:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 5fdb78f644952
Yes.
You are voguing for the camera in an attempt to show off your figure to maximum advantage. Poured into a crotch-grazing microskirt with a cleavage-baring top (both of which barely fit and cover you).
Then, the very first movie you mention is the suggestive “Dirty Dancing”, and the very first television show you mention is one that covers sex crimes.
All of these things create a somewhat negative impression of you, I’m sorry to say. Something that your writing, above, does little to alleviate.
-wolfe
December 19th, 2006 at 12:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5be6a3201772c
wolfe, with respect, there is a difference between being an actual slut that does sleep around and being coquettish because one is only 17 and filled with hormones. Just because someone may look “tartish” (sorry Nacole, no offense intended) does not make them a slut. And Dirty Dancing was about romance, not pr0n.
It is a shame that women aren’t allowed to wear clothes that make them feel sexy without men casting judgement on their entire character. Clothes do not maketh the person, sorry, but they don’t, I thought you of all people wouldn’t be that superficial.
December 19th, 2006 at 4:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9ea7c7f23f65b
You turned that saying around to coddle whores.
Congrats.
December 19th, 2006 at 5:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 479ab57a00cdd
It’s actually worse to be a tease - all men are equally horny and equally want sex and sexual approval from women - yet women only give it to a select few men while taunting and using the others; essentially it is collective rape of men as a whole.
It’s like going to a starving group of children and walking around with a tray of food, but not giving them any, just making them beg and fight, then you give the food to the winner who can “prove” their hunger.
Women don’t dress slutty to “feel sexy” - they do it to feel powerful over “little” men - to be able to drain power and resources from these men - while only actually giving the sex to a select group of “top” (alpha) men.
In essence, it is passive aggressive, predatorial, exploitative, abusive behavior.
And may I remind you, the clothing we wear is an expression - non verbal speech. Freedom of speech is a two way street, where the people being spoken (men, in this case) to have a right to speak back.
But I digress, since of course, “free speech” is a male logical concept based upon a male logical system (classical liberalism). Women’s logic only exists to twist and exploit male logic… the key feature of her logic being that it will not and cannot admit to it’s exploitative goals, and will instead justify her behavior as virtuous and righteous… a “victim” just trying to “live” in a world of “oppressive” men trying to “control” her. A type of passive aggressive, reverse logic.
December 19th, 2006 at 6:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0afc4252c34f2
Indeed.
“Clothes don’t make the person” is a saying that means rich people wearing nice clothes don’t make good honest people.
Any slut can afford some harlot skirt and wearing it makes her a whore - common sense.
December 19th, 2006 at 6:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fdb78f644952
This is certainly true. I do not make any claims about Nacole’s character; she may well sing in the choir and aspire to be a chaste nun. Unlikely, but certainly possible. None here are qualified to opine as to her actual character; we’ve not observed enough of her. All we can do is comment on the image she projects through her words, ideas, arguments, and, now, myspace page.
And she asked:
And I answered, sincerely and directly, and explained why.
Except you’ll note I made no judgment on her character. I simply noted the image she was projecting, presumably without being aware of it.
Indeed, it’s situational. Her garments, for some sort of evenings escapades through night clubs, might well be quite appropriate. At other venues, unless she wishes to project a ‘tarty’ (to use your excellent word) image, they are not as appropriate.
But this is certainly not limited to women. This is true for all of us, and I would argue that women have far more latitude than men. The range of context-acceptable clothes for most men is quite narrow, certainly narrower than that for women. I would admit though that the range of signals women can attempt to send with their clothing — and that they receive from men’s clothing — is far greater than those men intend to send or receive themselves from women’s clothing.
While I disagree with much of what beta_males_unite says (I’ve no brief against the man; his perspective is interesting and informative; I just disagree with many of his conclusions) this portion of his comment — especially the first sentence — is very apt:
Kind regards to all,
-wolfe
December 20th, 2006 at 2:13 am - IP Man-Hash: 6c8f8add62547
Of course clothes dont make the person. But the clothes do express the persons character. And the only power women really have is the power of sex and only because the demand is high. Therefore women will always push their power to the limits. The only time she would be considered slutty is if she became competition to another woman. Then let the name calling, slappin, hair pulling and clawing begin.
January 27th, 2007 at 5:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: fdf6776e6416f
I have a myspace,
i use it hands down…to talk to freinds and to make freinds.
I have seen some fucking ridiculous pictures that some girls put up of themselves on their pages.
it disgusts me.
But i do not have to talk to these people.
as long as im happy doing my own thing…
i cant say i give a shit what those skanks do.
The world is full of nasty stuff.
Why get so upset about some myspace sluts?
January 27th, 2007 at 5:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2f2d948528fdf
^ ditto. as hard as it is for some to believe, there are people who use myspace for something that doesnt involve.. being a slut. i think myspace is a great way to get in touch with people you havent seen/talk to for years and a great way to stay in touch with current friends. but now its all about having half nude pics up of yourself and being nasty or finding little girls/boys to rape and kill.
January 27th, 2007 at 9:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6748292abd369
Hence the title of this particular article.
February 3rd, 2007 at 7:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4e45ef73162b1
i disagree w/ this im on myspace n itz not 4 hoes and sluts even though there on that r on it it matters on the person n it dosen’t start on myspace if u think that n ppl could be sluts even if thre not on myspace itz not there fault if they like sex n itz fun!!!!
February 3rd, 2007 at 10:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2d5f294fd2234
From what I gather from this foriegn language she said being a hoe is fun.
case closed
February 4th, 2007 at 9:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 1e9a4fd46c3a7
It’s the curse of Americanese. And I’m sure some women like selling themselves for a sense of betterment.
February 4th, 2007 at 11:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 2d5f294fd2234
That is the most common female method of making money in America. Whores galore.
February 6th, 2007 at 4:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 03315da44b7d1
i think your lil article is a bunch of bull shyt!!!
Maybe all the chicks youve came across on there, are all sluts and hoes but ths one… I dont think you should categorize people like that… if anything categorize ya self u homo!!!!!
February 6th, 2007 at 5:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1e9a4fd46c3a7
And you shouldn’t categorise US. Hypocrite.