Female Oppression: More Monkey Shit
At any moment, a woman can say something completely stupid about something completely obvious. Women have an infinity of wrong inside them. Much in the same way that a child has an infinity of imagination inside it, or a tube of super glue contains an infinity of practical jokes.
Women contain an Infinity of Wrong.
For example, when told that no one gives a fuck about three fat secretaries bickering over an unloaded printer, a woman might call you rude or a jerk. This is completely stupid and wrong of her — and it is very likely fat of her as well. No one gives a fuck about three fat secretaries. Pretending anyone does is childish and insulting to good stories.
Here’s another example: women are worthless in science.
Women’s involvement in scientific progress has been less than a pittance of shit. If you ever tell an educated woman that, she will comb the depths of her Infinity of Wrong to spout something incredibly stupid.
Women haven’t discovered shit because we were oppressed!
Obviously, the only correct answer a woman can give when told something by a man is “how high”, “how long”, or “how young?” An explanation is like a woman’s Joker. It shouldn’t even be in the deck.
Women wouldn’t know real oppression if it walked up and smacked them on the ass. And that’s exactly what women think oppression is. Women have dreamed up a history in their little heads where women were politely coddled out of the laboratory and into the kitchen and that’s what they call oppression. That’s why they didn’t invent or discover shit; because of rebuke.
Men have been burned alive for science.
The fact is, men have been the real victims of oppression throughout history, not women. Men have been oppressed for their brilliance in math. Men have been punished for their innovations in science. Men have been drowned, stabbed, burned, tortured, and killed just for picking up a piece of chalk instead of a frying pan and a birth control test. Women can all go fuck off.
Hippasus - killed for discovering irrational numbers.
Archimedes - killed for doing math during the Roman invasion.
Giordano Bruno - burned for scientific astronomical heresy.
Galileo - imprisoned for discovering the Earth revolved around the sun.
Alan Turing - murdered for scientific prominence.
Einstein - forced out of Germany for being a smart Jew.
These men gave of their minds not because of fame or glory. They gave because men suffer from a condition that makes us give despite the consequences — despite oppression. This condition is called Competence, and it’s something women wouldn’t know about even if it came with the lowest APR in history. As if any woman knows what an APR is.
Women haven’t succeeded in science not because they’ve been oppressed, but because absolutely any woman in history except the very ugliest of the fugliest could put down her calculator whenever she wanted, pick up her dress, put her back on a mattress, and let oppression roar above her head like the man-train it is.
Women are cheap magicians performing in high school auditoriums with poorly-concealed, vaginal trapdoors always less than a step away. You could give a woman a pony for learning fractions, but the only thing she’s going to learn is how to give a hand job. I’ve probably just “oppressed” a dozen girls out of learning fractions.
Hippasus
Archimedes
Galileo
Giordano Bruno
Alan Turing
Related Articles:
Pages: [4] 3 2 1 » Show All
hahaha - Classic shit Dick!
Well, in my opinion, I think there is a huge difference between the image of beaming the Playboy Channel into Tehran homes versus the image of raping and murdering of women, and molesting children. So I don’t think my remark is on par in terms of violence and human degradation compared to his. I think his is far more heinous.
The reason why I brought him up was to suggest the possibility of a double standard that you might have in approaching posts. Yes, I may have it too as well- I admit it. But what I would like to see more of (in my humble opinion) is for posters to express outrage over clearly heinous remarks, even if it means giving up on “popularity”, if such a feeling exists in the poster. Maybe you feel that murdering women is less outrageous than cultural control, I dont know. But it would nice to see posters codemn C. Scott for what I consider disgusting remarks of murdering and raping women. I saw these condemnations come from transient women posters and a poster named “Bishop”, and from me, and thats it. A lot of other posters (such as you) I thought were pretty silent.
Again because it was already done. Even Dick came in and moderated his comments, but he still kept going. People have going over it with him much better then I could and didn’t change his mind. Saying more now is nothing but kicking a dead horse. Also, I find it funny how you brought him up so suddenly. Especially after suggesting something similar to a entire culture and all.
I dont me to pick a fight, but as far as I can tell, you have not once condemned “Commander Scott” for making posts about killing, raping,or child molesting women. Yet your quick to criticize me for making a post about using an obviously dubious method to control a culture. This strikes me as a strong double standard. But if this is not the case, please let me know.
Ever since he started those he’s been told he’s wrong by just about everyone. That line’s been drawn repeatedly already. Not only that, that’s a silly example.
But you forget, their culture has no puritanical foundation. Their word for ‘marriage’ is the same word they use for ’sex’, I recall. Porn might well increase their birth-rate. Let us face blunt facts, the Anglo-Saxon world is f***ed.
But is it TRUE that women are attracted to successful men? Aren’t women really attracted to violent deadbeats who batter and abuse them, not the males most effective in contemporary high-tech, post-industrial society (computer geeks like Bill Gates)? Aye, thereby hangs a tail (and by many a wind-instrument I know)…
OK. What your saying make sense. I have a queston for you, though:do you think its wrong for me to make posts that ridicule “Commander Scott”, b/c he suggests murdering and raping of women, and child molesting? Where do we draw the line?
There are somethings not worth joking about. Sex should only be used for procreation and pleasure, not to manipulate someone let alone a entire society. Not only that they alreadly look down on porn anywho, it wouldn’t work.
@sots- I saw your picture…not at all what I expected you to look like (except maybe flipping the bird part=))
My bad attempt at humor for Friday. Sorry.
Although I imagine that porn use is correlated with advanced cultures with poor birth rates. If a causal role can be shown, then we have a potential weapon to control the Muslim birth control rate: just beam in the Playboy Channel into Tehran. Instead of making nukes, the Iranian physicists will be jacking-off.
That’s so wrong on so many levels man. I mean, porn to decline birth rates just..what the hell are you smoking?
Her hints are games NMH.
She’s an intellectual whore.
Alexis is a good example of a woman that has priced herself out of the market, and one of the reasons why femiminst-driven anglo saxon culture is in decline.
Babies will be made apparently by cultures that have values not formed by the enlightment. Interesting.
This could be the greatest problem facing the world today. But rather than finding a way to increase the birth rate in anglo saxon culture, I think we need to find a way to decrease the birth rate in muslim culture and sub-sahran africa.
My theory is that internet pornography could save the world and human kind from complete devolution and destruction. If we can get the muslims hooked on western internet porn, then maybe their birth rates will decline.
I always new deep in my heart that porn was great! Larry Flynt is the second coming! Lord Flynt.
Alexis said:
“We are programmed by nature to only pick the strongest, alpha males, you just dont make the cut.”
So in other words: Women are whores who can’t rise above their most base animal instincts? I guess it’s true; women are controlled by their hormones (read: feelings) and men are the rational thinkers and builders of great empires.
No wonder we keep women in the bedroom!
Hey Alexis, when you women finally take over the world, and men would rather masturbate than deal with your bullshit, what are all you lonely females gonna do? Become lesbian?
Who’s gonna make babies then?
A laboratory?
I knew I could count on great advice from the site’s “genius jew”. Well, the girl you describe is hanging out with someone else, but she makes hints.
OK, maybe Ill blow 5K on a high end escort if I cant get things going with the last sweet single girl in America. Thanks again.
Too much of a risk from AIDS and serious STDs. There are cleaner ways to commit suicide. Alternatively, if you must, only use high-quality escorts who can present a medically-endorsed bill of sexual health. Practical things must be sorted out first, as in any MANly enterprise.
By the way, what happened to the chick who had been abused by her father, and was a nicer person because of it? A safer, cheaper option than hookers… just my opinion.
Im thinking of giving up women all together and start fucking prostitutes. Your opinion, please?
And this is why sociopathic mass killers on Death Row are inundated with offers of marriage, is it?
It IS a fact that males are programmed to find slim, tanned, nubile virgins under 22 desirable… which is why educated, middle class Anglo-American males are shipping them in from Venezuela and eschewing obese, haggard, neurotic Anglo fucktards like yourself, squatting amidst cat-turds in some dead-beat trailer-park as you no doubt are.
If true, that is mighty impressive. I have humiliated only nine Anglo-American cunts, and beaten up only two.