Kevin Federline: Man Hero
Today, October 1st, marks a great day for men and for justice. We can all give a manly nod and a manly point to the courts today, as they have just awarded Kevin Federline rightful custody over his children.
This is unlike the day on which Joey Buttafuoco was sent to prison. That was a sad day.
Today, the system works.
The law is heavily biased against men. Women don’t understand liability or intent — or anything for that matter. I was once asked by a woman why those plastic balls gerbils run around in have holes in them.
“Why do you have holes in you?” I asked. Her answer was unsatisfactory.
The law is lenient on women for the same reason it’s lenient on horses. Neither can think like a man.
Kevin Federline has a proven track record not only as a parent, but also as a musician, a lady’s man, a professional wrestler, and a humorist. Remember that Superbowl commercial where he was working in a fast food drive thru? That commercial was hilarious.
And it was also poignant. If a man looses his trailer-trash, pop-diva, Cesarean-scared “sugar mama”, he’s forced into a life of menial labor. Women who fail to please their meal tickets are forced to blow ten grand that isn’t theirs anyway on a legal dispute that can only help them — help them shove that ten grand up your ass, that is.
Today, the California Superior Court decided that Britney Spears is an unfit mother. That could be because she’s shown a “habitual, frequent and continuous use of controlled substances and alcohol,” or it could be because she refused to take random, court-ordered drug tests. Whenever I refuse to take a drug test, it’s because I’m on so many drugs I can barely fucking walk, let alone take a drug test after driving to the store without a seatbelt on and with my toddler sitting on my lap. It could be because of her hit and run, her insane head shaving, her flabby come-back special on MTV, or any of that other shit, but it’s not. Britney Spears was declared an unfit mother because she’s a woman.
At the age of 14, Hitler was raised by a single mother. Think about that. Then, thank Judge Scott M. Gordon and the California Supreme Court.
Justice isn’t blind or sleeping today.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 10 [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
In all, I am impressed with what Coderch has said. Sure, he may have his differences with Wolfe. Hell, he may even have struck a never with some of the men here but I respect him for his intelligence which can be seen in several of his posts. Thanks for the contributions, mate.
Coderch makes a compelling point for surrender. I mean 1 million dying in the first world war, must mean they should have to surrender in the second.
Clair how did the US come into that before everyone else?
Not to me. It’s not cowardly at all. Especially if Coderach was speaking pure fact there. 1 million is a huge number. It would only increase more. They probably knew Americans and others would label them cowards, but they did what they thought was right, that takes courage.
The spartan army regarded homosexuality with admiration, because a soldier would fight harder if he knew his love was watching.
For your libel of the white American male of Northern European descent who has created (surely dozens) of things that you would be hard-pressed, or at least very inconvenienced in not using, I hereby urge your “intellect” off this site.
@ Coderch. Pretty apt use of history. Can I ask though, does 1 million french dead warrant surrender? Because it sure as hell looks cowardly to the rest of the world.
The US pulled out of Vietnam. A pissed off public demanded it. It’s not like they were getting their asses kicked. I don’t call 1 million dead Vietnamese and only 50,000 American deaths as losing.
I am using the term only respectfully to all who died there.
What a moronic post. I talk about cultural achievements and you bring up a bunch of completely irrelevant CRAP to make yourself feel better.
First of all, the Germans did not invent anti-Semitism. Anyone with even half a brain knows that. Furthermore, even if they did, what the fuck does anti-Semitism has to do with a discussion of cultural achievements? You know, you’re right. The Nazi regime nullified all the incredible achievemsnts of Germany in the realsm of the arts, science and literature. LOL!
As for learning surrender from the French, you have proved yourself to be a typical American hillbilly by saying that. The French resistance in World War I was one of the most heroic in history. Only in the battle of the Marne, over 1 MILLION Frenchmen died. It was France that stopped Germany in it’s feet. As for World War II, the French were sick and tired of war after having fought two major wars in the previous 70 years(the franco-Prussian war and World War I), so yes, they surrendered. The U.S also surrendered in Vietnam even though far less Americans had died there than Frenchmen died in World War 1, and even though American cities were not being bombed likeFrench cities were. So who were more manly, the French or the Americans? Answer: NOT the Americans. And yes, you can take credit for liberating France in World War II, but it was Soviet Russia that defeated the Wehrmacht and not the U.S - 65% of Germany’s war casualties happened in the Eastern front.
As for the Revolutionary War, give me a fucking break! I mean, here we have Great Britian with it’s resources stretched thin in a global empire, and they face an uprising in one of their colonies across the Atlantic Ocean. It’s not like they could pull troops when they were needed elsewhere to make an amphibious attack and re-take their former colony. Americans had the advantage of being on their own soil while the English would have to cross the Atlantic. In my opinion, if the English REALLY wanted to keep their North American colony and sent a huge force, American would still be speaking English with an English accent nowadays and drinking tea, but that’s only speculation on my part.
P Coderch
Didn’t we establish engineers don’t work at Wal-Mart?
Who the fuck cares? You married a beta male, great job.
Fuck your inline comments. You’re nothing but a fucking cunt. Cunt.
Their arrogance
Yes, true. Feminists = ugly, old, haggled, unmarried, divorced and useless.
Their arrogance, duh?
Yes, true. Feminists = ugly, old, haggled, unmarried, divorced and useless.
I’m a feminist - young, married, and an engineer : )
If I got owned maybe you could explain how. The Wright Brothers first flight occured a full three years before Dumonts did.
As far as films…….foreign ones truly suck dick.
@ Mike5150: you should listen to P Coderch Mike. I mean without the French how would we know how to surrender? Without Germany, how would we know modern day anti-semitism? Without England whose ass would we have kicked in the revolutionary war? I mean really, someone has to lose, so why not Europe. (I mean no offense to you Necroswordsman as I hold you in the highest regards.) Just busting on P Coderch.
Oldone
The internal combustion engine was invented by a German. The first car was invented also by a German named Daimler Benz. The first airplane was not produced by the Writ]ght brothers, but by a Brazilian named Santos Dumont - son of French people. There was a BBC documentary on this. He flew around the Eiffel tower in Paris 2 years before the Wright brothers made their first inaugural flight. The computer was invented by two mathematicians, Allan Turing and John Von Neumann. Turing was an Englishman and Neumann was Hungarian by birth. Neither were Americans. As for electricity, Aericans can only claim the light bulb. The AC/DC protocol, which the World uses to today, was invente by Nicola Tesla, who was also not an American. In fact, Edison tried to sabbotage his work out of sheer envy. As you can see, you have just talked out of your ass and got OWNED. I know that you Americans are very nationalistic and will say anything to make yourselves look better - just look at Hollywood filsm which always depict you as heroes even when you murder babies -, but I truly think you should humble yourself because frankly you~re not that great in the larger sheme of things.
P Coderch
If it wasn’t for the US your dumb ass would have never driven a car, been aboard a plane, or ever used a pc.
In fact you’d probably be insulting us all by candlelight.
First of all, Kinsey was bisexual and not gay. Secondly, I wouldn’t say that you’re an American christian fanatic, but more like a homophobe, like in fact most straight men are - although few are open about it. The red flag showing that you’re a homophobe was when you said that “I knew that Wolfe had to watch out for you”. Watch out for me for what reason(s)? Even if I were gay, which I’m not, why would you need to “watch out” for me unless you were prejudiced against gays? besides, Wolfe wouldn’t need to watch out for me if I were gay, because gays like manly men and Wolfe is the antithesis of that. And it goes to show your virility that you look up to an emasculated, pussy-whipped, chivalrous anal queen like Wolfe. That turd is a complete bitch. He doesen’t even have the courage to meet me face-to-face.
P Coderch
As far as your comment about most men have some gay in them, speak for yourself. Your probably referring to a 40 year old study that yes, a gay man conducted.
All those things you say pertaining to warriors may be true. And guess what those men were. Gay.
If not wanting to blow another man makes me an American Christian fanatic, then I’ll settle for that title. I knew Wolfe had to watch out for you.
By Humanistic greatness, I said the U.S hasn’t contributed anything of true beauty to the World, something that is high and noble. Chasing the buck is all Americans were ever known to do. The ONLY contribution of the U.S is the creation of the mass consumers society. For instance, an European invented the internal combustion engine and the first car, but Americans mass produced the car. Every invention and creation of Americans is purely utilitarian and serves no higher purpose than making money. As one of your presidents, Calvin Coolidge once said: “This country’s business is business.” Americans are not a noble bunch, and any honest American will admit it. As for your donations to Africa and other countries, so what? American corporations steal every penny those countries have in resources. You are giving back to those countries through charity only 10% of what you rob from them.
As for Ancient Greece and Rome, they are so far above the U.S that there is really no way to even compare both. The Greeks build monuments of marble and gold and called them cities. They were constantly searching for the meaning of life, and questioning themselves about the nature of reality and of the universe. They were an existential people, who strived for ascension from their animal Human condition through the beauty of their architecture and by studying and questioning about the nature of reality and what it means to be human. Compare this to Americans, who celebrate moronic celebrities that can barely speak and who worship people who are good at up-maiing others and getting rich fast. Completely different values, completely different peoples.
The Romans were the greatest people who ever walked the face of the World. They excelled at practically every area of Human achievement. They were bold and tough as warriors, excelled in public organization and were the masters state-craftsmen. The entire way that Western nations organize their governements in our modern way is based on Roman model, and the entire juridical science is Roman in origin. Americans simply copied the Romans, just like many European countried did.
To a Roman man, the highest value that he could acquire in life was “dignitas”, or “dignity”. To the Romans, dignitas was acquired through public service, sacrifice to one’s country and to others, piety toward one’s father and showing selflessless, simplicity and frugality in one’s affairs, attitude and demeanor. Just like the greeks, the Romans also strove for transcendence. but there is a difference: while the Greeks tried to touch the divine through beauty, reflexion, contemplation and intellectual questioning, the Romans tried to achieve this through Earthly achievements. But there is a difference in the Nature of the achievements that the Romans strove for and the ones that the Americans strive for. Americans are individualistic and their achievements are strictly selfish and have the lowest common denominator of money as the goal, and Americans look up to people who got rich quick no matter how and admire fails of character like greed, dishonesty, cunning, deceit, being perdulary, etc. The Romans, conversely, strove for achievements that served their state and their society, and admired virtues like selflessness, sacrifice, simplicity. Both Americans and Romansstrove for earthly achievements, but Americans emphasize earthly achievements to oneself, while the Romans emphasized service to the nation and to society. Now, there were many Romans who only cared about their personal glory and thei selfish interest, but at least they pretended that they were striving for the greatness of their country and society. Compare this Americans, who don’t even pretend since their society actually values selfishness. So while both the Romans and Americans value earthly achievements, the difference is that one values achievement to oneself wile the other valued achivement to the common good. This is evident in that Americans worship greed, individualism and material achievements whereas the Romans valued simplicity, self-denial and sacrifice.
As for you copmments about paederasty, so what? Most men have some gay in them. It is only in anglo-saxon putritanical societies that men are conditioned to be strictly heterosexual. The warriors of the indian tribes of North America had sex with other warriors. The male adolescent of the Massai become men by drinking the sperm of older men. The samurai of Japan visited boy brothels. Alexander, Caesar and Richard the Lionhearted , three of the greatest warriors and statesmen ever, all had sex with other males at one or more points in their lives. I live in a country where it is normal for men to have sex with other men. As long as they don’t allow themselves to be penetrated, no one thinks that they are gay. Myself, I have made out with another boy at a party and I enjoyed it. Does that make me gay? Maybe to some American Christian fanatics, but that’s about it. Strict heterosexuality in males is a social construct of Northwestert Europeans and especially of Anglo-Saxon countries.
P Coderch
Stop it, mike. You’ll make har dump a lump in her drawers.
What’s pathetic is Vanessa isn’t even racist just some dumbfuck internet girl who thinks “jew” and “fag” are cool cutdowns.
The jewest jew in Israel and the biggest flaming homosexual male in San Francisco is better than women.