Not On Fire? Thank A Man.
Lady firemen are scum.
Not scum in the way that pedophiles are scum. And not scum in the way that Crystal Gail Mangum, who falsely accused three Duke Lacrosse players of rape, is scum. But scum in the way a man would be if he tried to flush his newborn baby down the toilet because he didn’t want to tell his parents or the father about it.
Lady firemen endanger your life.
Fire stations are like golf courses and conversations, women should stay the fuck out of them because they have nothing to add.
Firemen spend 100% of their time being awesome. They train, they prepare, they save lives — they also nail tons of chicks. Lady firemen spend their time doing half their work and lobbying for separate changing facilities.
When fires are burning the fuck out of everything, lady firemen are worried everyone is getting a free look at their tits. Firemen get the cream of the crop when it comes to women. Some soot and a pair of big rubber pants looks like ten million dollars to women. The last thing firemen want to see is the sour milk of some troll with an eighth of a Y-chromosome floating around in her flotsam.
What a joke.
In 2002, a federal jury awarded over $300,000 to lady-firemen Wedow and Kline because they didn’t want to change or shower in front of a bunch of guys who had just saved lives. If one of those two women had been in that famous World War II parade kiss, they would have sued Life magazine.
In 2006, a federal court declared that fire stations must provide appropriate, sanitary, and private facilities in their fire halls for lady firemen. Sanitary? Some women think oral sex is “gross”. If we’re going by women’s definition of “sanitary”, every fire station needs to look like like the Ritz Carlton. I sure hope California doesn’t need any more airtankers to drop water on the richest real estate in the world. Lady firemen need a mint on their pillow.
And $300,000 in “boo-hoo” money.
For every lady-fireman there is, there’s a man who didn’t get that job. Statistics can be a bitch. Sometimes they don’t matter until you’re the 0.00001% who’s unconscious on your burning toilet in the hands of a woman who isn’t strong enough to lift a pair of men’s issue, fire-retardant pants.
For every ten lady firemen there are, there’s a lady fireman bathroom and a lady fireman changing room — and there’s a hundred arguments about how the state needs to pay for nine more.
“The female locker room bathroom is me, because I’m the only one,” said Bors [a lady fireman]. “To have my own shower is really nice.”
You know what else would be nice? Saving lives. Here’s what the fire chief had to say about it.
“Our funding comes from taxes and we’re not going to raise taxes,” said Capt. Mark Dill of the Piedmont Park Fire Department. “We’re going to have to incorporate that into a budget and come up with a future plan.”
If your house burns down because some woman couldn’t handle a hose properly, that money comes from somewhere. No woman can handle a hose properly, by the way. If you’re not mindful of a woman stricken with sexual mania, she’ll break your dick in half in two strokes. Ask a fireman. He’ll agree with me.
According to the Women in the Fire Service Group’s website, the second biggest issue for women in the fire service is “Hair and Grooming” standards. Unless you’re Rapunzel, and burning children can crawl down your hair to freedom, keep it cut while you’re on the tax payers’ dime. Keep your fucking mouth shut too.
To all women in the fire service: quit.
To all women in law: quit.
To all women in med school: quit.
To all women in the army: quit.
Quit being a problem.
Harrassed into pregnancy?
Lady Fireman Issues.
Ladies’ Rooms on the Way to Fire Stations.
A Hole in the Dyke.
Related Articles:
October 23rd, 2007 at 1:36 am - IP Man-Hash: b7d609ca91802
I guess for physically demanding roles the test of ability ought to be a physical test. I know it’s sounds dumb to say it out loud but sometimes it’s needed.
If a firefighter, male or female, can’t do the job then they shouldn’t be doing it. Surely it’s as simple as that. Not sexist - just picking the right person for the job.
October 23rd, 2007 at 1:53 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
I agree with you. I wished everyone thought that way.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:19 am - IP Man-Hash: be93bbbcaf7e0
Absolutely none of that sounds nor is dumb to say. Women are dumb for not knowing it.
-Dick
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:28 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
I bet you if a woman said that, you’d disagree with it.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:35 am - IP Man-Hash: 13d094772aa05
If a woman said that, it would be because a man told her to.
*D3C*
October 23rd, 2007 at 6:14 am - IP Man-Hash: dd7bcbd0648d5
A very important point came up in this article. For every woman in a job there is a man without. It is true across the board and is highly suspect.
Generally, merit is the system of choice but in this case one is tempted to adopt a political position and simply say no jobs for women with some exceptions possibly. After all if you are trying to wheedle an upgrade to a suite in a hotel, so much better for exerting charm. And if you are good looking then it’s almost guaranteed. Of course being intellectually inferior and having a midget sized penis no doubt this comment won’t go down well with ladies. If any of them think this is written by a bitter sex-starved individual then I am sorry to say they are very,very wrong.
Of course since no women are allowed they will never know..will they?
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 497a2bd14e918
In Washington, the State Patrol had a requirement - no applicants under 6′ tall would be accepted - period. How many men did that “discriminate” against? Who cares. How many men sued? None. Why did the requirement get dropped? You already know the answer.
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 5acb8d5dc39dd
@ David: Welcome on board. Good points raised.
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 0264d76590fb0
Whenever a woman has a job I have to wonder if she earned it. Most of the women in my professional sphere are simply quota fillers.
October 23rd, 2007 at 9:28 am - IP Man-Hash: e40ae9a8aaa4f
I’m an intelligent male. I’m modest, but I’m honest, and I see that I’m of a steadily decreasing breed when I see people like you talking like you are. You people make me sick, all of you. I bet you all voted George Bush, John Howard, Or Mr. X the conservative who runs country Y in which you live into power. I’ve watched a woman pull a man out of a car wreck with my own eyes. I’ve seen a woman use the jaws of life to cut the roof off of a car. A woman is a human being with a slightly different genetic makeup that creates a recognizably different physical appearance. Not an inferior species, the same species.
I’ve considered it strongly, and I’ve come to this conclusion, which is by all means as logical as any point that you revolting people have raised. The reason you really object to the female fighters is because of the shower room matter. It’s because you want them in the same shower because you want them to see your large manly penises. You somehow thing this is impressive and will occasion a desire for your probably unattractive body. This inflates your egos and re-enforces your stale beliefs that somehow, you’re better.
People like you are the reason people like me are going to marry happily, because you’ll certainly be swimming in the shallow end of the dating pool when you think like you do.
October 23rd, 2007 at 9:57 am - IP Man-Hash: 191d005c2ce6a
I seem to remember a quote on this site that said something like this:
“If a person states here that they are a man then they are a woman.
“If a person states here they are a woman then they are a woman”
I think it may have been Wolfe that said it but I apologise to the originator if I am wrong.
Whoever said it, I think it applies to this post.
October 23rd, 2007 at 10:28 am - IP Man-Hash: 0264d76590fb0
Grapphinos, since you are obviously a woman, do you want to see my large manly penis?
October 23rd, 2007 at 12:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: d7677dd907e52
Sometimes it’s the simple truths that are most profound. Excellently put.
October 23rd, 2007 at 12:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 497a2bd14e918
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: 191d005c2ce6a
You have the idiocy to make this statement and then post such a convoluted conclusion to your insane rambling!?
That is because Grapphinos is likely a woman.
October 23rd, 2007 at 5:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: b21bb5fe17b59
Of course there are a few women who are physically capable of performing the minimum requirements for a job, the problem is that almost every job that requires intense physical activity has one set of requirements for men, and one for women. This lack of equality should gall anyone who thought Susan B. Anthony has the right idea. The issue most men on this site have is that women have been asking for equality for decades, but when it comes down to it, they complain that the standards that countless men have been able to hold themselves too are too high or unfair for women, and endanger the lives of people by lowering the standards.
Complaining about different physical characteristics is a mere cop-out. The jobs require a minimum amount of physical fitness and strength. If you can’t do it, then don’t sign up. Taking a slot that could be filled by a more qualified candidate, something that may cost someone’s life, is wrong. At the very least, firefighters should be able to carry a 200-pound dummy to safety. There are women capable of this, just not half as many as there are men. There are even less that are capable of carrying two 200-pound dummies.
October 23rd, 2007 at 7:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: e36376410e1aa
Thus, lady firemen are scum.
-Dick
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:55 pm - IP Man-Hash: d653cff06dec4
You can always tell slittails posing as men because they have some dumbfucking Bush bashing comment every single time.
It’s not that they have a valid opinion on politics, it’s just that they are incapable of forming an opinion with their empty skulls and just repeat whatever the media estrogen hivemind tells them for infinity.
October 24th, 2007 at 4:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 27bb4a532c17e
Here I’m going to come at Grapphinos from the other side. Bear with me, gents.
@Graph — A woman is a human being, period. Some might emphasize the period heavily, or lightly, or moderately. Apparently there are different products for that.
But she is a human being.
There’s no need for a qualifier.
She doesn’t have a “slightly different genetic makeup” from human beings, the way a chimpanzee would, because she is a human being.
This site isn’t about hating women.
It isn’t about marginalizing women.
It’s about recognizing that, generally, men are better than women.
So please: take your self-hating misogyny away. Let us respect men for being men and women for being women.
-wolfe
October 24th, 2007 at 4:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 43a15a7732fec
There isn’t much respecting of women of any sort here…