Now You’re Talking Double Team
I was sitting in my favorite chair yesterday evening drinking a glass of Black Label and ruminating on the myths in our society. One struck me as being especially ridiculous.
Marriage.
‘Marriage,’ I scoffed — or at least I’m sure that I did. And any man will do exactly the same if he’s not afraid of having his balls ripped off by someone who has just finished a grueling 20 hour work week. I’m talking about women. Millionaires aren’t in the habbit of ripping balls off when people say the most obvious goddamn thing in the world.
Women do not age discriminate when it comes to their precious 20 hour work weeks either. After all, what does a 40 year old woman need with more “me time” than a 20 year old. It’s not like she’s done anything more with her life than nothing. It’s not like she needs time to think about anything. It’s like giving baseball players with odd numbers more strikes than the ones with evens. You have an 11? You get six strikes. It makes no fucking sense and it would be exactly the way baseball was played if women were in charge.
Women have no sense of hierarchy. They don’t have to work their way up the benefits ladder as we men do. As soon as women are mobile, they’re looking for somewhere to sit down — or lay down. Because they’re whores.
Back to marriage.
Marriage is a waste of money and a ticket to unhappiness and No Sex Town. Here’s another reason why.
No one woman can ever possibly fully please a man. None. Not one. Ever.
In the immortally misquoted words of the Queen of Swine herself, Hillary Rodham Clinton, “It doesn’t take a village to raise a child; it takes a village to keep a husband.”
Women just aren’t up to the three-fold tasks of pleasing a man, intellectually stimulating a man, and giving a man the precious emotional support that he doesn’t need at all and which I just said as a joke.
A classic joke.
Women can’t even do one of those three. Look at the smartest woman on Earth. What’s her name? The girl with the advice column. Dear Abbey? She’s a genius and her column is so boring that I can barely remember who she is and I also don’t read it. And how about pleasing a man? Forget about it. That’s a two woman job at minimum.
You know I’m right too. Last time you were having sex, who were you thinking about?
Exactly. That was practically two women at the same time. And that’s a thousand damn Man Points.
As far as I’m concerned bigamy is the only way to go. Yes, it’s “illegal”. Yes, it’s “frowned upon”. But reread your history books and you’ll be in for a surprise. The men of the past found ways around that shit. I think it’s high time we turn back the clocks.
The sex clocks.
Related Articles:
January 31st, 2006 at 2:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0
“And any man will do exactly the same if he’s not afraid of having his balls ripped off by someone who has just finished a grueling 20 hour work week.”
Hah. Reminds me of a great Mitch Hedberg joke - “I don’t have a girlfriend, I just know a girl who would get really mad if she heard me say that.”
January 31st, 2006 at 10:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Turn back the clocks? Guess you’ve never heard of adultery.
February 1st, 2006 at 9:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
Female,
Since you brought adultery up, I have further evidence that Dick is right.
I was in a relationship with a divorced woman with a son. I was supportive of her through the toughest time immediately after the divorce when she was frightened of what the future might hold and how she was going to provide for and care for her young child, which she tried to come to terms with by drinking herself into a stupor almost every night and entertaining attention from other men. I stood by her even through this disrespect, because I believed that at some point, she would get beyond that. And she did eventually, but it was almost six months of denigration and belittling me before it happened. Things got better when I encouraged her to return to school and find a job in a field that she felt would be fulfilling. She enrolled in the local junior college and took a job as dental tech. She wanted to be in medicine and that was what she could get with her little experience and little school. All the while I paid all the bills. So I was supporting her emotionally and financially. When I first brought up marriage, she insisted that she needed to finish school before that could happen. So that was a four year wait staring me in the face. Based upon her emotional needs, I agreed to move 40 miles away from my job and bought a house with her. It was a sign of commitment and love. Soon after that, something kicked in… I believe it was partly her mother and partly her firends or something, because she couldn’t bear that we were living together and not married. I needed to get the ring and now. So I started working two jobs to get the money for the ring. With me paying all the bills, I didn’t have the money for a monthly payment even if I wanted to finance the ring. All the while, she was not emotionally supportive of me, could not offer small tithings upon the altar of love (like a back rub now and then after my long 14 hour days), complained about providing care for me while I cared for her (basically, she threatened not to pack my lunch or cook, because “thank you”s and the like weren’t enough of a display of gratitude) and was continually hostile when I tried to talk things out with her. Finally, she complained that I wasn’t home enough, she wasn’t getting the attention she “deserved” and that if something didn’t change “it would be too late” and she “would have to get that attention from somewhere else”. Threatening me with adultery (no we were not married, but in my view, in a committed relationship of 2 years, it is one and the same). Continued…
February 1st, 2006 at 9:42 am - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
So I left. I took her and her son by another man as my own family, cared and nurtured them, received no thanks, received demands of affection with no assurance or display of reciprocity and finally threats of infidelity. I asked for nothing when I left either. Not a thing out of the house and zero dollars from my investment. She refinanced the house into her name only and I will never see any of the fruits of my labor… emotional or material. Five months later now… I have only my clothes, a TV and a futon to sleep on. I still have to work two jobs now because I worked two jobs all last year and the added income sent my up two tax brackets and I must continue so I can pay the IRS what I owe them. My car is falling apart from driving 100 miles a day and I am so far upside down in value now because of all the miles, I can’t trade it in. I have nothing and no-one.
Am I upset, sure. Do I hate women or her, no. I pray that she will see how her self-important, entitlement-complex has and will continue to hurt her and her son. She had unbelievable love staring her in the face and she mucked it. She called to let me know the other day that is thinking about getting back with her emotionally and verbally abusive ex because her son “needs a father and” she “is sacrificing her own needs for his”. This is why Dick says illogical and irrational. I call it borderline psychotic and a ploy to try and get me to come back.
Don’t worry about me though…
I’m a man. Now I suck it up and get the job(s) done to rebuild my life.
February 2nd, 2006 at 4:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 6e486c35c5dee
You shouldn’t have let her have all the stuff. No way should you have done that. I used to care for this man who I met straight after he left a woman and situation like the one you describe. Except she wasn’t a drunk. I couldn’t believe he left with nothing other than his bed, car and golf clubs. Unbelievable. Said it wasn’t worth it dealing with her anymore to get them back….I still find it hard to believe what he left.
The fact that you, and he, let an ex basically completely rip you off, and, gave her your current phone number seems…not right.
February 2nd, 2006 at 6:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 5630214f5d8bf
Here’s the thing, Female:
Men are wired up such that we know when it’s time to just cut our losses and get out.
Do we like the material posessions we’ve spent years accumulating? Yes. But we also know that money and posessions aren’t the most important things in the universe. When it comes right down to it, one’s psychological well-being is more important.
In my divorce, the ex got everything. Literally everything. Despite the fact that I’ve been well-paid for all of our relationship, I left with a bed and the personal library I brought into the marriage. Oh, and $250 with which to buy a TV. When I moved out of the house, I had a buddy come over to help haul away the bed and take it to my otherwise-empty apartment.
Certainly I could have gotten more if I’d been willing to pay an attorney $10,000 to fight for it. However, if I’d've done that, I’d've had to trade away visitation with my children.
It made a lot more sense to cut my losses, give her everything, and see my kids as much as humanly possible.
See, by working hard, I can get more posessions. I can’t get psychological peace of mind nor time with my kids just by working hard.
So that’s that. You have to know when to cut your losses. It’s almost always better to let the bitch have whatever the fuck she wants and get away with what remains of your psychological well-being.
February 2nd, 2006 at 7:00 am - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
Bravo Dakota…
Just like a Female to think the possessions were the most important thing. If Female had read my post carefully, she would have noticed that this female I was dating did not have a well paying job. So then, why would I argue about furniture, dishes and primarily the house the she needed to retain to care for her son just to say I didn’t get ripped off. Especially when I have a well paying career and the testicular fortitude to suck it up and work twice as hard to rebuild, while her methodology is move on, or in this case move back to another man. It doesn’t matter who, just as long as she is with someone.
And I didn’t give her my new home phone number, I just didn’t change my cell or work numbers. Why would I go to the trouble? I’m an adult, I can handle a conversation with an ex.
The point here, Female, which I doubt you will be able to grasp, is that the material possessions don’t mean squat. I am upset not because of the money I invested, but because of the emotion and love and connection and nuturing that I invested, of which, she was unwilling to invest an equal share in me. The point is, that poor child, whom I love dearly, of such an emotional train wreck of a woman, needed that house and the things in it that made it a home more than I needed to take them to keep my ego from being bruised.
“The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few…. or the one.”
Even though he was only a TV character, Spock was a fucking genius!
February 2nd, 2006 at 9:32 am - IP Man-Hash: 8dd3dc862afae
Exactly! Female jumps right on the possessions just like a sad and greedy little girl. How disgusting.
What are possessions to a man, who can just go and get more of them.
-Dick
February 2nd, 2006 at 9:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Well Alan, sounds like you got well and truly taken. 2 year investment for her spending time with you and in exchange getting you to obtain her a house and furnishing it for her. Sounds a bit like a James and Jodhi Packer marriage to me. It constantly amazes me how many naive people there are in the world.
February 3rd, 2006 at 12:37 am - IP Man-Hash: f75c92aeb197e
Nothing amazing about your dumb and insensitive comments though.
Pretty much par for you.
February 3rd, 2006 at 7:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
Not naive, silly lemming…
I choose to believe that there are still women out there with a heart as good as mine and beliefs and life goals in common with mine. The fact that she is selfish and materialistic, and that I am altruistic, reflects poorly on me only in your (and women like you) feeble mind.
And that fact that you would blame me for being naive, rather than her for being capricious is indicative of your low moral and ethical standards.
February 3rd, 2006 at 4:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
In all fairness to lemmings, they were chased off those cliffs by the Disney photographers. Calling female a lemming is an insult to lemmings.
February 3rd, 2006 at 4:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: ee94550bfe94c
You’re too sensitive Geeza. Good thing you weren’t in Egypt when that ferry went down. Oh well.
Sometimes you also have to be cruel to be kind. It’s called being an adult.
February 3rd, 2006 at 9:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: c45f69086d97e
Female said:.
Sometimes you also have to be cruel to be kind. It’s called being an adult.
-Ahh , “tough love” is that what you are saying? Have you not grasped the points that these people are trying to tell you? I have noticed that you really haven’t responded to any of them. A large part of being an adult is called sacrifice, or the ability to part with things that are yours whether they be material, emotional or otherwise, for the wellbeing of others, or at least in the context that I am speaking. Women are WAY too materialistic, thats why many of them have 40 pairs of shoes. They tend to focus on what they HAVE physically, or what they can GET. Many refuse to recognize that true happiness or wellbeing isn’t measured by what kind of car you drive or how expensive your house is, but actually comes from within. I note that you only expound upon how “things” were taken away from Alan, not WHY he left them, and that he was “naive” for letting this happen. As many have said on here, so what of it? You can always get more things, that is the easy part, what you can never regain is the bond you created nor the emotion you felt.
February 4th, 2006 at 4:44 am - IP Man-Hash: dec2907738527
No darling, I understand perfectly well the points he is making, and I sympathise with him having to start from scratch, having a crap arse car (I can definately sympathise with that). However, I am disturbed by his still apparent feelings for affection for this women. As it has only been 5 months since he broke up with her, he is in a dangerous time, still missing her and probably exhausted with having nothing and no-one, thus he is vulnerable to getting back together with her. Don’t do it WindJammer, she’s a drunk and a flake, and you will regret it.
Happy now Abandanaff?
February 4th, 2006 at 4:46 am - IP Man-Hash: dec2907738527
Shoo housewife. Get out in the real world and then maybe you and I can swap “war stories.”
February 4th, 2006 at 8:52 am - IP Man-Hash: 5630214f5d8bf
Pardon my French, Female, but you are such a bitch sometimes.
As for the rest, I’ll leave the verbal spanking you’re about to recieve to Arielle.
:)
February 4th, 2006 at 9:15 am - IP Man-Hash: dcba60052c77d
The real joke about Female is that she hasn’t ever worked for anything in her entire life. She speaks from a stage of handouts and generosity. She’s admitted so in several other threads.
-Dick
February 4th, 2006 at 11:51 am - IP Man-Hash: f75c92aeb197e
I’m sure Arielle cant wait. Sitting in front of your computer and scratching your arse all day doesnt make much of a story.
February 4th, 2006 at 4:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Female - you can add “housewife” to the list of names I’m not insulted by. In fact, I’m proud of being a housewife. Making my man happy and helping him raise our contributions to the next generation are fulfilling in a way that you obviously cannot understand.
February 4th, 2006 at 6:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4e8b3f87a395f
“Housewife” as an insult? Female, you are indeed very funny.
February 4th, 2006 at 8:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1f683bd9d6787
Wow, isn’t she original.
February 5th, 2006 at 9:18 am - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
ROFL!
I’m sorry Arielle, I couldn’t help but draw the parallel, after all both follow the “herd” to their own demise (obviously you are an exception, I doff my hat to thee madam),
Dick, new topic for discussion… Men are better than women at insults.
ROFL!
I didn’t say my car was crap, I said it is beginning to have mechanical problems. And why would you be disturbed? Can you just shut off feelings of care and compassion so easily? Wait, stupid question… of course she can, she’s a woman… nevermind. And obviously you missed my post where I said I am already onto this psychotic ploy of hers. I have no intention of going back.
I do applaud your post though. You have finally spoken as an adult. You should have done this from the beginning. This is the point everyone is making. Your first inclination was to insinuate fault on my part for “letting her rip me off” and insult those who were offering support. Real adults speak and treat people with compassion, not with animosity. “Tough-love” is a tactic used on addicts to snap them out of bad behavior. I am no addict and have not behaved in a poor manner.
Bravo Female. Thank you for your words of encouragement and for finally addressing me in an adult manner.
I doff my hat to thee as well.
February 8th, 2006 at 9:07 am - IP Man-Hash: 1d5daf4ba7f69
Maybe someone has already pointed this out, but Female, men realize that arguing in court over “stuff” ends up costing WAY more than the stuff itself, even under the best of judicial circumstances. Never mind the court corruption a guy finances when he runs the risk of going to court at all. Cheaper to just get new stuff.
And ‘ATWJ,’ …(Your first inclination was to insinuate fault on my part for “letting her rip me offâ€? and insult those who were offering support. Real adults speak and treat people with compassion, not with animosity. “Tough-loveâ€? is a tactic used on addicts to snap them out of bad behavior. I am no addict and have not behaved in a poor manner.)
…I went through the very same thing when my wife was able to get away with theft and forgery…for openers. I lost my entire inheritance. Which was precisely what she married me for. And we’re talking $150,000 to date and counting, not including a car, the kids and control of a house I bought before we were married. She caused it to go into foreclosure out of sheer spite.
February 8th, 2006 at 9:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
Ouch!
I am sorry to hear of your misfortune. I hope/pray that fairer winds fill your sails in the future.
February 8th, 2006 at 8:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 43528c5f71839
In the end I do believe in a form of Karma, not all that mystical crap that people go on endlessly about, but I really do believe that what goes around comes around and the longer the wait the bigger the bill per se. So I don’t fret about a lot of these things I just learn from them and try not to repeat the same mistake twice. And tell others of my thoughts on the matter. So worry not guys, for real, in the end I think they get kicked in the ass 3 times as hard as we do for their own misguided acts.
February 9th, 2006 at 10:28 am - IP Man-Hash: e242bff47fa85
I’m sorry, but this website is completely rediculous. Do you honestly think that all men are the same and all women are the same? How old are all of you. I’m 26 years old, I have 3 boys with the same man that I’ve been with since I was 13 and he was 15, we’ve never been married, don’t need to or want to and neither of us are materialistic and to both our liking…we still have really great sex. People need to learn that there is absolutely no perfect person. I don’t care who you are or where you come from….people learn stupid and nasty habits from their parents and you just have to roll with the punches. If you honestly love someone, use your gentler side to show them you love them enough to help them change and you have to give you’re all into trying to change your own bad habits too. Whatever the sacrifices. The world has always been and always will be critical and unforgiving…..do your own thing and don’t worry about the moral majority. Just don’t kill anyone or hurt children….. :o) All in all, tough and smart are sexy as hell, but that can’t be the only side she sees.
A
February 9th, 2006 at 11:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
Alison,
That is the point of the website. Sweeping generalizations of ALL men is the exact modus operandi of Feminism. ALL men cheat, ALL men rape, ALL men abuse. So, why is so bad for a group of men to say the same thing about women? ALL women cheat, ALL women are unintellignet, ALL women moo.
You may only be 26, and think you have a good grasp on life, but you still have a long way to go to see the whole picture.
“Crude classifications and false generalizations are the curse of organized life.� - George Bernard Shaw
February 9th, 2006 at 12:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: e242bff47fa85
So you’re saying criticism/acclaim of “ALL” things generalized are justifiable by societal behavior? (Eye for an eye? How typical?) Well, you may think me unedumacated due to age and sex, but it’s that “type” of “thinking” (or not thinking) that that keeps you from finding real love. I’ll bet that you have never had a woman/man(?) look you in the face and tell you they’ll do anything in the world to make you “happy”……or visa versa. You’d be surprised at the wisdom in some other words of advice male & female…”Education is learning what you didn’t even know you didn’t know.” - Daniel Boorstin - Prize-winning author and Librarian of Congress…..”A real friend is one who walks in when the rest of the world walks out.” - Walter Winchell - American newspaper and radio commentator…..”Statistics are no substitute for judgement.” - Henry Clay - Senator and a Representative from Kentucky…..”To understand a man, you must know his memories.” - Anthony Quale - Actor……”It is a funny thing about life; if you refuse to accept anything but the best, you very often get it.” - W. Somerset Maugham - Novelist
And in your case, may favorite: “When the wires are all down and your heart is covered with the snows of pessimism and the ice of cynicism, then and only then have you grown old.” - Unknown to me
February 9th, 2006 at 12:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: e242bff47fa85
WindJammer - I pity you and all who have hardened your hearts in a time when so much information if available with the intention of making your lifetime on earth more enjoyable. You should be thankful you live in a time when words are simply that and you don’t see killings for simple words as much as in the past. I certainly am thankful for the fact that my children, as it appears at the moment, will not know the heartache my parents/grandparents and so on have known in their lifetimes. It’s succumbing minds like yours that break under the pressure of society and I truly hope that I can prevent my sons from admitting defeat to such people as you all are ranting about.
February 9th, 2006 at 1:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
Again, you missed it. Did I ever say an eye for an eye. No. The point is to show how damaging and ridiculous generalizations are. Visit a feminist site and you will find this site comparatively tame. I never said you were uneducated. I simply implied you have not had the life experiences some of us have. I congratulate you that your relationship is going well and you are able to tell your man you will do anything in the world to make him happy and that he can do the same for you. Can I? Yes. You really should read all my posts on this site before you ask a question that has already been answered. Could she? No. Could a couple of other past girlfriends? No. In my experience, and the experience of other men here, women think it is all about them. I offered real love, it wasn’t returned. And it is warm and fuzy thinking like yours, with your rambling, irrelevant quotes, that keep you in the dark. Take your own advice with your education quote. Learn that you don’t know it all, which you obiviously didn’t even know you didn’t know.
“The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it.” -George Bernard Shaw
February 9th, 2006 at 1:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Oh boy. Can you mark posts like that with “Sugar Coated Horseshit Ahead” please? You might hurt some poor diabetic reading this site.
Better yet, why don’t you just go ahead and fuck off my website, Alison.
-Dick
February 9th, 2006 at 1:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
I do not need your pity. I have not hardened my heart. Again, if you read all my posts, you would now that I still have hope to find someone with a heart as good as mine with a mind unbefouled by Feminist Rhetoric. And you think peoples lives are not taken for simple words today. Men’s lives; their children, family, financial stability, homes, etc., etc.; are taken from them each day because of the words of the Feminists. ALL men are evil, rapists and abusers. So laws have been biased against men.
I have not succumbed to or been broken by societal pressures or admitted defeat to anyone, man or woman. I am standing tall; in the world, working two jobs to rebuild my life after she took it apart, and here in cyberspace, voicing my opinion and disdain for what many people, including women, have attributed to the downfall of current civilization. The divorce rate, single-parenthood (which has been linked to increases in violence) and selfish mindset of many Western societies have been, in scientific studies linked to the rise in feminism.
Wake up, Alison.
February 9th, 2006 at 1:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: e242bff47fa85
Boy, you people really are fucked up in the head aren’t you??? Okay, have fun with your last little word. After all, it is a free country isn’t it? What a bunch of little whiney ass bitches! Please hold on the line while I fetch a big fat hairy tit for you to suck so your life isn’t so full of people………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………….
February 9th, 2006 at 1:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: e242bff47fa85
Oh and Dick, you’re just a pussy! Go kiss you’re father with that mouth!
February 9th, 2006 at 2:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: e242bff47fa85
So there’s no link between the societal problems and the rise in male scientists doing studies???
February 9th, 2006 at 2:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9c31584dfada4
Well stated Alan, there are still ignorant people on this website that still cling to the lie that feminism is. Been lied to by other women and still deny it, it’s coming back to bite them and now they are complaining even more about their selfish requirements not being met.
Women wanted it all and bugger the cost. Now the feminists are not supplying the Utopia they have lied about over the last 40 years. This is a blatant obvious truth, but beyond comprehension to women that troll here.
Now, the situation is that we have the scream squad howling “How dare you say women are not perfect”, again demanding attention and determined to prove to someone that they really are(not).
But, over and over again women demonstrate thier total ignorance. This site should clearly demonstrate what most of us think of women and how we are totally disinterested in their opinions.
But thier sad and sorry behaviour clearly demonstrates that they just don’t get it.
But there is help available.
Just so women can imitate sanity we have developed following drugs.
“thank God there’s Valium. And Prozac,
and Xanax, and Paxil, and Zoloft, and Serzone, and Lexipro, and Effexor
and Luvox, and Celexa. ”
Read it right here in our forum on “what women are really like”……
http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/forums/about74.html
February 9th, 2006 at 2:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: e242bff47fa85
Alison, that would be the rise in male scientists conducting studies to tell us feminism is the problem and male minds are the solutions…..please……and women are stupid?
February 9th, 2006 at 2:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
My my. Now what was that about a last word?
-Dick
February 9th, 2006 at 4:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3249507be8fb8
Alison said:
Boy, you people really are fucked up in the head aren’t you??? Okay, have fun with your last little word. After all, it is a free country isn’t it? What a bunch of little whiney ass bitches! Please hold on the line while I fetch a big fat hairy tit for you to suck so your life isn’t so full of people.
-Ahh yes the true nature of woman finally shines through, I was surprised actually, she did had some good thoughts and presented herself in befitting manner. But it only took 2-3 post for her to degrade into a screaming nag.
February 10th, 2006 at 7:50 am - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
Thank you, Christian.
Abaddon, I couldn’t have said it better.
When do you think people will understand that they cannot force others into changing their minds. The only thing anyone can do is present an intelligent, concise argument citing real information and hope that the listener is mature and intelligent enough to look at it from a different perspective. Enlightment only comes when you can see both sides.
February 10th, 2006 at 1:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9891cc1600fe8
From almost sensible to obnoxiuos in one breath, must be a record.
Typical female. Like the signs you see on the back windows of thier cars ” From zero to BITCH in 30 seconds” as if it’s some type of community effort or major achievement.
It’s just stating the obvious.
Do we have a forum listing for this type of behaviour ?
February 15th, 2006 at 3:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04a9a9a632489
A friend of mine told me about your site so I could see for myself just how awful it is. Although, being the coward that you are, I know you will simply dismiss me as a stupid, whiny bitch-ass prostitute (which is actually so far from the truth it makes me laugh), I would at least like to have the opportunity to defend my sex in this kangaroo court.
Your theories are so full of contradictions and grossly innaccurate “facts”, not to mention personal opinion falsely passed off as being “evidence”. how could anyone take you seriously? I am shocked to see how many men subscribe to your site and I am saddened that there are so many uninformed men in the world who would believe these horrible things you pass off as “truth”. Your reasons for men being ‘better’ than women, are based on an entirely male perspective, grounded in an entirely male social reality. The society we live in was shaped by men for men. Even if your theories were true, how could women ever possibly have the illusion of being able to compete with men anyways? By your logic, if women created a society whose social structures, institutions and entire definition of self was based on the ability to have a baby, men would be entirely marginalized. Isn’t this what has happened in our society? You cannot establish criteria for judging one’s worth as a person, based on something that some people genetically/naturally don’t have or can ever have, then deem them unworthy and yourself worthy, because they don’t have it. It is logically inconsistent.
While I know that you don’t think that men need any emotional support (because men, apparently, are made of tin and have no soul) I want to know what happened to you to make you so full of hate? It must be a horrible way to live - angry and bitter all the time. What exactly do you want women to do? Behave like animals? We can’t because we are not and you know that this is true because how would men be able to impregnate women if they were not of the same species? I really think you need to find a source for your anger. I am not saying that all women are perfect, or that the anti-male attitude that some women adopt isn’t equally as problematic as your own. I am just saying, that promoting attitudes like this only harms the person who is promoting it. I hope that you’ll be able to let of all this hatred eventually, the world (of both women and men) isn’t entirely bad, I hope you’ll be able to find some good in it.
Prayerfully,
A Woman
February 15th, 2006 at 3:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
You tell me, you silly, smelly manatee type creature.
-Dick
February 15th, 2006 at 5:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
Maybe we should call women like female and jess ” the Jabbermonkeys”
February 15th, 2006 at 6:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
speaking as if you are a man again are you Grump? Maybe I should start to call you something more reflective of your sexual orientation?
February 15th, 2006 at 6:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 49c9ff889fded
Yeah Dick, [thick sarcasm] how do you live with yourself? Have you thought of therapy? Maybe you just need a hug. If one of your women would simply get you a valentines gift, all would be better.
Jess, sweetcheeks, doll,
first you are defending your gender, not your sex. As Dick has so masterfully written, “women hate sex.” Second, you say you are not a “stupid, whiny bitch-ass prostitute.” Fine place to start as any.
Stupid: posting to a site that says quite clearly, “no women allowed”
Whiny: :Jess said
Bitch-Ass: Going to a site like MABTW.com and, well, going to a site like MABTW.com
Prostitute: I suppose you could be that 12 sigma event, a woman who has never used sex for personal gain.
February 15th, 2006 at 6:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Welcome to the site. Actually, most men on the site don’t use hostile and aggressive language against women on the site unless those women initiate it.
What perspective would you propose we base it on, given the thesis? That of sea-otters? women? dolphins? unicorns? Again, given the view that men are better than women, why should we base our reasoning on a less logical foundation?
No. About 50 years ago, we did indeed live in a society shaped largely by men, for the benefit of families. There were costs for women in this society, and there were costs for men. (You could argue that families benefit men more than they do women; I think this would be a challenging position to argue, but not impossible).
More recently, society has been redesigned by a group of social engineers coupled with feminists. It would be fair to say that our present society is an attempt — albeit a poor one — to design a society for women’s benefit. You have but to look at affirmative action laws, college entrances, the very rapid decline of male academic performance in an increasingly feminized educational system, divorce laws, actuarial computations coupled with annuities and pensions, etc.
Not my logic; yours. Moreover, I predict that would not be a very successful society. Designing a society that supports the raising of strong, healthy, successful children might be a better goal.
So you are admitting our society has been reengineered for women’s nominal benefit?
Someone who is a sociopath is genetically damaged; they naturally lack true empathy (amongst other things). Do I judge that person as a less worthy person than someone who is not? Probably, yes. I fail to see the logical inconsistency in judging Stalin a less worthy human being than, say, Gandhi.
An interesting view that I do not think you gained by reading this site.
May I remind you, you arrived, without ever having exchanged a word with any man here, declaiming that the site was “awful” and that he who read you was a “coward” and predicting you would be dismissed with rude, hateful, ignorant language.
I am not sure who is full of hate, but I doubt that it is the men here.
While I cannot speak for every — or indeed any — other man on this site, there is no hate in my heart for most women; I love and cherish many