Now You’re Talking Double Team
I was sitting in my favorite chair yesterday evening drinking a glass of Black Label and ruminating on the myths in our society. One struck me as being especially ridiculous.
Marriage.
‘Marriage,’ I scoffed — or at least I’m sure that I did. And any man will do exactly the same if he’s not afraid of having his balls ripped off by someone who has just finished a grueling 20 hour work week. I’m talking about women. Millionaires aren’t in the habbit of ripping balls off when people say the most obvious goddamn thing in the world.
Women do not age discriminate when it comes to their precious 20 hour work weeks either. After all, what does a 40 year old woman need with more “me time” than a 20 year old. It’s not like she’s done anything more with her life than nothing. It’s not like she needs time to think about anything. It’s like giving baseball players with odd numbers more strikes than the ones with evens. You have an 11? You get six strikes. It makes no fucking sense and it would be exactly the way baseball was played if women were in charge.
Women have no sense of hierarchy. They don’t have to work their way up the benefits ladder as we men do. As soon as women are mobile, they’re looking for somewhere to sit down — or lay down. Because they’re whores.
Back to marriage.
Marriage is a waste of money and a ticket to unhappiness and No Sex Town. Here’s another reason why.
No one woman can ever possibly fully please a man. None. Not one. Ever.
In the immortally misquoted words of the Queen of Swine herself, Hillary Rodham Clinton, “It doesn’t take a village to raise a child; it takes a village to keep a husband.”
Women just aren’t up to the three-fold tasks of pleasing a man, intellectually stimulating a man, and giving a man the precious emotional support that he doesn’t need at all and which I just said as a joke.
A classic joke.
Women can’t even do one of those three. Look at the smartest woman on Earth. What’s her name? The girl with the advice column. Dear Abbey? She’s a genius and her column is so boring that I can barely remember who she is and I also don’t read it. And how about pleasing a man? Forget about it. That’s a two woman job at minimum.
You know I’m right too. Last time you were having sex, who were you thinking about?
Exactly. That was practically two women at the same time. And that’s a thousand damn Man Points.
As far as I’m concerned bigamy is the only way to go. Yes, it’s “illegal”. Yes, it’s “frowned upon”. But reread your history books and you’ll be in for a surprise. The men of the past found ways around that shit. I think it’s high time we turn back the clocks.
The sex clocks.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 7 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All
Steve T writes like a woman, spells like a woman, and uses exclamation marks like a woman.
I reckon he’s a duck.
-Big Al
Yes, I’m afraid we part company here slightly. I admire women who are admirable. The overwhelming majority aren’t. As for being “equalled [sic]â€? with men, well, that’s like saying diamonds and men are equal. They aren’t. If you want something sharp and brittle to cut glass, a diamond is a better tool than a man. If you want something sharp and brittle to cook you dinner, well, perhaps I’d best stop there.
As for a woman posting on this website, pretending to be a man, I think that’s a distinct possibility, though Dick would not be my chief candidate.
-wolfe
YES!! At last, a sensible topic!! I can totaly relate to you wolfe! Women are not there to be hated, just there to be admired and be equalled with us men. We help tham, they help us! I totally agree with Dan when he says (quote) and Dick, you’re name is very accurate. What a useless way to spend your time, foaming at the mouth and making totally contradicting statements (unquote). I think, Dick is definitely in a minority here and it beginning to show (and I can bet he does not like it!) If he really hated women that much, he would not keep being so derogatory towards them (you know, the love-hate thing). I cant imagine him being more than about 20, possibly gay (well he would have to be really,) and sat at home with no money, no job and loads of time on his hands too. I guess thats why he started this site. Out of bordem. Ok, so he has lots of people here writing on it, but if everybody here was told by Dick to “fuck off,” just because we did not agree with his views, he would be here all alone! (like his sad life!) Poor man, I wish we could help him, but I think he is way beyond that. Anyway this is miles to long, but needed to be said! MEN AND WOMEN BOTH RULE!!!
PS, do you think Dick is really a woman in disguise?
Wolfe, I tip my hat to you sir. You demonstrated excellent sword-play of logic. Very well put and very, very true.
vaya con dios,
Oldone
Dan/Jess,
I value diamonds very highly (though women more so) but I’ve no problem with the thesis that men are better than diamonds. I’ve therefore no problem being on this site.
If you mean that I am foaming at the mouth, I regret your lack of reading comprehension (or applaud your simplistic defense of Jess for uh… obvious gains. If that’s the case, Total Masculine Kudos to you.).
A real man does not dominate a woman. We agree on that. A real man inspires his woman to be a better woman, and a real woman inspires her man to be a better man. The latter job is probably tougher and more important.
NB- This should not be confused with consciously trying to mould someone as most women do. That’s crap.
The women close to me in my life have inspired me to be a better man, and I bow to them.
Best,
-wolfe
all of this sounds wonderful but i have only one question: why are you on a site called MEN ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN if you love and value women as much you say you do??? and Dick, you’re name is very accurate….
what a useless way to spend your time, foaming at the mouth and making totally contradicting statements.
You all make no sense, I’m off to find more productive ways to be a real man (and don’t give me that bullshit about how a real man is one who dominates over a woman. A real man doesn’t blame his own failings and insecurities on someone else.)
Peace
Dan
The deception women attempt even in every day activities is staggering.
-Dick
Dock me a couple man points Dick for responding to myself, but lol.
Cheers,
-wolfe
With respect, I think the swift nature of the modest proposals of this site may be escaping you, Dan.
I will repeat: most here don’t hate women. A good woman is a pearl beyond price. I have the utmost respect for a woman who stays loyal to a good husband (which, deep down, is most men), and cares for her family — including the husband — as much or more than herself. (A good husband of course cares far more for his family than himself).
God made women; Satan gave them (and men) ideas.
-wolfe
Dan, your IP Man Hash is showing.
-Dick
Well, considering the fact that Dick believes that every single woman on earth is a prostitute (????), can’t really be sure of his intellectual abilities, can we? dude, this site makes me sad - the last thing we need in this world is more hatred. plus, what the hell? your comebacks are just telling people to F-off? what is that? is this site run by 7th graders? although that would explain a lot…….is there a forth-coming ‘cooties’ entry?
I think it’s just possible that Dick realized this.
-wolfe
ummm Dick, I dont think you’ve realized but I think Jess is being sarcastic, seriously buddy if your going to try to prove your point at least try to sound a little clever, honestly just writing into this makes me feel less of a man, I can only imagine how low you feel right now. Yikes!
Honestly Dick…Dont hate the player Hate the game….
Have fun being alone for the rest of your life!
Dan
Female, take a note. That’s woman who knows her place.
-Dick
Well said, Dick, well said. Female - cheers,
Fucking off (ouch!)
Jess
Yes Jess, looks like Dick has just proved your point. Nice one.
Jesus. What a load of bullshit.
Jess, I can only assume you are a woman. In which case, fuck off my site.
-Dick
I am sorry Oldone but that is not correct. I am not trying to change your beliefs - I am trying, however, to introduce another way of looking at your beliefs. But, as I mentioned in my earlier post, I was mistaken because you are obviously not looking for ways to question or test your theories against other theories, to prove or disprove their validity since your response to challenges to your beliefs are to either to insult the person who posted them or to revert to an argument that is framed by a totally subjective premise: men are better than women because they are men, in effect. Sometimes people don’t want to hear anything that forces them to question what they accept as gospel truth and it seems that this is the attitude of the posters on this site. I respect your right to have this space even though I completely disagree with your theories. My mistake, as mentioned before, was to try to engage people who obviously do not wish to be engaged.
Jess
P.S. If I were to try to present “proof” of how wrong you were about the history of women in society, or try to explain all the ways that you are deluded about said history, I would need much more space than I have here and you probably wouldn’t get past the first sentence before dismissing me as “a silly manatee”. Am I right?
Jess said: “….if you really believe that society has been entirely reconstructed in the space of 50 years to suit women entirely, you are sadly, deluded on so many levels�
I note that you neither stated these levels nor provided proof to back this statement.
Jess said: “…I don’t accept your standard and since you are not God (unless I am wildly mistaken) or some other divine/all-powerful source of authority, you can’t make me accept it.�
Yet you post here in an attempt to make us accept your standard and opinion. How hypocritical.
Jess said: “I am sure you can find scores of historians, philosphers, theologians, academics etc of both GENDERS (pardon my misguided reference to sex which I OBVIOUSLY hate) to support your theories.�
Actually, Theodore Roosevelt, Nietzsche, Sun Tzu, Churchill, just to name a few.
Jess said: “I was exercising that wonderful ideal that your founding FATHERS created (although I’m sure it was their wives’ idea, silly manatees) of freedom of speech - the same freedom that allows you to create a website like this in the first place.�
Yet despite that freedom you post on this site in an attempt to suppress and or change our beliefs, hindering that very right. Again what hypocrisy.
Integrity as according to Princeton’s WordNet:
Sense 2
integrity — (moral soundness; “he expects to find in us the common honesty and integrity of men of business”; “they admired his scrupulous professional integrity”) => honesty, honestness (the quality of being honest)
—————————————————————————————————————
If you wanna make it in this horrible world polluted by man, you should learn integrity and do what you say you will. People will respect you more and not ridicule you and insult you.