The Romans didn’t feed them to lions for fun.

Female said:

Yes, answer the question, why are you so worried about doing so? Perhaps because you realise that it is logically impossible for all women to be whores because nuns don’t fit the definition of what a whore is. I guess that means I win. Of course, everytime that happens, rather than admit that a woman has demonstrated superior logic, you men atttempt to convince me or another woman here that has shown superior logic, that we are in fact the stupid ones. It’s lame.

Your other tactic to avoid admitting a female has won a point or argument over a man is to change the topic and start talking about sex or making crass, abusive remarks to her. This may work to sidetrack or end the discussion if the female disappears and doesn’t respond, but it doesn’t change the fact that she has defeated you intellectually. And anyone following the thread, with a modicum of intelligence, will realise this. They will also clearly perceive your lame attempt to avoid acknowledging that she is your intellectual superior and that you got owned.

It’s pretty clear that you don’t have a clue what a Freudian slip is, because I didn’t use one, nor did I refer to one. Why don’t you give me a laugh and provide me with your definition of what one is.

Wall of text that means nothing. Leave it to women to type a huge wall of text with words looked up in thesaurus.reference.com just to drag out what they always say – which is nothing.

There is nothing in your huge wall of text that is even remotely interesting, besides the fact that it’s redundant as FUCK.

FFS, everyone knows nuns are whores. All of those faggots in there got a ton of issues. If nuns weren’t sucking the Pope’s cock 24/7, what’d stop him from rounding up the little boys?

If you want to be fulfilled, it is true no woman or man can ever fulfill all your needs.

It just means you, yourself are lacking and must fulfill your own needs and desires. If there is a gap in your soul, it is up to you to try and fill it.

No one else has responsibility for yourself except yourself. It is not anyone else’s burden to make sure you are happy.

If you are unhappy, it is probably your fault.

Grow up.

Female said:

In most cases, when I realise that smacking my head against the wall would proivde more pleasure than trying to make people here perceive another point of view, I discontinue the discusssion. I am not obligated to provide this information when I leave and in any case, you can and will interpret a non-response in whichever way you please to suit your own view of me.

Instead of diving head on into the argument by proving your points against those that I have mentioned, you sought to go on a lengthy cowardly rant which in turn … proves nothing. way to go to prove that you are a feminist bitch.
no go smack your head against the wall then instead of acting all high and mighty and posting repeatedly to get the last word, bitch.

Elitist_Prick said:

Okay, so if you “believed” the world was flat and “don’t believe you were wrong,” does that make you right?

Please, don’t kid yourself because you aren’t fooling anybody. You don’t ever know why you say anything or do anything.

Exactly!

Female said:

Please, don’t kid yourself because you aren’t fooling anybody. You don’t ever know why you say anything or do anything. If you kept your word half of the time, you would have left the site for good a long time ago.

MansVoice said:

Its my opinion that not all women are whores. That may be Dick’s opinion but it is certainly mine. I believe it to be a freudian slip because I believe it is exaggerated but Dick may have his own rationale in saying it.

Mansvoice, didn’t it tip you off that if I was so keen to hear your understanding of a Freudian slip, that you therefore should have looked it up? Why do you think that an exaggeration (obviously) makes it a Freudian slilp?

We are intellectually owning you. Like a dog. Worst than a dog.

No actually, you and the others here are not intellectually owning me. You may think you are, but that is because it amuses me to see you all think you are so great when you think you have morally and intellectually defeated a woman’s argument.

I should admit that there is something I didn’t know. I wasn’t aware that people routinely engaged in argumentative debates with their dogs, but then again, I’m all for equal rights and I wouldn’t try and stop anyone from debating their views with who or whatever they see fit.

Lets face the facts. In every argument say Wimbledon, Date Rape, Alimony etc, you have refused to admit you are wrong

Well hon, maybe that is because I don’t believe I was wrong. It doesn’t matter to me whether people perceive me to have lost just because I fail to make a point or leave a discussion, for I know why I say what I say and do what I do.

In most cases, when I realise that smacking my head against the wall would proivde more pleasure than trying to make people here perceive another point of view, I discontinue the discusssion. I am not obligated to provide this information when I leave and in any case, you can and will interpret a non-response in whichever way you please to suit your own view of me.

*My bad, loss of man points.

Female said:

Your other tactic to avoid admitting a female has won a point or argument over a man is to change the topic and start talking about sex or making crass, abusive remarks to her.

It was brought up in the forums that Female obsessively comments here because she enjoys the sexual gratification of being dominated by men — even if it’s only a domination of logic and argument.

It explains everything.

-Dick

Your other tactic to avoid admitting a female has won a point or argument over a man is to change the topic and start talking about sex or making crass, abusive remarks to her. This may work to sidetrack or end the discussion if the female disappears and doesn’t respond, but it doesn’t change the fact that she has defeated you intellectually. And anyone following the thread, with a modicum of intelligence, will realise this. They will also clearly perceive your lame attempt to avoid acknowledging that she is your intellectual superior and that you got owned.

It’s pretty clear that you don’t have a clue what a Freudian slip is, because I didn’t use one, nor did I refer to one. Why don’t you give me a laugh and provide me with your definition of what one is.

I will admit that was a bit over the top but my problem with whatever your saying is that … you only bother about freudian slips?

Every argument, every debate, you have lost. Dont deny it. You lose ALL your arguments, seen for yourself how the men just slice through your “verbal walls” then run and hide and refuse to admit defeat.

It is these kinda feminist attitudes, that which reeks of hypocrisy, which disgusts so many of us. Go get a life and stop hanging yourself under Dick’s crotch.

diamatik said:

I smoke Benson & Hedges, but when I’m in other countries I smoke Marlboro Lights. I’ve never done weed or any other illegal drug. Any legal drugs I’ve ever taken were either prescribed (and used only for the duration of the prescription) or over the counter (and I didn’t abuse those either).

I did have a drinking problem a few years ago, but I’ve gotten over that. I need to quit smoking though. When I look at the fact that people are disappointed at Barack Obama for his love of nicotine, I get worried about my own political aspirations.

Thanks but my unanswered question was to Dick, specifically asking how nuns can be whores.

diamatik said:

I live in a third-world country, and a small one at that. Everyone knows everyone else, so everything you’ve ever done since birth is in everyone’s memory. Such is political life in a nation with a population less than 100k.

Diamatik, this might interest you. Nick Hornby, the author of “High Fidelity”, reads his short story “Small Country”.

http://www.thislife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=295

Alex said:

@ Diamatik- What do you plan to do in politics? (I’m asking genuinely, I aid in political research at my university and am interested in politics myself.)

That sentence wasn’t redundant wasn’t redundant.

@ Dick – Once again your comments are putting my job in jeopardy. These sudden violent outbursts of laughter are not very becoming at the office.