Old Men Are Saviors, Cougars Are Gross
A manpiphany is a jolt of genius that starts at the balls and proceeds directly to the brain. Whenever I experience this phenomenon, I open my mouth and speak as quickly as I can. What comes out may offend loads of women, but fuck women. The truth needs to be spoken.
Female anger is the weather vane of truth.
Truth is the enemy of women.
If a woman ever gets pissed off at anything you say, science will prove you right.
Old guys hooking up with young women is fucking awesome.
See? If any women were allowed to read that, it would offend the shit out of them. That means it must be the truth.
Old guys hooking up with young women is awesome and every guy in the world hopes to do it one day — tomorrow preferably. During our twenties, men realize that all women our age stopped emotionally maturing long ago. Puberty for women should actually be called retirement — a retirement of emotional growth, a retirement of critical thinking, and a retirement of whatever makes women not behave like frigid cunts.
Men are better than women.
You don’t buy a new car with a bunch of fucking dings in it, do you? Dings don’t fix themselves. Cars don’t “grow out of” a bunch of dings. God I fucking hate dings.
Women’s egos are like trees. You can tell their age by counting the number of un-fixable fucking dings all over them. Dings like getting offered $300 for a blowjob by one of her boyfriend’s poker buddies because everyone was drunk and she can’t take a joke or a hint. Here comes the sobbing MySpace journal!
Here comes the science.
Old men who hook up with younger women are propelling our species into the next millennium in a big way — big like an ACME rocket. A new study brought to you by the letters M, E, N, says old men are dumping genes that make them live longer into the E-Z Bake oven that is a young woman every time they cross the May/December divide.
An E-Z Bake oven is a cheap and over-hyped toy that produces a consistent supply of shit.
Think about it like this. Biologically speaking, women expire somewhere around 50; even though we know their actual expiration date is 23. Biologically speaking, men can reproduce into their 70’s. In order to pass on that “long life” gene, these older men must sleep with younger women. And by “younger”, I mean women in their 20’s. Do the math, 70 minus 50 is 20. It makes sense.
Older men who hook up with young girls are also doing you and I a favor. Girls who would date older men have father issues that border on psychotic. They’ll key your car if you piss them off. They’ll stalk you. The last thing you want is a relationship with one of these broads without a good twenty years on her. You’ll never hear the end of it, and if she wasn’t too stupid to figure it out, she would do something really horrible like wreck your credit.
A long living man needs to pass on his long living genetic code to a woman before she turns 50. 50 is when menopause rains down on women like the glacier of hormones it is. And that’s exactly what the study found: something I already knew.
Here’s something else I already knew: cougars are gross.
Everything you think is right.
Related Articles:
October 9th, 2007 at 8:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: f42c56a3b67c9
This is just so true. On 14th October this year I will celebrate the start of my 8th year without any female interference in my life. I do have female friends; some are married, some single and a fair few of them are divorced and are bringing kids up alone. When they look at the freedom (and money) I have it gets on their tits and some have even tried to move into my “freedom” but have, of course, been unable to. Even the happily married ones have tried. I think they see me as a challenge but none are able to conquer the challenge they set themselves. Why? Because they have nothing I want or need and the only thing they can offer me is turmoil. First of all, when they fail, they hate me for it, then they get jealous of the freedom I have and then finally they realise that what it is that they really don’t like……and that is themselves because they are incapable of doing what I have done. For a woman to abandon and ignore all attention focused upon her by a male would be like asking her not to breathe. She could achieve it for a very short time but would have to return to it very quickly. I am single and, before the insults start, I am not gay. I am missing out on nothing in my life and there isn’t a thing that any female could offer me that would make me even consider changing the way I live and the person I am. In fact I challenge them to just tell me what I am missing out on just because I refuse to have any kind of attachment to a female. I know the answer. Do they?
October 9th, 2007 at 11:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: a281a32be3004
Ok, Rob C, do not take offense to this, it is a legitimate question with no malice or shit stirring intended; Are you gay?
That was an actual question, I wasn’t being a bitch. I was just inquiring.
In fact, is anyone on here gay? Again, no shit stirring intended. I’m just wondering if men that have such low opinions and respect for women, could actually be heterosexual.
October 9th, 2007 at 11:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: 78aa99a80f85e
Interestingly enough I’ve just about reached the point where I’m going to swear off women myself. I’ve just had enough, and it’s clearly become idiotic to continue to be a hopeless romantic/optimist.
A “good woman” is a contradiction in terms. Until I can get me a toaster like this (but with sunnier programming) there’s just no point any more.
This is one of the most brilliant quotes I’ve ever seen. :)
October 9th, 2007 at 11:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 78aa99a80f85e
Clair, I daresay none of us are gay.
The reason we have such low opinions of women is due to one simple thing: life experience.
Even if you think we’re all totally full of shit, you should think about that. Women have now burned so many men so badly over so long a period of time that we’d rather choose a life of celibacy and lack of female companionship than deal with women again.
Think about it. That’s just how bad it is.
So when you read the next feminist article that harps on about how men are afraid of commitment/strong woman/[insert favorite male-bashing excuse here] and consequently women can’t find husbands, consider that the feminists are dead wrong.
We’re not gay and we’re not afraid. We just don’t want to deal with all the artificial drama, gold-digging, verbal/emotional abuse, and general bullshit that women inevitably drag into our lives.
Women are just no longer worth any level of interest, and the only people they have to blame for it are themselves.
October 9th, 2007 at 11:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: f42c56a3b67c9
Ok, Clair, please don’t take offence to this as it is a legitimate question with no malice or shit-stirring intended:
Are you fucking blind, fucking stupid or just fucking irritating? What kind of a stupid fucking question have you just asked me? READ MY POST!! No, let me make it easy for you and quote the relevant part.
Said RobC:
Now Clair…..tell me…..what part of “I am not gay” did you not understand? On second thoughts, don’t bother. Just fuck off and let the men talk amongst themselves.
October 9th, 2007 at 11:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: f42c56a3b67c9
DS, I return the compliment. Brilliant!!
October 10th, 2007 at 12:32 am - IP Man-Hash: a281a32be3004
Dakota Smith - ok. Thanks for answering. And no, I don’t think you’re all full of shit. I know that their are bitches out there, and I’m guessing some men (if not most) of the men on this site have encountered one or more which morphed their opinions on women. Just so you know though, alot of women have been burnt by men to, so much that they to have turned off the opposite sex. I think people owe it to themselves to not judge an entire sex based on the assholes that they’ve met. Thats the same reason racism is stupid and looked down upon. There are good women, just as there are good men. You and I, and everyone else owe it to these people to not label them the same as the assholes we’ve met. Don’t you think?
Rob C - Hey, no offense takin! Thanks for asking! It’s a pleasure to answer your question. No, I’m not “blind”, or “fucking stupid”, as for irritating, I believe thats up to personal opinion.
“Clair…..tell me…..what part of “I am not gay” did you not understand?”
It’s not that I didn’t understand it, it’s just that I didn’t believe it. You see, you seem to exhibit traits of ancient Greek men. You know with the whole “men are superior, women are inferior” attitude. This was the same attitude that led to male homosexuality becoming favorable and the norm.
October 10th, 2007 at 1:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 422940479a69d
Just off the side, have you stopped doing Podcasts then Dick?
October 10th, 2007 at 1:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 422940479a69d
It is true homosexuallity was encouraged within the spartan army, but because a warrior would then work hard to impress his partner.
And look how the spartan army did.
October 10th, 2007 at 1:28 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Clair are you gay? You seem to have such low opinions of men. How could you be hetero?
October 10th, 2007 at 2:25 am - IP Man-Hash: a281a32be3004
Necroswordsman- the Spartan army no longer exists. It ultimately failed.
mike5150 - what makes you think I have low opinions of men? Is it because I think that their on the same level as women? But to answer your question, no I am not homosexual.
After repeatedly reinforcing the fact that that question was indeed not to be taken offensively, I wonder, why did you feel the need to become defensive? It was not meant to offend anyone, and I said that. I was purely inquiring.
October 10th, 2007 at 4:10 am - IP Man-Hash: f42c56a3b67c9
Blind? No. Stupid? Jury still out. Irritating? Hell, yes!! And this is why you are irritating. Even though you said that the question you asked was a legitimate question with no malice or shit-stirring intended, anyone with only 10% of their brain working can tell from the reply you gave (see below) that your statement was total bollocks. Anyway, my point on that part made, I shall continue.
My traits have nothing to do with Ancient Greeks, gay or otherwise. They are the traits of the new 21st century man who will no longer put up with the bullshit from a leeching bitch anymore and you women just can’t stand the fact that you have lost your power over me and those like me. Get it into your head that your are surplus to requirement where I am concerned. I don’t want you (or any of your kind ) for a wife and I neither want you or need you for conversation. I am on a completely different and higher plane than any female when it comes to conversation because of the utter tripe that spews forth from your mouth. When you disagree with someone whilst conversing you become irrational and start spitting like a mentally disturbed viper and all normal speech from you disappears as fast as a snowball in the fucking Kalahari. As the men from this site will testify, all we get from you are insults relating to being either gay, having small penises, being sexually abused by our mothers and needing castrating. You are incapable of disagreeing without resorting to something that equates to Verbal Armageddon. Do I need that? Like fuck, do I.
So, as I neither want to fuck you or even talk to you, what fucking good are you to me? The answer to that question is that you are NO fucking good to me whatsoever. I don’t want you, I don’t need you and you have NOTHING beneficial to offer me. That, Clair, is freedom……and it’s MAN-FUCKING-TASTIC. Never again will I have to put up with the kind of shit a woman dishes out to men today.
A nice sidenote to this is, because I am not available to the women, they all want me and I just dismiss them with a wave of the hand. That is called Power OVER the Pussy…..and you fucking hate it. Now do us all a favour, Clair, and fuck off Dick’s site.
October 10th, 2007 at 1:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6d2bcc78aa95d
Clair, I have read all kinds of crap from females, but you got it bad. Please take your patranizing, condescending fat arse out of here.
You offer nothing at all to the discussion. You ask all manner of fucking retarded questions.
If your here to promote women, and convince us that your worth a damn, you have failed miserably!
October 10th, 2007 at 1:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6d2bcc78aa95d
Very well said, I wish I could articulate like that. I believe you do represent most men on this site, and others out there in feminist hell.
We are not gay, we dont have small penises, and most of us probly have no trouble getting laid if we wanted to, just look at the slutty femisists in bars these days, fucking every man in sight because they feel empowered to do so. Its even worse at the universities.
The real reason is what Rob says, its because men have figured out your game, were not going for it anymore, and we know we can make it thru life without getting married. You females have tried to shame us into thinking your just being “strong and independant”, but we see thru that now, and makes you angry.
You females have lost all the power you once had, and you know it, thats why you are so angry. Deal with it!
October 10th, 2007 at 4:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 78aa99a80f85e
I would correct your statement in the following way:
All the women that all the men on this site have met have collectively molded our opinions of women.
That includes our sisters, wives, mothers, and grandmothers. Every single last one of them. No exceptions. Ever.
Having made the same mistake on numerous occasions in 42 years, I can confidently say that any man who thinks he’s found the perfect woman is simply inaccurate. There is no such thing. There never has been, there isn’t now, and there never will be.
Ever. In the history of the human species.
I will certainly grant you that a small number of women have been legitimately abused (verbally, emotionally, sexually, or physically) by men. However, this number is extraordinarily small.
The reverse is not true. Women abuse men in relationships as a matter of course. Were men to treat women the way they routinely treat men, we’d be thrown in jail, literally.
Let me relate a story that you may find enlightening. The men on this site have heard it before, so I apologize. But it’s very instructive.
I’m divorced and have been since 2004. I was married for 13 years, the last five of which were a living hell that I intentionally tried to ignore so that my children would grow up in a two-parent family.
My ex was verbally and emotionally abusive. That’s not my subjective interpretation, but rather that of her therapist. That’s right: my ex-wife’s therapist told me point blank that she was verbally and emotionally abusive.
I could relate a litany of ways in which this played out, but I won’t. Google “verbal and emotional abuse” and you can find out for yourself. Once I researched it, I discovered she was entirely and classically abusive.
Suffice to say that there came a day when my psyche could suffer no more and I sought divorce.
The divorce proceeded. It wasn’t friendly, but it wasn’t particularly messy. At least, no more so than the average divorce.
I negotiated with my ex on the basis that I would trade any asset that the law said I was entitled to for increased access to our daughters. My philosophy is that you can always buy more stuff, but I can’t buy my daughters another father.
We negotiated this way for a good six months. Then one Saturday evening, she came to see me. We were still living together, with me sleeping in the guest bedroom. She was concerned that legally I was due some part of her retirement savings that she had earned prior to marriage. As always, I told her I was willing to barter it away for increased access to the kids.
At some point in the conversation, she let slip that as soon as the ink was wet on the stipulation, she planned to thwart our visitation agreement by taking the kids and moving 500 miles away.
I took the weekend and pondered that. Until that point, all of my negotiations were based on living near my children, and I was giving away assets right and left to see them as much as humanly possible. Yet here she was, telling me that she planned to take me for everything I had and run off with the kids.
I went to her the following Monday morning. We had a meeting with our attorneys scheduled for Tuesday. Because of the cost of the attorneys’ time, I felt that it was appropriate to advise her that I was going to cancel the meeting and that she should tell her attorney about this. It made no sense to me to continue with the negotiations until I’d had a chance to talk to my attorney about her plans and probably start negotiations anew with my new understanding of her intent.
She went ballistic and attacked me physically.
I suffered no injury, but philosophically I felt a line had been crossed that I wouldn’t tolerate. I’ll suffer a massive amount of verbal and emotional abuse for the sake of my children, but physical assault is a different matter.
When she calmed down, I informed her that either she would amicably agree to me taking the children to visit my parents for a few days or I would call the Sheriff and have her charge with assault.
She chose the latter.
Between the time of dispatch and the sheriff’s arrival, I hustled to get the kids out of the house so that they wouldn’t be present to see their mother arrested. My ex wanted them to remain to see what kind of a fool I’d look like in the eyes of the law. Fortunately, I prevailed.
The sheriff arrived and questioned her. She didn’t even try to deny it. She was arrested and taken away.
As something of a parting shot, her best friend (who lived two doors down from us) came over to berate me before she drove to the jail to bail out my ex.
Now, believe it or not, all of this is just backstory.
I went to my attorney for advice. While he agreed that getting her behind bars for a few hours and having a protective order taken out was a good idea, he didn’t think it would have any impact on either the divorce nor custody nor visitation.
And he was right: the attitude of the court is that women assault men during divorce all the time. The solution: get the man out of the house and everything will be fine.
Think about that for a moment: it is so common for women to assault men during divorce that the courts don’t even consider it relevant.
I invite you to imagine for a moment what would have happened to me had I assaulted my ex.
So, for having the temerity to actually charge my ex with an assault that she didn’t contest, I was forced out of the house.
Furthermore, her plans to thwart the custody arrangement had precisely no impact on the divorce negotiations. Since she’d told me privately, she could claim to her attorney that she said no such thing and that her official stance was that she and the children would remain in the area.
Consequently, it wasn’t possible to negotiate in good faith. She took me for everything I owned, and six months later we were making a new visitation agreement based on her running off with the kids.
Ultimately, I was out of everything I owned and wound up destitute. She got all the money.
The kids lost their father.
I talk to them every night for as long as they’ll let me. I help them with their homework over the phone. I make the 1000-mile round trip at least once a month (more, if I can afford it) and spend as much time with them as I can. I get tearful phone calls in the middle of the night telling me how much they don’t like it there and how much they miss me.
And there’s not a damned thing I can do about it.
I’ve investigated moving to where they live, but it’s financially impossible. If there was any way I could make it work, I would. I can barely scrape together enough to live in $450-a-month hovel in South Dakota. Where they live would cost me at least $1500/month, and there would be no salary increase to help cover it.
So my kids are screwed, and there’s nothing anyone can do about it.
Now, you might well say to yourself, “But Dakota, not all women are like that!”
To which I’d reply, “Yes, they are, and I can prove it easily.”
Remember the court’s attitude about my ex’s assault? The court routinely sees women assaulting men during divorce. Routinely. as in, it’s one of the most common occurrences they see during divorce.
What my ex did is not unusual.
Think about that for a moment: when angered during a divorce, it is normal for women to assault their husbands.
Women assaulting husbands is normal.
Let that sink in while I say it again:
Women assaulting husbands during divorce is normal behavior.
When an entire court system nationwide considers it normal when women assault men, you can be damned sure that it really is normal behavior.
It’s not good behavior. It’s not justifiable behavior. But you don’t guage what’s normal based on whether it’s good, you guage it based on how often it occurs.
Every day in the United States, roughly 50% of couples divorce. In most of those cases, the woman will at some point assault the man.
The reverse is not true. In fact, it’s so rare that the court has sanctions it imposes against men that include serious jail time and never seeing their children unsupervised again.
This massive difference in legal attitude is indicative of just how common female assault is. The legal system can’t dare prosecute the behavior, because the jails would be filled with women who assaulted men during divorce.
The reverse is not true.
October 10th, 2007 at 10:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: e5765c6a6556f
Dakota, 10,000 man-points to you for the time you took to warn future boys of Femerica what awaits them upon marriage. That was a mantastik testimony and I am sure Clair is fully aware of what you have described, as probably she or all her friends have done just that.
I wonder, Dakota, would you be willing to write a second testimony as to the courting process? When you and your ex-wife / kidnapper first began dating, how did you meet, what were some of the wonderful things you two did together, and how did you “fall in love”. Did you call each other cutesy names? What made you propose, and how did you do it? The more descriptive, the better. And what did your wedding cost $$$? How about the worthless glass rock $$$?
The reason I am asking, is because I am interested in the dichotomy between how marriage begins and how marriage fails. I have never been married, and like many men out there, sometimes when I date a girl, it is easy to get caught up in “being in love”, and we tend to think of the divorced couples as couples that must have been doomed from the start… surely there must have been signs of the ensuing time-bomb. Were there signs in your courting stage or was it all starry-eyes? How did you feel about your then girlfriend before you got married?
I just want the boys out there to see how the incredible feeling of “being in love”, and “she can do no wrong”, or “ain’t no mountain high enough gonna keep me from gettin’ to you” can (or will, for that matter) lead to what you have described above.
October 11th, 2007 at 12:07 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Dakota Smith-
Firstly that is a sad story. Especially if you legitimately did nothing awful to incite that behaviour.
“I will certainly grant you that a small number of women have been legitimately abused (verbally, emotionally, sexually, or physically) by men. However, this number is extraordinarily small.”
Could you give me a link that proves this statement?
“Now, you might well say to yourself, “But Dakota, not all women are like that!”
To which I’d reply, “Yes, they are, and I can prove it easily.”
What about your daughters?
October 11th, 2007 at 12:41 am - IP Man-Hash: de55713197a6e
Clair: I think you are discrediting ancient greeks. Sure, there were homosexuals in the Spartan Army but they were the best . Pronto. That can also be said about many men on this site who have accomplished, continue to accomplish and do so by being a man.
I think thats what being an ancient greek in about. Skilled in both warfare and philosophy yet with chivalry in them. Now, chivalry is near lost.. and you women have chose that. So when you lose chivalry, when you lose all sense of respect/love from a man or men, its the beginining of the end. Men are awakening. Words are out and you women hate that.
October 11th, 2007 at 12:48 am - IP Man-Hash: b97a424d9626a
*Yawns*, there are always exceptions. Are we here to talk about exceptions? Would Dick be wrong if he said 95% of women are whores? No, so stop shifting the scope.
October 11th, 2007 at 1:35 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
I LOVE THE ANCIENT GREEKS! By no means do I underestimate the awesome power that they had of the world around them. However, as an objective historian, I can not ignore the fact that they did fail. So something did fail their society. They were not perfect.
“*Yawns*, there are always exceptions.”
Don’t you owe it to these women not to belittle them and degrade them, on the basis that other people have been assholes?
“Would Dick be wrong if he said 95% of women are whores?No, so stop shifting the scope.”
So “ALL” women are whores, is right…and “95%” of women are whores is right? Make up your mind, better yet don’t make fickle claims. Until you’ve interviewed and assessed half of the human population, with out any bias, then make statements about them.