Old Men Are Saviors, Cougars Are Gross
A manpiphany is a jolt of genius that starts at the balls and proceeds directly to the brain. Whenever I experience this phenomenon, I open my mouth and speak as quickly as I can. What comes out may offend loads of women, but fuck women. The truth needs to be spoken.
Female anger is the weather vane of truth.
Truth is the enemy of women.
If a woman ever gets pissed off at anything you say, science will prove you right.
Old guys hooking up with young women is fucking awesome.
See? If any women were allowed to read that, it would offend the shit out of them. That means it must be the truth.
Old guys hooking up with young women is awesome and every guy in the world hopes to do it one day — tomorrow preferably. During our twenties, men realize that all women our age stopped emotionally maturing long ago. Puberty for women should actually be called retirement — a retirement of emotional growth, a retirement of critical thinking, and a retirement of whatever makes women not behave like frigid cunts.
Men are better than women.
You don’t buy a new car with a bunch of fucking dings in it, do you? Dings don’t fix themselves. Cars don’t “grow out of” a bunch of dings. God I fucking hate dings.
Women’s egos are like trees. You can tell their age by counting the number of un-fixable fucking dings all over them. Dings like getting offered $300 for a blowjob by one of her boyfriend’s poker buddies because everyone was drunk and she can’t take a joke or a hint. Here comes the sobbing MySpace journal!
Here comes the science.
Old men who hook up with younger women are propelling our species into the next millennium in a big way — big like an ACME rocket. A new study brought to you by the letters M, E, N, says old men are dumping genes that make them live longer into the E-Z Bake oven that is a young woman every time they cross the May/December divide.
An E-Z Bake oven is a cheap and over-hyped toy that produces a consistent supply of shit.
Think about it like this. Biologically speaking, women expire somewhere around 50; even though we know their actual expiration date is 23. Biologically speaking, men can reproduce into their 70’s. In order to pass on that “long life” gene, these older men must sleep with younger women. And by “younger”, I mean women in their 20’s. Do the math, 70 minus 50 is 20. It makes sense.
Older men who hook up with young girls are also doing you and I a favor. Girls who would date older men have father issues that border on psychotic. They’ll key your car if you piss them off. They’ll stalk you. The last thing you want is a relationship with one of these broads without a good twenty years on her. You’ll never hear the end of it, and if she wasn’t too stupid to figure it out, she would do something really horrible like wreck your credit.
A long living man needs to pass on his long living genetic code to a woman before she turns 50. 50 is when menopause rains down on women like the glacier of hormones it is. And that’s exactly what the study found: something I already knew.
Here’s something else I already knew: cougars are gross.
Everything you think is right.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 11 10 [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
I think you are right in a certain way but i think it would be better to say : There are good women as long as they don’t look good. Sadly, 100% of the women I’ve met so far, which were good looking, were total whores, and the more the worst. I’ve as well decided to live alone, woman-free. Consider that i am less that 40, healthy and good looking (which brought me so far more trouble with woman than joy), so if you were to think that only older men chose that way of life, it’s wrong and i’m sure i am not the only one of my age who’s lost total interest in women.
ClairE, don’t you have business we’re detaining you from?
Maybe your hubby needs his catnip or somethin’.
- Rolling Stones - Paint It Black
You’re welcome to comment. Indeed, I welcome you. You’ve clearly got some ideas you wish to express and you approach things from a historical perspective. Cool. Go for it. That doesn’t mean I don’t think you’re dead wrong in a number of aspects.
OK, your response is a bit incoherent. But…
It’s offended me only in that I want to see women (and men) that are intelligent and engage ideas effectively. You do part of that. You have some interesting assertions (80% bogus, but 20% interesting) yet you destroy yourself by writing poorly.
It’s fine if you think a site such as MABTW.com is beyond you and ludicrous. Fair enough. It’s not fine if you choose to engage and do so poorly.
Always seek to write well. This goes for men and women.
Even if that’s so (which I don’t agree), why drag yourself down to that level?
And that’s not something this site has a great deal of admiration for.
Indeed.
What!? Why equate those? Even if what you assert is true, why equate the two?
I’ll give you an example. I’m a Christian. Yes, yes, evil right-wing Christian. Bad for me.
I believe that we have souls as human beings and that our souls are equal before God.
That is a profoundly egalitarian doctrine, but also a profoundly anti-humanist doctrine.
How do you reconcile that?
Can you? You’ve stated something very flatly as young people often do. And it’s profoundly unimpressive.
-wolfe
You needn’t so. If it alleviates a burden from you, I shall cease to comment on your blog. Ok?
I’m sorry if this has offended you. I just honestly don’t see the point in refining my language for the sake of arguments directed at people that will inevitably resort to directing crude insults at. Just doesn’t seem worth it. Can you blame me?
About this, I actually, believe it or not, thought about it. I figured that this particular argument was going no where.
Yeah I was talking about things from a feminist stand point. Females are the greatest element of that movement. I believe it was MansVoice (sorry if I’m wrong) that said that if his genders loss of pride, is his loss of pride, and as I said to him, thats the very same mentality of feminism, and there’s nothing wrong with it. However, it becomes a problem when one side gains a power imbalance and then the other side becomes neglected. This is why I maintain that being an egalitarian or a humanist is the best option.
If you’re an egalitarian, probably not as much as you think. However, if this is the case, you probably differ SUBSTANTIALLY to alot of men on this site.
I didn’t mention males in that statement, if you noticed, they were completely omitted. This can only leave one to assume, as you did. I’m not saying your assumption was entirely out of line (I can understand why you came to that assumption,it’s wrong, just so you know though), but thats what it was, an assumption, hardly my own words.
You wrote me 4 lines of bullshit. I will give you 3 words “Fuck off, owned.”
That wasn’t directed to you Wolfe.
Or perhaps he realizes everything regarding your feminist diatribe is fallacious.
@Clair. Evidently you’ve commented on my blog. And sadly, I tend to go easier on those who’ve done so — since I’ve quite different rules for conduct at wolfesMusings than Dick applies here. Indeed if you keep commenting I shall largely withdraw myself from dispute save when I believe you are grossly in error.
That may not prove to be a challenge, of course.
You’ve raised some questions and asked me to respond.
You’ll forgive me, I trust, if I talk about your general comments here, not just those to MansVoice.
I should also note that you need to proof better. Abnegation, good. Some of your previous posts? Sloppy at best.
Surely rather dismissive?
Interesting. You ignore the clear evidence of men being discriminated against and seek to elevate all women — regardless of effort or intellect — to privileged lives.
I differ greatly from you. Human beings the world over matter to me. Male or female. I don’t seek to elevate all to a life of privilege because I’m intelligent enough to know that’s not possible. (it is possible to elevate all to a life of privilege relative to, say, any arbitrary time in the past. And that’s perhaps something we should seek. But no true progressive in possession of mathematical facts could assert otherwise.
You seem to seek — by your own words — a male underclass supporting 3 billion “privileged lifestyle” females. Good luck with that. Not.
Your very focus: women deserve lives of privilege; men are nothing ignores everything that MansVoice and others on this site are saying.
-wolfe
HA! Do you have some form of eye impairment? Or perhaps you you are not to familiar with the English language and have trouble deciphering it. OR perhaps…just perhaps… you are basking in a pitiful sea of mental abnegation.
Excuse me? I handed your ass to you on a plate in all our arguments.
LOL!!1!
Sorry gentlemen, Dick’s patient list is full, no more patients being accepted for the foreseeable future. Call again in six months.
Explain how I didn’t pay any attention to what he said? I answered his comments and pointed out hypocrisies in his argument, this just proves that I did indeed listen to him.
@ Christian J: Agreed
Btw, do you do podcast on men’s rights? Is this you -> http://odeo.com/audio/17054533/view?
Awesome, lol.
A limit to Dick’s “patients” - oh good lord, that is funny.
Dick, haven’t you banned this bitch yet…
There’s should be a limit to your patients, surely..
Contributes nothing more than it’s usual drivel…
Incapable of seeing outside the feminist sphere.
5 days is old now is it? Why don’t you go and tell that to the idiots who are quoting me from 2005 and 06. Oh, sure, it’s alright for men to do it, but if a woman quotes something more than 2hrs old, it’s a scandal! Pfft.
Hilarious. Is that why you cut the women on this sight so much slack is it? Oh no, it’s okay, I get it, again, it’s okay for men to make mistakes and we should really allow them to get away with it, considering their male pride is such a sensitive thing that we all need to take into account, but hey, if a woman stuffs up, you can just trash her to your heart’s content. Hypocrite.
really? you’re a sensitive thing aren’t you. Being more logical and less emotional than you, I think your swearing at women is far more disgusting than me taking a fun poke at Dakota. Which by the way, is a conversation you weren’t involved in so really, can’t you just mind your own business? Guess not.
Honestly, I couldn’t make this stuff up if I tried.
Right now? Right now, I’d like you to shut up and stop deliberately baiting me, yeah, it’s pretty obvious.
Ha! No, that’s what Facebook is for.
Stop coming onto this site to yell at men everytime a man ditches you. Its getting old, fuck off.
It’d be my pleasure not to post here anymore seeing as you are boring the life out of me, however, until you idiots stop calling me out, what can I do? Btw, you really need to learn to read.
It’s the same stupid, dumb, feminised females again. They are like robots sprouting that irrelevant drivel they are brainwashed into at “wimmyn’s studies”. Only women would study themselves.
Have a look back over the beginning of this manly site and have a look at the same, idealized, irrelevant feminised cretins espousing that same level of hypocrisy.
Fuck me, these bitches really do have a life don’t they..
Women actually liked staying home to care for their children etc.
*Yawns*, proof?
*Yawns*, so what has been done by feminists to undo or reverse this? Nothing, in fact, they expound on the issue and demand for more. For example, VEVA gave another 3 billion to women’s education when its clear the boys are the ones in need of help. Hypocrisy eh?
@Dakota (or should, I call you Dokota, as Clair does?) good comments on James Doohan. Nice picture. Definitely a manly man. Pawned was pretty funny.
@MansVoice a valiant effort with Clair. Sadly, she seems a typical university proto-feminist, regurgitating tired feminist ideas without actually paying any attention to what anyone says to her.
The board does have a resident history professor. I wonder if he will ever comment.
-wolfe
Pawn means to give something in security for a loan. So who knows what to make of it. Maybe she’s giving it up for $5 a pop.