The Middle East Has Enough Problems As It Is

A women’s group in the Middle East is attempting to piss in the face of God this week by petitioning the king of Saudi Arabia for the driving rights they don’t deserve.

That’s right, the burning bra of feminism has torched itself all the way around the world. Women in Saudi Arabia want to drive.

I am writing this article as an open letter to King Abdullah (the king of Saudi Arabia) in hopes of stopping this catastrofuck of lady locomotion before it explodes all over the Middle East like ten nuclear bombs.

If you support this letter, show King Abdullah by signing below in the comments.

King Abdullah,

My name is Dick Masterson. I am a celebrated Man Coach and author of Men Are Better Than Women, a fine work of non-fiction that you can purchase in your local bookstore as of April 2008, or pre-order today through Amazon.com. It is a book of such masculine profundity that your camels will have goosebumps.

Sir, it has come to my attention that a band of progressive misfits and hooligans are attempting to bamboozle you into giving women the right to drive. Rest assured that your manly instincts in this matter are correct — as were those of your father and his father. Letting women drive is dangerous. It’s dangerous to life, and it’s dangerous to your way of life.

While 10% of Americans may not be able to point to your country on a map, 100% of Americans can point to a country who fucked up by giving women a number of rights they don’t deserve. That country rhymes with and also is “America”.

Driving is not a religious issue, sir. On that and only that do I agree with these groups of swindling activists. However, it is not a social issue as they claim it to be. Letting women on the road is a matter of public safety and national security.

Women on the road are more dangerous than cancer.

No cancer can hit you broadside at 60 miles per hour in a two thousand pound SUV. At least no cancer I’ve heard of, and I watch House MD reruns at least twice a day. I’ve heard of every type of cancer there is.

Just this month, a woman in Chicago killed her four kids by trying to race a train across the tracks. I don’t know if you guys have trains over there, but I hope you do because they’re awesome. They’re also deadly when women are behind the wheel.

Trains are just like divorces. Man always loses.

Women on the road are needless congestion.

Fact. If you allow women to drive, your roads will have ten times the cars on them as they do today. While men are working from 9 to 5, women are driving all over the place: shopping, shopping some more, getting their hair done. Women are so stupid and predictable that I bet they get their hair done over there in the Middle East even though they have to wear burkas at all times. Women are the same all over the globe, Your Majesty: dumb as Sea Monkeys.

The point is, when you let women drive, you’re giving them the power to vote. In this case, they get to “vote” on where they’re going. Voting is a slippery slope, sir, and the last “right” you want to be fucking around with like a hot falafel on Eid. I think you guys have enough problems over there as it is.

You may be familiar with the character Borat. He is an exaggerated personification of Middle Eastern stereotypes as held by the Western World. He’s humorous, and while he may have generated over 260 million dollars worldwide, he is very much a fictional character.

You may also be familiar with the characters of Hilary Clinton and Gloria Steinhem. While these “ladies” may seem like overly exaggerated stereotypes of barren and shrewish female horse-pigs, they are in fact real women. These women have been driving their entire lives.

Coincidence? I don’t think so.

I read about a television program you guys have called Amsha bint Ammash, where a woman wears a mustache and drives a cab around. Over here, we have a television program called Doogie Howser, where a 16 year-old is a brain surgeon. I think you’ll agree that some things are better left on television.

-Dick Masterson
MenAreBetterThanWomen.com

Burn, Baby. Burn.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

145 Comments in 136 threads.»

Pages: « 7 [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by jarbrain
2008-04-23 17:47:43

Oh, no, no, no! If you gave a cursory glance to any of the femme rags pelted on the newstand lately, you’d see they’re hinting around that the fat is your fault, my friend!
Fat hormones are now being attributed to women doing too much and not getting enough sleep….they don’t come right out show a pic of a man on a couch in front of game, but they (being women, catching all the wrong hints at all the wrong time)…but the clothy-headed gender sees it anyways. Their remedy is practically you shaving your head, getting a big, gold Mr. Clean earing, and a litre to bear her around town.

 
Comment by jarbrain
2008-04-23 17:39:23

wtf said:

women behind wheels should be punished with cruesifiction and all you who say against should be tourtured, hanged, shot, burned och slaughtered with a touthstick.

Seriusly, women cant drive but so? why so serious, like its the end of the world!?

What the hell do you mean? Everyone dies in your thoughts, I’m counting.
The prob. in the US may not be so much w/ the four wheel drive as w/ the mouth in gear when she gets behind the wheel:
“I only have drive right one time…when I run the f*** over!”
…Yeah, but she probably won’t get to work on time…again.

 
Comment by Sway
2008-04-18 18:47:29

I agree that we women are horrible drivers, texting, talking on the phone, putting on those 20 lbs of fakeup and just generally being the bitches that we are, however, it would be hard for me to retain my job without being able to drive.

 
Comment by Manos
2008-04-17 12:27:15

I agree with dick. DO NOT let the women drive over there.
And if you continue to keep women from driving, I may just move to saudi arabia… sand schmand… at least the whores over there know their place and its safer streets because they don’t drive.
~Manos.

 
Comment by Enough
2008-04-16 20:10:48

PLEASE READ

All the stupidness on this site is enough ,but what caugh my attention is not Dick’s bullshit but the little line at the bottom of every page “Men Are Better Than Women, by Dick Masterson is proudly powered by WordPress and hosted at LTTech 1,642,966 Served. ”

I can not believe ,company’s like that whom also powers big name like :Yahoo and CNN ,also powers this idiot .

I will make it a personal business to let them know how about this website ,which calls to violence and hatered ,and everybody that feels like me should do the same .

 
Comment by wtf
2008-04-10 16:51:06

women behind wheels should be punished with cruesifiction and all you who say against should be tourtured, hanged, shot, burned och slaughtered with a touthstick.

Seriusly, women cant drive but so? why so serious, like its the end of the world!?

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-04-07 22:20:59

kuntvomit said:

who cares about a bunch of damn sand niggers.. let them do to their breed of women as they wish. they are not humans.

All western women are racist, frigid whores. All women, especially Yankee, English, and Canadian females in particular, deserve to have sticks of dynamite stuffed into their cunts… the more the merrier!

 
Comment by kuntvomit
2008-04-07 22:00:34

who cares about a bunch of damn sand niggers.. let them do to their breed of women as they wish. they are not humans.

 
Comment by Lynn
2008-04-03 09:36:35

I’d also say that socialism is an underlying factor in our cultural problems. It’s been creeping in for the past several decades, a mentality that instead of working to get what you want in life, all you need to do is get free handouts from the government. Those who benefit from this mentality do whatever they can in order to keep the status quo. How many politicians are carrying on about how people in poverty are stuck in poverty, with no way out, and yet they offer no real solutions beyond that which will maintain the situation.
I saw something on the news a few weeks ago where a guy, just graduated from college, decided to put the American dream to the test. He randomly picked a city that he had no connections in, only brought the clothes on his back, a sleeping bag, and $25 in his pocket, and without relying on his college degree went to see if he could make it. He spent about 3 months in a homeless shelter, but within the year he had saved enough money to afford rent in a modest apartment, and had the means to build himself up.
I’m not saying that necessarily everyone can do what he did, barring certain life circumstances, but the idea of pride in being able to stand on your own two feet seems to be dissappearing from our society.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2008-04-03 09:30:19

If they’re fat as fuck their personality clearly is flawed - unless lack of self control is a virtue now.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-04-03 09:07:45

I guess I see the decline of american culture as being largely due to rampant materialism. Some of its promoted by the media, but I think a lot of it is when people just go out on Sunday drives and see nice neighborhoods, and wondering why they dont live there. Housing prices have gone up way over inflation–this must be supported by consumer demand, and this demand I think is because people are willing to sink more of their money into property to keep themselves and significant others happy in a time of continually rising expectations.

Ive met a lot of immigrant women in my work environment who are always unhappy–unhappy with their husbands, unhappy with the money they make, despite the fact they live reasonably comfortable lives. So even new immigrants are corrupted by the american over-inflated dreams.

And yes, obesity is a problem. Sure, I would love to consider women as potential partners based only on personality, but it just doesn’t work. Obesity just limits the number of potential dateable women out there–and because of the morbidity it generates, I suspect it may be the major driver of the health-care crises in america. We live in a spoiled-lazy-ass culture. We are fucked.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2008-04-03 08:54:46

The media is dominated by secular Jews and homosexuals with fucktons of money and as little sense as females - I think most of us here(who matter) agree it’s a powerful arm of this corrupt order that must be wiped out with our other enemies.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-04-03 08:47:05

@Muzalon-totally agree and well stated.

 
Comment by Muzalon
2008-04-03 08:17:11

If I may say so, I think the present difficulties between men and women can be traced to several sources. One thing many miss is the Anglo-American media, which has raised expectations of relationships and life itself to absurd levels. Back in 17th Century England, say, most people would not be bombarded with expectations of marrying supermodels, being forever young, living in a Hollywood mansion, and the like. In fact, most people would only ever meet plain looking people like themselves. Consequently, folks would just marry a plain-ish person in the village, breed, and live quite contentedly. Now, things are very different. Most of what we see in the media is wildly unrepresentative of real experience - it is all millionaire celebrities, yachts and beautiful people. And this has raised mass expectations way beyond most people’s realities. Most people do not ’see’ viable mates around them, because their expectations are unrealistic. It is no surprise the West has plummeting birthrates, as the West is the world’s most media-saturated region. Also, the decline of mass religious belief means many invest relationships with too much psychic detritus when, after all, a mate is just someone to breed with, not some kind of religion.

There is something wrong with our modern culture in a very deep sense. I am trying to say these problems run deeper than feminism, although that is a problem too. Many conservative intellectuals consider our civilization to be fucked, to put it bluntly. Which it will be, unless it starts to reproduce itself.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-04-03 01:31:45

@proudatheist- it sounds like our view are consistent with equity-feminism, which I am all for–I am for equal rights for the sexes. I dont think equity-feminism is evil. But radical feminism in my view is wrong.

@agents-Yes! I guess in a women’s eyes, I am acting disloyal and shallow, and this site has given me the voice to act this way. But, I really think women need to know whats attractive to a man. As we discussed before, men are visually inclined–men want to feel his partner is beautiful in his eyes, and women want to feel that they are beautiful; it’s a good partnership here. But when women let themselves go and become overweight viragos in a relationship then it is seem by men as a betrayal. Certainly men can become fat as well, and women may see this as a betrayal, or a man may betray the relationship in other ways. What I’m getting at is the danger of a woman’s expecting “unconditional love”–no matter how bad it gets, the woman feeling entitled. This puts a lot of stress on the relationship.

@Lynn- I agree with you–well put.

 
Comment by Lynn
2008-04-02 23:49:20

Ok, the ‘ravaged by pregnancy” thing is a little extreme, and after about 6-9 months on average they’re usually sleeping through most of the night anyway. Not that you snap back like a rubber band or anything, but eating sensibly and exercise are just as important as they were before you had kids. Exercise can even be incorporated into everyday activities, such as playtime, running errands, etc. (I swear I spent about 30 minutes running circles in the backyard with my toddler today. Seriously, they never get tired!!!) Your actions (mom and dad) also teach your kids good lifestyle habits. Having kids shouldn’t be an excuse to blimp out.
My point being, on both sides of the relationship it’s important to take care of yourself, both for personal health reasons, and for keeping the relationship healthy. I’m not talking extremes here, but “for better or worse” shouldn’t be an excuse to see how far you can get on “worse”.

 
Comment by agentofdesire
2008-04-02 23:09:48

no manhole said:

I have to agree with SOTS here. There are few quality females out there, because most of the good ones are married. Also, I know a number of good men that are made miserable by their wives who have become overweight viragos. My view is that marriage constitutes a lot of things, but beyond the friendship and companionship, many are instinctually based. For example, men may want women with maternal charcteristics that are good for raising children, and a wife that will make some effort to stay sexually attractive to her man. What women want are good fathers and traits that define competence in her eyes: fixing cars, painting the house, killing bugs, etc.

I think what we need to do is get beyond the PC, which seems like women trying to brainwash men into thinking whats attractive for them should be attractive for us. We need some kind of new awakening for women to understand what Men really need from them, but it should not be violent.

Aw… This is not on. Men ‘let themselves go’ too. Why according to this site do so many married women go off sex? Why are there so many male bitter divorcees that visit this site? Why is there this assumption that women don’t have eyes?

Also, we are force-fed ‘what men need from women’ by the media etc. You come across as horribly disloyal when you talk about women needing to stay attractive for their man. When a woman has had her body ravaged by pregnancy and had very little sleep - having to wake up and breastfeed throughout the night, she has barely 5 minutes to herself throughout the day because of her demanding offspring it is ridiculous for you to expect her to put on make-up, do her hair and get dressed up for her man…like some hideous 1950’s stepford wife relying on valium to stop her topping herself.

I would argue that the female entitlement to find their partner attractive has been under attack for millenia.. having to have sex with men much older than them through forced marriage etc. Men are now getting grumpy that in the past couple of decades women are saying - hang on: Men have looked like shit for years and still expect to get laid. Why don’t we do the same?

 
Comment by proudathiest
2008-04-02 19:29:01

no manhole said:

proudathiest said:

What? Im just trying to understand here… how to WOMEN decide what men think is attractive? Heck, if I could decide, attractive would mean not having to get up at 6:00 every morning to do my hair and put on makeup, and just being COMPLETLY natural.

In my opinion, radical feminists are trying to feminize male sexual attraction. For example, radical feminists feel we should be ashamed of our libidos, that we should not be attracted to women’s bodies, that we should not care if women are obese–that men should find these women attractive b/c they have wonderful personalities. This attempt at feminization of male sexual attraction is bashed on us by the media with misandrous TV shows or literature that suggest than men are neanderthals for being attracted to the female body.

Yet, the media allows women to show off their sexuality as a form of an empowerment. Its a double standard, and almost seems like an attempt for women to control men.

I am a feminist, but I certianly do not believe in that at all. I personally have standards for guys as in they can not be fat, cuss alot, etc., and I would only EXPECT for a man to have standards for women as well. Also, nobody I know wants to control men, at least I dont think so. All I ask for when I am older is the right to control myself… not for men, or anybody els to control me. I honestly WANT men to have their own personalitys. Who would want a pansey for a boyfriend? I think that it is strange that you all seem to think that feminism is evil when I am a feminist, and I do not believe in almost everything you think that feminists believe in.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-04-02 17:58:50

proudathiest said:

What? Im just trying to understand here… how to WOMEN decide what men think is attractive? Heck, if I could decide, attractive would mean not having to get up at 6:00 every morning to do my hair and put on makeup, and just being COMPLETLY natural.

In my opinion, radical feminists are trying to feminize male sexual attraction. For example, radical feminists feel we should be ashamed of our libidos, that we should not be attracted to women’s bodies, that we should not care if women are obese–that men should find these women attractive b/c they have wonderful personalities. This attempt at feminization of male sexual attraction is bashed on us by the media with misandrous TV shows or literature that suggest than men are neanderthals for being attracted to the female body.

Yet, the media allows women to show off their sexuality as a form of an empowerment. Its a double standard, and almost seems like an attempt for women to control men.

 
Comment by proudathiest
2008-04-02 17:52:02

agentofdesire said:

no manhole said:

agentofdesire said:

in ’struggling’ guys. Women of quality are in very short supply.

I disagree. There are loads of women out there who want to partner up, but you have to look in the right places. You won’t find them tarted up on the dancefloor. They are just your normal women, into their own thing wanting to meet a nice guy who doesn’t buy into all that materialistic stuff. Come on. The need for companionship goes deeper than money.

Agents: there was recently a paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences, USA. Basically what the researches found was that before a speed dating event, women and men suggested they wanted in a mate was somebody like themselves–the PC based theory of attraction. After the event, the researches found that men tended to want to date women above a certain level of attractiveness, and that women based there selections on their perceived level of attractivness compared to other women (reference are ealier skirmish). In other words, the hotter they thought they were, the more selective they became.

I believe its difficult for men and women to break the thrall of evolutionary-honed instinct. Feminism is frustrating–men feel that women want to fool us with the like attacts like hypothesis but we know better. I think men are angry in part because many men feel that if women want to keep the instinctual basis of attraction then they also better want to stay in the kitchen. I dont feel this way, and Im still refining my views in this issue.

Yeah… but I think there is a confusion between the desire for social status and attraction.

It’s not possible to show how women and men, away from the pressure that society puts on them to chose a mate would chose their loins.

That survey only represents people who are too insecure to stick by what their loins tell them. They are thinking… How would I introduce this person to my mother, my friends, my colleagues. It’s not just sexual attraction those stats represent, but social pressure to conform.
Until these societal pressures are gone you cannot get a realistic impression of what people find attractive.

Brillant.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis