Oprah Knows Shit About Shit
I was walking through an airport recently and I saw the following headline on a shitty magazine:
“What do Men Really Think About Boob Jobs?”
I was filled with dismay. Of course a question like this wouldn’t be on a men’s magazine. First of all, men’s magazines don’t phrase their headlines so fucking stupidly. What do men really think about boob jobs? I don’t know, why the fuck don’t you just say what they think on the front so I actually give a shit about reading the why’s and how’s. That’s called marketing, you fucks.
But that’s not the way it was. This was Oprah.
I’ll tell you what men think about boob jobs. They love them. I know this because I’m a man and all men think the same. That’s why we’re always right. You know that old saying, “there’s more than one way to skin a cat”? Well there are. There about a million ways to skin a cat and 999,999 of them are fucking wrong. Women know every single one of them.
All men agree that boob jobs are good. Not for all women of course, but for the one’s boob jobs are good for, they’re good for. See, men don’t live by hard and fast stupid rules like women do. Rules that women invent when they’re 5 years old because they think it’s cute or because their fucking mother tells them that’s what you have to do to be an adult.
Here’s my point. Myself and all men like anything that encourages women to take a good hard look in the mirror and ask themselves, “Why do I look like shit?”
Because they do. They all fucking do. All women look completely like shit pretty much most of the time. Have you seen those fucking bug-eye sunglasses women wear? They look asinine. Case closed.
Every day I get home from work and ask myself, “how can I do a better job? What do I need to learn or practice to be more productive?” With women, looks should be treated exactly the same. Women are nothing more than their looks after all and they all know it. That’s why Curves the women’s only gym is so successful. I’m not saying it’s a bad thing. That would be sexist, which I’m not. It’s just the way it works. Anything else would be like trying to pound a square peg into a cannonball.
Oprah is humongously fat. She knows absolutely nothing about what men think about anything so fuck off Oprah magazine. I’m pretty sure whatever your article said on what men think about anything was fucked and full of self-fellating shit about inner beauty and the best color shoes to wear to make your tits look bigger. Blue isn’t magic. It’s just an ugly color for shoes.
Fuck what men think about boob jobs. What do women think about boob jobs? That’s the interesting question. They’re the ones that are so fucking obsessed with them.
Related Articles:
why is it every time a woman proves you men wrong, you refuse to believe it.
your ignorant.
Dick knows boobs are cool - if you are worthy enough to have them - Listen to Dick - He knows!
hilarious…..keep it up
amazing how oprah gives advice yet doesnt have the self control to maintain weight. honestly why do people listen to her? shes just a fat fucking hippo who promotes the “you go girl” attitude.
women suck, they really do, im married, 2 kids still dont like them(women that is). All they have is their looks…they try so hard to hold on to them, once they are gone… well they are just the moaning, annoying fuckhead they always were, only difference is you dont want t stick your dick’n'them nemore…oh yea, fuck oprah
This from someone replying to a topic that’s been dead for two months?
You are damn right. All they do is bring women down to try to feel better about themselves. They have no real argument on why men are “better” than women. The thing is, they have nothing to do with their lives except watch Oprah even if they don’t like her and criticize about everything. I wouldn’t want my life to be that meaningless… Find something better to do, something you actually enjoy and is usefull.
@David- i’m sorry but according to Mr Masterson you are wrong-
“I’ll tell you what men think about boob jobs. They love them. I know this because I’m a man and all men think the same”
My question is, being that she’s a woman, how would Oprah know anything about what men think about boob-jobs? And does she consider the fact that not all men share the same opinion on the subject? Some men like boob-jobs, some don’t. Shit, some guys HAVE boob-jobs. Does she put that in her magazine? I doubt it.
Hmm, maybe you should just not watch Oprah? If lots of people want to watch, let them. Why work yourself up over it? If they are so stupid to listen to her bullshit, why are you expending the time and effort to criticize?
Maybe you need to find something better to do than criticize. If you want to praise the male sex, please do. There are many worthy things about men but don’t say you are praising the male sex by criticizing the female sex that apparently, you as men still want to fuck. It makes me think you are just comparing shit with diarrhea, it’s still bad regardless of which one is better.
So why don’t you try and come up with reasons why men rock without bringing women into the picture. I thought men don’t need women, so why not reasons for men rocking without women in the picture?
I really hope you don’t have some significant other you are making miserable with that attitude. Unless she is sticking around hoping you will grow up. Then she is just stupid and that is something separate of gender.
Learn to think, please.
FUCK OPRAH FAT BITCH! IF SHE DIES THERE WILL BE 100′S OF IDOITS LISTING TO HER BULLSHIT SHE’S FOR THE BLACK PEOPLE THAT IS HOW SHE GOT STARTED SHE KNOWS NOTHING. SHE’S NOT FUNNY!!!!! AND THE TOPICS ON THE SHOW SUCK!!!!! FUCK YOU OPRAH.
So true!
You proceed from a false assumption…not all women are like you.
It would be nicer if you were more feminine and understanding of the REASONS for this site. Men would much prefer it if you looked up to them.
You’ll find this easier from a kneeling position.
Isn’t justice supposed to hurt?
Handjobs don’t..
Poetic justice, SotS.
- Papa Roach - Infest
That doesn’t explain how I was almost raped friday night.. me being one of the most radical “mysoganists” here.
yuck, yuck, you’re dumb as bricks… lol
men who are misogynists are angry because no one wants to sleep with them… lol
and a damn rich one too.
Randall the mangina is making a living off of the women he appeases with words. And a damn good living. But he is still a mangina and a turncoat.
Alright, I hate Oprah, but no one has yet mentioned her brainwashed sidekick Dr. Phil. I believe he has already been castrated and turned into a female. He must be wearing a man costume, for no man could say the things he does without having a gun in his mouth. Also, what actions are being taken here? I understand publicly complaining about “all women being whores,” and promoting men being better than women… But what next? Is it my goal as a firm believer of men being greater to just fuck every random whore? Should I degrade every woman I meet to a point where she has a clue about what is going on?
First link below is almost certainly safe for work, (it’s in the Daily Mirror) but if your work is very strict, don’t chance it; click the second (but less funny) link.
Well they make (SFW?) Christmas trees shaped like penises, in the aptly named (I am not making this up) PENISTONE, South Yorkshire.
If your work is very strict, you can try this link (Definitely SFW; without picture):
http://www.mirror.co.uk/northernireland/news/tm_method=full%26objectid =18248220%26siteid=94762-name_page.html
-wolfe
So they make warships that look like a penis now?
How manly is that!
Law 2, gentlemen. Though I’ve never seen the word “warship” used in that fashion. Law 1 there, I guess.
-wolfe
penis warshiping fags
Yes, fuck Oprah indeed. I do mean that figuratively of course. She’s a hideous, pompous, cunt with an overinflated opinion of herself and her position in this mans world, so I wouldn’t actually expect any self respecting man to physically endure that torture. If you have ever had the misfortune of tuning in during one of her self serving estrogen cult airings, then you have noticed that her audience is composed of 99% women and a few token “men” who have been castrated and lobotomized. The point is this: If she is so fucking special, then why does she carry absolutely no clout with the people in society that truly count… men. She is queen of the retards, so why should a man give a second thought to any of her drivel?
About those boob jobs, amazing things, but you already know this. The funny thing is that the market was created by women and their incessent whinning about being inferior to other females, thus beig unable to whore-monger all male attention. Men, being big fans of nice titties and capitolizing on the opportunity, put superior man intellect to work and actually came up with the medical solution. Had it been left to the inferior female mind to devise we would probably be staring at square tits or worse. Thus, the question posed by Oprah is (typically) as irrelevent as all the shit that escapes from her tiny brain. Men perfected the procedure so it stands to reason that men absolutely LOVE big titties, be they natural or medically perfected. Period.
Fuck Oprah (though I wouldn’t). I couldn’t eat hamburgers for 6 months as a child because of that whore. Of course this was all because of a women who watched the show and I was unfortunate enough to live under the same roof as. Not my mother, just another mistake my father made.
We have loads of anti-religious fanatics in the USA. And their intolerance is spreading. The same groups who scream tolerance also screams intolerance. Liberals are wackos.
@Luka - “Crossing himself” — sorry, I’d forgotten how post-Christian we were, collectively. Thank you son of the suns. Quite correct.
More specifically, a gesture that can be vertically from the forehead to the mid torso, then left to right, horizontally along the torso. It symbolizes both Christ’s crucifixion, and the trinity of Father (forehead), Son (torso), and Holy Ghost (left right). It is, as sots said, predominantly RC, but also High Anglican, some Lutheran and Orthodox. It is done at times as a gesture of respect, at times as a prayer.
It imposes no force, makes no implications as to what others should believe; it is simply a peaceful, brief and quiet expression of faith.
It is also an almost automatic gesture for Christians of a certain age range and/or belief structure.
I find it abominable that this simple and humble Christian gesture should be the result of a police cautioning. I would hope that the first amendment in the US would prevent that happening here.
-wolfe
Crossing himself with the son/father/holy ghost. A Catholic thing. No doubt a liberal feminist group was deeply offended.
Since women gave up their role as wives and mothers, suck at all jobs, and have only sex to offer and they suck at that too… they’re looking desparately for a new role.
And the best thing to do if you suck at everything that exists, is to make up something you’re good at. There shall be no GODS but the GODDESS… the conciousness of the universe.. of course all of us here know by their actions that women have as deep a councious as some type of hybrid feline/seagull creature. That is.. without loyalty or obediance, and will go apeshit over the smallest scraps of attention.
I’ve read about the Wichita horror.
it’s was tragic.
Wolfe - I don’t understand your reference to the Polish goalkeeper? Crossing himself? You mean writing on himself or something? Please clarify.
@Luka: these hatecrimes have been regularly brought to trial in Canada. In the UK too. A Polish goalkeeper in your strange “football” game was cautioned by police for crossing himself during a match. WTF!? WTF!?! That is f-ing obscene. (Sorry I’m assuming you’re UKian, too lazy to check).
@Sony “Women can parallel park.” I confess I misread that as “Women can parallel PORK”. That caused a moment’s amusement. (pork = slang for ummm… horizontal jogging. Getting jiggy with it. Sex.).
@Billy: yeah it’s more anti-gay/black hatecrimes in the US. “If a group of blacks attack a white then it is racist to suggest that it was racially motivated”. Google the “Wichita Horror” and prepare to be horrified. Also be careful, as a lot of racist websites crop up on that googling.
@diamatik: “Well, Billy, hegemony does have its downside.”. Heh. That’s rather good.
-wolfe
That’s how bloody far!
This explains why driving test no longer require parallel parking.
They got tired of having to pass a woman on the second try.
Well, Billy, hegemony does have its downside.
Hate crimes have been mentioned a good bit here.
Mainly concerning a fight between gay and straight males or if a black man is done harm by a white male. Of course these do go to court.
If a group of blacks attack a white then it is racist to suggest that it was racially motivated. Anything said about a Jew that isn’t appreciated is anti-semetic(hatred). Forgot that one but it’s very prevalent here.
crazy wOrLd no doubt
LOL! Was that written on this message board or did you get that from elsewhere? That was an amusing response.
That’s how bloody far!
Are these hatecrimes actually brought to trial in any shape or form, Billy?
I was having a discussion with friends this morning about the idea that political correctness is a form of mind control. I suppose on some level it is - it is not until you are faced with a person with politically incorrect ideas that you start to realize how trained you are to respond to such ideas with much discomfort. I am too tired to think about the ramifications of that idea just yet (as oddly it has only just occured to me…) - would be interested to know some thoughts on that….(and just to keep on topic) especially with regard to gender issues - how far have we been brainwashed with political correctness with regards to attitudes about gender?
Thoughtcrimes a.k.a. hatecrimes here in the USA…
The push is on but hasn’t came to pass yet.
Speak badly about gays = hatecrime(thoughtcrime)
Hate crimes have been in the media way to much and it is similar to thoughtcrime.
Speak poorly of a woman = woman hater(thoughtcrime)
Speak against abortion = wacko(thoughtcrime)
Preacher speaks about sinners = judgemental and intolerant(thoughtcrime)
Say something bad about female = gayness(thoughtcrime) lol
Sonyad - you have a valid point. I would agree that Big Brother has come to pass in the UK - but I am not sure that ThoughtCrime is strictly speaking in existence yet - although of course there have been forms of it in history.
Some of the concepts explained in that book were terrifying - the DoubleThink concept is a bit freaky. I’m thinking that a part of this concept has to have been used during the times of the Soviets and/or Nazis, though I confess that I don’t really know exactly where or how. In my view George Orwell is a fantastic writer - very accurate with incredible understanding of how power manifests itself and operates.
The unfortunate thing about 1984 is that it has been dominated by the TV series, so now when anyone mentions Big Brother, it conjurs up images of stupid men and women stuck in a house with cameras watching them all day.
I didn’t. But it’s welcome. Josh’s position, that people who’s views he disagreed with (even when no evidence of disagreeable views existed) did indeed seem profoundly Orwellian.
The questionmark after “ThoughtCrime, anyone” was simply rhetorical in nature.
@sony, I agree, the Soviet Empire is good evidence of both ThoughtCrime and Big Brother, and most UK urban centers are good evidence of the latter.
The US is not as far away as I’d like from it either. While we’re not yet a “surveillance society” the way the UK is, the degree of data-mining that goes on in the information age is disturbing indeed. While many will also point to NSA-wiretaps, and bypassing FISA courts as another dangerous example, I’m more worried about the return of the “Imperial Presidency” and ‘unitary executive’ theories of which such of course is one manifestation. And the corporation, HMO, or labor union down the street can’t control the NSA. They can data-mine you and strip privacy from you, though.
@gwallan, I’d certainly agree.
-wolfe
Orwell is one of the great prophets of recent times. Even the choice of 1984 as a title coincides very accurately with the beginings of gender feminism.
And Josh, read my previous post.
And don’t forget the feminoxious laws and cunt court systems.
How cowardly of you… Then again good riddance you rodent!
First of all, I have not bothered to read any of the posts that you have made (if any) in response to me. I no longer have the energy or enthusiasm to confront you that I have had in droves recently. Please don’t kid yourself into thinking this is because of your arguments, it is because I have become so disappointed that people like you exist that feel I can no longer warrant spending time here.
I am aware that you will probably reply to this with comments along the lines of ‘looks like we proved him (or her) wrong’ etc… and to be honest I don’t care, if you want to kid yourself into this then please be my guest.
If you read back to one of the posts on this site you will see a surprisingly good quote ‘Many, but stupid’, this describes the whole sexist movement and this site in general perfectly. I am ashamed to call myself male if this is what being male involves. I personally believe that your feelings are rooted in either upbringing or rejection, either of these cases are tragic but do not warrant this despicable behaviour.
I’m not going to be checking this site again, although I have told a few of my friends about you and I’m sure you’ll get a few more messages.
I sincerely hope that you can get some perspective soon and realise that your attitudes are nothing but degrative to society. Have a go at considering other peoples opinions, even if just once, you may be surprised to realise they could have a point.
Goodbye
(P.S. ‘Spear Chucker’, if you eventually manage to find me and enclose on me from the four points of the compass and two vertical orientations, please point yourself out to me first, I will happily take the pleasure beating you down from your perch with a huge smile on my face)
I beg to differ. I contend that thought crime and the thought police have already come to pass. So too Big Brother.
The Evil Empire of the Soviets, as Reagon would doubtlessly put it and downtown London, respectively.
I’m reading 1984 at the moment.
I find George Orwell’s writing to be accurate on many aspects of 20th Century history plus his ideas regarding the ‘thought police’ is chilling because it could happen in the modern world (and might even be in the process of happening??). Indeed, with the speed of the development of technology today, the thought police and ‘big brother’ are not very far from the realm of possibility.
Yes, George Orwell’s 1984.
We read you loud’n clear, Wolfe. Just didn’t occur you’d expect feedback.
Josh any attempt on your behalf to debate with myself has been notable only by it’s absence.
You seem to miss the whole point of this site. You are taking it far too seriously.
Go check out feministing.org
It is an hilarious satire of many of the internet’s renowned feminist sites. Believe me when I say that, while MABTW may appear to be populated by women haters, we couldn’t possibly compete with the vile hatred of men published on many of the serious feminist sites. Appearences aside nobody here genuinely hates women in the way many feminists openly espouse not only hatred of men but violence against them to the point of genocide.
Another valuable read for you would therefore be the SCUM manifesto. The SCUM in this instance stands for the Society for Cutting Up Men. Hold on to your guts. You’ll need to. As you read it bear in mind that it is compulsory reading in many Women’s Studies courses and is paid great reverence by many feminists. Also notable with this particular link is that the site hosting it claims to advocate against violence.
Above all lighten up. There are some very knowledgeable folk posting here and, more particularly, in the forums. Don’t waste the opportunity.
And look at it this way. There is an immense difference between saying (admittedly a bit hyperbolically at times) that men are better than women as against seriously demanding that all men should be exterminated.
Do you have a pact to compliment each other to boost your self esteem? you will notice that in the first set of posts I made I attempted to debate reasnably with you. However you will notice if you try and argue with someone similar to you in the future that if someone is convinced they are right and not mature enough to consider other possibilities, it is very difficult.
Refusing to understand the meaning behind my posts is another way of avoiding the issue.
I have a piece of advice, read through your posts before you submit them and see if the arguments you are presenting can be used against you. You’ll find that in the majority of cases they can, which is way its so much fun replying to you :-)
Thanks wolfe.
I’m sure I read the posts concerned but the lack of substance clearly resulted in my subconscious consigning them to the virtual dunny.
Good to know my bullshit and waste-of-space filters are working.
@gwallan: Josh has no argument. That became apparent in the first few posts I exchanged with him. Later, he even admitted it to Sony: “I also choose simply to annoy as much as possible and not be your ’sparring partner’ (It’s my right) as I have no need to argue with you to prove a point, as I already know who is correct.”
Prejudiced would certainly be an accurate word, denotatively speaking, to describe Josh. (Josh seems to have a problem believing that others grasp denotation and connotation as well as he does). Add in the gay comments, the segregation on the basis of someone’s thoughts (ThoughtCrime anyone?) and we can say he’s some form of fairly repulsive bigot.
But all that — his prejudice and bigotry — is irrelevant. He, or she, is simply a troll by ‘his’ own admission. Don’t expect logic or rationality out of Josh’s mouth or fingers anytime soon.
@Josh: Note how I actually referenced specific things you’d said to construct an argument, rather than just made blind assertions. This is what grownups do.
-wolfe
What?
-Dick
Mantastic, wow, your earning your credit there, big man points to you. Notice how while trying to get me to present an argument your pals are constantly ridiculing someone who disagrees with them?
diamatik, I didn’t even have to mouse over that link to know it goes here. That was a classically mantastic joke.
-Dick
So do you have an argument to present - good, bad or indifferent?
Well, if you’re childish enough to believe that I am bigoted and sexist for believing that men are better than women, then so be it. But I have undisputable proof of it here.
Fair enough, took you a while to get your quote tho… Much rather be a troll than a bigoted sexist.. just saying :-)
Well, it is pretty obvious that you don’t know what a troll is. Besides that thing you see when you look in the mirror every morning, a troll can also be defined in internet terminology as:
That describes you perfectly! You come here, make no sense, and then talk about others not constructing a decent arguement. You are an annoying troll.
Troll!? Oh no! You’ve hurt my feelings! …Oh wait, no you haven’t. try and construct a decent argument.
While you’re at it, point your way off this website, you troll.
Imagination running away with you ey? This is the internet, not a war zone (thought I’d point it out).
My God! It’s a coordinated skank attack! They’re flanking us.
sarah, shut the fuck up and fuck off my website.
-Dick
I think that women aren’t that complicated at all. They simply wish to appear so, or they complicate things that really aren’t that complicated to begin with.
Women can be extremely simple for example, take this equasion: A= The amount of money she would get if she stayed with her husband, B= The amount of money she would get if she left her husband, C= The difference between both. If A-B results in C being a postive number, chances are that they can “work” things out. However if A-B results in a negative number, the chances are that there are going to be “irreconciliable differences”. Of course children aren’t even factored into this equasion, because they aren’t really a variable, in most cases women get those on the basis of gender.
-Strength and Honor-
If you consider the term ‘more complicated’ to be the new euphemism for ‘not better,’ then I agree with sarah whole-heartedly on that statement.
Believe it. Our views are exact on women. We just paint it like you whores live it. Our views are appalling because women are appalling.
In touch with your feelings, big dam deal, no. Your feelings is what makes you so damn self centered and narsistic. We don’t live in the stone age, it’s men who brought the new world to you ungreatful women and you would be living in the stone age if it weren’t for us men. If we live to complement each other why is it that women never compliment men unless he is fithy rich? Don’t answer that we know why…
1000 times the number of websites with women bashing males and even threathening to kill us all yet you get your panties in a knot over this site. I bet you never made a fuss over those others.. You probably laugh when some gold digger talks about ass raping her man in court. What is really sad is you women today. Reach out and touch this with your feelers… WORTHLESS BITCHES. Women’s feelings are like space junk.
You should just fuck off this site and really get in touch with your feelers.
The only reason your male friends are insecure is because if they’re hanging out with you; in all likelyhood they don’t have balls.
Some of us here may be insecure, I mean we’re living in a society that can’t survive without man’s technical innovations. Everyone gobbles up the progress we make, yet in the social, education, political spheres, we’re pariahs.
Do you know what the Muslims hate most about the west? Ill give you a hint it ain’t capitalism. It’s lying moral relativists like you.
Maybe we can all quit our works and you can sit us down and show us how to deal with our insecurities and how to be just like females?
Or maybe you can fuck off.
So kiss.
I sympathise with the poor lass. Just imagine how awful it must be to bear the make believe pressure fellow dopes exert.
Take your own advice. Try putting yourself in the shoes of one falsely accused of violence or rape. Try putting yourself in the shoes of the millions of fathers who never get to see their kids. Or the shoes of those murdered or raped by women who walk away scot free. How about the boots of the hundreds of thousands of young men FORCED to fight and die for their country(and your fat arse) without ever getting to do as much as vote.
Poor, poor sarah.
Life is so tough for sarah. Oh the trials and tribulations of living up to standards.
Listen honeybun - if that’s all you’ve got to worry about your life must be one long annus horribilus.
Oh no. There’s another ad on the telly with a girl prettier than sarah. Oh the oppression.
Jesus Chris, sarah, do you women realize the Enter key doesn’t wisk you away into the magical world of cyberspace?
-Dick
ever notice how the women have so much to say.
i all i got is uh-huh uh-huh uh-huh *head nodding* well thats all nice do you spit or swallow?
I cannot believe that I have come across a website like this. You really are living in the stone age; talk about living in a box. Your views on women are appalling; has it ever occurred to you that people who generalise are usually thick? Everyone is different; I have just as many male friends who are insecure as my female friends if not more so its just they are not as in touch with their feelings and feel unable to voice them - and by having a website like this you must be SERIOUSLY insecure ( take a look in the mirror-you only see reality as it exists in your head- one projects there own insecurities onto others). Maybe women are often more complicated than men ( they are known to be more verbal and more socially aware) whereas men are inclined to be more tunnel-visioned which might benefit in ignoring social insecurities but it also makes them less sensitive and more oblivious. We all have different attributes to offer each other - and I think instead of childishly and ignorantly generalising the opposite sex and putting them down you could see that we exist to complement and be there for one another. Try putting yourself in someone else’s shoes for a change; the brain is extremely sensitive to conditioning - and advertising certainly knows this. When one is constantly bombarded by a media ‘idea’ of ‘perfecton’ it takes a lot of strength to keep guarding yourself against it, especially if one is very aware and sensitive. Then ontop of that there is peer pressure, even your loved ones telling you what you should look like and teasing you when you don’t match up. In that atmosphere it seems like a cruel world indeed. It is even sadder that a website like this fuels such ignorance and cruelty even more.
I’ll be covering all those questions soon enough, John.
-Dick
Men speak straight and to the point because we have better things to do with our time than manipulate a conversation. Period.
A Woman that asks questions that simply cannot be answered correctly ie ( do you think she’s pretty? Does this make me look fat?, etc) are looking for the answer to a question IN THIER HEAD.
If you know he is cheating on you, your relationship is dying. Be blunt or get out! If you think he is cheating on you and you need to prove it, you have no trust and your relationship is dying, be blunt or get out. Thats how simple it is. if you are meandering down this thought track you are only hurting yourself and others.
Period
Fem I believe I told you once before that you have no idea of anything in my life. And in that I believe I have the better of you given your ealier drivel.
Your paranoia is understandable, even if not explicable.
It is overly simplistic, but it’s also 100% correct. I was unkind to a woman recently; I’d no idea (or intention of being so) I’d been so, but she pointed it out and I was.
If s