If giving a warning not to go futher lest something happens isn’t polite, what is?

No, if you hadn’t noticed yet, I’m here for a decent argument.

Making break ups illegal would be stupid. Did you know that many women actually break up with men, too?

That was precisely Chris’ point.

Women don’t leave REAL GOOD MEN.

They only leave WEAK men.

You don’t even know the difference.

Women claw their way to the last Berkin bag on sale and they will claw each other’s eyes out to get it.

When a woman leaves a man, it’s because he was doing something WRONG. And the number one thing women are NOT attracted to — is male weakness.

Yet you beg for it.

And now that we’ve educated your cunt. Perhaps you can finally fuck off and attend to your boyfriend’s cock and be fulfilling to him for a change. Instead of begging for other men’s attention.

Fuck, I can’t stop laughing.

He’s not a weak man simply because he respects me. In fact, that makes him a much better person.
Do you men really ever expect a decent, intelligent woman to ever love you? Of course you don’t, you all want bimbos who will do whatever you say.

You are totally, totally missing out in love.

And what the fuck is a Berkin bag, even though that argument was so irrelevant.

A Berkin bag is a $4000 purse. Women wait 2 years and will kill their own to get one. You failed to miss the point entirely. Women are like that with purses, and they are even more so with real men. They eject weak men as you have already pointed out.

And don’t knock bimbos. A bimbo who does what a man wants and cares about his satisfaction more than her own has a much better chance of hanging on to a real man than you ever will.

Respecting you for free when you don’t earn or deserve it while desperately going out of your way to seek attention from other men doesn’t make him a ‘much better person’. That’s you brainwashing yourself and him again.

Yes I expect a decent intelligent woman to love me and plenty of them have. I eject women like you who call yourself ‘decent’ from my life frequently. You don’t have what it takes. Not even close.

Isn’t it FASCINATING how whimmin will openly LIE to man’s face and says she wants RESPECT…. says she wants and desserves a “SMART” man who should want her approval…..

….. but then she speaks about her boyfriend when no one is listening and says “I have never met a man in my life who can spell as well as I can”….. while wanting OTHER men to pay attention to her.

She and her illiterate boyfriend set the example beautifully, wouldn’t you say?

What a transparent piece of shit.

I never said that women eject weak men from their lives. I said that women break up with men. You’re the one who specified it was only weak men.
Once again, you’re manipulating my words.

Your argument about women’s materialism/consumer habits is silly, but I understand the analogy and think that any woman who dumps the man they’re with for another, what you call ‘real’ man is a whore. But not every woman does that, and therefore not every woman is a whore.

I’ve earned his respect by being with him for 3 years, and he’s earned mine by doing the same. And as I already said, this isn’t a desperate attempt to gain attention from men. Oh my God, no. This is me telling you you’re wrong because I’m bored.

Explain your definition of the ‘intelligent’ women who’ve loved you. I find it hard to believe, considering your amazing endorsement of bimbos.

Chris - that cunt should have shut the fuck up and left when she had the chance and now she knows it. Prepare for more backpeddling.

Also, he knows I can spell better than him. He can admit it, and get over it, he’s fine with that.
He’s seen the comments I’ve written on this site (though not all of them yet) and thinks you’re all losers.

Don’t imply that I’m lying to him and being deceitful in anyway.

@MARK

Cunts like this are everywhere. What I can’t fathom is how they manage to CLAIM to DEMAND “respect” with every breath.

Just count to three and she will probablyt justify her presence here because she is “BORED”. Wow. Some “happy” relationship. Do you think her boyfriend knows?

Brutal.

Have a good evening.

She’s not ‘bored’.
She’s boring.

Wait ’til her boyfriend figures it out. - LOL!!!!!!!

Oh yeah. I get it.

He respects HER.
But she has no respect for HIM.

Classic.

Tick Tock Tick Tock…….

weph, don’t call bimbos whores simply because they’re more popular with men.

all women are whores. sticking with your man for 3 years doesn’t mean you’ve deserved his respect. it simply means that a real man hasn’t bothered looking your way for all that time.

and you know it.

so now you’re sitting here, on a site where everybody hates you, taking shit from people you don’t know. and loving it. what does that say about you?

you’re an attention seeking bitch just like Dick has proclaimed, and the only way to prove him wrong would have been to understand three simple words.

“No Women Allowed”

for all your spelling ability, you still have the reading comprehension of a rock. take your social sciences degree elsewhere, you’re just making your entire sex look bad.

mabtw

What is the world coming to??Men and women fighting about who can spell better?I’m a man, proficient in 8 Indian languages and 14 dialects.Why?I had to travel all over India as my father was a civil servant and got transferred every year or so to some far corner of the country or another.I suppose I don’t have to add that I can speak English too.So far, I have never met a woman who can speak as many languages as me(including my mother who can speak about 3.)

How did I learn those languages?By reading?No.I went out and fucking talked to people and learned their language, while having to face brawls with some of those people because the word for ‘mother’ in one language turns out to be almost the same as the word for ‘bull’ in another.

I don’t know how to write some of the languages I speak, and I don’t need to, because I am not a fucking linguist or a translator, I’m a lawyer and my premise of language is strictly Devnagari Hindi and English.So there women, if you spell correctly-FUCK YOU!!Become a fucking spelling instructor or whatever useless job your femi-whipped western society has in store for you.

It was initially used as in indicator of intelligence because of the “Women can’t spell” article by Dick. Good for you with the whole 8/14 languages thing, really.

How are all women whores? Because they have sex? Would you prefer that we just didn’t have sex?

Or are all women whores because they have sex with men in return for love, etc? That’s natural. That’s normal, that’s not being a whore.

Because the actual definition of whore is a female who has sex with a lot of men, which would constitute approximately 1/10th of women in the world.

Sex is natural, no woman who has sex is a whore. If so, then every man who has sex is a man-whore.

And I think it’s pretty obvious that I understand women aren’t allowed here. I just couldn’t care less about that moronic rule. There’s no better way to guarantee that a specific demographic will come to your site than banning them.

In case anyone wonders why I wrote the above comment, I was referring to Weph’s comment:-

“Also, he knows I can spell better than him. He can admit it, and get over it, he’s fine with that.”

He cant spell better than you, so you start feeling smug and superior to him and gain the birthright to get respect from him no matter what you do.Am I right bitch?

Actually “WEPH” …… (what is “WEPH” the sound your pussy makes when the cock slides out?)…..

A whore is not a woman who has sex with alt of partners…..

A Whore is a woman who does NOT have sex with ANYONE unless she gets something ELSE.

Don’t believe me? Go out on the street ( or call one up) and ask her if she’ll fuck for thr fun, orgasm and good time.

No.

But she’ll fuck you for $250.

That’s a whore—->> A woman who does NOT have sex until a price is paid or a condition is met FIRST.

Sound familiar? WHORE.

You women are so completely unaware that these women have YOU beat by a country mile…. because even though they also expect men to pay for it…. they don’t love to RESERVE THE RIGHT TO SAY NO.

Its a whores job to say YES. TO give a guy what HE wants, WHEN he wants it, exactly HOW he wants it… and she is not going home until HE is satisfied.

How many WHORE dates, WHORE wives and WHORE girlfriends are THAT interested in getting the men they pretend to “love” off - HIS WAY - for everything they expect men to invest in them

?

I have far more respect for a WHORE like THAT than a WHORE like YOU any day of the week. And I know I am not alone.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

…. and even she will have the fucking courtesy to GET THE FUCK OUT when she’s told. And she won’t fight tooth and nail to stay where she is not welcome

WEPH — Your mentality is completely BACKWARDS.

You’re doing everything WRONG.

And until you snap the fuck out of your little mermaid trance “I’m so special even though you don’t want me here, you should show me the courtesy”…. why don’t you do so first by example and fuck off this website.

No one is buying your CRAAAAAAAAAAAP.

apologies for double post.

So any woman who has ever slept with a guy who bought her dinner is a whore? Regardless of whether she did so simply because she liked him and felt like it?

So the answer is only having sex if you intend to pay for: half the meal, half the taxi cost, half the cost of the movie tickets, etc?
Please clarify.

And every time I’ve seen a man say ‘whore’ in this site, it’s been in a negative sense. So you’re totally in the minority using the term the way you do.

there is no answer. this is the way women are. paying for half the shit wouldn’t work even if women actually did it. which they don’t. it’s not just a question of money.

you’re looking for equality. how can we be equal if we’re completely different? what we had previously was harmony. men were forced to work themselves to death. women provided them with the reason to do so by not cheating, and thus giving the man children he can be sure are his. providing him with a family. everybody was more or less content. we advanced as a civilization.

what we have now is women trying to take all the benefits of this arrangement, without upholding their responsibilities. that is feminism. what has it given us?

ridiculously high divorce rates.

single parent (almost exclusively female-headed) families raising fucked up children.

you’re proposing we continue this trend. the men on this site disagree. society requires everybody to make sacrifices, and this is a fact that most women don’t understand, and don’t WANT to understand because it’s too convenient to stay ignorant.

i suggest you lurk this site a bit more, and try to look through the humorous rhetoric to see the underlying points that are being made.

Chris seems to think money is what makes a whore a whore.
So according to you, a woman is a whore just because she’s a woman. What about virgins?

Also, things weren’t harmonious ‘previously’ (I assume you mean the typical American 1950’s neighbourhood). Women were bored. There are books on it, read them sometime. We didn’t advance as a society, the exact same problems existed back then as they do now, only now we know more about them.

Your definition of feminism is completely wrong. The only definition which all the varieties of feminism have in common is the desire for equality of the sexes. Have you even looked into Feminism? I at least have taken the liberty of looking around this site, quite a bit of it. It’s all the same. It all bashes women, generalising and stereotyping them as preeety much everything bad. Obviously this is all false. Generalisations can never be true.

But there have been a couple of things I agree with on here. Like the fact that a woman who hits a man gets off scott free but vice versa and it’s a massive issue. Because that’s not equality.

How can you say that women don’t make sacrifices? Women make infinitely more sacrifices than men every day. Do you think they’d rather clean the house or sit with a child than read a book or go out to work?
Of course not. You really don’t know what you’re talking about.

@WEPH

Stop talking about what it “SEEMS” like to you.

WHAT ABOUT VIRGINS?

VIRGINS who “save it” for marriage are the BIGGEST WHORES OF ALL.

They expect to go into relationships and marriages with full INTENT to be unfulfilling - withholding their affection and one of the greatest pleasures in life - from the man she pretends to “LOVE”.

….. until he pays the biggest price a man can possibly pay for that WHORE.

She expects everything imaginable for HERSELF, until he buys a diamond, makes a promise to God for life until Death and signs a life contract to which he is now bound to let this unfulfilling cuntwhore fight him for 1/2 his assets when she decides it’s appropriate.

Thank God I never learned that the hard way.

Oh yeah…. we know she just won’t fuck him ” for religious reasons”.

But will she NOT fuck him in divorce court when he goes and gets himself a decent blowjob from a different FULFILLING woman.

Hilarious how these women pretend to have principles BEFORE the wedding , and completely IGNORE them after.

Even MORE hilarious are when these women try to get away with calling men “CHEATERS” –>> When she did everything imaginable to try and get away with CHEATING HIM OUT OF IT.

She doesn’t even deserve love (or a man)
AND SHE SHOULD JUST STAY SINGLE INSTEAD.

Menarebetterthanwomen at identifying WHORES.

So how can a woman not be a whore? Are they a whore by default, simply by existing?
What about a newborn baby girl? Is she a whore?

Generalisations are what keep the feminist propagandas going.What Dick is doing is putting an ‘all’ where there should be a ‘many’.That’s it.The facts he gives ARE correct.The way he applies them,i.e,to all women, is disturbing to some people who are too stupid too understand-MOST of them being women.See how I used MOST instead of ALL?

And the American 1950s?Women were BORED?Your men prevented your country and the world from being dipped into fascism by fighting and dying for your country in the 40s.And you women thank them by becoming BORED in the 50s?No wonder you are a feminist! Weph,You just disgusted me very much, I guess your name is making sense now.’Weph’ is probably illiterate American English for ‘I am a bag of dead beetles.’

Actually it’s a nickname. And as I’ve specified many times now, I’m not American.

Most feminist literature doesn’t generalise. Because we’re smart enough to allow for those who don’t prove the stereotype, whether its a small or large number. Have you read more Feminist literature than me? No, I’ll bet you haven’t, so you don’t know what you’re talking about again.

I would have no issue with this site if it said “Most women are cheating whores” because it would allow for those who aren’t. What annoys me most are the gross generalisations.

And everything in Western society is the way it is because:

“Your men prevented your country and the world from being dipped into fascism by fighting and dying for your country in the 40s”.

Have you never been bored with anything in your life, ever?
If you have, then you should feel guilty! Because people died for you to live in a free world. God, you’re so selfish for having ever felt bored. You disgust me even more than I disgust you.

the only thing i have to add to this is that we DID advance as as society.

we’re not currently being hunted down by lions and shit. we have patriarchy to thank for this.

not people, honey. men.

men died, so you can have the freedom to feel bored. be grateful, and shut the fuck up.

We also advanced from salvery too. And WW II was pretty damn beneficial for the German economy.
So we should be equally as grateful for patriarchy, slavery and Hitler, then, according to your logic.

woman, you wouldn’t know logic if it hit you in the face like a giant, pre-cum dripping cock.

enjoy that analogy, by the way, because from the sounds of it you’re not getting what you need from your mangina.

You mean logic like that thing I just used to completely prove you wrong?
And you know it, because you’ve resorted to crude imagry and petty insults now. There there, it’s not your fault I’m more logical than you. Don’t get hysterical, like Chris though.

Most feminist literature does generalise,Weph.That is why women have so many fucking useless reservations.I graduated out of a National Law School 2 years back from a class of 33 with 8 women who were only there because of a 30% reservation bullshit.Only two of those 8 women can now say without getting very red in the face that they are ‘lawyers’.All of them are married and many of them already have children.

On the other hand ALL of the other 25 men are doing very well.Some are married and have children.I meet quite a few of them everyday.That’s reservation for you, not equality.If it were equality, there’d be those two successful women and another 31 successful men in that class,but there weren’t.Instead six talented boys probably did not realize their life’s goals because of those six cows.And all because of you feminazis of the Western world.

That’s what feminism is all about then?If girlies are bored, give them reservations for educations and careers they don’t need, cant make, and destroy the lives and aspirations of thousands of other men.Thank you very, very much….

And Weph, you did not prove anybody wrong but yourself.So don’t fuck off this site as nothing gives me more pleasure than thrashing a femicunt on a holiday.

‘Raghupati Raghava Sitaram Patita Pavana Rajaram.’
Vedic phrase basically meaning that men are better than women.

Show me a feminist text which generalises males. Until then, you’re wrong about that.

I don’t have any knowledge over your Law school rules or whether they resulted in the unfair treatment of male candidates or not. Personally I think that entry into the school should be merit-based, regardless of gender.
You’re obviously bitter about it though, so good luck with that.

That Vedic phrase is old, outdated and religious.
It’s completely irrelevant to modern life. I’ve already written this somewhere on this site, but religion has no place in society anymore.
It doesn’t susprise me to learn that many of you are conservative religious losers, though.

Religious obviously has a place in society.It just plays differently in your society than ours.Eg.,the Catholic Church no longer considers contraception heretic because they say that your God is willing to accept that now.Our religion and all Eastern religions disapproves of it.That is why we don’t have 15 year old girls foaming at the mouth with cocaine getting pregnant at age fucking 15!

Five feminist text generalising males for bitch Weph:-
1.’All men are chauvinist pigs inside(it’s supposed to be bad.)’
2.’All men are vicious rabid wolves who can’t wait to nail little red fucking riding hood.’
3.’All men are incapable of giving sexual pleasure to a woman.’
4.’All men are inattentive to the problems of women.’
5.’All men are men, and therefore must be banished from the planet.’

There you go!And as a bonus here is another Vedic saying for you:-
Antara Bastuti Bakiruti Paraye Ayodhya Nagari Dhangshaye Baje

Meaning-If you split the smallest small particle of matter, then you will generate energy enough to destroy the city of Ayodhya(a large city believed to have existed since the beginning of Indian civilization.)Old, outdated and religious.

And if you don’t know already, many of the world’s greatest physicians copy the surgical instruments and techniques described in the Athurvaveda and Rigveda-Vedic texts.The world’s most revolutionary medicines and medicinal techniques have been derived from Vedic texts.There are many more examples of these old, outdated and religious books which have marvellously changed the way many people live.

And if you think that education should be merit-based then why the fuck are you even posting here?I don’t need any luck with education because thankfully I am through with it and am leading a wonderful reservation-free life in a wonderful reservation-free workplace.Those boys who were the victims of reservations do need a lot of luck though.So no thanks for the good luck wish bitch.

I’m betting that your does in fact have girls getting pregnant at the age of 15 or younger, because all religions do. Did you know that whatever man impregnanted them did so by rape? Because 15 is, in most countries under the legal age. In fact, you meant to point out that girls in ‘my religion’ (I assume you mean Christianity, of which I am no part) are sluts for engaging in sexual intercourse. But what you actually did was just point out that men rape women, sometimes impregnating them. Nice.

So Vedic technologies were advanced for their time, and are still relevant today. That’s awesome. It doesn’t, however have any impact on the fact that religion is pointless in modern society. Just because these two thing are in one text, maybe even right next to each other, the validity of one doesn’t validate the other.

I said feminist texts, as in actual published literature. Not ‘invent some phrases which you think man-hating women may have used’. Read properly before responding next time.

Sorry:
*I’m betting that your RELIGION does in fact have girls etc…..

She made an akident.

All people who say they are feminists make at least one of those claims.Most feminists make all of them.If you now say that you’re a feminist and never once heard those opinions in feminist circles then you are lying.Don’t make the effort.

And no, 15 year old girls don’t get pregnant everywhere, only in western societies, because they are morally poor, half-educated, self-full sluts who don’t know the R in responsibility but think they are Empowered adult females and Entitled to Ali Baba’s treasure cave.You yourself proved one of my points,i.e,

‘All men are vicious rabid wolves who can’t wait to nail little red fucking riding hood.’

By saying:-
‘Did you know that whatever man impregnanted them did so by rape?’

You feminists are so funny, giving yourself away with every argument.

And I myself do not believe in religion but only Christianity and Islam because those two have been been fucking up the world for the last 2000 years.

Legal Advice:-Get some sleep.I’m feeling sorry for you now.It is 2.15 in the night there, for God’s sake!

One more thing bitch Weph.Being religious does not necessarily mean that you are ignorant and orthodox.It can also mean that you are interpreting the realm of the unknown as the realm of God, while trying to know it.Believing in a God(unfortunately I cannot believe in one)does make a lot of things easier.

I live in a country where a billion men work all day in the fields, under intolerable heat and rain, and are happy with a bowl of rice and some salt at the end of it.They thank the Gods for the crop, the rain, the rice they eat and the salt.Believe me, these are the happiest, noblest, simplest, most beautiful people on earth.Their whole lives are held together by faith in God.

Wrong. There are women out there who call themselves feminists out there who would have made some of those claims, sure. But real feminists believe in equality, not the opression of men.
But many feminists would not have said any of those super-insightful comments of yours.
You have no clue as to what Feminism really is. I asked you to find actual published texts which generalise against males, you couldn’t name one.
This leads me to conclude that you are lying because you’re too close-minded to think critically about anything.

You can call me a bitch, but it’s equivalent to me calling you a ‘dick’ or an ‘asshole’. I take the best from it. Being a bitch means I won’t let an ignorant man such as yourself tell me what to do or think. Being a bitch in that sense is a great thing.

Oh, and I’d bet that 15 year olds have gotten pregnant in every god damn society that’s ever existed. Probability says so. Don’t pretend your culture is so high and mighty when you have that number of women living in the streets with no choice for life other than to prostitute themselves out for food money.

You’re the one who wanted to turn this into a societal/cultural thing, not me, by bringing in Vedic phrases.

But then again, it makes sense for you to be racist, because you’re obviously sexist.

I am not saying that all feminists view every man as one to be oppressed, but that they view all men as oppressors and consequently some of them come to the conclusion that they must in turn be oppressed.

You yourself said that men raped women everywhere, hence proving one of my points.And of course there are 15 year olds getting raped.I do not not deny that.But their number is very small now compared to the number of 15 year olds not getting raped everywhere.But a lot of them do get married, sometimes forcibly.Even now in some parts of Indian society this is happening.

A lot of times in history and even today-girls had and are getting married under age 15, let alone 18.I don’t support that.Do you know who supported/supports that?Women themselves!A lot of the oppression against women were done by women themselves.Men didn’t have the time to oppress them.They were too busy earning money to keep up their huge polygamous dynasties.Look into your feminist ‘books’ to find this.You will not.Because it debases 90% of their arguments.You will find these facts in books that are written by very eminent sociologists and even wikipedia.First check them out, then come and argue.

Look, a bitch is a bitch I don’t want to argue about that.I was not lying about anything.The vedic phrase just came to my mind so I put it down.I will tell you its meaning-’Love your husband, he is your God.Praise your husband, he is your king.’It was synonymous with the spirit of the site and the consequent vedic phrase proved that men who lived thousands of years penetrated the secrets of atomic energy.They were also, in your books, chauvinist pigs as they told a woman to think of her husband as her god and her king, to love and praise him.You immediately called most of ‘us’ Indians conservative religious losers.So whose racist?

Bringing in vedic phrases is not synonymous to bringing in the ’societal/cultural thing’.You do not know that that proves that you have received a very, very feminist upbringing, surrounded by propaganda.Sorry for the delay.I had to go out to fry in the sun for a while.

Look I’m leaving now, until later.But think about this, your western femicunts don’t give a fuck about the 15 year old girls who get raped every year.All they care about is to give the worthless spoilt middle-class to filthy rich sluts like you the education you’ve received and to give you more useless rights and reservations which would improve nothing about you internally or externally, but would add more misery to some unfortunate men.

Firstly, way too many women get raped. Around 1/3 in Western society will be sexually assaulted. That’s far too many.

There are many Feminist texts arguing the women oppress other women. It’s a big issue in Feminism. It’s common and therefore quite well documented. I think you’re the one who should do some research.

You know, the problem with religion is humans. Human interpretation (usually male interpretation) of sacred texts, the Bible, the Qur’an, etc. is the whole issue.
You take that Vedic phrase to imply that women should be submissive, I think it says “love and praise your husband”. Which most married women do.

And most importantly, when I said ‘you conservative religious losers’ I did not mean people of any particular ethnicity. I meant ‘you’ as in ‘all you men on this site’. And I’d still bet money on the fact that most of you are conservative jerks.

One fact of life which depressed me is that people don’t care about what they can’t see (i.e. the rape of 15 year olds). I most certainly do. I’m a student and have next to no income, but still give money to Amnesty International every month, to prevent men using rape as a war crime in war torn countries. I think everyone should give to this cause, but unfortunately, most men and women in Western society are too selfish to consider it.
Don’t label feminists as globally ignorant, most of the women donating to female-related causes would be feminists. Once again, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

But this has gone on forever. You agree with me, I’m obviously right, so this is the end of this.

WTF, money to Amnesty International to prevent rape. Money makes people have sex, not avert it. The only thing that can prevent rape is men. Men are better than women at preventing rape.

For once, I agree with you. Men are better than women at preventing themselves from raping women, or at least should be.
And by giving money to AI I’m doing a lot more than you are to prevent injustices.

Gotcha bitch, your man-hating comes shining through. You’re implying all men everywhere have to be constantly keeping themselves in check to keep from raping women.

I like to play a little trick on women I meet like you. If the subject of rape comes up I simply say, “Awe c’mon, who would want to rape you.” They get very angry not because I think they are safe from rape but because I’m saying nobody wants them. 40% of North American women have admitted to having a rape fantasy. Just goes to show how sick their minds really are.

Nobody here wants to rape you darling, we just want you to go away. Little use to tell you that though, when women see nobody wants to rape them they interpret it as rape.

Actually, this Weph is talking through her butt. There is abundant textual and historical evidence that early feminists were racist, class-ist and fascist. For example, Marie Stopes was an active eugenicist; Virginia Woolf was also a fascist bigot. Early feminist texts were massively inflected by fascist intolerance. Indeed, the whole thrust of puritanical Anglo-American ‘gender’ feminism is that males are inherently aggressive, destructive and oppressive (mainly for being sexual beings), and I would point any interested reader to the entire Dorkin (sorry, Dworkin) canon for confirmation of this. Quite aside from which, feminist liter