I believe this is untrue. From my experience, she’s behind him because she’s about to stab him in the back. Or because he told her to go back there and sniff his farts while the aforementioned thunderous roar covers the sound. That’s why men smile during applause. We know there is a woman back there snorting our ass air.

And damn grateful for it she should be.

Women react like they’ve been physically attacked if your opinion differs from their’s.

almost every law on our books is a derivative of this idea.

Female said:

Narcissism and ego is a defense. Defenses are not impenetrable. Others may call this false pride or even just pride. Believing you are always right is evidence of both pride and ignorance. Inevitably, someone else will make you see that you are wrong and do not actually know it (you will hate this person but you should thank them), possibly showing you that you are actually the opposite of what your image of yourself is, and that will probably involve quite a lot of pain through wounded pride. People that are humble and respectful of others tend not to have to go through this. Specific enough?

Women think because they have breasts all men should give them gifts

Women assume men will allow them to go ahead in line waiting for the bus and get offended if they don’t.

Women generate more garbage then men ( tampons, maxi-pads, makeup, piles of “only worn once” outfits, etc )

Women proclaim “Anything a man can do.. I can do better” and your deity of choosing forgive you if you prove her otherwise for she will become an enraged beast and claw your eyes out.

Women have all the power of giving birth.. but only accept half the responsibility.

Women comprehend one example to eliminate an entire rule… example being: “I know of a girl who doesn’t like shoes.. so your rule of “women like shoes” is invalid”

Women react like they’ve been physically attacked if your opinion differs from their’s.

Women go out to bars even when in a relationship to get male attention to make themselves feel attractive.. yet attempt to cut a man’s genitals off if he talks to a female friend.

Women use PMS as an excuse to get away with murder

Women continuously sexually assault men and accuse them of being “pussies” if they protest

Women lie to you, yet expect you to be always honest and when you are you are called “cold” or “unfeeling” or “emotionally distant”

Women wear the most sexually revealing clothing in the most inappropriate of places and have the ability to have you arrested for
even commenting on it and still expect to gain respect.

That should do for now. :)

I’ve never been a victim to a woman.

I just met some spectacular living examples of all my generalizations and until I meet the same number of women whom don’t live up to my generalizations… I will continue to generalize.

sonyad said:
No, it couldn’t be construed as sarcastic or rhetorical.

*giggle* Oh that’s right, silly me, I actually wrote it not realising that using a different name on a different page, amongst the millions of pages on the internet wouldn’t mean that I couldn’t be recognised as a poster on this site. Because some people – such as myself – are just that dumb.

Bullshit. Betraying loving, gratuitous trust is not outsmarting someone.

I never mentioned a loving relationship, you are assuming, according to your own opinion that all men are victims of women. Which is position of victimization, I might add – which, again is ironic, because that is something that I thought all you men disliked about women – the fact that women can play the victim card with a bettter chance of being given sympathy than men can.

Behold. The quarry tracks the predator.

*sigh* this doesn’t have to have anything to do with gender. Any person who thinks they are infallibly right, all of the time, are wrong because nobody is perfect. Even the odds of chance would show that someone, no matter how learned, will not always be correct. Therefore, any person – whether male or female – who believes they are always right, give others an advantage in being able to lead or influence them through their blindspots.

Could the logical intepretation of my post be that it was rhetorical and smartarsey?

No, it couldn’t be construed as sarcastic or rhetorical.
You don’t get to claim those as defence retroactively for the most egregiously silly claims and suppositions.

Of course, you will never read me correctly when you only ever perceive women as either irrational bimbos or like children.

That is to read women as they are.

Women can outsmart men

Bullshit. Betraying loving, gratuitous trust is not outsmarting someone.

They’re what we girls like to call, ‘easy’. As in, ‘targets’.

Behold. The quarry tracks the predator.
- lemon jelly – pushy

Female said:

And if that is you, you have unknowingly previously supported me there, so why dont you do the same for me here?

Could the answer possibly be that it was because he didn’t know he was supporting you?