The Booby Trap’s Cousin
Well think again. Apparently, in addition to everything in the world, men are also better than women at not getting raped.
I know this is a sensitive subject, so I’m going to be treading more lightly than usual today. Here’s the gist of what’s going on:
All feminists are more retarded than you think and would rather women be raped in far away countries than miss a chance to flip way the fuck out and ride a high tide of feminist agenda when it’s totally inappropriate and when no one gives a shit.
Rampant rape is a huge problem in Africa, so some woman invented a device that is a big deterrent to rape. You can find more information about the device here, or you can just listen to this humorous description of what it’s like.
It’s like when you get a soda out of a vending machine, instead of pulling out a soda, what happens is that an oven mitt full of fishing hooks permanently attaches to your hand.
Yea. Woah is right, men.
As a man, I can tell you that that is so far beyond fucked you’d need to stop for gas like probably twice to get there. It is not only a serious deterrent to rape, but also to thinking about anything below the waist for the next several days. In fact, I’m making its inventor, Sonette Ehlers, MenAreBetterThanWomen.com’s first Honorary Man of the Month. Way to go Sondy.
When I first read about this, just like any other man who read about it, I thought it was fantastic. Women are weaker and smaller than men and need that kind of protection. That’s why men invented things like mace, kicks to the groin, and the plastic polymers and alloys that are used in anti-rape devices.
Feminists, however, disagree.
Apparently, having a rape-free environment is someone else’s problem and therefore feminists are calling for the banning of all such anti-rape devices. These feminists are thinking several things, and they’re saying it too, just follow the links at the bottom.
“Responsibility? I don’t like the sound of that.”
“Something can actually deter rape? Does that mean we have to change what we wear?”
“Rapists need to just stop raping. That’s way more feasible!”
Well played, ladies. Well played. We can only hope these jackasses haven’t shamed any temporarily clear-thinking women into staying away from the drug store today.
I know one thing for certain. If alien abductions and anal probing became the outer-space version of The Macarena this year, men would be lining up around the block to buy these fucking things.
Honestly, sometimes I just can’t get over how straight we men truly have our heads screwed on. It’s like we need robots or another gender in the middle just to keep us on our toes.
Some sickening excerpts:
“a disgusting idea and represents a complete failure to understand the nature of rape” here
“The device puts the burden of responsibility on the woman rather than the rapist when clearly it should be the other way round.” here
“It is a terrifying thought that women are being made to adapt to rape. [bolded] here
Related Articles:
I am a woman and I really dislike feminists because they do not stand for equality they stand for what most pig-headed men stand for. They want to be better. I think we should just look at everyone as being individual. We are all different.
Honestly I think that device is a good idea. It would help a lot of women. Especially in certain places in Africa there are a lot of weak people due to the lack of food and clean water. They need protection. There is a big problem with AIDS as well, so women need more protection. Stupid feminists.
ur links dont work dumb fuck
A rapist with more than two brain cells is going to wear a rubber to diminish the chance of leaving DNA traces, and he’s also likely to check manually if a device has been inserted. That’s simply a question of professionalism.
A boyfriend however is a different matter. His girlfriend invites him over after a break up. They have sex. He leaves for the hospital in great agony. He will probably not file a complaint, because she can insist she never gave consent, and he’ll have a rape charge hanging over his head, or she can claim that she forgot she was wearing the device and didn’t remove it. Perfect crime. Expect to read about it in your newspaper before long.
Boyfriend will have to learn to think like a rapist.
raped mutelated and then killed
anybody who finds castration, in any degree, humourous, deserves to be raped.
Factual dissonance - a buddy of mine passed out drunk one night when we were in college, only to wake up to an obsessive girl (whom he had very clearly expressed his disinterest in) blowing him without any kind of permission or consciousness on his part. Was it a fucked up violation of privacy, personal space, and explicit wishes? Absolutely. Did he sue her, go to the college administration/any other manner of authority figures? No. In fact, we made fun of him for weeks afterwards because he got raped (orally… at least) and he’s a dude. But you know what? He was asking for it because he was promiscuous, flirted with girls a lot, and passed out while she was around. The line of logic that claims that a man can’t get raped by a woman (though it is rare) assumes that a man’s dick is happy only when his brain is. Case-in-point, the oft-embarrassing middle school music class boner.
So, for some of the women out there who see a double standard - yeah, it’s there, but it’s not that only men can rape women, but rather that only women have the right to claim victimhood. If a man complains about something - even getting raped - then he’s a pussy. I’m not saying women deserve to get raped, but ladies, imagine having to hold yourself to that standard and not even complain about it (which would of course make you a pussy). Of course, all of this neglects the fact that men can also get raped by other men (and there are, in fact, buildings full of this kind of activity, commonly known as prisons), but nobody gives a shit, least of all other men. So hop on off that cross.
Well said.
Rape is just another thing we women lie about on a regualr basis, there are far fewer actual rapes than the amount reported.
hi your all right…cya
YES! god yes. Dirty bitch. Deserves everything she gets. Oh mikey, men didn’t invent the device, a woman did. But you know why this sort of device hasn’t been made for women yet? I’m guessing coz the majority of rapists are men, so it would be a failed market. Sounds like your a little pissed at the idea of this, why?
Women get hurt so we make devices to mutilate men. Women do the same thing and no one would consider it. So do you think it can be beneficial and great if a woman rapes a minor boy that we remove her clit and sew her up?
I really agree with that last quote, “It is a terrifying thought that women are being made to adapt to rape.” And I think the device would be a great idea, if there wasn’t a risk that some chick isn’t gonna be a bitch coz she found out her man was cheating or something and …you know.
So I don’t know, I’m torn (no pun intended). It can be so so so so so benificial and great, but it can be so so so so so dangerous. But it speaks loads about what kind of world we live in.
So men should control their actions but women can do whatever they want? That makes no sense. And what do you mean as usual most most don’t rape women and you never see news about that, you just care about the few men who do such a thing. I demand a apology for your comparing all men to a rapist. and make it quick. It’s not all men’s fault for your attraction to the wrong kind of man.
No put all rapists (who are out of their minds like your father) in jail. Men are responsible for their own actions and as usual, put the blame on women just because they CANT or WONT control their actions. You attack us and blame us women. Make all the excuses in the world for yall actions. Yall are just stupid dumb asses starting with your father
I absolutely think a woman with a gun it a terrible idea unless they have a man around to teach them how to use one. Most women I know can’t handle a gun to save their fuckin’ lives. The idea of the movie ‘Enough’ was a nice idea and just that; a fuckin’ movie.
Women would turn the streets of America into Beirut on steroids and still not hit a tank 10 feet in front of them if they truly thought a gun was a tool that should be handled by a woman… but what do I know, I’m just a Marine?
od dear me there was a test? oh my…ahhh welll…still a bitch :) and yes i still believefeminists sunk lower with the whole adapting for rape :/ there isnt anything wrong with protecting yourself…i mean whos gonna rape you if you might have something in you thatll damage their precious stick?(no offense on the name you guys) …
No Kristina, only morons believe that shit. You failed the test.
Catfight!
- Anka & Alina Puscasu - My baby (tell me why)
one word…bitch…but anywho…feminists really believe that shit?….for heavens sake…just as arielle said…just when i thought feminists couldnt sink any lower…….uh oh…im starting to agree with you men….crap…is that good or bad ? :P
Its a good idea, and would work well just worries me that there are alot of sick women out there that would use this device for revenge purposes.
There one is Misandry.
Um i dont get this one. The best anti-rape device for women is made of cold steel and lead and is called a gun. Except most women i know are too stupid to understand or use them and would wind up accidentally shooting themselves, their kid, the neighbor’s cat or the mailman long before theyd prevent a rape. So i’d be all for this one-stop anti rape device except for these reasons.
Im no neanderthal, women obviously should be protected against being raped. Throughout history their traditional anti-rape device was referred to as a husband. But things have changed nowadays and if they are too antisocial, miscogynistic, man-hating or lesbo to have and keep same, then spend alot of time learning how to use a 9 or a shotgun.
what the hell? ok, most of the time these victims are 100 percent innocent. its the random few that “have it coming” by dressing provacatively and playing little mind games. how fucking insensitive. my friend was raped when she was only 8 years old. no she didnt dress like a whore. and she WAS in her own house. its horrible what happens to girls/women these days and how people try to put blame on the victim.
Yeah, that’s a bullshit example, assuming it’s true.
Take Dick’s advice: get the fuck off this site.
And no one wants to hear about it. Fuck off.
-Dick
hooks? ouch.
what the hell? ok, most of the time these victims are 100 percent innocent. its the random few that “have it coming” by dressing provacatively and playing little mind games. how fucking insensitive. my friend was raped when she was only 8 years old. no she didnt dress like a whore. and she WAS in her own house. its horrible what happens to girls/women these days and how people try to put blame on the victim.
I think you got her all wrong..
Most women are attention whores, they jsut don’t know how to get attention in a proper manner. They aren’t funny or intelligent and since she is an old fat fugly witch this is her only way of getting the man attention she craves. Needless to say it isn’t good attention but it’s the best she can do.
She is certainly fucked up.
-Dick
There are such places. One is called Office of Gender Affairs, and another is the National Women’s Media Centre. Such a great way to waste men’s hard earned tax dollars.
Female is one fucked up character. Seriously. She needs help.
She probably hasn’t amounted to much in her life, which is why she is so pissed at the world. Taking it out on men is her only means of escape.
One thing she can do, however, in order to make life more pleasing is to get a job with the government! Yes, some obscure policy think tank that relies on public support (ie., $$$) for its existence, since nobody in the right mind would willingly pay for their shit. Then she can obsess all day about how men have screwed her (figuratively, since I don’t suspect anything but a blind nympho would be interested in her) and actually get paid for it. Kinda like whoring but without the physical effort!
The real figure should read ” 1 in 4 wimmin will lie about being raped!”
Statistics show 45 to 47% of all rapes being false.
women speak “We shouldn’t have to change or stay at home to be safe, we just need more men to protect us from all men who are rapist so we can sell our vaginas instead to the highest bidders!”
The comments at the bottom of Dick’s article lend a fascinating insight into the workings of the female mind.
Why is it important to understand something you want to eradicate? I manage to kill cockroaches and flies without having to understand them.
If he was a responsible person, he wouldn’t be a rapist. It’s my burden to put locks on the doors of my house. I could bitch about how the burglars out there should take responsibility for it, but it’s a waste of time and pisses people off.
Maiming the rapist is “adapting” to rape? And having the choice of buying one of these devices is “being made to adapt”?
Why do women believe that shopping is compulsory?
-Big Al
It truly is impossible for a woman to stay on topic about anything. But then again how can you stay on topic about something you have no understanding of whatsoever.
Really, I dont think one of them read more than two lines of Dicks’ post before posting comments on it. Oh, and Nicole I really should compliment you on your superhuman ability to manipulate a persons writing into meaning whatever in the world you want it to.
As for the the contraption Dick wrote about. While it’s good to try and come up with a quick fix to the problem it’ll probably just get a bunch of women killed and every other woman who gets raped will have a stick shoved in first “to be safe”.
You know Fem for all your bullshit about Dick and his essays I don’t think he has ever once said that women or people should be “culled”. You cull herds of animals, and if that is your view of humanity I cordially invite you to be the first to die in this glorious experiment.
-Strength and Honor-
Guys, please pass around the hat.
I cannot take more of this, it’s just too laughable.
But….save Thomas the Tank Engine ok.
CJ, are you advocating that I kill American infants? I can understand your suscpicion of these people with their oversized chins, loud voice boxes and clueless musical tastes but you have obviously missed the point of my mass extinction plans. Children don’t learn to sort into categories until at least the age of three (you will notice when they start to do this when they become obsessed with wearing one particular item of clothing and no others, eg. if it doesn’t have Thomas the Tank Engine on it, forget it) thus they have not yet been able to become prejucided and thus are exempt from the culling. Of course, if there parents have to go, then so be it, I’m sure the pandas will be able to find far more suitable carers for them.
Female(femme) Fatale,
“You are damn lucky a woman isn’t in the Oval Office, cause if I was, many of you would no longer be walking the earth. I’m not kidding”
It has finally lost it.
Now we have proof.
Oh, Look ! You can start killing these right away Femme !
http://www.growingfamily.com/webnursery/hospitalpage.asp?hospitalID=56 40
I’d managed to miss this post.
Just when I think feminists have hit the bottom of the well of stupidity, they burrow themselves deeper into the muck.
Female needs to take some of those meds she’s always trying to prescribe to others that happen to disagree with her.
Of course I don’t approve rape. I’m not a sick fascist like you, either. What I mean is ‘There is a large industry, led by mental health professionals and pressure group organisers, who all have a vested interest in the expansion of the very problem that they are pledged to combat. The greater the so-called “epidemic”, the more they can justify their demands for resources’, as Leo Mckinstry put it. That’s why they are so strongly against a device which would significantly reduce the number of women getting raped.
Women rape and mutilate their sons all the time when they take them to get circumcised as youngsters. That is why men hate you ignorant sort of bitches later on in life !
Nooo, the issue is bought up because it is a horrendous crime, or are you a rapist who doesn’t consider it wrong? Don’t bother answering me, I’m not going to bother wasting my valuable time reading your pathetic response.
If it was physically possible for women to rape a person, they would certainly do it. They do at least as horrible things as well, including false allegations of rape against men. The fact that sexual rape is a crime committable only by men is the reason why wimmin keep bringing up the issue. Rape is a never-ending fuel for them to pump up and justify male antagonism. That’s why they are both furious about it and wish it would never end.
Ha ha, just like Martin Luther Coon, and JFK you’d get popped by a real red blooded American.
There are still a few out there who will not let your republic get compromised any further by the likes of you.
Now go and getcher your copy of Marxism 101, you need to brush up on being a bitch !
I’ve changed my mind, don’t move to Iran, move to Afghanistan instead.
Do you men think that you OWN this planet and can do the fuck what you wish with it and all creatures on it whenever you godamn wish? You are damn lucky a woman isn’t in the Oval Office, cause if I was, many of you would no longer be walking the earth. I’m not kidding.
If women don’t want to be raped, stop dressing provocatively and stay your retarded asses home ! Especially in urban areas where there’s alt of thugged out young black men and hispanics that don’t care about your politics.
All they see is an ass that wants to be fucked, and they would be right. If you act like tramps, don’t be surprised when you get what you ask for.
And these feminists that say women can dress how they want to are full of shit. Of course you can dress sexily, and walk around by yourself, you’re an independent woman after all !
But just don’t forget, not everyone is playing by your rules. There are men who will do what they want to\with you. And your little feminist friends filling your “mind” with shit are not going to be around when some thug ape strips your clothes off and fucks you in the bushes.
Some “men” are primitive in nature, and don’t give two shits about your “rights”.
Stay the fuck at home where you’ll be safe, or suffer the consequences of listening to bad women who tell you what you want to hear.
Ah….
THe feminazies have learnt that and they use it often.
Eg. 1 in 4 wimmin will be raped. A load of rubbish.
Not only disproved but totally debunked.
Yet we still have the “wimmin” on this site still howling and stating that it’s fact.
What a joke.
Half-Soul,
Actually Goebbels never (as far as I am aware) said exactly that. That’s why I said he was “associated” with the quote. The exact phrase you cite comes from an OSS (precursor to the CIA) report in the US on Goebbels, written during the war. http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hitler-adolf/oss-papers/text/oss-p rofile-03-02.html
(h/t Wikipedia). If you have a solid reference that indicates I am mistaken I would enjoy hearing it.
I agree the statement is repeatedly attributed to him, by endless dubious sources.
The closest I found with quick searching was (as I referenced in my original post on the matter):
Your Descartes quote is certainly one of his most famous; on the matter of metaphysics and epistemology, I rather think I prefer Bishop George Berkeley’s “Esse est percipi” — to be is to be perceived. It avoids some of the traps of Cartesian logic.
Good luck on your exams.
Best,
-wolfe
Joseph Goebbels actually said: “people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it”.
hello wolfie, if you see the second part of the sentence you will see that the meaning of the sentence is the same, as the quote Christian J used.
(I got the name right about Christan J ´s quote you got the name right about my quote, what a mix up heh)
Though the quote I used was made by Lenin as you said, thus the reason why I said “believeâ€? I was too lazy to check google, but I’ll remember to be much more critical next time…
as we are into quotes i have a nice one by René Descartes: dubito ergo cogito, cogito ergo sum(i doubt therefore i think, i think therefore i am) his metaphysics and epistemology is not something i will go into details with here. it´s a bit too time consuming, but more importantly i need to do a lot studying, as i have an exsamination in about 1 moth.
Half-Soul
Dick is precisely correct, Female. Kirsty also has something salient and correct to say.
Half-Soul: I believe you mean Lenin, himself quite the propagandist. Goebbels is more associated with the “big lie” quote (”people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one”), even though his comments (and previous ones from Hitler) attributed the technique to the English and the Jews respectively.
Amusing idea that they were speaking of women!
Best,
-wolfe
hi Christian J
Christian J: Someone once said � tell a lie often enough it becomes the truth�, I know he was talking about wimmin.
i believe it was Hitler´s propaganda creator Goebbels who said it:
“A lie told often enough becomes truth.”
cheers
What a fantastic comeback, Female. Bravo.
Now, if you don’t mind, please stop embarrassing our gender.
Shut up Yankee Doodle
Female, I believe wolfe is referring to the way in which you consistently behave like a stupid, ignorant bitch. You’re an embarrassment to women. Ask one to read what you type. You will be surprised.
-Dick
“Female, you are out to lunch on this one. You don’t even grasp how out of the ballpark (what’s an Aussie equivalent involving cricket?) you are.” That would be cricket.
Please explain.
“And Female does her best to persuade me I should abandon my dislike of referring to women in this manner.” In exactly what way have I done this? My post didn’t defend these twits.
The sad thing is, the “I am a victim” mindset denies women the possibility of acting as intelligent moral beings with a soul.
Female, you are out to lunch on this one. You don’t even grasp how out of the ballpark (what’s an Aussie equivalent involving cricket?) you are.
Excellent post, Christian, thanks for the link too. Much appreciated.
I hate characterizing women as stupid, ignorant or b*tches, but I have to admit there is some merit in your quotes above.
And Female does her best to persuade me I should abandon my dislike of referring to women in this manner.
-wolfe.
These stupid ignorant bitches just keep pushing the feminist bullshit.
“At some rape awareness meetings, women who have not yet been date raped are referred to as “potential survivors.â€? Their male classmates are “potential rapists.â€? That has got to be a joke. Oh wait, we are talking about the USA here.
Get over yourselves. Soon.
That study or analysis of the study is really interesting, Christian J. Thanks for posting it.
-Dick
These stupid ignorant bitches just keep pushing the feminist bullshit.
Even when it’s clearly demonstrated that it’s totally untrue, they keep telling it. When does the brain kick in ?
They all want to be part of the “I am such a victim” syndrome and are quite happy when they drag out the “one in four” crap.
Someone once said ” tell a lie often enough it becomes the truth”, I know he was talking about wimmin.
I was trying to keep my post short, Christian J. But sometimes, as you’ve demonstrated, one must present evidence in large slabs.
I don’t know if Female has read Dick’s excellent post on women and sarcasm. If so, she should read it again.
Not that I’m sure she would understand it any better.
Researching the “Rape Culture” of America
Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers
“Koss and her colleagues concluded that 15.4 percent of respondents had been raped, and that 12.1 percent had been victims of attempted rape.[9] Thus, a total of 27.5 percent of the respondents were determined to have been victims of rape or attempted rape because they gave answers that fit Koss’s criteria for rape (penetration by penis, finger, or other object under coercive influence such as physical force, alcohol, or threats). However, that is not how the so-called rape victims saw it. Only about a quarter of the women Koss calls rape victims labeled what happened to them as rape. According to Koss, the answers to the follow-up questions revealed that “only 27 percent” of the women she counted as having been raped labeled themselves as rape victims.[10] Of the remainder, 49 percent said it was “miscommunication,” 14 percent said it was a “crime but not rape,” and 11 percent said they “don’t feel victimized.”[11] ”
Koss is a liar like all feminists are……
It gets better…….Here a good question to get more lies about rape…
“In line with her view of rape as existing on a continuum of male sexual aggression, Koss also asked: “Have you given in to sex play (fondling, kissing, or petting, but not intercourse) when you didn’t want to because you were overwhelmed by a man’s continual arguments and pressure?” To this question, 53.7 percent responded affirmatively, and they were counted as having been sexually victimized.”
“They took a close look at Koss’s study and at several others that were being cited to support the alarming tidings of widespread sexual abuse on college campuses. In a special three-part series on rape called “The Making of an Epidemic,” published in October 1992, the reporters, Nara Shoenberg and Sam Roe, revealed that Koss was quoting the Ohio statute in a very misleading way: she had stopped short of mentioning the qualifying clause of the statute, which specifically excludes “the situations where a person plies his intended partner with drink or drugs in hopes that lowered inhibition might lead to a liaison.”[19] Koss now concedes that question eight was badly worded. Indeed, she told the Blade reporters, “At the time I viewed the question as legal; I now concede that it’s ambiguous.”[20] That concession should have been followed by the admission that her survey may be inaccurate by a factor of two: for, as Koss herself told the Blade, once you remove the positive responses to question eight, the finding that one in four college women is a victim of rape or attempted rape drops to one in nine.”
“One in four” has since become the official figure on women’s rape victimization cited in women’s studies departments, rape crisis centers, women’s magazines, and on protest buttons and posters. Susan Faludi defended it in a Newsweek story on sexual correctness.[13] Naomi Wolf refers to it in The Beauty Myth, calculating that acquaintance rape is “more common than lefthandedness, alcoholism, and heart attacks.”[14] “One in four” is chanted in “Take Back the Night” processions, and it is the number given in the date rape brochures handed out at freshman orientation at colleges and universities around the country.[15] Politicians, from Senator Joseph Biden of Delaware, a Democrat, to Republican Congressman Jim Ramstad of Minnesota, cite it regularly, and it is the primary reason for the Title IV, “Safe Campuses for Women” provision of the Violence Against Women Act of 1993, which provides twenty million dollars to combat rape on college campuses.[16]
But women don’t know when they are raped, they are too stupid to know, only feminists know the truth….
“Koss and Pollitt make a technical (and in fact dubious) legal point: women are ignorant about what counts as rape. Roiphe makes a straightforward human point: the women were there, and they know best how to judge what happened to them. Since when do feminists consider “law” to override women’s experience?”
A Serious Discrepancy
“The more serious worry is that Kilpatrick’s findings, and many other findings on rape, vary wildly unless the respondents are explicitly asked whether they have been raped. In 1993, Louis Harris and Associates did a telephone survey and came up with quite different results. Harris was commissioned by the Commonwealth Fund to do a study of women’s health. As we shall see, their high figures on women’s depression and psychological abuse by men caused a stir.[28] But their finding on rape went altogether unnoticed. Among the questions asked of its random sample population of 2,500 women was, “In the last five years, have you been a victim of a rape or sexual assault?” Two percent of the respondents said yes; 98 percent said no. Since attempted rape counts as sexual assault, the combined figures for rape and attempted rape would be 1.9 million over five years or 380,000 for a single year. Since there are approximately twice as many attempted rapes as completed rapes, the Commonwealth/ Harris figure for completed rapes would come to approximately 190,000. That is dramatically lower than Kilpatrick’s finding of 683,000 completed forcible rapes.”
Now the rape levels are one in fifty, but that can’t be right. There’s no money in those results…….
“Eugene Kanin, a retired professor of sociology from Purdue University and a pioneer in the field of acquaintance rape, is upset by the intrusion of politics into the field of inquiry: “This is highly convoluted activism rather than social science research.”[35] Professor Margaret Gordon of the University of Washington did a study in 1981 that came with relatively low figures for rape (one in fifty). She tells of the negative reaction to her findings: “There was some pressure-at least I felt pressure-to have rape be as prevalent as possible . . .. I’m a pretty strong feminist, but one of the things I was fighting was that the really avid feminists were trying to get me to say that things were worse than they really are.”[36]”
Oh… no, an unbeliever that says date rape is a hoax…….
“Rape Crisis” Hysteria: “Potential Survivors” and “Potential Rapists”
An intrepid few in the academy have publicly criticized those who have proclaimed a “rape crisis” for irresponsibly exaggerating the problem and causing needless anxiety. Camille Paglia claims that they have been especially hysterical about date rape: “Date rape has swelled into a catastrophic cosmic event, like an asteroid threatening the earth in a 50’s science fiction film.”[39] She bluntly rejects the contention that “‘No’ always means no . . ..’No’ has always been, and always will be, part of the dangerous, alluring courtship ritual of sex and seduction, observable even in the animal kingdom.”[40]
Paglia’s dismissal of date rape hype infuriates campus feminists, for whom the rape crisis is very real. On most campuses, date-rape groups hold meetings, marches, rallies. Victims are “survivors,” and their friends are “co-survivors” who also suffer and need counseling.[41] At some rape awareness meetings, women who have not yet been date raped are referred to as “potential survivors.” Their male classmates are “potential rapists.”[42]
“They also found that campus rape rates were 30 times lower than the rape rates for the general population of 18-to 24-year-olds in Toledo. The attention and the money are disproportionately going to those least at risk. According to the Blade reporters:
Across the nation, public universities are spending millions of dollars a year on rapidly growing programs to combat rape. Videos, self-defense classes, and full-time rape educators are commonplace. . . . But the new spending comes at a time when community rape programs-also dependent on tax dollars-are desperately scrambling for money to help populations at much higher risk than college students.[47]”
Hardly one in four as the lying feminists want us to believe and wear the blame for.
” International Crime Rates (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1988), p. 1. The figures for 1983: England and Wales, 2.7 per 100,000; United States, 33.7 per 100,000 (p. 8). Consider these figures comparing Japan to other countries (rates of tape per 100,000 inhabitants):
FORCIBLE RAPE (per 100,000)
U.S. 38.1
U.K. (England and Wales only) 12.1
(West) Germany 8.0
France 7.8
Japan 1.3″
http://www.leaderu.com/real/ri9502/sommers.html
Big Al, I don’t want to embarrass you, but you have changed the point there.
There is a difference (quick, let’s see if you can spot it) between a reported “pretend” event, and an event that isn’t “pretend” but which isn’t reported. Those slippery little absent stats fool you every time, don’t that? Dagnammit that must be irritating for you. Do you need help tying your shoelaces together? Ask Dick if he can help you, I think he mastered that art last week.
According to a nine-year study conducted by former Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin, in over 40 percent of the cases reviewed, the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred (Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1994). Kanin also studied rape allegations in two large Midwestern universities and found that 50 percent of the allegations were recanted by the accuser.
Kanin found that most of the false accusers were motivated by a need for an alibi or a desire for revenge. Kanin was once well known and lauded by the feminist movement for his groundbreaking research on male sexual aggression. However, hell hath no fury like a woman who has been shown to be a fucking idiot. Or should that be fucking liar? Whatever.
The “need for an alibi” reason, in fact, fits in well with Dick’s post at .
When someone’s wife gets the clap she won’t say “I’ve been screwing around for the last x years of our marriage.” She’ll say “I was raped.” It’s what women do when thay are presented with the consequences of their actions. They lie.
And how exactly do you know this Chrisvet? You must have some super amazing man type psychic powers there to be able to state that with such certainty. You must be richer than Richard Branson with your abilities. Sure, he might own an island or two, or three, or even four, but you could probably buy them all and more after a high rollin’ night in Vegas.
And hey, don’t go throwing any crap stats at me m’kay, cause actually believing them would mean I’d also have to believe in the tooth fairy or that all victims of rape actually report the incident….where the hell did I put that tooth???
I believe such a device would possibly enrage the culprit to the point he may inflict lethal damage on the victim (if perhaps holding a knife etc)
However, the western man need not worry about such shenanigans as the 1 in 4 women will be raped statistic is misleading and part of an instilled fear to sustain the male/female wedge. This separation of the sexes fuels the conflict necessary to compete for yearly gov’t money.
Hence, the special interest group is fed with tax dollars, and has incentive to maintain gaps between people.
Considering rape has now been lowered to inappropriate touching, actual forcible rape is less than 1 in 1000 western women per lifetime.
Things like this are the first step in preventing rapes, especially in places like Africa. It needs to be improved and built upon though, to stop gang-rapes and the like. Preferably by a man, because I’m the first to admit that us women aren’t particularly great at making things better.
Don’t worry Dick, you won’t get stoned by me.
Richard, indeed there are a number of problems with this kind of device — and certainly this incarnation of such a device. However, what it does do successfully is take a step in the right direction. Women should do everything they can to prevent rape. Most of the solutions women give on the subject are ludacris or infeasible at best. The device marks the birth of responsibility and “preventative medicine”.
If you say any of that to a woman, however, you will be stoned.
-Dick
That’s because it was designed by wommyn.
To get back to the article, I have a question about the actual practicality of this invention.
It is well-documented that most rapes in South Africa are gang rapes. So how does this device prevent a woman being held down by a gang of men who then grab her hand and force her own finger into her vagina so that the device clamps onto that, then pull her hand away, leaving the gang free to penetrate the woman without further fear of injury?
Sounds like an idea not fully thought out, to me.
Those women are the worst human beings in history. That have no philosophy.
-Dick
Christian J,
I can remember the first time I came across the demented scrawlings from the likes of Robin Morgan, Andrea Dworkin and Susan Griffin.
Your parody of their typical female readership is excellent.