MIT’s New Fall Courses: Prostitution 101
There was a time when women would stand on street corners for something other than prostitution. They would stand in droves and chant silly rhymes and riddles in the cold, burn undergarments — some would even hold signs proclaiming loudly to the world that women were “equal” or as “able” as a man.
It was a silly time to be sure, and it was also a much different time to today.
Women still stand on street corners for reasons other than prostitution (even though this particular one is dressed like one), but when they hold up signs they say things like:
“Need $$ for BOOB JOB.”
With that, please welcome November’s Honorary Man of the Month!
Sarah “B cups” Buckley is a role model for women — if women could have one of those, that is. Of all the possessions on Earth, the only one that a woman does not ever want is a shinny new Role Model. Women all think that they are born perfect. And that might as well be true because they’re not going to change a goddamn thing about themselves ever anyway, so fuck it. That’s why men are so much better than women, because we grow up idolizing role models like Batman, a dashing crime fighter; or Perry Mason, a slightly less dashing crime fighter. It gives us direction and makes us better people.
Recently, Miss November stood out on a cold street corner in some big city (I think Boston, but I didn’t her rambling article in entirety) with the sign I mentioned earlier in the hopes of raising funds that would better her quality of life. Now here’s the kicker: she goes to MIT.
See, this is what I’ve been saying all along. Education and especially higher education is completely wasted on women.
Besides, MIT? Isn’t that school all about science? Please. Step away from the chalk and put your hands on your head. You have no fucking idea what you’re talking about.
How many degrees does it take for a woman to do the most significant thing she can do with her life: have a kid? It takes zero degrees. It just takes a half dozen men around to take care of all the difficult work, like delivering the baby and paying for a nanny when the obligations of watching a child watch TV become too stressful for a woman’s delicate sensibilities. She’s got a whole potential life to invent that she sacrificed for the child after all. And that takes work.
What Sarah “Not so Busty” Buckley has shown here is not necessarily courage in the face of adversity from a feminized society, but desperation against the very same — desperation for a future that is not pounding a round peg into a square hole (that’s a man’s job after all. I think we all know what I’m talking about), and desperation for the tools that will get her there; not a degree from some manstitution like MIT, but a set of jaw dropping jubblies.
Congratulations, Sarah. How oh how will you top such wacky shenanigans!
Read about being an attention whore.
Related Articles:
November 30th, 2005 at 2:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: f0e613eb82949
“And yet the average American is a full-on C (and fat), which means that I’m sub-par.”
So, this not-so-attractive wimmin MIT student (at last check, nearly 4000 parsecs removed from the life of your “average American”) considers herself “sub-par” ’cause she has small boobies? Amazing that someone in her enviable position would still WANT to be part of the herd. oh well, I guess you can take the cow from the herd, but the herd never leaves the cow.
Wouldn’t the fact that she’s the honor and distinction (wait… manly qualities… what’s that claxon ringing for?) of being a MIT student be enough to satisfy her self-esteem? Besides, wouldn’t she be studying to be a leader in a field where boobies (or lack thereof) wouldn’t be an issue of acceptance? Where the quality of your BRAINS decides your fate?
oops, there I go again… please, silence that damn claxon?
December 1st, 2005 at 1:17 am - IP Man-Hash: e1702f4af0072
Is is unclear why her foot was broken or why she took the piss out of herself.
December 6th, 2005 at 3:51 am - IP Man-Hash: bc0e974c91242
They really would not to learn much would they. Most of the inherent functions are already in their DNA.
Just lie there and charge money for it.
Nice and simple. Any female can and does it.
December 6th, 2005 at 5:27 am - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
Christian please, put your porn collection away, it’s just not appropriate.
December 9th, 2005 at 11:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 94bbe3affbced
Well they are offering pole dancing for the whores now, so I wouldn’t bet that’d be too far behind !
April 24th, 2006 at 6:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: f02acd4334e0c
4. The LL law: Women are easily offended by what they perceive as oral or written assaults on their femininity, intelligence, or other attributes, and respond entirely out of proportion, demonstrating near total ignorance, thereby reinforcing the notion that they are stupid beyond belief.
April 26th, 2006 at 3:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 967676b8f4107
This is too funny.
So I was doing a google search of myself because I’m not embarassed to admit things like that, and this page came up. I like it. Yet most of the publicity I got from this stunt came down to people asking why someone “with brains” would want to focus on a trait so superficial as looks, as if life is really a choise between one or the other. Hm.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I gotta get back to the kitchen.
April 26th, 2006 at 3:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Sarah, congratulations on winning the November MenAreBetterThanWomen.com Honorary Man of the Month Award! I hope everything goes smashingly with your new breasts.
People actually ask why a woman with “brains” would want bigger breasts? Not men I hope. All us men know there’s nothing more to women than their looks. That’s hardly superficial. That’s the payoff. That’s the whole point of entertaining them and their endless fucking bullshit.
-Dick
April 26th, 2006 at 4:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6ff82527c3113
ha hah yall can lick me rass… and pussy too !! did I misspell anything you fucking Dicks ??
April 27th, 2006 at 12:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 49c9ff889fded
Sarah, don’t leave. I appreciate what you did for Santa. That was too cool. Oh by the way you look fine the way you are. Even with a flipped up collar and “I look stupid” sign.
May 10th, 2007 at 3:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: c46011aeb3b2a
I’m surprised she’s not embarsassed to do stuff like that because it’s embarrassing for me to read. Not surprising, though.
I’ve always been a proponent of equal pay for equal work (when it actually happens), and I’ve had the privilege of working temporarily in the R&D engineering department at a Hewlett Packard plant, where I surrounded by the some of the most brilliant people I’ll ever meet. All of them were graduates of prestigious universities. A few of them were women, who were extremely professional and would cringe to see some chick at MIT behaving like this, and I wouldn’t blame them.
The simple fact is that if make a choice to attend one of the most challenging universities in the world, you don’t act in an undignified manner that makes you look like a bimbo.
If you go to cosmetology school, you can beg for money for bigger boobs. When you go to MIT, have some fucking self-respect.
May 10th, 2007 at 9:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0e28bd5d23947
Ummm did you even read her article you fucking idiot.
She did it as a dare, and she actually likes her body including her boobs.
She was doing this because some asshole criticized her boob-size
and she thought it would be interesting and maybe funny to do this dare.
I suggest you read her article before you judge her. You are an asshole.
Fuck you.
May 10th, 2007 at 9:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: e36376410e1aa
How much are your parents paying for you to learn to talk like that at MIT?
-Dick
May 10th, 2007 at 10:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: a195d2c8d4a47
This is all over the map. I’ll parse this as follows:
(1a) You don’t have to spell out “Ummm”. I know that’s how you dipshit little chicks talk, and you preface condescension with that sound, but you don’t have to fucking spell it. Learn to write without sounding like a teenager.
(1b) We all read it, ya dumb broad.
(2) Who cares?! If I criticized her fellating skills and challenged her to prove herself publicly, would she also think it’s interesting and funny to blow me in front of rush hour traffic? An education there costs about a quarter of a million dollars, and I’m so happy I could be the recipient of a quarter-million dollar blow job!
(3) Who cares what you suggest? It’s irrelevant. No broads allowed here.
So we see the decline of American education, and I despair of it.
I stand by what I said, and I back up Dick’s opinion.
Oh, by the way, fuck off, bimbo.
May 10th, 2007 at 11:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
It is interesting and funny. It’s also interesting and funny her page on mit.edu 404s.
Then again, the article is from Nov 2005…
- Locomondo - Liubi, Liubi, I Love You
July 27th, 2007 at 9:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 897b290c9c693
Why does it cost $250,000 to go MIT if it is supposed to be for the smartest people like one of the posters said. I don’t understand american culture, that is batshit insane it excludes most of population who don’t have a spare $250,000 how does that equate to the best ? batshit insanity.
Anyway is she wants to stand on a street corner for money or boob jobs or whatever that is her right as a human, and it is my right to fuck her, and I would if she is hot. I object to her because she would not actually have sex with me If I approached her on said street corner with some $$. I object to women pretending to want to have sex with me, all i want is sex. Give me sex so I don;t have to hate you.
July 27th, 2007 at 9:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
You make no sense.
July 27th, 2007 at 10:50 am - IP Man-Hash: 0da82aefb99ab
I don’t think it’s the $250K that’s keeping him out of MIT.
July 27th, 2007 at 8:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 897b290c9c693
for example
Take 100 students as the popultation
exlude 50 of them b.c they have no money
take the best of the remaining 50
thats not the best of the population
i.e like mit if it costs $250,000 per year
July 27th, 2007 at 9:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
An MIT education is good, but it’s not a million dollars, dude. Swing and a miss.
July 28th, 2007 at 12:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 897b290c9c693
Sorry $75,000 per year or $250,000 overall I don’t know the figures I am quoting someone on this thread.
“Who cares?! If I criticized her fellating skills and challenged her to prove herself publicly, would she also think it’s interesting and funny to blow me in front of rush hour traffic? An education there costs about a quarter of a million dollars, and I’m so happy I could be the recipient of a quarter-million dollar blow job!”
Why does it cost $250,000 dollars. Is it supposed to have the best students or the best teachers or what ? Thats what I cannot get my head around why it is so expensive. I can go RMIT in Australia and study any engineering course I like for $28,000 in total. Yeah I am not the best at writing so I figure this is a decent place to practice (the internet that is).
So is this institution just a tool the rich use to keep themselves above the plebs ? why $250,000 for a degree ?
July 28th, 2007 at 12:21 am - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
I don’t understand how any young person could afford to pay off a 1/4 mill debt and attempt to buy a house/unit or pay of a car, clothe themselves, afford a holiday or wedding, have children, and don’t forget, they don’t have free health care, so I dread to think what the average North American’s teeth look like.
July 28th, 2007 at 6:32 am - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
You either have big money going in, make big money coming out, or qualify for big scholarships to make tuition. In my experience, the scholarship factor allows in the truly gifted and talented students who might otherwise have been unable to even dream of going to a prestigious school. And yes, you are paying for the privilege of being taught by the highest achievers in your chosen field of study. Stanford has 18 Nobel prize winners currently on faculty, and that’s gotta be expensive.
July 28th, 2007 at 6:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
You really should read ayn rand.
It’s called ‘enlightened self interest.’
Leave the yanks be. You’re batshit insane or evil yourself if you understand or concur with some more sordid bits of their culture.
July 28th, 2007 at 7:26 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
At least there’s no recommendation/credentials system in place like there is at Harvard and the like. Methinks.
- Iio - Be It (2007 Reconstruction MiX)
July 28th, 2007 at 7:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 897b290c9c693
Hey I’ve got nothing against yanks their country is awesome. I suppose sometimes they make mistakes but who doesn’t. I’m just shocked a degree could cost $250,000 I could buy a house for that much lol. I guess Australias just awesome.
July 28th, 2007 at 10:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
In a highly competitive career market, a ‘prestigious’ degree may well pay for itself. I’d wager as well that there are many more students from other countries who put themselves on the line financially to obtain a US Ivy League education than US students who choose to pursue their education overseas. Perhaps Americans don’t have a corner on the self-interest market.
July 28th, 2007 at 11:16 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
If you’ve a quarter mill to begin with, there’s lots more efficient ways of investing it to get earlier yet longer lasting, far more palpable financial returns.
I believe something like 25 hundred is amply enough here to keep you in ‘college’ to a master’s degree. Not buy it, of course, despite those so inclined.
Paying for the certified precursory education and evaluation is just the necessary condition.
And this not withstanding third party tutors and the like of expenses.
A quarter mill is far and away more than enough to start a profitable business.
- Style Of Eye - We Got You (King Unique Mix)
July 28th, 2007 at 11:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
You’ll get no argument from me if you’re stating there are a lot of other things one could do with $250K. Likewise, there are higher education options which are far less costly, even in the decadent US. But that’s what it’s all about; freedom of choice. And if a prospective employer chooses to compensate a high-achieving graduate by paying of his/her loans in exchange for an employment commitment, that’s even better.
July 28th, 2007 at 11:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
In the end, they can ethically charge whatever the hell they like, irrespective how outrageous, since it’s a private institution.
It’s just a shame that they should come to hold a prohibitively expensive monopoly by virtue of no competition and sheer popular inertia(hysteria).
- SUNSHINE PEOPLE FEAT MIKE FRANCIS - Still The Same (Club Mix)
July 28th, 2007 at 12:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
I believe that’s the basis of capitalism. And it’s hardly a monopoly; anyone is free to choose the institution which best suits them academically and financially. In certain fields of study, an equally respected degree can be obtained at a fraction of the cost. See: South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Hysteria? LOL.
July 28th, 2007 at 1:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Yes, hysteria. Don’t your state universities have some sort of profound stigma attached thereto?
Or are they really all known diploma mills? As far as I know and presuppose, all such institutions of yours are… private ventures.
And has anyone but you ever heard of the sdsmt in your town? Would that weigh nearly as much as an MIT master even for a comparatively more capable and competent absolvee(graduate) thereof?
I thought a single, central, stable currency is the basis of capitalism.
- John Creamer & Stephane K & Jordan ft Susan - The healing (hotel mix)
July 28th, 2007 at 3:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8fc81e33f248b
American colleges are whore houses.
July 28th, 2007 at 6:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
Anyone who is anyone in the appropriate industries and research ventures would view a degree from the School of Mines as a guaranteed ticket to a well-paying job. As a matter of fact, nationwide, simply having achieved admission would be an impressive feat. You are far off the mark when you believe there to be a stigma attached to the state university system. The University of Minnesota is well-regarded as a medical school, and beyond reproach in education. University of North Dakota is tops for aeronautics, and that’s only two examples in my little corner of the world. I’m sure that word of these schools doesn’t make a splash overseas, but a top-notch education does not need to be prohibitively expense, even in the US.
SotS: How many American colleges have you attended? Don’t believe everything you read in Penthouse forum. ;)
July 28th, 2007 at 6:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
Uni of Minnesota certainly is top notch in the medical field, especially the seminal work they have done on child development and parent/child interaction. Just brilliant.
http://education.umn.edu/ICD/Parent-Child/default.html
http://www.amazon.com/Development-Person-Minnesota-Adaptation-Adulthoo d/dp/1593851588
July 28th, 2007 at 6:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4f553055ef75c
I’d believe pornaddicts before you.
July 28th, 2007 at 7:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
SotS: You’ve come to the right place to find the truth, then. Cheers!
July 28th, 2007 at 9:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2559f72d0fa8d
Amen. Just sluts in shortie-shorts who act when I turn on them the same way they would turn on me. I’m not going to let anyone get a free pass in my society. This is my life, and if I see a girl getting raped or beaten, I’ll just walk on by. We’re equals, and I am just stupid in that I see equality as a two-way road.
I’m really stupid. I can only follow one path in life, I can only see the truth for what it is, and I can only know what I see. I’m just not as creative as some of those superior heel-clad sluts, so I’ve been stepping back and letting them fend for themselves. I have no remorse in requesting a drink, cigarette, or anything else from any of them. They would do the same to me, so it’s my little revolution. Sorry, I’m just a stupid caveman who sees only his own benefit, as opposed to being some creepy tool who fondles an uncomfortable whore.
I just can see one set of laws applying anywhere and everywhere. I can’t comprehend a little slut shaking her titties for a video and walking away with no emotional loss or pain. I feel that something keeps girls from enjoying rape. Like I said, I don’t appreciate the beauty of young girls nor do I wish to become one like the moral perfect in-crowd, so I’m going to let them support my inferior ass for a change.
Hey, I can’t help outperforming those superior little sluts. It’s just my nature.
July 28th, 2007 at 10:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
There’s nothing revolutionary about asking for a cigarette or drink from a woman. It’s a small favor most women probably wouldn’t think twice about.
Also, please tell me where you get this idea that women are constantly flashing their breasts at people. That is nowhere NEAR representative of ordinary female behavior. It’s rare, only slightly more common than men exposing themselves or likewise acting outrageously. Any psychological effects are probably pretty much the same, but I doubt as traumatizing as you seem to think.
Yes, there is something that keeps women from enjoying rape: the fact that it’s rape. It is UNWANTED, forced, often painful and always degrading.
July 28th, 2007 at 10:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2559f72d0fa8d
Then why do they mislead men with their pheromones and garment? Perhaps they should have thought twice about getting a job waiting only because they had tits. Maybe people are going to expect something if they pay a little extra for drinks in both quality and price for a nice rack. I doubt many people would be content with just looking at some huge jugs - just put out every once and a while. If you just flash and wear jogging shorts, and make out with your girlies to tease men, you confuse us. We’re Neanderthals. We are very simple, and you need to use simple, logical, and sensible language with us.
July 28th, 2007 at 11:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2559f72d0fa8d
myspace.com? My college experience? Oh, you must be talking about magical fairy tale world where gurls can do any shit they want with the perverse in-crowd, and if they don’t remember it, no one else does. I’m just a Neanderthal in that I don’t consider myself a part of that world. For example, if I burn a church down while I am toootally wasted, I still burned a church. I may not remember it, but the evil and repercussions of the deed still exist.
July 29th, 2007 at 6:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
Do you mean flashing people or merely wearing revealing clothes? I’ll give you that plenty of women wear revealing clothes. But if girls at your college walk around flashing people, that is quite an interesting college you go to. I very rarely see behavior like that at mine.
July 29th, 2007 at 6:13 am - IP Man-Hash: 2559f72d0fa8d
Well, let’s see… gurls making out with each other, gurls sitting on each other, gurls rubbing on complete strangers… I dunno, I kind of lump stripping into that category. And with a flash, you just show your tits for a few seconds, as opposed to an entire day to many different people. And what is so great about some unwanted attention, anyways? If you aren’t going to fuck me, don’t dress like it. That’s just being a slutty prude.
July 29th, 2007 at 6:32 am - IP Man-Hash: bf1c132f6631e
Would you explain what that is supposed to mean?
July 29th, 2007 at 6:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
I’ve spent a year in college so far, and I’ve seen girls at my college making out with other girls maybe twice. I see a lot of provocative dancing. Never seen a girl flash her boobs at anyone, drunk or otherwise, or for any amount of time. You mention it enough to make it seem like the norm.
Yep, dressing slutty sends a certain message, and people will assume things about a girl who does. Girls who do so and then complain about the attention are foolish. However, once the woman clearly says “no”, that has to be respected.
July 29th, 2007 at 12:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: b67f42e69a8ed
Really? I thought women only dressed that way because “the weather is, like, just so hot.”
August 15th, 2007 at 7:01 am - IP Man-Hash: b24fa70c8e643
So in the same light, it’s okay for me as a man (and MY “no” would similarly have to be respected), if I dressed up all rich and led some girl on all night at a 5 star theatre restaurant, until the bill came when I say “Oh no, you misunderstood completely…you have to pay YOUR half” of this $300 bill.
I mean, once I clearly say “no” that obviously has to be respected. It’s not my problem if I led her on and she got the crazy idea that I was gonna pay for EVERYTHING, right?
August 15th, 2007 at 7:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
oh damn.. that’s a great idea for a date.. see how she reacts..
even better when the bill comes to just slide it to her and go.. “I’m sorry.. If I paid for this meal I’d feel you owed me sex.. so.. could you be a dear and get this?”
August 15th, 2007 at 8:11 am - IP Man-Hash: a8fc8ce9fb283
Yes, mansman, that obviously has to be respected. You’re talking to two girls of the new generation. :) I pay my way. Once in a while my boyfriend will pay for all of a very special occasion. Sometimes I do the same for him. I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s how it works for Alex too.
But it doesn’t really have to be all one way or the other. My brothers prefer to be more traditional. They find themselves women who prefer to be treated that way. They’re happy, we’re happy.
The important thing is to find someone who’s compatible with you and isn’t just a self-centered jerk (there are self-centered jerks in both camps, believe me).
Personally, I think a sense of humor is essential as well. :)
August 15th, 2007 at 8:22 am - IP Man-Hash: 1d7991e476ee8
I agree that “no” should be respected. Up to what point, though? I’ve read that legally, it’s considered rape if, even after intercourse begins, and she says “no”, he doesn’t pull out immediately. I mean, come ON! You didn’t know you did want to have sex until you were actually in the act itself?
I’ll admit, I don’t have much sexual experience. My husband is the only man I’ve ever had intercourse with. But, you know, if I decided, after I had encouraged and/or allowed penetration, that I wasn’t into it any more, I’d just wait until it was over. I guess the only time I wouldn’t would be if he were hurting me.
August 15th, 2007 at 8:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
I could see that the woman was into having sex.. then seen the guy had some herpes sores on his dick and she changed her mind.
But if a woman dresses like a slut, acts like a slut then changes her mind midway during sex.. that’s retarded.
I guess the only solution is to have the woman sign a legal consent form before coitus.
August 15th, 2007 at 9:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 3f59001e0c599
Let’s see here now, what’s that motto that teenage whores use? Oh, yes, ‘I want it all.’
Now, much like the first domestication of animals had some unintended repercussions, so too does sending the message that there is a such thing as positive sexism, even in a society where privilege and entitlement are more in the swing of things than during the fiefdoms and feudal era, and whatnot. You really can’t expect to brandish tits for attention, and then be ignored by everyone like a… bombshell, and then get all of that attention, like, for the real you. If you dehumanize yourself, even the in crowd - especially the in crowd - is going to see you as a machine - you put effort in, you get a good fucking out. Now, if you don’t put out, especially if the person just wasn’t cool enough, you’re going to degrade yourself and your gender.
Perhaps you’re familiar with physics if you didn’t get through the class with class-action lawsuits and halter tops. I believe one of the more fundamental laws would be for every action, there is a reaction. Now, if you get attention for showing your tits, and you got a job for having tits, you took attention away from someone else or a different activity. In short, you are using other people’s time to feed your dying ego. Now, if you do not return the favor, or act like you’re better than everyone else… people are going to naturally lash out at you in one way or another.
Hence, in a perverse balancing act, the in-crowd has dashed over to protect you genius-whores in one way or another. The revenge could be in the form of social alienation - usually, pressure, and henceforth a discount of your worth in the publics eye. However, to fill this power vacuum, you like have titties.
Furthering your denegration as a human, until eventually you’re just a sex toy.
A funny thing about society is, the oppressed always outlives the oppressor. Now, there’s going to be a release for all of the boys who have been jailed for saying ‘bang,’ all of the men who have been arrested for the lying tendencies of a bitch. Gurlz will find themselves discounted by society, and actually have to fulfill a sex quota with deserving men to even get a shadow of the attention they once received. And they will no longer be able to ‘embrace’ their smuttiness. They’ll find themselves treated much in the same way as bitches used to be treated: no free protection drinks or meals, the atrocity of being judged by their character alone…
And in conclusion, no sluts can’t have it all. You can’t have the privileges of an equal and the rights of a princess.
If you prepare to actually compete on a level playing field, and to be hired for something other than your gender, you might just pull through your Armageddon. But then, I doubt even a genius-whore could put a lifetime’s show on in a few years.
August 15th, 2007 at 9:20 am - IP Man-Hash: a8fc8ce9fb283
I carry my own, evileddy, I carry my own.
The pen too.
August 15th, 2007 at 9:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
Why not just use a finger and menstrual blood?
August 15th, 2007 at 9:26 am - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
AMEN!
August 15th, 2007 at 10:09 am - IP Man-Hash: b49936f2bf38b
Mansman- Of course she should have to pay her half. Women don’t have the right to free meals in your example, and men don’t have the right to a woman’s body in mine.
As for what Catherine said, yep, I always pay my own way. That aside though, it is RIDICULOUS for a woman to just assume a man will pay, and have dinner with him if she couldn’t afford to pay for it herself.
What I was saying is that a woman’s body belongs to her at all times. I agree that if the two people are already having sex, the whole rape issue becomes tricky. I would consider it rape, or at least sexual assault, if the man is fully aware that consent is withdrawn (the woman keeps on insisting, or yelling, or what have you), and the man ignores her for an unreasonable amount of time. If he’s confused about whether consent exists, or if he stops but not “fast enough”, then that isn’t rape.
@ KellyMac- There are a lot of reasons a woman could want to stop. It could be painful, maybe she was younger and realized she wasn’t ready, who knows. I agree it’s a tricky situation, but if a person says “no” at any point, the other person must stop. At no point during sex do you lose the right to your body.
August 15th, 2007 at 10:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 369bfee4084ad
So, say you’re on top, and you’re on the edge of an orgasm, and he decides he’s too young and not ready and tells you to stop, but you keep going and satisfy yourself, is that rape?