MIT’s New Fall Courses: Prostitution 101

There was a time when women would stand on street corners for something other than prostitution. They would stand in droves and chant silly rhymes and riddles in the cold, burn undergarments — some would even hold signs proclaiming loudly to the world that women were “equal” or as “able” as a man.

It was a silly time to be sure, and it was also a much different time to today.

Women still stand on street corners for reasons other than prostitution (even though this particular one is dressed like one), but when they hold up signs they say things like:

“Need $$ for BOOB JOB.”

With that, please welcome November’s Honorary Man of the Month!

Sarah “B cups” Buckley is a role model for women — if women could have one of those, that is. Of all the possessions on Earth, the only one that a woman does not ever want is a shinny new Role Model. Women all think that they are born perfect. And that might as well be true because they’re not going to change a goddamn thing about themselves ever anyway, so fuck it. That’s why men are so much better than women, because we grow up idolizing role models like Batman, a dashing crime fighter; or Perry Mason, a slightly less dashing crime fighter. It gives us direction and makes us better people.

Recently, Miss November stood out on a cold street corner in some big city (I think Boston, but I didn’t her rambling article in entirety) with the sign I mentioned earlier in the hopes of raising funds that would better her quality of life. Now here’s the kicker: she goes to MIT.

See, this is what I’ve been saying all along. Education and especially higher education is completely wasted on women.

Besides, MIT? Isn’t that school all about science? Please. Step away from the chalk and put your hands on your head. You have no fucking idea what you’re talking about.

How many degrees does it take for a woman to do the most significant thing she can do with her life: have a kid? It takes zero degrees. It just takes a half dozen men around to take care of all the difficult work, like delivering the baby and paying for a nanny when the obligations of watching a child watch TV become too stressful for a woman’s delicate sensibilities. She’s got a whole potential life to invent that she sacrificed for the child after all. And that takes work.

What Sarah “Not so Busty” Buckley has shown here is not necessarily courage in the face of adversity from a feminized society, but desperation against the very same — desperation for a future that is not pounding a round peg into a square hole (that’s a man’s job after all. I think we all know what I’m talking about), and desperation for the tools that will get her there; not a degree from some manstitution like MIT, but a set of jaw dropping jubblies.

Congratulations, Sarah. How oh how will you top such wacky shenanigans!

Read about being an attention whore.

Related Articles:

78 Responses to “MIT’s New Fall Courses: Prostitution 101”

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All

  1. Alex Says:

    @ KellyMac- That’s what I just said, isn’t it? Of course it’s rape if I don’t stop. (Again, this is assuming the person made it very clear the consent is withdrawn, and I don’t stop within a reasonable amount of time. If it takes a few seconds or a minute or two to realize what’s going on, that isn’t rape. Four minutes, five minutes? I would consider that rape or sexual assault). I realize it’s difficult to prove a lot of these things in court, but theoretically, that is how I would draw the line.

  2. e v i l e d d y Says:

    Except if the woman has had any alcohol at all.. then it’s rape.

  3. Alex Says:

    @ evileddy- That might be the law in some states, but it’s not my view of it. If a woman is unconcious from alcohol and someone has sex with her, that’s rape. If she’s just drunk, even very drunk, that isn’t rape. It again gets tricky in some cases (like if she’s concious, but so drunk she can barely talk or walk, and in no way participates in the sex or is able to).

  4. KellyMac Says:

    This is exactly what I mean when I say we don’t require women to take any personal responsibility in our culture. I realize the law *should* be applied equally, but what man is going to report a situation like what I described above? Even if he did report it, how do you think it would be treated? He’d be laughed out of the room. “You got laid, and you’re COMPLAINING??” Talk about re-traumatizing someone.

    That isn’t the stupidest law I ever heard, but it’s right up there. If we as a culture placed a little more meaning on intimacy and sex, and if girls grew up knowing they have to face the consequences of their actions (including the way they choose to dress and act and imbibe, by the way), we wouldn’t be having this conversation. How is it that a woman can say on the morning after, “I had too much to drink last night and was in no fit state to consent to sex. I was raped.” And the man, although he may have had just as much to drink and been in the same state of mind, is arrested as a rapist?

  5. Alex Says:

    The fact that a man wouldn’t feel comfortable reporting such a situation, or that society wouldn’t take him seriously, has nothing to do with what we were discussing. It is up to the man to prosecute a rapist if he feels he’s been raped, and it’s up to the police and judicial system to do their job and uphold the law. We’re talking about what -should- legally be considered rape, assuming the law is actually applied equally (I realize it currently isn’t).

    Yes, women and men are both responsible for their actions (including how they dress and how much they drink). However, dressing inappropriately or drinking too much doesn’t mean that people should legally be allowed to rape you. A person should more carefully consider their actions so that they don’t feel the need to stop intercourse in the middle of it, and shouldn’t drink so much that they pass out. But, people do make mistakes and dress inappropriately; that does not mean their body is up for grabs, and that rape is merely their just punishment for not acting properly. A person’s body is legally theirs no matter what they wear or how much they drink. Rape is still rape. Having sex with someone without their permission is rape.

    “How is it that a woman can say on the morning after, “I had too much to drink last night and was in no fit state to consent to sex. I was raped.” And the man, although he may have had just as much to drink and been in the same state of mind, is arrested as a rapist?”

    For one thing, I specifically said that being drunk, even very drunk, does not constitute rape. I said being so drunk you were UNCONCIOUS is rape, and (possibly) if you were so drunk that you couldn’t walk, talk, or even know what’s going on or being concious enough to stop it. For another, what you are talking about is the current laws not being applied equally. I already said that they should be.

  6. sonyad Says:

    How very convenient women can’t hold their liquor worth a shyte, then.

    - Patriot - Get up

  7. Catherine Says:

    sonyad said:

    How very convenient women can’t hold their liquor worth a shyte, then.

    - Patriot - Get up

    Sonyad, what the heck is this music you listen to? I have an interest in music, and I don’t believe I’ve ever heard of a single thing you listen to.

    I think this warrants some research…

  8. sonyad Says:

    I doubt you could afford the travel arrangements and accommodation.

    - CJ Stones - In 2 the sea

  9. Talon Says:

    sonyad said:

    How very convenient women can’t hold their liquor worth a shyte, then.

    - Patriot - Get up

    Four words, mate.

    She was not drunk.

    And by the way, I want your music.

  10. Necroswordsman Says:

    The fact of alcohol and rape is not because of the law. It’s because being drunk means the court is more likely to believe the woman was raped.

    In my opinion, if you get drunk, you deserve what you get into.

    Excluding rape.

  11. sonyad Says:

    Talon said:

    Four words, mate.

    She was not drunk.

    And by the way, I want your music.

    All 28 gigs of it?

    - Antiloop - Nowhere to hide

  12. KellyMac Says:

    Unfortunately, we aren’t dealing with what should be, but with what is. Until the laws giving one gender a clear advantage over the other gender are abolished or changed, and until the so-called “equal” laws are enforced equally, I for one will not stop fighting.

  13. Talon Says:

    sonyad said:

    Talon said:

    Four words, mate.

    She was not drunk.

    And by the way, I want your music.

    All 28 gigs of it?

    - Antiloop - Nowhere to hide

    Yow. Maybe when I get a external hard drive, then. My hard disk is pretty much full, anyway.

  14. Mansman Says:

    e v i l e d d y said:

    I guess the only solution is to have the woman sign a legal consent form before coitus.

    Better still, don’t coit her at all. There’s a superior choice.

    The beautiful ladies of Thailand await you in “the Land of Smiles”. It’s called that for a good reason; and there’s no feminist bullshit there.

  15. kristina Says:

    Women all think that they are born perfect. And that might as well be true because they’re not going to change a goddamn thing about themselves ever anyway, so fuck it

    i must disagree with this dick…I do not think im perfect…i do not htink anyone is perfect…and im always up for suggestions on how to improve myself :P

  16. kristina Says:

    Alex said:

    @ evileddy- That might be the law in some states, but it’s not my view of it. If a woman is unconcious from alcohol and someone has sex with her, that’s rape. If she’s just drunk, even very drunk, that isn’t rape. It again gets tricky in some cases (like if she’s concious, but so drunk she can barely talk or walk, and in no way participates in the sex or is able to).

    Alex! You are my new hero!!! i do agree with you on what you have to say about rape…question…do you think a 19yr old boy should be convicted of sexual assault and statatory(yes misspelled i know)rape if he has sex with his 15 yr old to 17 yr old girlfriend (who is willing in the sexual intercourse)

    i dont believe he should be….what do you think?

  17. Mansman Says:

    So he was 19 when he did you, right? You were 15, but willing.

    I’m putting the evidence together from all your posts. So far it’s 17yr old mother, you were willing, he left but got replaced by some schmuck who agreed to be the stand in “daddy”.

    There’s more, but I only gave you a 15 second time ration here.

    What’s the kids name by the way, and are you collecting benefits of any type?

  18. Alex Says:

    It depends on the laws in your state. Some consider it statuatory rape, some don’t. Personally I’m unsure of where the lines should be drawn with statuatory rape.

  19. MansVoice Says:

    KellyMac said:

    Unfortunately, we aren’t dealing with what should be, but with what is. Until the laws giving one gender a clear advantage over the other gender are abolished or changed, and until the so-called “equal” laws are enforced equally, I for one will not stop fighting.

    Well said. *applauds*.

  20. Necroswordsman Says:

    kristina said:

    and im always up for suggestions on how to improve myself :P

    Ok here’s a suggestion to improve yourself.

    FUCK OFF.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 » Show All

Leave a Reply


Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis