MIT’s New Fall Courses: Prostitution 101
There was a time when women would stand on street corners for something other than prostitution. They would stand in droves and chant silly rhymes and riddles in the cold, burn undergarments — some would even hold signs proclaiming loudly to the world that women were “equal” or as “able” as a man.
It was a silly time to be sure, and it was also a much different time to today.
Women still stand on street corners for reasons other than prostitution (even though this particular one is dressed like one), but when they hold up signs they say things like:
“Need $$ for BOOB JOB.”
With that, please welcome November’s Honorary Man of the Month!
Sarah “B cups” Buckley is a role model for women — if women could have one of those, that is. Of all the possessions on Earth, the only one that a woman does not ever want is a shinny new Role Model. Women all think that they are born perfect. And that might as well be true because they’re not going to change a goddamn thing about themselves ever anyway, so fuck it. That’s why men are so much better than women, because we grow up idolizing role models like Batman, a dashing crime fighter; or Perry Mason, a slightly less dashing crime fighter. It gives us direction and makes us better people.
Recently, Miss November stood out on a cold street corner in some big city (I think Boston, but I didn’t her rambling article in entirety) with the sign I mentioned earlier in the hopes of raising funds that would better her quality of life. Now here’s the kicker: she goes to MIT.
See, this is what I’ve been saying all along. Education and especially higher education is completely wasted on women.
Besides, MIT? Isn’t that school all about science? Please. Step away from the chalk and put your hands on your head. You have no fucking idea what you’re talking about.
How many degrees does it take for a woman to do the most significant thing she can do with her life: have a kid? It takes zero degrees. It just takes a half dozen men around to take care of all the difficult work, like delivering the baby and paying for a nanny when the obligations of watching a child watch TV become too stressful for a woman’s delicate sensibilities. She’s got a whole potential life to invent that she sacrificed for the child after all. And that takes work.
What Sarah “Not so Busty” Buckley has shown here is not necessarily courage in the face of adversity from a feminized society, but desperation against the very same — desperation for a future that is not pounding a round peg into a square hole (that’s a man’s job after all. I think we all know what I’m talking about), and desperation for the tools that will get her there; not a degree from some manstitution like MIT, but a set of jaw dropping jubblies.
Congratulations, Sarah. How oh how will you top such wacky shenanigans!
Read about being an attention whore.
Related Articles:
July 28th, 2007 at 10:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
There’s nothing revolutionary about asking for a cigarette or drink from a woman. It’s a small favor most women probably wouldn’t think twice about.
Also, please tell me where you get this idea that women are constantly flashing their breasts at people. That is nowhere NEAR representative of ordinary female behavior. It’s rare, only slightly more common than men exposing themselves or likewise acting outrageously. Any psychological effects are probably pretty much the same, but I doubt as traumatizing as you seem to think.
Yes, there is something that keeps women from enjoying rape: the fact that it’s rape. It is UNWANTED, forced, often painful and always degrading.
July 28th, 2007 at 10:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2559f72d0fa8d
Then why do they mislead men with their pheromones and garment? Perhaps they should have thought twice about getting a job waiting only because they had tits. Maybe people are going to expect something if they pay a little extra for drinks in both quality and price for a nice rack. I doubt many people would be content with just looking at some huge jugs - just put out every once and a while. If you just flash and wear jogging shorts, and make out with your girlies to tease men, you confuse us. We’re Neanderthals. We are very simple, and you need to use simple, logical, and sensible language with us.
July 28th, 2007 at 11:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2559f72d0fa8d
myspace.com? My college experience? Oh, you must be talking about magical fairy tale world where gurls can do any shit they want with the perverse in-crowd, and if they don’t remember it, no one else does. I’m just a Neanderthal in that I don’t consider myself a part of that world. For example, if I burn a church down while I am toootally wasted, I still burned a church. I may not remember it, but the evil and repercussions of the deed still exist.
July 29th, 2007 at 6:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
Do you mean flashing people or merely wearing revealing clothes? I’ll give you that plenty of women wear revealing clothes. But if girls at your college walk around flashing people, that is quite an interesting college you go to. I very rarely see behavior like that at mine.
July 29th, 2007 at 6:13 am - IP Man-Hash: 2559f72d0fa8d
Well, let’s see… gurls making out with each other, gurls sitting on each other, gurls rubbing on complete strangers… I dunno, I kind of lump stripping into that category. And with a flash, you just show your tits for a few seconds, as opposed to an entire day to many different people. And what is so great about some unwanted attention, anyways? If you aren’t going to fuck me, don’t dress like it. That’s just being a slutty prude.
July 29th, 2007 at 6:32 am - IP Man-Hash: bf1c132f6631e
Would you explain what that is supposed to mean?
July 29th, 2007 at 6:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
I’ve spent a year in college so far, and I’ve seen girls at my college making out with other girls maybe twice. I see a lot of provocative dancing. Never seen a girl flash her boobs at anyone, drunk or otherwise, or for any amount of time. You mention it enough to make it seem like the norm.
Yep, dressing slutty sends a certain message, and people will assume things about a girl who does. Girls who do so and then complain about the attention are foolish. However, once the woman clearly says “no”, that has to be respected.
July 29th, 2007 at 12:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: b67f42e69a8ed
Really? I thought women only dressed that way because “the weather is, like, just so hot.”
August 15th, 2007 at 7:01 am - IP Man-Hash: b24fa70c8e643
So in the same light, it’s okay for me as a man (and MY “no” would similarly have to be respected), if I dressed up all rich and led some girl on all night at a 5 star theatre restaurant, until the bill came when I say “Oh no, you misunderstood completely…you have to pay YOUR half” of this $300 bill.
I mean, once I clearly say “no” that obviously has to be respected. It’s not my problem if I led her on and she got the crazy idea that I was gonna pay for EVERYTHING, right?
August 15th, 2007 at 7:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
oh damn.. that’s a great idea for a date.. see how she reacts..
even better when the bill comes to just slide it to her and go.. “I’m sorry.. If I paid for this meal I’d feel you owed me sex.. so.. could you be a dear and get this?”
August 15th, 2007 at 8:11 am - IP Man-Hash: a8fc8ce9fb283
Yes, mansman, that obviously has to be respected. You’re talking to two girls of the new generation. :) I pay my way. Once in a while my boyfriend will pay for all of a very special occasion. Sometimes I do the same for him. I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s how it works for Alex too.
But it doesn’t really have to be all one way or the other. My brothers prefer to be more traditional. They find themselves women who prefer to be treated that way. They’re happy, we’re happy.
The important thing is to find someone who’s compatible with you and isn’t just a self-centered jerk (there are self-centered jerks in both camps, believe me).
Personally, I think a sense of humor is essential as well. :)
August 15th, 2007 at 8:22 am - IP Man-Hash: 1d7991e476ee8
I agree that “no” should be respected. Up to what point, though? I’ve read that legally, it’s considered rape if, even after intercourse begins, and she says “no”, he doesn’t pull out immediately. I mean, come ON! You didn’t know you did want to have sex until you were actually in the act itself?
I’ll admit, I don’t have much sexual experience. My husband is the only man I’ve ever had intercourse with. But, you know, if I decided, after I had encouraged and/or allowed penetration, that I wasn’t into it any more, I’d just wait until it was over. I guess the only time I wouldn’t would be if he were hurting me.
August 15th, 2007 at 8:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
I could see that the woman was into having sex.. then seen the guy had some herpes sores on his dick and she changed her mind.
But if a woman dresses like a slut, acts like a slut then changes her mind midway during sex.. that’s retarded.
I guess the only solution is to have the woman sign a legal consent form before coitus.
August 15th, 2007 at 9:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 3f59001e0c599
Let’s see here now, what’s that motto that teenage whores use? Oh, yes, ‘I want it all.’
Now, much like the first domestication of animals had some unintended repercussions, so too does sending the message that there is a such thing as positive sexism, even in a society where privilege and entitlement are more in the swing of things than during the fiefdoms and feudal era, and whatnot. You really can’t expect to brandish tits for attention, and then be ignored by everyone like a… bombshell, and then get all of that attention, like, for the real you. If you dehumanize yourself, even the in crowd - especially the in crowd - is going to see you as a machine - you put effort in, you get a good fucking out. Now, if you don’t put out, especially if the person just wasn’t cool enough, you’re going to degrade yourself and your gender.
Perhaps you’re familiar with physics if you didn’t get through the class with class-action lawsuits and halter tops. I believe one of the more fundamental laws would be for every action, there is a reaction. Now, if you get attention for showing your tits, and you got a job for having tits, you took attention away from someone else or a different activity. In short, you are using other people’s time to feed your dying ego. Now, if you do not return the favor, or act like you’re better than everyone else… people are going to naturally lash out at you in one way or another.
Hence, in a perverse balancing act, the in-crowd has dashed over to protect you genius-whores in one way or another. The revenge could be in the form of social alienation - usually, pressure, and henceforth a discount of your worth in the publics eye. However, to fill this power vacuum, you like have titties.
Furthering your denegration as a human, until eventually you’re just a sex toy.
A funny thing about society is, the oppressed always outlives the oppressor. Now, there’s going to be a release for all of the boys who have been jailed for saying ‘bang,’ all of the men who have been arrested for the lying tendencies of a bitch. Gurlz will find themselves discounted by society, and actually have to fulfill a sex quota with deserving men to even get a shadow of the attention they once received. And they will no longer be able to ‘embrace’ their smuttiness. They’ll find themselves treated much in the same way as bitches used to be treated: no free protection drinks or meals, the atrocity of being judged by their character alone…
And in conclusion, no sluts can’t have it all. You can’t have the privileges of an equal and the rights of a princess.
If you prepare to actually compete on a level playing field, and to be hired for something other than your gender, you might just pull through your Armageddon. But then, I doubt even a genius-whore could put a lifetime’s show on in a few years.
August 15th, 2007 at 9:20 am - IP Man-Hash: a8fc8ce9fb283
I carry my own, evileddy, I carry my own.
The pen too.
August 15th, 2007 at 9:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
Why not just use a finger and menstrual blood?
August 15th, 2007 at 9:26 am - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
AMEN!
August 15th, 2007 at 10:09 am - IP Man-Hash: b49936f2bf38b
Mansman- Of course she should have to pay her half. Women don’t have the right to free meals in your example, and men don’t have the right to a woman’s body in mine.
As for what Catherine said, yep, I always pay my own way. That aside though, it is RIDICULOUS for a woman to just assume a man will pay, and have dinner with him if she couldn’t afford to pay for it herself.
What I was saying is that a woman’s body belongs to her at all times. I agree that if the two people are already having sex, the whole rape issue becomes tricky. I would consider it rape, or at least sexual assault, if the man is fully aware that consent is withdrawn (the woman keeps on insisting, or yelling, or what have you), and the man ignores her for an unreasonable amount of time. If he’s confused about whether consent exists, or if he stops but not “fast enough”, then that isn’t rape.
@ KellyMac- There are a lot of reasons a woman could want to stop. It could be painful, maybe she was younger and realized she wasn’t ready, who knows. I agree it’s a tricky situation, but if a person says “no” at any point, the other person must stop. At no point during sex do you lose the right to your body.
August 15th, 2007 at 10:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 369bfee4084ad
So, say you’re on top, and you’re on the edge of an orgasm, and he decides he’s too young and not ready and tells you to stop, but you keep going and satisfy yourself, is that rape?
August 15th, 2007 at 10:37 am - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
According to the law.. yes.