Comments on: Science Says: Women Are Miserable

By: Shewhopeesstanding

Shewhopeesstanding — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:16:56 +0000

What a moron. Read orde Levinson the female urinal, women can pee further because their urethra’s are shorter so the pee has less distance to travel. See Becky Flanders website. I bet she could out pee a little dicked pipsqueak like you.

By: Harry

Harry — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:56:30 +0000

@John:
You got it John, point it out to others.

By: studioline

studioline — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:56:29 +0000

It will collapse, simple as that.

Throughout a history, whimmin are behind all social tragedys, that’s why the were deny rights in the past.

By: John

John — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:54:36 +0000

Wow if they are miserable now I cant imagine what will happen once we hit a major war or depression. American society today is a fantasy where millions of women are employed in service jobs where they dont make anything, dont produce anything, ect. This sort of economy is dependent on the vast wealth that our country amassed due to enterprising men over the last 200 years. Public relations, real estate, advertising, smiling receptionists, obnoxious middle managers- all of these careers that women flock to are dependent on having a man at the top who produces a product for them to sell and leech off of. If you go high enough in any company, there is always a man who runs it and made it happen. 90% of jobs in this country that women posess are there because of that man. The fact is, now that men are being replaced by women in school and the workforce, nothing is being produced or advanced, innovations are stagnating, and new businesses are not starting up. Our country’s economy has stagnated, and the recent economic woes are just a hint at whats to come. When the country goes broke, and the welfare state has ended, women are going to be shitting a brick with no man willing to take care of them anymore.

By: benignbullet

benignbullet — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:46:59 +0000

So that’s why men confuse the whimmin in their beds with the whimmin at the office: no net difference.

“ButWe’reNotAaaalllLikeThat!!!”

By: Absintheminded

Absintheminded — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:21:05 +0000

It should be noted that during female orgasm, the brain almost entirely shuts down. This is to a markedly greater degree than in men.

By: Absintheminded

Absintheminded — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:20:07 +0000

Actually, a small amount of hormone therapy would allow a man to experience breastfeeding.

By: Absintheminded

Absintheminded — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:18:45 +0000

He never said anything about dislike. It’s stated more in the sense of, “I think men are superior workers, so it’s a better idea to hire a man. I also acknowledge that will lead a woman to live off of a man, making her a whore. There is nothing wrong with being a whore, as long as you own up to it.”

By: Absintheminded

Absintheminded — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:15:04 +0000

Well, considering single men have the same responsibilities at home that a woman would have years ago, the only change is the increase in responsibility in the workplace. It’s not as far fetched as you imply.

By: Watcher

Watcher — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:18:10 +0000

See this is how women do it.

They take a grain of truth, women CAN pee standing up, and then build it into fallacy.

There is no skill in the distance you can pee, it is a product of anatomy and relative muscular strength. Given the divergent morphology of males and females, males would obviously posses a significant advantage over females.

What she should have said was,

“Actually women can pee standing.”

Oh God, it’s 1am, and I’m arguing with a cretinous female over who can pee the furthest – this is perhaps the lowest point in my life…

By: ona

ona — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:18:04 +0000

Actually women can pee standing, and if they are skilled in the art can actually pee further than men.

By: Haha89

Haha89 — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:39:18 +0000

If this site is any indication…men with tiny dicks are miserable…but help is on the way. Just go here: http://www.maleenhancement.org/ Hahahahahahahaha

By: Hades

Hades — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:06:41 +0000

Women can do anything a man can? Three words: Pee Standing Up. There.. Men win.

By: KISS MY MANLY ASS

KISS MY MANLY ASS — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:19:17 +0000

You Dam SKIPPY!!!

By: Banderman

Banderman — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:24:38 +0000

‘Women can do as much as a man’? On what planet and in what solar system would that be true? Women keep promising and giving us false hopes and lip service in this endeavor, but it has not yet materialized. If women can do as much as a man, stop bitching and start doing; the challenge of our times. Otherwise, STFU. (shut the freak up) Men only die younger than women because females nag, cheat, and manipulate us to death. We no longer fall for that crap. “There’s a new sheriff in town…and his name is Reggie Hammond”. Gender equality is a complete sham perpetrated on men to try and keep them manipulated and on the defensive. The cat is out of the bag. If women really wanted ‘gender equality’ they would be out protesting when female child molesters receive movie and book deals instead of JAIL for their crimes. We never hear a peep out of women except when they have more demands like maintaining an unfair leg up in child custody battles, sexist alimony payments, or job and promotion preferences. Put a sock in it. We are so unto your game.

By: Baglady

Baglady — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:42:05 +0000

That’s sort of odd since men are more likely to die in the workplace (they make up something like 96% of workplace deaths) and live less than women.

By: ahahahahaha your still a virgin huh

ahahahahaha your still a virgin huh — Tue, 26 May 2009 10:56:38 +0000

ahahahahahah OWNED DICK

By: Ben

Ben — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:45:29 +0000

I wish you would acknowledge entire articles instead of only the piece of them that support your own theories.

The study attributed the cause of this difference to the relatively recent change in the social dynamic between sexes, saying instead that men need to pick up more slack at home, not saying that women are incapable of managing the amount of work managed by men.

The New York Times’ assertion is relatively logical. The assertion that women’s inferiority causes their inability to handle the amount of work men normally deal with is based off of conclusions you have drawn from your incomplete readings of other studies.

By: studioline

studioline — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:11:42 +0000

@justsomeone.

We men are not against the way women are, in fact we are all for women to be themselves, each and one of them. We are against the way women act, and they act all in the same way, which everybody hates, even women, even you “hate Hilary guts”. For ex I puke when I think of Hilary that’s why I don’t even think about that creature. And all men puke when they, think about the way women act, which suprises a lot of women because they think, that they way they act is making men wanting them more and welcomed by men, because the Social Matrix of which feminists are a big part, assures women to act the way they do. So women live in a big mistake, and no one benefits this way. The most disturbing part is that a peson becomes who they act, women become who they act even though they dany it. This way everyone is fucked and this is what we are against. We are liveing in the time of lies, women can not be themselces, althrough they are told, that this is their time and they can be themselves. That’s where the emotional responces of women come form as they can’t see the Social Matrix. Some men do and they are on this site. To understand them women should read between the lines and see the Matrix.

By: Bill

Bill — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:46:08 +0000

Not real smart are you!
You want to believe the average female could complete with men in sports?
You’re retarded?