Ask Dick: Should Women Be In the Marines?
To me, the Marine Corps was the toughest branch in the military where only America’s top 1% earn the honor of being called Marine. Now women and their “equal oppurtunity bullshit” can earn this prestige. They shouldnt. They don’t do pull-ups like the men do, instead they do an arm hang, and their run time can be slower all because they’re not built like men. Even the women in our administration fuck shit up. I believe i just lost a shit load of man points for complaining but my question is, Should women be allowed in not just the Marine Corps but any branch of military?
Thanks for the question, Manly in the Marines, but my answer may surprise you.
Yes. Women should be in the Marines.
Dealing with women wanting stupid things is like spilling shit all over yourself while you’re driving. If you want to make it way worse, just flail around and grab at things to stop the mess. While you’re distracted by globs of catsup running into the cracks of your leather upholstery, you will either wreck your fucking car or something else will spill.
Unmanly.
Driving and women are exactly the same in this respect, just like they are in all respects. Both are expensive as fuck and after a while of doing it every day, it starts to get tedious. That means it’s time to check out the financing options on those 08 models.
Women wanting to be in the Marines is stupid, but dealing with it is as simple as dealing with women in general. Just give them exactly what they want.
When I was much younger, I saw a cartoon about a child caught smoking. Thankfully, the child was caught by his father. If his mother had caught him, she might have taken it upon herself to enact some discipline and she most certainly would have fucked that up. The boy’s father sat the child down and forced him to smoke an entire pack of cigarettes. Actually, I think it was Donald Duck that did this.
The point is, the best way to discipline a child is figuratively (and sometimes literally) knock the ingratitude out of it. You want to know what smoking is like? Here, smoke this hockey puck sized hunk of tar and shut the fuck up.
Manly.
Do women have a place in the marines? Jesus Fuck, no! Women have no place in anything where incompetence doesn’t equal results. That means women have no place anywhere except attracting a mate. Men are suckers for damsels in distress. We respect honesty in a life partner and realize sub-man-consciously that women who constantly fuck up are merely being as honest with you as you are with them. No one can fault women for their incompetence.
We can’t fault women for sticking their fat feet in the Marines either. It’s our fault for inventing satellites and wrist communicators to make up for women’s cartographically challenged shit-brains and their inability to communicate simply and efficiently. It’s our fault for keeping the world so fucking safe for the last 50 years women got the idea to join The Army. They’re doing it for no other reason than to prove something to themselves and that’s bullshit. Any female Marine who says she’s joining up for the right reasons is full of monkey shit. The right reasons are honor and country and the protection of liberties. FeMarines wouldn’t know the right reasons for war if they walked right up and offered to help her carry something heavy — something like her gun.
It’s our fault as men this happened. That means it’s our responsibility to end it, just like we did with slavery. Fortunately it’s easy. Take a lesson from Donald Duck. We just have to make women smoke a fucking full pack of Marines.
Related Articles:
December 22nd, 2006 at 7:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: b02bdee7ba95c
Exactly.
They need the full experience. Draft to infantry. Let them smoke a whole fucking pack of Marines with Iraqi insurgent flavor.
December 22nd, 2006 at 8:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: 479ab57a00cdd
I always say this: the femicunts want equality, let’s give it to them good and hard. matriarchy only grows and sustains itself on freebies chivalrous average/beta men are suckered into providing for them.
Ladies, want to be men? Rule no.1 of being a man is if a man hits you, you have the right to hit back. Any woman who tries to do one of her bratty little soap opera antics - slaps or water in a man’s face - should not complain if she gets her teeth knocked out. Take one for the sisterhood. Suck it up for equality.
December 23rd, 2006 at 1:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Yes, women should join the Marines. Let’s go further than that and force the military draft on them. It’ll be payback for all the millions of young men that died throughout History, most against their wills, protecting women, just for the bitches to complain about how hard they have it in life. Let’s create entire divisions made of nothing but women, and then invade China or Russia. Millions of them will die in a few weeks, and then they’ll realize the cruelties that adolescent males and young men have endured throughout History, which girls were always spared from. Let’s also institute mandatory cliterodoctomy - female curcumcision - on all infant girls.
P Coderch
December 24th, 2006 at 4:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0363c503d25ea
I think this is extremely offensive to the women who are currently serving in any unit of the military who are sacrificing & dying while you’re sitting on your fat, worthless ass posting shit like this. & I actually strongly agree that women should be drafted. Just as gays & everyone else over 18. I don’t like the idea of drafting, but if it MUST be done, then draft any legal adult citizen. Women actually fought in the Civil War, dressed as men & usually weren’t caught until their death. And how the fuck are you blaming women for not severing when they weren’t even allowed to for half the time in our nations history?? Besides, they did other things for war, such as, building weapons, writing the death notices, severing as nurses, & whatnot. So, why don’t you all join the Marines & maybe make yourselves useful in this world. Crackwhore.
December 24th, 2006 at 4:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
Maybe men wouldn’t have needed so many death notices and nurses if women could build weapons properly.
-Dick
December 24th, 2006 at 5:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 99a1f654602a6
No one wants to die for you. No one wants to live up to your definition of “useful”.
December 24th, 2006 at 5:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
How wonderfully cheesily melodramatic of you. I think they’re extremely offensive to the military branches they chose to intrude upon. Anyway, female casualties/POW-MIAs are surely by far the scarcest of occurrences in wartime. Iraq included.
And I strongly feel I’m entitled to my very own personal harem. About as much chance of that happening.
Unremarkable womanly homophobia. How noble and valiant it must be to be audacious and self sacrificing from behind the fence! Hell will freeze over before women are drafted. And you bloody well know it.
Course they did. And this was such a common occurrence it actually merits a fart.
Begs the question, though. What kind of women were (not) those that could pass themselves off as men, even under the most thorough of guises? germ greer could only have had so many ancestors.
Is that the favourite passtime where you come from?
Woe is you. Tesk, tesk… Such cruel and egregious injustice!
And what’s up with ’severing’? I’m drunk but collected enough to smell a rat. A spellcheck applet can only do som uch.
Said the kettle to the pot.
Fitting closure. Self loathing’s a bitch, ain’t it?
December 25th, 2006 at 1:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 56dc1935b41ca
Let’s also institute mandatory cliterodoctomy - female curcumcision - on all infant girls.”
how could any human being do that to a new born baby?
Male or female , torture and cutting things off of a child
is SICK ( including male circumsicion ).
I have a little girl and i take much offense to that sir.
December 25th, 2006 at 4:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Good thing you’ve made it unequivocal you’re with the leberwurstian movement. People might have mistook you for something else.
Sieg heil, Milton Friedman!
Not.
- Stratovarius - Hunting High And Low
December 26th, 2006 at 4:59 am - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Ok, first of all, go fuck yourself. Secondly, the entire premisse behind the post was missed by your tiny pea brain. I am a libertarian, which means that I’m agains the military draft in any way, shape or form. I consider the military draft the ultimate insult upon individual liberties.
My whole point is that men have always made the greatest of all sacrifices to the Society, including having to endure the burden of the military draft all by themselves. Women never had to endure the humiliation of being sripped naked like cattle, given a serial number and then being sent to be blown to pieces in some battlefield agains their wills. Feminists have never acknowledged that the Society has always regarded women’s lives as more valuable than men’s.
Feminists love to bitc about men, but the fact is that men never had any more rights than women. What about the right to survive? A 17 year-old boy is sent to exploded in some foreign battlefield, wile his sister remains safe at home. She gets to live and he gets to die. Who has the better lot? Wha about traditional chivalry? A man demeans himself by opening doors to women, pulling their coat and oter duties that are traditonally assigned to servants. And how abou the much harsher ways that boys have always been treated when compared to girls? The way that parents will beat him up and then tell him to “be a man” and shut up, while his precious little sister is treated like a princess, receives all kinds of pampering and attention from the parents, etc. The ways that she is infantilized and treated like a fragile an precious thing, while boys are treated very harshly and taught resposability from a young age.
What femiwhores like you don’t admit is that, yes, men had political rights in the past that women didn’t have, bu that political systems have been always about protecting women and children, and have always put their well-being above that of men. Women had no political rights, but they also had an exalted ststus in the Society - with their lives being regarded as more important than men’s -, and they also had no resposabilities, like children.
Now we ave a situation where women have all the political rights that men have, BUT they continue to have their lives regarded as more valuable than men’s, men are still expected to be chivalrous AND men still assume all the burdens of responsabilities in the Society! Women have a dream-like existence nowadays.
As for your comments about how women contributed to the war effort: bla, bla, bla! Utter bullshit! There are several key differences between that and what youn men have always had to endure. First of all, the women who worked on the factories, etc, were not risking their lives. Big difference! Secondly, they were volunteers and not drafted against their wills. Another big difference! How te fuck can you compare working on a factory or getting a cushy job working as the general’s personal secretary compare, in your pea brain, to actually dodging bullets in combat is beyonf me!(rolls eyes).
And finally, joining te Marines is the last thing I’ll do. First of all, my life is of supreme importance, at least to me, so I’d never waste it so stupidly. Secondly, as I have already elucidated, I don’t need to make myself “useful” to anyone but myself - because I am a libertarian. Thirdly, as I have proposed, it is actually time for you women to go die in our places, as an ethical retribution for all the millions of youn men who’ve died throughout history without receving even a “thank you” from you cunts. So let me reverse te question: Why don’t YOU join the Marines, you cunt? Oh, that’s right: the “Patriarchy” regards women’s lives too precious to even allow them to waste it by joining te Marines. See my point, cunt?
P Coderch
December 26th, 2006 at 5:15 am - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Good thing you’ve made it unequivocal you’re with the leberwurstian movement. People might have mistook you for something else.
Sieg heil, Milton Friedman!
Not.
- Stratovarius - Hunting High And Low
Stop stalking me, you fool.
P Coderch
December 26th, 2006 at 6:28 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
So joining the marines is wasting one’s life. Enlightening.
A libertarian? You’re shitting me! Who’d've thought?!
It all makes perfect sense now. Of course you don’t. It’s steadfast, individualistic Leberwurstians that the draft is for. Though, by what you’re saying and how you’re saying it, I can’t imagine who’d choose to share a squad with you, let alone a fox hole. Lest you… cut and run or defect for liberty.
But… but the trail! The trail of scrumptious little leberwurstian wisdom crumbs! I just can’t help myself. Unless…
You don’t happen to own a gun, do you? Now, I can’t possibly be that accurate or you that archetypical. It’s just not possible.
Then again, you are t3h emblematic king…
- Jurgen Vries - Wilderness
December 26th, 2006 at 7:44 am - IP Man-Hash: c514b8f48d5f5
sonyad is ecstatic he found a new American to mock.
December 26th, 2006 at 7:47 am - IP Man-Hash: c514b8f48d5f5
By that I mean sonyad hates Americans more than he loves Romanians.
December 26th, 2006 at 11:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 796c1d8aebfd3
so if the even of subscription happens. What will be the rule with “equal rights” then ?
December 26th, 2006 at 11:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 796c1d8aebfd3
event*
December 26th, 2006 at 1:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4fcada9323419
Son Of Suns said:
Perhaps then it is a blessing that, so far as I know, he has not yet chosen to mock me. :-)
-Oldone
December 26th, 2006 at 8:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 479ab57a00cdd
It is honorable, right and smart for an individual to fight for one’s country when one’s country fights for the individual.
It is stupid, enabling and immoral to fight/die defending the whores and cunts of matriarchy.
December 26th, 2006 at 11:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: b9b7e9fe9772b
I would like to be an army scientist when I’m older. Dunno if the Royal Navy is the same though. But yeah the guns and weapons haha and knowing when I supply a weapon to a woman they’ll blow themselves up!
I can’t blame him. I think most Americans are very egotistic.
December 27th, 2006 at 6:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 5fdb78f644952
It is terrible the way we Americans are always criticizing other nationalities based on our own parochial perceptions.
-wolfe
December 27th, 2006 at 8:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 30e1c1a3872d2
It is honorable, right and smart for an individual to fight for one’s country when one’s country fights for the individual.
It is stupid, enabling and immoral to fight/die defending the whores and cunts of matriarchy.
Precisely and eloquently stated as always.
Bagging groceries is more honorable than fighting to preserve matriarchy and degeneracy.
December 27th, 2006 at 12:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: a1da9f9ac370d
Well, as an American I can honestly say I do not think that we are egotistic. Is a bird showing off when it flies? No it is just the natural state of things. Likewise it is not that Americans are egotistic, it is just that every other nation is naturally below us. :-) lol
- Oldone
December 27th, 2006 at 4:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: b9b7e9fe9772b
You only have size, boy! :P. Britain has been around since the dark ages! I still have doubts your even a real country! Lots of people today say America is not a country but a corporation.
Also, WTF, vote better leaders. Blair’s not perfect but at least he admits his mistakes.
Note: I dont mean to bash Americans. I love them really. But come on you yanks shape up. If it wasn’t for Iraq I would respect you guys.
December 27th, 2006 at 5:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: a1da9f9ac370d
lol…Alas, i must admit I do have much respect for you limeys. :-) But you haven’t had a good leader since Churchill.
-Oldone
December 27th, 2006 at 7:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Hey, fuck your precious little princess. Fuck her and all the unearned pampering you’ll undoubtedly give her. The only way to achieve ethical consistency is for all baby girls to have their clits ripped off wit pliers RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
P Coderch
December 27th, 2006 at 7:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
So joining the marines is wasting one’s life. Enlightening.
A libertarian? You’re shitting me! Who’d've thought?!
It all makes perfect sense now. Of course you don’t. It’s steadfast, individualistic Leberwurstians that the draft is for. Though, by what you’re saying and how you’re saying it, I can’t imagine who’d choose to share a squad with you, let alone a fox hole. Lest you… cut and run or defect for liberty.
But… but the trail! The trail of scrumptious little leberwurstian wisdom crumbs! I just can’t help myself. Unless…
You don’t happen to own a gun, do you? Now, I can’t possibly be that accurate or you that archetypical. It’s just not possible.
Then again, you are t3h emblematic king…
- Jurgen Vries - Wilderness
Let me guess: you are a Jew. Hitler was a great man.
P Coderch
December 28th, 2006 at 9:26 am - IP Man-Hash: b9b7e9fe9772b
Agreed. Lets hope the next one is a man and will do better.
December 28th, 2006 at 8:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fdb78f644952
Even if this is trolling, a response is required. This is anathema. He was an incompetent leader, and, far far worse, he either directed the slaughter of millions or he was so incompetent that millions were slaughtered under his nose.
Don’t give a crap whether someone is a Jew, Christan or whatever. Don’t care if they’re black or white. Care about his ideas and the content of his character. And I damn well will scrutinize that.
Tout finale.
-wolfe
December 28th, 2006 at 9:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 479ab57a00cdd
@Wolfe
I strongly agree with you on this one.
Hitler was a satanic authoritarian animal who consumed not only millions of innocent Jewish lives, but the lives all of the brave honorable men who went to their deaths fighting to defend the world from Nazi dictatorship .. to keep the flame of freedom burning.. so that (in Lincoln’s words about a century prior) “a government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
In fact, one of my greatest all-time heroes was a Jew: the great conservative libertarian Barry Goldwater - who was the Republican nominee for president in 1964. He was characterized by the average mainstream nuckelhead as being an ugly, little, nerdy, greedy, extremist, capitalist jew who going to cause the destruction of the world. He lost in a landslide to Lyndon Johnson - who as we know was the true nutjob.
Goldwater’s dire warnings would later be proven correct - that the socialist/communist threat to America and the world was a threat to human liberty itself: Ronald Reagan and the conservatives later rise to power can largely be credited to Goldwater’s courageous stance.
“Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice ! … and may I remind you also .. that moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue !”
Barry M. Goldwater - 1964 Republican National Convention.
December 28th, 2006 at 10:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fdb78f644952
Hey BMU. Your response made me get up out of bed. (I generally do a bit of surfing just before falling asleep on a hand-held, unless *cough* there is a lady present in bed. You can deduce that there wasn’t tonight).
So you made me get up!
You’re pretty much bang-on (especially about LBJ), and even though much of me feels aligned to the Christian Right, I’m more inclined to agree with you on Goldwater and his views — and his spectacular statements in the 60’s.
But Jewish? His (paternal) grandad was a Jew as was his dad until he converted. But his mom was Episcopalian. By Jewish law he was a gentile, and his Dad converted and was baptized (given matrialineal descent. No fools those Jews).
I owe you a response on some other thread — you stated some things which ranged between non-responsive and brilliant with respect to your views. (I think the “puke city” thread? I’ll have to go look. Catching up after Xmas). My apologies for missing it til now.
Let me add my views to “Extremism…” (which you may not agree with, though if you view justice as a pursuable end, I trust you shall):
“Right and wrong are not mere matters of personal or public opinion. Evil is a reality to be constrained and justice an end to be pursued.”
Best,
-wolfe (channeling some dead Greek guy).
December 28th, 2006 at 10:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Hitler was a genius for seeing that the only parasitical animals were the Jews. There is no possible libertarian society when Jews are around, because they tend to be highly ethnocentric and to champion social causes that further their group status.
Practically every anti-Western movement of the Twentieth Century was conceived and promoted by Jewish intellectuals. Karl Marx was a Jew, and he pomoted the idea that all the World’s ills were caused by the Western White Male.
Susan Sontag was also a Jewess. She promoted the idea that male rule was a social construct of the Capitalistic Western Patriarchal White Male, and that the very concepts of masculinity and femininity had no meaning outside that system. Of course, her argument breaks down due to the fact that there isn’t a single society that isn’t male ruled, and that the “Patriarchal” Western Male is the only one who has historically treated women chivalrously: most of the “oppressed” cultures of the World have always treated women as the worthless bitches that they are.
Sigmund Freud was also a Jew. He reduced all mental illnesses to a single factor: sexuality. According to him, all mental ilnesses are caused by the dysfuntional, repressed, “civilized” sexuality of Western Man. According to Dr.Freud, we’d all be better off if we adopted the customs of the sub-Saharan Africans, who have sex orgies all day long, resulting in a culture that never invented the wheel and where 50% of the adult population has AIDS. Thanks, but no thanks.
The 1965 Immigration Act, which decreased the number of Caucasian immigrants to the U.S to no more than 10% of the total number of immigrants, while simultaneously opening the gates to the Third World, was designed by Jewish intellectuals and enforced by Jewish lobyists, with the precise goal of deminishing the influence of Western Caucasian Man in American Society.
So cut the crap about Jews, because they’re no friends of Western Man; they are competitors. They are as hostile to modern European and American societies as they were to the Romans who sacked Jerusalem under emperor Vespasian nineteen centuries ago. Now, I have an immense admiration for Jews, because they are a highly intelligent and cultured people who enjoy the highest income and number of Nobel Laureates of all ethnic groups. Having said that, however, still makes me see them as a negative influence in the West: as rivals. Formidable rivals, mind you, but still rivals. BetaMalesUnite, you have let me down on this one. Funny that a guy that is anti-feminism doesen’t realize that Jews were key in the design and implementation of institutionalized feminism, both in the U.S and Europe.
P Coderch
December 28th, 2006 at 11:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fdb78f644952
I semi-missed the whole thing that this started with. Sony’s post. He got accused of being a Jew. I assume that’s bad.
Sony, in my view, is a highly intelligent twit. He trolls and is often wrong. But he’s a decent human being, a man with honor.
You don’t get to dismiss him as some johnny-come-lately.
I’m making it clear this is an Arouet — Voltaire moment — for me.
Virtually everything Sony says is, in my view, wrong. Guns, Republicans, Libertarianism, the US. Sony doesn’t even seem to attempt to understand what’s going on, he just emotes. He is a twit.
But that doesn’t make him a weapons free target. Dismiss him in the way that you did, and you make an enemy of every decent person on this board.
He is a man; he is a member of this community to whom respect is owed.
No one gets dismissed with “you are a Jew”, ever, and Sony doesn’t get dismissed by you.
Learn to be a man and work with other people, and apologize for your abominable behavior, or just piss the hell off.
I didn’t think anything would make me defend Sony — especially against the hard right. I was wrong.
And Sony, you’re still what you are.
-wolfe
December 29th, 2006 at 8:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
I can almost picture you sobbing as you typed this. I mean, I insulted you and your daughter, and told you what I would do to her in front of you, and this is the best you can come up with? How sad. What a pathetic little unmanly turd boy you are.
And for the last fucking time, your standar of masculinity is EFFEMINATE, so I couldn’t care less what you think about me. Being a pussy-whipped moron who’s subservient to women and put their well-being above you own does not make you virile in my book; it makes yu a dolt. I called you out to fight me, and you bitched out like the pussy boy you are. Your “replies” are nothing more than admissions of defeat, as you passively criticize me for me for calling you the effeminate butt-boy that you undoubtedly are and also because you never address any of the points I make. Tell your precious little princess that I’m cumming tonight. Ops, I meant “coming”.(grins)
P Coderch
December 29th, 2006 at 8:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: b9b7e9fe9772b
Gentlemen, don’t you think we should go back to the real target?
December 29th, 2006 at 9:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: db423994ebcf1
This has gone on far enough. There’s a rather large difference between being RESPECTFUL of others, and being submissive. It’s called being an adult. Do you honestly think that words are that hurtful or do anything at all? Or your insults that great? Please, spare me your childlike attempts at being witty P Coderech i’ve heard it all before.
What you’re doing is pretty childish and like a child disruptive and wasteful. So you don’t like Wolfe or Sony, so fucking what? Get on with it. This little flame war is nothing more than a waste of time. You claim you’re a Man, and i’ll give you that, however you’re not acting much like one at all.
-Strength and Honor-
December 29th, 2006 at 9:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: b0faf2e55a98d
I was once told that racialism is defined by femininity(BMU has also talked about women using race to divide and conquer) so it makes sense that a proud bisexual like Coderch would be a hardcore racialist. Note I said racialist instead of racist. Racialists generally believe that the West is not about democracy and Christiandom, but of the white race alone. And that Christianity is a jew invented disease meant to wipe whites out. What separates racialists from racists is racists like Hitler want the whole world white, whereas racialists just want the West.
Now that we’ve got the semantics explained, I kindly invite Coderch to fuck off the site and go to some sites of his bretheren, like majorityrights.com or nationalvanguard or whatever the fuck you like.
You keep hating other men and we’ll be facing the real enemy.
PS: Wolfe has no daughters for you to harass you dense fuck.
December 29th, 2006 at 11:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Too bad Hitler failed to gass your ancestors, so that you could come here and harass Real Men, like yours truly, with your Jewish feminist bullshit. Furthermore, your definition of racialism is incorrect. And finally, you dumb turd, I have already stated repeatedly that I’m not bisexual: I WISH I were bisexual. As for the daughter thing, moron, it was him who said that he had a daughter.
P Coderch
December 29th, 2006 at 11:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Bla bla bla bla…all this babbling and you have accomplished nothing more than to make me even more determined to continue to do exactly what I’m doing.
P Coderch
December 29th, 2006 at 11:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Oh, and by the way, retard, racialists would make most of you chivalrous morons very happy, since they believe in protecting and pampering women and keeping them as only as breeders. No: feminism is an infection bestowed upon the Society by JEWISH intellectuals to disrupt traditional gender roles. As a libertarian, I see nothing wrong with that, but the Jewish intellectuals essentially advocated giving women all the rights with noen of the responsabilities, with their discourse about the “Patriarchy”, and so on. You are a moron.
P Coderch