son of the suns said:

Coderch, you are a bipolar(and stupid) fuck.

I’m Italian, so actually my ancestors(from Europe) fought with Hitler for some time. But I guess I must have some Jew in me… creeping in my Aryan blood and planning to kill your white order, that’s my genetic destiny isn’t it? Parasitism as group strategy?

No.. I’m really not Jewish but you’re a stupid fuck. There’s lots of annoying Jews..2/10 radicals might be Jewish, but 1/2 Jews are radical. Is this a genetically based thing? No you moron, it’s called “diasporia”. It’s because Jews went so long being shit on and thrown out of places that radicalism and a culture of critique was born.

I am a real man. I’ve said time and time again that I’m anti-chivalry, and I practice it in real life too. Doesn’t mean I call talk random shit to wolfe, and call sony a “jew”. You’re the emotwat here who kisses men to test your “bicuriosity” and worships Uncle Adolfs cock.

I’ll give you a hint: You’re nothing like Hitler, the alpha male war hero with charisma to change the world. You’re one of the bisexual mentally disturbed sicophants who would follow him. Hitler used his God given talent to do terrible things, probably because he was obsessed with theater and the 50% homosexual SA/SS were always fawning over his every need.

First of all, dumbass, fuck you. Secondly, fuck you harder. Thirdly, I couldn’t care less whaty you think of me.

Also, I’m not a racist by any means, I’m a realist - no pun intended. You are an idiot if you thint that Jews had nothing to do with the theoretization and implementation of feminism.

And I would love to be bisexual; unfortunately, I’m not. Mathematically and logically speaking, bisexuality is more rational than heterosexuality: it’s double the options, potentially double the fun. You think that having sex with another guy is a turn-off because you have specific pattern of neurochemical firing in your brain that makes you feel that way; if you had a different one, you’d jack-off to naked guys and such. Naure is ammoral, you idiot. It doesen’t care you, so it made you fell attracted to women so that you DNA could survive. In what way does feeling attrated to women and only to women benefit you as an individual? It puts you under the yokel of women and give them the power to ruin your life. If you were ruly rational - obviously not the case -, then you’d be envious of bisexual men instead of using the term pejoratively. I’ll take you insunuation that I’m bisexual as a compiment. It’s not true, but thanks anyway, dipshit.

And finally: ha ha ha ha ha! So I’m a bisexual beta male who would serve under Uncle Adolph’s tutelage. Firstly, I’m not a nazist, so that would never happen. Secondly, I find it funny that a guy that comes here to bitch about how he doesen’t get enough pussy, that deffers and is nice to “Female” and other female posters here, and basically agrees with everything that other posters say would call me a beta-male. You are pussy-whipped: by the system, by life and by the women in your life, exactly the reason why you’re here.

You and others of your ilk are not here for the reasons that I am: to change the system, to finally make women accept responsability for their own problems and for the historical oppresssion of men through chivalry, the military draft and taditional “manhood” - which defines men by his capacity to tolerate pain and an inferior social staus -, to end. You bastards don’t really want a male revolution; you want a return to being the protectors and feedres of women, and to feel manly by being “useful” to women and children. This is, basically, all this is about. What I want is for men to be truly free; to be truly Human and respected for it. Feminism is basically about women getting the political rights while still getting pampered by traditional “manhood” - the pussy-whipped kind that “Wolfe” loves so much.

In conclusion, you’re the true beta-male, because you’re the one who’s willing to continue accepting an inferior status quo as long as the system allows you to feel “manly”, by being the bread-winner and the defender of women and children. Your comments about bisexuality reveals blatant homophobia. I’m going to leave you with a comment from a gay friend of mine, which he says to homophobes like you:

“I’m more man then you’ll ever be, and more woman then you’ll ever get.”

You have been brutally OWNED by yours truly.

beta_males_unite said:
@P. Coderich - you are very intelligent - but you are neither a man nor libertarian.

My hope for you is that you toss the (thoroughly disproven) “jews rule the world” conspiracy theories. You will simply grow old, outcast, wasted like all of the neo-nazi losers out there, who instead of channeling their rage and intelligence correctly - towards rational, ethical change - they simply wind up destroying innocent lives - theirs, their families, the lives of their victims and their families…

Come over to the good side my friend. I empathize with your rage and concerns, which is why you need to channel your brilliant mind into real change - we need you on the good side - to fight against an oppressor - not to become one ourselves.

Well, since you said that you don’t think that I’m a real man, we have3 nothing left to discuss. I’ll now put you on the same boat as all the ohter pussy-whipped losers that post here, who want to make war on women while simultaneously deferring to and being chivalrous to them. I am a real man, because I’m not here to be diplomatic and make friends, but rather to put forth on the table what I’m all about unapologetically. If you don’t like it, hey, you can all go fuck yourselves for all I care.

As for ews, let’s see. Are you denying that Susan Sontag, one of the intellectual pillars of feminism, is Jewish? Are you denying that Karl Marx was a Jew? Are you denying that Freud was a Jew? Don’t you see the pattern? Practically all political movements that take a collectivist approach to the affairs of state was created and supported by Jews.

By the way, I’m not a racialist in any way, shape or form: I’m a rational libertarian. I actually have a great deal of respect for Jews and their success. Look at all the Nobel Prizes that they win. Look how, at 2% of the U.S population, that control entire industries, like that of entertainment and the media.

My beef with them is not that they are successful; it’s that their success is, to a high degree, the result of disenfranchising Gentiles through collective action. They basically don’t play by the libertarian rules of individualism, but rather blatantly discriminate in favor of other Jews. Look at all the Hollywood actors who converted to Judaism or “suddenly” found Jewish ancestors in their family trees when they entered the bizz. You can’t have a true libertarian sociey if some are not willing to play by the rules and engage in cronism, nepotism and ethnically particularist political lobbyism.

By the way, I’m no interested in societal approval; if I were, I wouldn’t be questioning feminism and other politically correct doctrines. You’re in the same boat I am. Funny that you called me a racialist, and yet it is the Jews whoa re the true racialists, favoring their own people against the goys. Funny that, according o you, I’m an outcast for challenging what the Society preaches, when it’s obvious that challenging feminism would make you, by your own definition, an outcast. Even more incredible is that you have been already admitted to being an outcast anyway, when you said that you can’t get pussy because you’re a beta male.(rolls eyes). So I’m gonna end up an outcast? Funny, because I’already am one, and you are two. I’m goling to end this missive by telling you that I’m much more of a man then you’ll ever be, because I’m willing to speak my mind without fear of being reprehended, and I’m willing to stick up for what I believe in even if it costs me my social status, respect and even life. That’s what being a real man is all about; that’s what I am and you are not.

P Coderch

“In my opinion, women are no better than men & men are no better than women, no race is better than another, & no religion is more “correctâ€? than another.”

2 out of 3 ain’t bad.

“Good points on Hitler, by the way. He was a good leader.
Most on here are just too blind to see the good he did [or could have done] & only look at the bad [like the Holocaust.]”

What good was that? A slave command economy? Or sending archeologists to every corner of the Earth to search for the roots of the “Aryan” race? Oh wait, you’re just a doozy bitch who throws her panties at the powerful. “Good” is the last thing on your mind.

P Coderch said:

Ok, first of all, go fuck yourself. Secondly, the entire premisse behind the post was missed by your tiny pea brain. I am a libertarian, which means that I’m agains the military draft in any way, shape or form. I consider the military draft the ultimate insult upon individual liberties.

My whole point is that men have always made the greatest of all sacrifices to the Society, including having to endure the burden of the military draft all by themselves. Women never had to endure the humiliation of being sripped naked like cattle, given a serial number and then being sent to be blown to pieces in some battlefield agains their wills. Feminists have never acknowledged that the Society has always regarded women’s lives as more valuable than men’s.

Feminists love to bitc about men, but the fact is that men never had any more rights than women. What about the right to survive? A 17 year-old boy is sent to exploded in some foreign battlefield, wile his sister remains safe at home. She gets to live and he gets to die. Who has the better lot? Wha about traditional chivalry? A man demeans himself by opening doors to women, pulling their coat and oter duties that are traditonally assigned to servants. And how abou the much harsher ways that boys have always been treated when compared to girls? The way that parents will beat him up and then tell him to “be a man” and shut up, while his precious little sister is treated like a princess, receives all kinds of pampering and attention from the parents, etc. The ways that she is infantilized and treated like a fragile an precious thing, while boys are treated very harshly and taught resposability from a young age.

What femiwhores like you don’t admit is that, yes, men had political rights in the past that women didn’t have, bu that political systems have been always about protecting women and children, and have always put their well-being above that of men. Women had no political rights, but they also had an exalted ststus in the Society - with their lives being regarded as more important than men’s -, and they also had no resposabilities, like children.

Now we ave a situation where women have all the political rights that men have, BUT they continue to have their lives regarded as more valuable than men’s, men are still expected to be chivalrous AND men still assume all the burdens of responsabilities in the Society! Women have a dream-like existence nowadays.

As for your comments about how women contributed to the war effort: bla, bla, bla! Utter bullshit! There are several key differences between that and what youn men have always had to endure. First of all, the women who worked on the factories, etc, were not risking their lives. Big difference! Secondly, they were volunteers and not drafted against their wills. Another big difference! How te fuck can you compare working on a factory or getting a cushy job working as the general’s personal secretary compare, in your pea brain, to actually dodging bullets in combat is beyonf me!(rolls eyes).

And finally, joining te Marines is the last thing I’ll do. First of all, my life is of supreme importance, at least to me, so I’d never waste it so stupidly. Secondly, as I have already elucidated, I don’t need to make myself “useful” to anyone but myself - because I am a libertarian. Thirdly, as I have proposed, it is actually time for you women to go die in our places, as an ethical retribution for all the millions of youn men who’ve died throughout history without receving even a “thank you” from you cunts. So let me reverse te question: Why don’t YOU join the Marines, you cunt? Oh, that’s right: the “Patriarchy” regards women’s lives too precious to even allow them to waste it by joining te Marines. See my point, cunt?

P Coderch

Okay, so if I have a pea for a brain, then you must not have one at all, seeing as you missed the whole point of my post that agreed with many of the statements you attempted to rebuttal upon.
You don’t know me at all. Stop pretending to. You don’t know ANY of my beliefs, so stop assuming because you’re only making an ass out of yourself. I don’t agree with war, let alone draft, but war is obviously a fact of life, & if the draft must be too, then draft all. Now for your empty skull to comprehend, that implys that everyone, including women, should be drafted. In my opinion, women are no better than men & men are no better than women, no race is better than another, & no religion is more “correct” than another. I don’t believe that any recent war is in any way justifiyed. As far as the whole brother/sister sanario you set up, i agree completely that it is unfair, but it was men who made it that way. It was a few men that decided for all men that they should be the ones to fight the war, while the women stayed at home. That’s not the women’s fault, but their not the ones that have to suffer because of it. I don’t know too much about how parents tend to bring up boys, but every sterio-type i know it is the father telling the son to “be a man” & treating him harshly, while the daughter is “daddy’s little girl.” The mother is usually the one trying to make the daugther into a mirror image of herself & meanwhile unknowingly “making the son homosexual” as the father thinks. I AM NOT A FEMINIST. Don’t try to tell me i am, fucker. Regarding your statements that “women should be dying in war currently” that is exactly my point. If men have to die, then so do women. You are missing my point completely. Oh, & as far as you telling me that i should join the marines, for one, i’m not of age to join the marines, & secondly, i actually wanted to join the army [not the marines] when i was a lot younger [as in like 10] but then i opened my eyes & saw assholes like you staring back at me & that’s when i relized, you’re not worth my life. But then again, i’m not worth yours. Once again, it is extremely offensive to EVERYONE serving in the war, that you’re saying that you’re life is to preious to join the military, what about theirs? You contradicted yourself. You had just stated, a few phrases above that it wasn’t right that the women’s lives were considered “too precious”, but now you’re considering your life “too precious.”

Good points on Hitler, by the way.
He was a good leader.
Most on here are just too blind to see the good he did [or could have done] & only look at the bad [like the Holocaust.]
But, you don’t have to be Jewish to be against the Holocaust seeing as it was a absolutely tragic event in history, which Hitler foolishly started, seeing now that is all he is remembered for.

With the new year looming closer into view, I take the chance to wish that 2007 bestow upon all of you perfect strangers and your loved ones, by the grace of God, health, fulfillment of wants and needs, peace, happiness and joy. May this be a new year of good tidings and renewed hope.

To those more than 3 hours to the East of me… the same regardless!

- Paul Oakenfold . Dark Machine - sipping a Pinot Noir DS in equally good company

I don’t know what you’re talking about.

I am far from childish, as I’m completely calm, not arguing and don’t care about who wins. I was merely correcting my earlier remarks about the definitions of racialist and racist.

Gentlemen, if we could all take a deep breath. We are men, and arguements like these are below us. Now, we are all here for the same reason (Probably) and think the same (most likely). So if someone doesn’t agree with you, be a man, and just say ‘Fair enough, your opinion is your own’.

And Abaddon is right, you are acting like children. No, worse, like WOMEN. Be a man and fucking be able to walk away without bitching on and on.

A correction to my earlier post:

A racialist is actually a person who believes that distinct human races exist. As opposed to the academic intelligensia who think race is a social construct.. just like gender. So anyone with common sense knows that Africans and Europeans are different, just like male and female. Not because of society, but because of GOD or bioevolution.

Paleo-conservatives like Pat Buchanan believe that each race has a right to it’s own homeland, and that putting them together is as dumb a scheme as putting Jews and Muslims in the same region.

Then you have the fringe like Coderch, who thinks Hitler was a prophet and all lesser races should be gassed. Lesser races include even non-Aryan whites, such as Meds(Greeks/Italians/Spaniards who mostly don’t have the blondism trait). These geniuses actually believe that Aryans from Northern Europe founded the Roman Republic, and the fall of that Empire was when the stubby muscular Mediterranians started taking power from the blonde ectomorphs from the North. Idiots.

P Coderch said:

abaddon_fff said:

This has gone on far enough. There’s a rather large difference between being RESPECTFUL of others, and being submissive. It’s called being an adult. Do you honestly think that words are that hurtful or do anything at all? Or your insults that great? Please, spare me your childlike attempts at being witty P Coderech i’ve heard it all before.

What you’re doing is pretty childish and like a child disruptive and wasteful. So you don’t like Wolfe or Sony, so fucking what? Get on with it. This little flame war is nothing more than a waste of time. You claim you’re a Man, and i’ll give you that, however you’re not acting much like one at all.

-Strength and Honor-

Bla bla bla bla…all this babbling and you have accomplished nothing more than to make me even more determined to continue to do exactly what I’m doing.

P Coderch

How sad.

-Strength and Honor-

Anything to your right seems to encompass a broad swathe of humanity. but at least you admit it.

Yes, many sheep in yander lost flock, bless their cheap, black, stingy little hearts.

As for whether or not it vexes you, I’ve long given up trying to determine what, if anything, does.

Is that a compliment? I can’t tell. Really. Showing no adverse reaction must be your simpletonian Pavlovian cue to keep administering. Or is it the other way around?

That said, fair enough, you troll emotively and frequently show no obvious sign of discernment to some observers.

Kewl. Can I call them to the stand?

I do not think we share the same definition of sardonic. That said, fair enough, you troll emotively and frequently show no obvious sign of discernment to some observers.

I object to your qualifying me trollful as subjectively biased and hearsay. I call Oldone to the stand.

Just the tiniest bit twit-like?

Repetitio mater studiorum est? Extensive repetition does not make this teaching valid.
Are you trying to tell me something?

In a post that refers to the Nazis and Hitler, don’t you find “Herr Wolfe� just a little over the top in trolling?

Admittedly, all that talk of Hitler probably caused me to involuntarily dynamically link the term. In any case, it’s a noun that stipulates a man of gentlemanly distinction, to the best of my meagre knowledge of German.

Admittedly, I might be wrong.

I actually meant nothing malfeasantly subversive by it. Though I confess it was a little harmless, if thinly veiled, subterfuge for humour. Not at all over the top in trolling. You’re obviously as yet still oblivious of my capabilities therein.

Ad hominem? Perhaps, but far less, I think than you repeatedly calling Conservatives killers, which I find jejune.

Though telling the truth is often so childlike in it mindless simplicity, where and when did it explicitly slip my tongue to the tune of calling all Conservatives killers? That’s just your paranoid Republican lining acting up. Careful, I think I saw Trotsky on your shoulder!

Indeed, I think characterizing your trolling as twit-like is perhaps more accurate than your assertions re Republicans, the NRA, Americans, etc.

But you explicitly called me a twit twice that instance alone before ever mutilating it into an adverb.

Just a little lacking in, oh, imagination?

Actually, I think “twit-like” is more than a little lacking in imagination. You might have used twitesque or twitonian, twitful at the very least. Twit-like? Form without fond.

Regards.

sonyad said:
As such, you’ll have to make do with Wolfe’s and SotS devices alone from here on.

I respond only, and I respond at about 20dB down, and only some of the time.

With regard to trolling you; yes, I do confess to an evil, sullied titillation in taunting anyone and anything to my right on their political beliefs. Though I’d much rather retrieve my antagonists from the dark side they staunchly persist in.

Naturally, the further in they be, the worse the trolling.

Anything to your right seems to encompass a broad swathe of humanity. but at least you admit it.

I don’t find being appelated as “Jew” to be at all a worthy dismissal. And even if it were, why should a dismissal vex me the slightest?

I agree it’s not a worthy dismissal. As for whether or not it vexes you, I’ve long given up trying to determine what, if anything, does.

Sony doesn’t even seem to attempt to understand what’s going on, he just emotes.
You are mistaken in superficially taking at face value the sardonic twist oft found in my posts.

I do not think we share the same definition of sardonic. That said, fair enough, you troll emotively and frequently show no obvious sign of discernment to some observers.

Sony, in my view, is a highly intelligent twit.

You were right up to, not including, the ‘twit’ part. Everyone’s entitled to their opinion

And that remains my opinion, and very carefully expressed as my opinion, therefore somewhat unassailable. If you’d prefer, I’ll say you’re a highly intelligent troll (we both agree at least that you commit repeated trolling behavior). I think people that troll repeatedly are twits. Ergo, I think you are a twit.

Ad hominem? Perhaps, but far less, I think than you repeatedly calling Conservatives killers, which I find jejune.

Indeed, I think characterizing your trolling as twit-like is perhaps more accurate than your assertions re Republicans, the NRA, Americans, etc.

In closing, I take note of your industrious application of pleonastical tautology, Herr Wolfe.

In a post that refers to the Nazis and Hitler, don’t you find “Herr Wolfe” just a little over the top in trolling?

Just a little lacking in, oh, imagination?

Just the tiniest bit twit-like?

Regards.

-wolfe

I see the pack mentality involved in ostracising or turning in droves on a disfavoured, unpopular or foul mouthed individual or likewise minority within a social group for safety, political or face/popularity/hierarchy gains inside that group as repugnant and morally reprehensible. I find it reminiscent of collectives of superficial, phony, menially intelligent human beings with no fortitude of character or own system of values. Akin to high school or junior high, the reality shows ’survivor’, ‘big brother’ and so forth.

Though it might be argued that’s exactly the case with women in regard to mabtw, this is untrue as they are morally excluded apriori from legitimate member population as opposed to being picked out, or picking themselves out, for exclusion whence.

The first paragraph is on the money. It is exactly why I say the males here all sound like teenagers or younger. They rant, rave, and swear at women, while simultaneously accusing women who do such things as the lowest of the low. Ironic. You all need to buy a mirror.

The second paragraph is a sly way to slide out of blame as you yourself have acted towards me and other women on this site in the exact manner that you are accusing the men of in paragraph one. Nice bit of hypocritical, self-justification you’ve got going on there. It makes no difference that women are advised not to be on the site, for you could equally choose to ignore or not address female posters. Instead you choose to go with the hatred and rage and attack them. Nothing can excuse, justify or rationalise that type of behaviour, not even a site disclaimer that many readers may not even be aware of unless it was pointed out to them.

Oldone said:

Well, as an American I can honestly say I do not think that we are egotistic. Is a bird showing off when it flies? No it is just the natural state of things. Likewise it is not that Americans are egotistic, it is just that every other nation is naturally below us. :-) lol

- Oldone

Dixieland uber alles…

- Los Paraguayos - Ave Maria

@P Coderch

I’ve no qualms or issues about being called a Jew. Though I am of the belief this particular word likely carries distinctly pejorative connotations (that you knowingly purposefully enscribed) and is of a deeply emotional heritage with both antisemites and, implicitely, Jews and Israelis. Understandably more so with the latter.

Either when it’s infused with obvious spite or hostility toward the people and ethnic group or, equally reprehensible, with pride and equal prejudice when meant to show inclusion in exclusivism, self perceived superiority or belonging to the Jewish people as a putative virtue, arbitrarily bestowed by merely being and not earned, that dually contrasts with the imputed blemish of being born to ‘gentiles’.

Though the manifest animosity is not lost on me, the acrimonious exalting of Hitler in the face of your inferring Jewish lineage on my part leaves me cold.

Your rhetoric, though ardently passionate, is misguidedly emotive. I do respect you for your occasional intelligent protrusion from your otherwise opaque and impenetrable wisdom (not to mention bleak insight). I also respect the conviction of your philosophical beliefs. Much more than your actual beliefs, in any case, as you can probably tell.

Contrastingly, I have little respect for your iniquitous xenophobia, unchiseled manners, selfishness, the callous views and sentiments you espouse regarding other people as well as your blind allegiance to the inanity that is Libertarianism.

However, when I take somebody to task it’s not because someone or many have done so prior or because he’s down. And I refrain from doing so when everyone is.

I see the pack mentality involved in ostracising or turning in droves on a disfavoured, unpopular or foul mouthed individual or likewise minority within a social group for safety, political or face/popularity/hierarchy gains inside that group as repugnant and morally reprehensible. I find it reminiscent of collectives of superficial, phony, menially intelligent human beings with no fortitude of character or own system of values. Akin to high school or junior high, the reality shows ’survivor’, ‘big brother’ and so forth.

Though it might be argued that’s exactly the case with women in regard to mabtw, this is untrue as they are morally excluded apriori from legitimate member population as opposed to being picked out, or picking themselves out, for exclusion whence.

Anyway, I loath to side with the strong against the weak. Even if it is written words alone that fly.

I also loath joining in turning someone away from a group or community from which we are both part.

As such, you’ll have to make do with Wolfe’s and SotS devices alone from here on.

With regard to trolling you; yes, I do confess to an evil, sullied titillation in taunting anyone and anything to my right on their political beliefs. Though I’d much rather retrieve my antagonists from the dark side they staunchly persist in.

Naturally, the further in they be, the worse the trolling.

@Wolfe

I don’t find being appelated as “Jew” to be at all a worthy dismissal. And even if it were, why should a dismissal vex me the slightest?

Sony doesn’t even seem to attempt to understand what’s going on, he just emotes.

You’re plain, dead wrong there.

You are mistaken in superficially taking at face value the sardonic twist oft found in my posts.

I have seen and felt death’s ‘leathery wings’. What is there left for me, or anyone like me sane, to understand about being dead without actually expiring myself or killing someone with my own hands?

Sony, in my view, is a highly intelligent twit.

You were right up to, not including, the ‘twit’ part. Everyone’s entitled to their opinion and ad hominem attacks. Only we don’t call them that when we actually do it.

I didn’t think anything would make me defend Sony — especially against the hard right.

Oh! Is that what you were doing? Silly me.

In closing, I take note of your industrious application of pleonastical tautology, Herr Wolfe. Impressive:

And Sony, you’re still what you are.

Regards.

- Lola Flores - Remedios de la Montilla

Coderch, you are a bipolar(and stupid) fuck.

I’m Italian, so actually my ancestors(from Europe) fought with Hitler for some time. But I guess I must have some Jew in me… creeping in my Aryan blood and planning to kill your white order, that’s my genetic destiny isn’t it? Parasitism as group strategy?

No.. I’m really not Jewish but you’re a stupid fuck. There’s lots of annoying Jews..2/10 radicals might be Jewish, but 1/2 Jews are radical. Is this a genetically based thing? No you moron, it’s called “diasporia”. It’s because Jews went so long being shit on and thrown out of places that radicalism and a culture of critique was born.

I am a real man. I’ve said time and time again that I’m anti-chivalry, and I practice it in real life too. Doesn’t mean I call talk random shit to wolfe, and call sony a “jew”. You’re the emotwat here who kisses men to test your “bicuriosity” and worships Uncle Adolfs cock.

I’ll give you a hint: You’re nothing like Hitler, the alpha male war hero with charisma to change the world. You’re one of the bisexual mentally disturbed sicophants who would follow him. Hitler used his God given talent to do terrible things, probably because he was obsessed with theater and the 50% homosexual SA/SS were always fawning over his every need.

@Wolfe - I strongly support you. Wolfe, you have a strong, good soul. Though we may disagree on “high level” political solutions, I think our “low level” values are more alike than we may realize.

You were absolutely correct in your other posts - about not siding with evil men, even if evil men are on your own side.

The inalienable human spirit trumps all else. Humanness and goodness of soul trumps even the most superior abilities of mind or body.

@P. Coderich - you are very intelligent - but you are neither a man nor libertarian.

My hope for you is that you toss the (thoroughly disproven) “jews rule the world” conspiracy theories. You will simply grow old, outcast, wasted like all of the neo-nazi losers out there, who instead of channeling their rage and intelligence correctly - towards rational, ethical change - they simply wind up destroying innocent lives - theirs, their families, the lives of their victims and their families…

Come over to the good side my friend. I empathize with your rage and concerns, which is why you need to channel your brilliant mind into real change - we need you on the good side - to fight against an oppressor - not to become one ourselves.

@All - perhaps I myself gave all of you the impression that I too was a hypocritical libertarian - that I want to reduce women to animal status just like P Cod would to the Jews. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I love women - I was a feminist when I was younger, a liberal. I simply wish for them to live up to the feminist dream of true equality - to understand that truly being equal in a democratic society entails assuming an equal level of responsibility to match rights and opportunities.

I only use hyperbolic “sexist” language to give feminists a look in the mirror - a “bad cop” alter ego - to vent my frustrations against an oppressor of freedom - to show the feminists how it feels to be on the “receiving end”, if you will…

That being said - I deeply admire and respect many women - including libertarian feminists such as the great Camille Paglia - I think she is brilliant - a woman and a lesbian.

I am a true libertarian and an honorable male human, citizen of the world, first and foremost, and will always hold true to my values, no matter how evil someone may be towards me, I will not allow their evil to corrupt my soul.

How could one claim to be a fighter for human liberty .. seek to free an oppressed class .. while seeking to oppress and enslave other members of the human family at the same time !? That type of thinking is nothing more than old school, thuggish, unenlightened, authoritarianism !

son of the suns said:

I was once told that racialism is defined by femininity(BMU has also talked about women using race to divide and conquer) so it makes sense that a proud bisexual like Coderch would be a hardcore racialist. Note I said racialist instead of racist. Racialists generally believe that the West is not about democracy and Christiandom, but of the white race alone. And that Christianity is a jew invented disease meant to wipe whites out. What separates racialists from racists is racists like Hitler want the whole world white, whereas racialists just want the West.

Now that we’ve got the semantics explained, I kindly invite Coderch to fuck off the site and go to some sites of his bretheren, like majorityrights.com or nationalvanguard or whatever the fuck you like.

You keep hating other men and we’ll be facing the real enemy.

PS: Wolfe has no daughters for you to harass you dense fuck.

Oh, and by the way, retard, racialists would make most of you chivalrous morons very happy, since they believe in protecting and pampering women and keeping them as only as breeders. No: feminism is an infection bestowed upon the Society by JEWISH intellectuals to disrupt traditional gender roles. As a libertarian, I see nothing wrong with that, but the Jewish intellectuals essentially advocated giving women all the rights with noen of the responsabilities, with their discourse about the “Patriarchy”, and so on. You are a moron.

P Coderch

abaddon_fff said:

This has gone on far enough. There’s a rather large difference between being RESPECTFUL of others, and being submissive. It’s called being an adult. Do you honestly think that words are that hurtful or do anything at all? Or your insults that great? Please, spare me your childlike attempts at being witty P Coderech i’ve heard it all before.

What you’re doing is pretty childish and like a child disruptive and wasteful. So you don’t like Wolfe or Sony, so fucking what? Get on with it. This little flame war is nothing more than a waste of time. You claim you’re a Man, and i’ll give you that, however you’re not acting much like one at all.

-Strength and Honor-

Bla bla bla bla…all this babbling and you have accomplished nothing more than to make me even more determined to continue to do exactly what I’m doing.

P Coderch

son of the suns said:

I was once told that racialism is defined by femininity(BMU has also talked about women using race to divide and conquer) so it makes sense that a proud bisexual like Coderch would be a hardcore racialist. Note I said racialist instead of racist. Racialists generally believe that the West is not about democracy and Christiandom, but of the white race alone. And that Christianity is a jew invented disease meant to wipe whites out. What separates racialists from racists is racists like Hitler want the whole world white, whereas racialists just want the West.

Now that we’ve got the semantics explained, I kindly invite Coderch to fuck off the site and go to some sites of his bretheren, like majorityrights.com or nationalvanguard or whatever the fuck you like.

You keep hating other men and we’ll be facing the real enemy.

PS: Wolfe has no daughters for you to harass you dense fuck.

Too bad Hitler failed to gass your ancestors, so that you could come here and harass Real Men, like yours truly, with your Jewish feminist bullshit. Furthermore, your definition of racialism is incorrect. And finally, you dumb turd, I have already stated repeatedly that I’m not bisexual: I WISH I were bisexual. As for the daughter thing, moron, it was him who said that he had a daughter.

P Coderch

I was once told that racialism is defined by femininity(BMU has also talked about women using race to divide and conquer) so it makes sense that a proud bisexual like Coderch would be a hardcore racialist. Note I said racialist instead of racist. Racialists generally believe that the West is not about democracy and Christiandom, but of the white race alone. And that Christianity is a jew invented disease meant to wipe whites out. What separates racialists from racists is racists like Hitler want the whole world white, whereas racialists just want the West.

Now that we’ve got the semantics explained, I kindly invite Coderch to fuck off the site and go to some sites of his bretheren, like majorityrights.com or nationalvanguard or whatever the fuck you like.

You keep hating other men and we’ll be facing the real enemy.

PS: Wolfe has no daughters for you to harass you dense fuck.