Space…the Male Frontier

If you’re anything like me, you have never asked yourself why a woman has never been to the moon because the answer is obvious.

Actually, the answer may surprise you.

The male instinct is a good one — it’s solid when the chips are down, and in this case it tells us men that women have never been to the moon because the moon is chalk full of science — like a robot, the natural enemy of womankind (both technology and robots). This is absolutely true, however, only true in the way that there are no unicorns underwater. Yes, unicorns cannot breathe water, but they also do not fucking exist. So what are we talking about here.

The real reason that women have never been to the moon has very little to do with their astounding ability to turn even the simplest of technologies into a catastrophic fucking unsolvable mystery on par with Stonehenge.

Remember the last time you were making some hot-hot jokes around a woman or womans, or the last time you were enjoying a cinematographic masterpiece like Die Hard 3, Payback, or The South Park Movie — or any other time that you were trying to mind your own fucking business?

Well what happened?

That’s right, said woman or womans ruined it with a torrent of shitty comments and/or nay saying. Perhaps something like, “Nicolas Cage thinks he’s so great” (in a sarcastic tone though. Nicholas Cage only thinks he’s so great because he’s fucking awesome), or maybe a “those are fake”, “you only think you’re funny”, or a “cigarettes cause cancer”.

Cigarettes cause cancer? No shit, I didn’t know that. Guess what talking any more during Face Off causes?

Can you imagine this manner of hijink aboard the USS Space Ship to the moon?

That’s why women will never go to the moon, because of their piss-poor, wet-blanket attitudes.

Related Articles:

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

RSS feed | Trackback URI

616 Comments in 516 threads.»

Pages: [26] 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 161 » Show All

Comment by OffMyBallsBitch
2009-06-18 18:31:34 - IP Man-Hash: 3c2345abf352d

Feminism:

——————————————————————— ��—-

“All men are good for is fucking, and running over with a truck”.
Statement made by A University of Maine Feminist Administrator

“Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience.”
Catherine Comin, Vassar College. Assistant Dean of Students.

“I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that
the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is
oppressing them.” — Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.
——————————————————————— ��——-

According to the US Department of Justice, 70% of confirmed cases of child abuse and 65% of parental murders of children are committed by mothers, not fathers.

To get the universal “1 in 4″ rape stat. feminists turn a consensual act–drinking and having sex–into Rape!.

Mary Koss who was sponsored by Ms. magazine spurred this hoax and by her definition of rape a large percentage of college men are raped too.

*** Stop The Hate Against Men ***

——————————————————————————-

Wimmin, head like your hole, I’d rather die than give you cuntrol!

Without men, the world would scratch it’s own eyes out blaming men even still for not saving them from their Princess Syndrome pathetic Ms. selves.

Comment by sarah
2009-07-03 01:44:00 - IP Man-Hash: 73bab3d0e3608

where do you get your facts, the bureo of delusion.

 
 
Comment by A
2009-06-16 19:25:37 - IP Man-Hash: 2c268e21c12f7

lol…ur pretty good sir..i do have 2 agree with u on most things…but wat about women like the girl who invented mercury?…i think it was Meri Curi?

Anyway….do u think that there r exceptions?….good job BTW

Comment by Manoverse
2009-06-16 19:49:16 - IP Man-Hash: 8c29564ca60ca

Keep in mind, the bitch died from it. And she didn’t invent mercury, she “discovered” it. Mercury is a natural element, occurs in nature.

Comment by killinmachine
2009-06-17 13:35:50 - IP Man-Hash: f14761125546a

I never even heard of a woman discovering mercury, but if she died from it… HAHA! Take that bitch!

 
 
 
Comment by Manly McBalls
2009-05-21 13:33:42 - IP Man-Hash: 6cce0e584b897

if i can recall, were try to get women impregnated in space, not your male fantasies of rough hairy butt sex

Comment by cuntknocker
2009-05-21 16:03:00 - IP Man-Hash: 28bf00c4f7fa8

Given the effect on astronauts’ health, (search NASA’s Life Sciences Data Archive) I imagine space would be a bad environment for a developing fetus and a pregnant woman.

 
 
Comment by Rastaban
2009-04-13 13:50:22 - IP Man-Hash: 61e3056fbc52a

“…piss-poor, wet-blanket attitude.”

Projection.

 
Comment by hermes
2009-04-10 23:15:03 - IP Man-Hash: 6c15c6e5e738c

wow. all this hatred for women. im sure you all hate your mothers too. looks to me like your a bunch of cock loving faggots. you dont need women. just some faggots butthole. nice choice smello.

Comment by Bob
2009-04-10 23:22:19 - IP Man-Hash: 353c85c1948ee

Wow. How original.

Comment by Bob
2009-07-03 01:37:21 - IP Man-Hash: d15d62a58fe78

Damn I’m just like a zombie.What’s wrong with me?

Comment by chris
2009-07-03 01:52:07 - IP Man-Hash: 73bab3d0e3608

what you need to do is develop a hatred of women so you can stop being a happy reasonable person and start seeing red everytime a woman drives a car or is wearing a ring, then you can be a miserable angry fuck like myself and be dicks personal policeman and call women names evertime they piss you off.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by micho
2009-04-11 10:44:02 - IP Man-Hash: 4f170a2732404

Should a man accept whatever the woman says or does; otherwise he would be a gay or woman-hater? This is the most retarded way of thinking, which MOST women show when they enter this site. I wonder how come women say they are equal to the man when they are so much small-brained!

 
Comment by micho
2009-04-11 10:47:53 - IP Man-Hash: 4f170a2732404

The woman, because of her small brain, would take her a long time to understand the reasons behind compliments and critiques (the same as it takes her a long time to know how to drive a car).

In the past, yes, the woman used to be complimented. But there was a reason for this. She was feminine, NOT ONLY by makeup and dressing, but in feelings. Now that the woman says she is “equal” to the man (which of course is wrong, but supposedly), why would the man still treat her like in the past. Doesn’t she say I don’t want to be like my grandmother, and want to work like the man? So, why would this narrow-mind of her then make her expect being complimented?

 
Comment by James
2009-04-12 12:39:46 - IP Man-Hash: a49f5cd8d5d77

Why hermes? I don’t see how the god of theives and travelers has anything to do with this…

 
Comment by Women_suck
2009-05-27 13:07:23 - IP Man-Hash: a0d25bc092cba

women suck. you (a woman) suck and your mom sucks bitch

 
 
Comment by chersmarty
2009-04-05 22:44:22 - IP Man-Hash: fd3f178e32dfd

i can’t actually tell if these posts are jokes or if these men are actually sexist bigots.. i like to think the posts are jokes because as a female i can laugh at prior social prejudices against my sex and personally do not agree with full equality for men and women, mainly because women are not biologically as able to do the same things men are. it has nothing to do with intellectual prowess, as women and men have proven throughout history to be on equal intellectual ground, but physically women are not going to be able to do the same jobs as men in the same way. although i disagree that it is because we are wet blankets and ruin all your fun, i did take that to be somewhat in jest.

Comment by Bob
2009-04-05 23:00:27 - IP Man-Hash: 7f8d5b0d7e896

I really wish people would “oppress” me by buying me fur coats,exotic foods and beverages, and diamond jewelry I did nothing to earn.Sign me up for some of that sweet,sweet “prejudice”.

“it has nothing to do with intellectual prowess, as women and men have proven throughout history to be on equal intellectual ground…”

That’s laughable. Point me to the equal numbers of great female mathematicians and philosophers that represent your sex’s “equal contribution” to human knowledge.

Comment by thelowerdepths
2009-04-06 14:57:17 - IP Man-Hash: 3018e7113c5fd

Looking at much of human history women were not allowed to be educated and if they wanted to they had to do it in secret. And who were they hiding from? Men. You guys seem just as useless to men as feminists seem to women. Masculinists.

Comment by micho
2009-04-11 10:54:48 - IP Man-Hash: 4f170a2732404

False. Women DID have the right to be educated, and many past authors were women. It is women who prefer the literature and art fields over the science, not because someone orders her to choose this or that field. Even today, most women still prefer this.

On the other hand, in the past education was difficult for everybody, not just the woman, because of the rare schools and thus one had to travel for long distances even for elementary studies.

We’re not against women; we are against the feminists. Feminists are against women and men, and we are pro-both sexes. However, this cannot be achieved unless we promote the suitable role for each sex instead of lying at people and telling them that both sexes are equal.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Bob
2009-04-11 12:24:07 - IP Man-Hash: e16cbe3e2dac0

The truth is, rich women had the same opportunities for education as rich men.

ALL poor people,men and women, were uneducated. Women actually had a BETTER shot at improving their standard of life, because they could “marry up”. Men have never had that option.

If I were a dumbshit,like our friend “thelowerdepths” , I would claim that women were oppressing us by not marrying poor men.However, being a man, I realize that this is simply the way the world works and I’m not really concerned about it.

 
Comment by micho
2009-04-11 13:49:19 - IP Man-Hash: 4f170a2732404

Exactly, Bob. We, as men, never expect to enhance our levels through women, but women do, and that’s why they keep blaming men for everything, even losing sleep.

 
 
 
 
Comment by .. .
2009-06-24 08:53:39 - IP Man-Hash: ba0a6cee78914

“as women and men have proven throughout history to be on equal intellectual ground”

…Right.
Discoveries made by men: All that you see around you.
Discoveries made by women: Ermmm… Mercury?

 
 
Comment by i like to party?
2009-04-05 20:34:35 - IP Man-Hash: 169496598d28d

im the shit

Comment by i like to party?
2009-07-02 19:06:23 - IP Man-Hash: d15d62a58fe78

As in the kind that comes out of your ass!wooh I rock this bitch site!

 
 
Comment by Monsieur Chauvin
2009-04-04 14:12:17 - IP Man-Hash: ee0e5692e14ed

In the distant evolutionary past, as well as in all pre-industrial, agricultural societies, men who possessed high levels of physical strength, athletic prowess, natural aggression, and dominance, were those deemed most capable of providing for and defending a woman and her children. In an age where might made right and tilling the land for sustenance involved an incredible amount of physical strength, it made perfect evolutionary sense for a woman to choose a warrior or a really tough “bad boy”. A scholar, a poet, or a philosopher would stand no chance before a horde of wandering barbarians, unpaid soldiers, and merciless nomads, enabling the woman and her children to be slaughtered in cold blood. However, if a woman selected a man who was known for having an aggressive, violent, even murderous temperament, she was simply making a long-term investment in the eventual success of her future reproductive strategy. Secondly, it also made sense for women to choose “bad boys” over “nice guys” (unless they were members of the aristocracy) given the rudimentary technology and high levels of physical strength and aggression involved in providing for a family; accordingly, really tough “bad boys” were much more successful hunters, farmers, defenders, and killers.

Even today, in a world where women are physically weaker and less aggressive than men and often subject to the greater violence and cruelty of dominant males, it still makes sense for a woman to select “tough guys” over “nice guys” (unless they happen to be financially well-off). Hundreds of thousands of women are often raped, tortured, mutilated, and even brutally killed each year, especially in Third World countries, making it necessary for a substantial percentage of women to follow their primitive evolutionary drives and value having physical strength and a violent temperament in a male sex partner, especially when financial wealth is very scarce.

Furthermore, the 1979 “sexy sons” hypothesis developed by a team of evolutionary biologists named Weatherhead and Robertson, postulates that a man’s ability to provide for his wife and children is irrelevant to his genetic value as a potential father of viable offspring. Women would select an “attractive” male (a “bad boy”) on the basis of such testosterone-related features as physical strength, athletic prowess, bilateral symmetry, aggression, dominance, masculinity and social presence, as opposed to the weakness and kindness of “unattractive”, more feminised males (”nice guys”). Thus, taking the laws of genetic transmission into account, selecting “bad boys” as potential mates would produce more “bad boys” who would be just as tough as their fathers and able to compete against other “bad boys” in the struggle for reproductive access to available females. From an evolutionary biological point of view, “nice guys” would not be considered attractive partners because they would be publicly humiliated, beaten up, and even killed by rival dominant males, making the woman unable to pursue a viable reproductive strategy.

It is the dysgenic effects of female reproductive choice which necessitate male patriarchal control being exercised over female socio-sexual behaviour. Women are irrational, hysterical beings of low intelligence who act almost completely under the influence of their hormones; we cannot give the human female a free hand over the destiny of mankind. Therefore, I propose that a regime of scientific eugenics be substituted for female reproductive choice, so that womankind will no longer be able to select brawn over intelligence, and mankind will be gradually improved from generation to generation.

Comment by Bob
2009-04-04 14:53:57 - IP Man-Hash: 7f8d5b0d7e896

“Therefore, I propose that a regime of scientific eugenics be substituted for female reproductive choice, so that womankind will no longer be able to select brawn over intelligence, and mankind will be gradually improved from generation to generation.”

I agree,but I believe both brawn AND intelligence should be selected for,with slightly more emphasis on intelligence.

 
 
Comment by Bryan
2009-03-19 16:21:37 - IP Man-Hash: 3d092cfad4f13

Agreed. Most females are hypocrites, in any scenario in the first place.

 
Comment by Jordan
2009-03-13 22:46:12 - IP Man-Hash: a07479b46cad4

616 word paragraph, and 2556 characters of meaningless banter, back to public school for you

 
Comment by Sian
2009-01-25 19:20:29 - IP Man-Hash: 68454b8e55784

I have been reading through most of this stuff, specially the parts about “women never inventing anything” and “women not being able to go to the moon”.

Women haven’t invented anything “amazing” because they’ve never had the chance. It’s always been “men above women” which in my opinion and many others is wrong.

Its not because women talk during movies, that has to be the stupidest reason i’v ever heard. It’s because women have been be littled by men.
It’s kind of like racism, black people get less advantages, not because their stupid, or annoying, or say stupid shit, its because their black. It’s fucking radiculous.

Comment by jake
2009-01-29 16:53:13 - IP Man-Hash: cf746cc7e33b9

so right

 
Comment by Joseph James Frantz
2009-01-29 17:07:00 - IP Man-Hash: c4c42f0c648b0

-==-Women haven’t invented anything “amazing” because they’ve never had the chance. It’s always been “men above women” which in my opinion and many others is wrong.-==-

Men have always been ABOVE women, which is just another way of saying that men are better than women. So you agree. Excellent.

However, the claim that women did not invent because they were HELD DOWN by men is bullocks. MOST inventors, MOST men who have accomplished ANYTHING have done so AGAINST GREAT ODDS. Among those odds in MOST CASES was an ENTIRE SOCIETY telling them THEY COULD NOT DO IT. Laws and customs were DESIGNED to THWART these men. Did this PREVENT them from inventing or ACCOMPLISHING OTHER GREAT THINGS?

Fuck no. Why? Because when women face confrontation they SHUT DOWN. When men face it, WE EXCEL.

It’s like the broads complaining on this TV show I saw once. “Women weren’t in the military because they weren’t ALLOWED. They were PREVENTED from being warriors!” HELLO you dipshit. A WARRIOR is a person (actually a man) that FIGHTS. No one says, you CAN’T to a mother fucker that can kick their ever luvin asses. The conclusion? Women weren’t warriors because they COULD NOT be warriors.

Just like they cannot do just about everything else. Today’s MODERN ENTITLED western woman is the MOST ENTITLED BEING IN HISTORY. She has at her disposal resources such as have never been available and are STILL not available to most INCLUDING WESTERN MEN. Title VII makes sure she gets a job EVEN if not qualified. The Ledbetter Act will ensure that she gets paid AT LEAST AS MUCH AS a man, EVEN if her PERFORMANCE is LOWER than his. She has GRANTS and LOANS available which NO ONE has in this country alone.

And STILL women fail in great numbers. Men sure the fuck aren’t HOLDING WOMEN DOWN anymore. In fact we NEVER did. We’ve ALWAYS been the ones dying and PROTECTING women.

So come back with some more fairy tales.

Or better yet fuck off this website.

Men are better than broads.

Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 06:32:14 - IP Man-Hash: e7a817ccd436d

You are dead wrong you putrid fucking nerd. There are women inventors. Women have invented some pretty cool shit. Here is an example.

“In 1845, Sarah Mather received a patent for the invention of a submarine telescope and lamp. This was a remarkable device that permitted sea-going vessels to survey the depths of the ocean.”

Google women inventors for more you sorry excuse for a man.

Comment by RB
2009-01-30 07:02:21 - IP Man-Hash: d3b419a3ea491

Wow, yeah….submarine telescopes were absolutely INGENIOUS! (or something…)

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 07:11:00 - IP Man-Hash: fe1128175b248

Well dipshit I am sure those in the submarine found them handy. What have you invented lately. Go masterbate in a sock you fucking tard.

 
Comment by Joseph James Frantz
2009-01-30 07:29:45 - IP Man-Hash: 3339fb85335a1

You are really obsessed with our sexuality. That’s not going to interest us in fucking you.

How much do you weigh?

 
Comment by RB
2009-01-30 07:34:15 - IP Man-Hash: d3b419a3ea491

“Well dipshit I am sure those in the submarine found them handy.”

Really? No, no, no, I don’t think so.

“What have you invented lately.”

A way to shut broads like you the fuck up. And I’m not going to share it with anyone because I’m very selfish.

“Go masterbate in a sock you fucking tard.”

A sock? Why, that’s a novel idea! Did you invent it?

 
Comment by Stan the Man
2009-01-30 14:47:31 - IP Man-Hash: 61d1f2aa6cb60

So let me get this straight. She basically attached a flashlight to a telescope? WHAT A BRILLIANT INVENTION. I guess that makes the all time score 1-1,000,000? Oh, and you just proved the other manginas and cunts here wrong on their bullshit claim that “women never had the opportunity to invent anything.” This proves that women have had the opportunity since at least 1845, but probably always–they just don’t have the ability to.

QED, bitch.

 
Comment by Jordan
2009-03-13 23:04:35 - IP Man-Hash: a07479b46cad4

so the man invented the flashlight, and the telescope, and didnt have time to patent the rest, so he gave it to idea to a woman to patent

 
 
Comment by Joseph James Frantz
2009-01-30 07:26:04 - IP Man-Hash: 3339fb85335a1

Actually she received a PATENT on ONE TYPE of submarine telescope. They ALREADY existed at the time.

If you understood how the patent system worked, then and now, you would understand that CHANGES to an EXISTING invention can be patented.

I’ve already done ACCURATE research into this, no need to spend time googling, what I ALREADY know and you DO NOT.

How much do you weigh?

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 12:52:06 - IP Man-Hash: 0ebae4cdfdaa2

Oh go suck it James. As if I fuckin care who made what. I am simply saying that women have invented things.

How much do I weigh?? Not that it is any of your business but I weigh 140lbs.

How small is your wang?????

 
Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 12:57:39 - IP Man-Hash: 0ebae4cdfdaa2

Oh yeah and I am 5′ 11″ with long black hair and hazel eyes. I have a masters degree in nursing. I am flight nurse who specializes in trauma. All the folks in my chopper are chicks even the pilot. Better hope you never get into a bad wreck in my neck of the woods or you will be treated by WOMEN ohhhhh noooooooo! Have a nice day and go fuck yourself.

 
Comment by Unlimited-Misogyny
2009-01-30 13:07:25 - IP Man-Hash: ecca301c6a470

Kelly, you are an ignorant, nasty cunt with no manners whatsoever. Judging from your spelling and punctuation, I find it highly unlikely that you possess a master’s degree in anyhting, other than stroking that disgusting, fish-smelling cunt of yours. Go roast in hell, you frigid bitch.

 
Comment by Joseph James Frantz
2009-01-30 13:11:21 - IP Man-Hash: 3339fb85335a1

Again you prove my point. Good attitude for a nurse to have. Gentlemen take note.

I am Irish toots, so I have a small dick. On a good day it is one and a half inches. On a better day it is one inch. Irish men have to compensate, because as a race, we have tiny cocks. The deities did this because they knew we had over inflated egos. So they had to do SOMETHING to make other men a bit more equal to us.

Of course you don’t care who made what. You only care that women invented things. Except, MAKING those things first IS the inventing. THAT’S the meaning of the feckin’ word. But even then you are wrong, women have not invented. They have ONLY ADDED CHANGES (little ones at that) to EXISTING inventions.

Now about your Height/weight ratio, once again gentlemen I stand CORRECT. As we all knew I would Kelly, your OPINION is wrong, but we don’t mind DISSENTING opinions. However, your TYPING and GRAMMAR and WRITING STYLE is MOSTLY correct. Which, combined with your answer and EXPERIENCE from other posters, thin women write better than fat women.

 
Comment by Joseph James Frantz
2009-01-30 13:17:33 - IP Man-Hash: 3339fb85335a1

Except for Grace Murray Hopper, that Irish bitch invented some serious shit. I’d bang her if she were still around. (And she had a note from her doctor.)

 
Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 13:19:57 - IP Man-Hash: acc0cf203def3

Oh excuse me for not being so polite ladies. Also, please excuse any typos that I may have had. Unlimited, if you did not notice my master’s degree is in nursing not fucking English.

I have a great attitude that I enjoy every day. Sorry, but it is my day off and I could give a shit about “nursing” your egos.

As to my manners… well stick it up your ass! How is that for manners? I may be a frigid cunt with a stinky pussy, but it is one more pussy that you will not be getting, but I am guessing you are used to that by now.

Oh and by the way Unlimited you over use comas. If in doubt leave it out!

 
Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 13:25:23 - IP Man-Hash: acc0cf203def3

Dear James,

Don’t forget Herminie Cadolle she thought up the bra.

Here are some others for ya tiny dong:

http://www.women-inventors.com/

 
Comment by RB
2009-01-30 13:42:11 - IP Man-Hash: 8788a8331710b

^^^^Wut A sToOpId CuNt.

 
Comment by Chris
2009-01-30 13:51:56 - IP Man-Hash: 8fdae3316d084

OTTO TITSLING invented the bra.

Yes –>> a MAN named OTTO •TIT• SLING.

Commemorated in popular song, trivia, and cautionary tale, the tortuous history of Otto Titzling (a.k.a. Titsling, Titslinger, Titzlinger) and the invention of the modern brassiere has a lesson to teach us all — though not necessarily the one you might expect.

As the story goes, Otto Titzling, a German immigrant living in New York City circa 1912, was employed at a factory making women’s undergarments when he met an aspiring opera singer named Swanhilda Olafsen. Miss Olafsen, a buxom woman by all accounts, complained to Titzling that the standard corsets in use at the time were not only uncomfortable to wear but failed to provide adequate support where it counted most.

Titzling rose to the challenge. With the help of his trusty assistant, Hans Delving, he set about inventing a new kind of undergarment specifically engineered to meet the needs of the modern woman. The “chest halter” he designed proved to be a brilliant innovation and a commercial success, but our hero neglected to take out a patent, an oversight that would haunt him for the rest of his days.

Otto Titzling vs. Philippe de Brassiere

Enter the flamboyant, French-born fashion designer Philippe de Brassiere, who began ripping off Otto Titzling’s designs and manufacturing competing products in the early 1930s. Titzling sued de Brassiere for patent infringement. In a court battle lasting four years, the two men fought to prove ownership of the concept, facing off in a climactic courtroom “fashion show” in which live models paraded before the judge wearing prototypes by each designer. In the end Titzling lost the case, not only in the court of law but in the court of public opinion, where de Brassiere, with his knack for self-promotion, managed to cement in the public’s mind a lasting connection between the product and his own name.

In the words of songstress Bette Midler, “The result of this swindle is pointedly clear — do you buy a titsling or do you buy a brassiere?”

Titzling died penniless and unappreciated, we are told. But nothing could be further from the truth.

 
Comment by Solomon
2009-01-30 13:53:52 - IP Man-Hash: 829be8a41e45b

Typical woman, whether or not she is a “mile-high nurse” is irrelevant.

She goes on about her qualifications as if that is supposed to get some respect from us–WRONG.

She also tries to set herself up as some sort of caring individual and comes on here and acts like a TOTAL CUNT.

Like I said nurse or not is irrelevant, she’s just a horrible person. Just like all the rest of them.

 
Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 14:02:26 - IP Man-Hash: acc0cf203def3

Soloman you are a waste of a good name.

I was not trying to impress you I just think that it is funny that women can be so accomplished in life save the lives of those with dongs and yet are worthless in your view.

I am caring just not for you.

A horrible person huh. Well I am not the one that hates an entire gender of people.

Chris,

“1889: Corset-maker Herminie Cadolle invents a bra-like garment called “Bien-être” (’Well-Being’.) The garment supports the breasts by the shoulders rather than squeezing them up from below like a traditional corset.”
Notice the date here.

“1912: Garment maker Otto Titzling is said to have develop a bra for buxom singer Swanhilda Olafsen. Swanhilda lived in the same New York boarding house as Otto, and needed a supporting garment. She was the inspiration for Otto’s breakthrough design, but Otto neglected to patent his creation, and therefore lost his chance to be the inventor of the bra.

1913: The first modern bra to be patented was a silk hanky and pink ribbon affair created by New York socialite Mary Phelps Jacob. Mary had bought a sheer evening dress to wear to an event, and at the time, the only undergarment available to her was a corset made with whaleback bones. Mary found that the bones showed through the sheer fabric and created her DIY alternative.

1914: After a year of sharing her creation with friends, Mary Phelps Jacob applies for a patent (under the business name “Caresse Crosby”) on November 3 for her “Backless Brassiere” design. Mary’s “brassiere” was very lightweight, soft, and separated the breasts naturally. Unlike Marie Tucek’s 1893 design, Jacob’s garment did not have cups to support the breasts, but flattened them instead. Jacob markets the “Backless Brassiere” garment until she tires of the business and sells the patent to Warner Brothers Corset Company in Bridgeport, Connecticut, for $1,500. Warner’s reportedly made over $15 million over the next 30 years from the patent.”

Yeah he forgot to patent it. Must have slipped his mind. It appears that everyone wanted in on the tit sling.

 
Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 14:05:43 - IP Man-Hash: acc0cf203def3

“The first modern bra to be patented was a silk hanky and pink ribbon affair created by New York socialite Mary Phelps Jacob.”

Notice she is a woman. Point proven. Women have and do invent things and have the brains to remember to patent them.

 
Comment by Chris
2009-01-30 14:14:36 - IP Man-Hash: 8fdae3316d084

Yeah ok. sweety, you cunts always have to SLEAZE your way into being good for something.

Wow thats something to be proud of.

Mind opening your fucking eyes and taking your head out of your miserable cunt to see what MEN do. No. A man outdid a woman…… didn’t patent the fucking thing…. woman’s pretends to win on a technichality.

try harder bitch.
Or just get fucked.

 
Comment by Chris
2009-01-30 14:16:22 - IP Man-Hash: 8fdae3316d084

Pardon me. I spelled “technicality” incorrectly. I am a man – so let me fix that. There you go, honey.

 
Comment by Joseph James Frantz
2009-01-30 14:31:38 - IP Man-Hash: 3339fb85335a1

Once again those were NOT INVENTIONS. They were MERELY CHANGES to EXISTING things.

Finding new uses or modifying existing things doesn’t count.

Actually your attitude is most important. Because if you are this angry now, and are willing, as you did originally, to use it as some sort of silly empty threat, god help the man you are rescuing.

I do note though that everyone here has noticed you have a clear sexual obsession, particularly with me. It’s alright, I understand, I am difficult for women to resist.

Also this gal demonstrates another theory that I developed years ago and proved many times. Women like this WANT to be dominated. Consider the facts.

A policeman attempts to pull you over. What do you do? Run? Resist? No, you SUBMIT. Why? Because you do not want him to DOMINATE you. So you follow the logical course, submission, which prevents domination.

So too with a woman. She gets up to go into the kitchen, while in there you ask her for a beer. “I’m NOT YOUR FUCKING SLAVE!” is a typical response of the modern woman. Now, SHE knows and YOU know that she IS going to bring you a beer. So why resist? Why not just SUBMIT and bring the damned beer? You’d do it for a friend. Hell you’d do it for her.

Why indeed? Because she wants you to DOMINATE her ass. She wants you to CONTROL her. Her EXTREME reaction is designed by nature to TEST the male, to make him DOMINATE and CONTROL her, proving his strength, which is beneficial to the continuation of the species.

So to with nurse, “I are evil bitch hear me roar” kelly. She is CRYING OUT to be dominated. It’s clear from every post she makes.

What is the matter cupcake, not been spanked lately?

How old are you?

 
Comment by MD
2009-05-17 15:38:22 - IP Man-Hash: d8adaa8aa855f

Oh yeah and I am 5′ 11″ with long black hair and hazel eyes. I have a masters degree in nursing. I am flight nurse who specializes in trauma. All the folks in my chopper are chicks even the pilot. Better hope you never get into a bad wreck in my neck of the woods or you will be treated by WOMEN ohhhhh noooooooo! Have a nice day and go fuck yourself.

Ya, you take care of them long enough for them to get to the fucking DOCTOR, you know, the profession still dominated by men – especially the trauma docs. Nice try. Are you going for your doctorate in nursing too? So you can pretend to be a doctor?

 
 
 
Comment by Fl
2009-04-10 18:33:45 - IP Man-Hash: 409de7f2a3df4

Read the life story about Rosalind Franklin. She was on the verge of discovering the structure of DNA until a couple of slacker scientists stole her work. Francis Crick and James Watson were their names, and they won the Nobel Prize. It should have been Franklin. Just another classic scenario of how many men think taking away credibility from women is justified. Do humanity a favor and go read a book.

Comment by benignbullet
2009-04-10 20:39:00 - IP Man-Hash: 540f95f4d5a0c

Men “stealing” whimmin’s ideas – in the rare instances where such a thing can/could be verified – could statistically be shown to be rare, even yesteryear, if cross-referenced to the achievements between men and whimmin today (where if a man ACTUALLY DID steal a woman’s discovery, patent, or invention, there would be a lawsuit, or at the very least, a “major” news story about it that they’d never let go of – another chance to expose that “evil patriarchy”).

Even with all the impetus, push, prodding to get the ladies into the “hard” sciences, and referencing those areas in which they meet or exceed men’s numbers, the many and major advancements in these fields, ARE STILL coming because of men (so, even with the special push to get the ladies into these fields, and their increasing numbers, MEN are still the major producers – it’s biological proclivity, as men have more gray matter – of the many and major discoveries advancing society). This blows to hell this nonsense about “discrimination,” “oppression,” or “theft,” holding the “ladies” back.

Do us a favor, and get some new material – a blanky, pacifier, and beddy-time story should suffice for now.

space-themalefrontierindeed

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by tom
2009-01-30 00:18:48 - IP Man-Hash: e7d00ca53e76a

You’re a stupid bitch and I hope you die. Back to the kitchen with you.

Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 06:34:02 - IP Man-Hash: e7a817ccd436d

Well the whole fucking world hopes you die you waste of space. Back to hell with you cum wad.

Comment by Joseph James Frantz
2009-01-30 07:27:00 - IP Man-Hash: 3339fb85335a1

Notice that women speak for THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD.

Also notice that she has to revert to sex for an attempted insult. Cum wad, that’s funny, but not insulting.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
Comment by tom
2009-01-30 08:19:29 - IP Man-Hash: e7d00ca53e76a

Aye, I noticed. Can’t insult men on anything other than sex.

And Kelly, what the fuck don’t you understand about BACK TO THE KITCHEN? Make me a sandwich. Ah, hell, never mind that, you’d fuck that up, too.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Joseph James Frantz
2009-01-30 09:22:23 - IP Man-Hash: 3339fb85335a1

Right. Like the ole “you are in your mother’s basement fucking to porn and you have a small dick and you are gay and you are mad cause you can’t get a woman”…

Well first my ma died many moons ago.

Next, I have my own place, not in a basement. I’ve had some pretty nice places to live actually.

I am Irish, so having a small dick is a given. Thus I have to compensate. I do so by fucking hard like a rabbit.

If I am gay, why am I upset that I cannot get a woman?

THAT is the insulting logic of women. In other words, no insult at all.

 
Comment by Muzalon
2009-01-30 12:07:17 - IP Man-Hash: 4aa7d61a4a878

*THAT is the insulting logic of women. In other words, no insult at all.*

And no logic at all…

 
Comment by Kelly
2009-01-30 12:49:31 - IP Man-Hash: 0ebae4cdfdaa2

Well handy tards it was not meant as an insult. As if I really think any of you are capable of being insulted. It takes brains and feelings to be insulted. Neither of which you have.

Tom you don’t notice shit because you have no fucking brain.

Also, fuck off on the whole using sex to insult you. All you lame turds know how to say is cunt, whore, rape, I hate women, and blah bafucking blah.

No one actually cares if you like women or think they are stupid or anything else. We just like to argue with you. It is fun.

Tom, You get in the kitchen and get your own damn sandwich. I could make you one but I would spit in it.

Have fun spending your day in front of the computer talking about hating women. I am going to go live my life even if it is as a lousy woman at least I don’t waste my whole day doing what you asshats do which is nothing significant.

 
Comment by tom
2009-01-30 20:20:55 - IP Man-Hash: e7d00ca53e76a

Well, as the old cadence goes, “Airborne Soldiers jump from planes, we ain’t got no fuckin’ brains!” So she may be right there. Or, you know, we might be making a joke about our willingness to jump out of a moving airplane and into into a firefight. Definitely something I wouldn’t trust a woman to do. She might break a nail, oh, no.

And do you see how she’d fuck up? Spit goes on my cock, not in a sandwich.

And I love the last part – nothing significant? Shit, I fought for fifteen months in a sand swept shithole. I made a difference to the lives of many people in Iraq. The sector of Baghdad we cleared out is now a thriving family-oriented neighborhood rather than the war-torn, al-Qaeda controlled combat zone it was when we got there. I’d call that significant.

And you know who cleared that sector out and helped those families to rebuild? That’s right – MEN. And what happened when men were fighting overseas? That’s right, those cheating whores we left back home left us because we were gone for so long.

So, yeah, women shouldn’t go to war, shouldn’t go to space, and shouldn’t be left alone. They can and do fuck up all of the above. Ought to be put in cages and poked with sticks for a man’s pleasure.

 
Comment by Joseph James Frantz
2009-01-30 21:58:40 - IP Man-Hash: 3339fb85335a1

The last line is just classic Tom. You should add, tape gagged, cause damn, their talkin’ can get annoyin’. One day my good man, one day.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Lol
2009-03-09 12:55:29 - IP Man-Hash: fdad20edfe9d9

No, actually, black people get more advantages and government handouts than white people, and look what they do with these things.

Women and men are equal in the law in today’s society. If they don’t accomplish piss-shit, it’s their fault. Same with a man. Take responsibility for yourselves people. A woman can achieve something if she wants to, tries to, and stops bitching about feminism.

 
Comment by Jordan
2009-03-13 22:36:36 - IP Man-Hash: a07479b46cad4

did your woman help you write this

 
Comment by Jordan
2009-03-13 23:13:31 - IP Man-Hash: a07479b46cad4

I think men invent stuff so the bitch shuts the hell up. unfortunately, the complaining never stops

 
Comment by Trojans
2009-05-28 22:32:43 - IP Man-Hash: 9c6c8524c479b

Fail.

 
 
Comment by Perdition
2008-10-28 14:06:44 - IP Man-Hash: a7bd6238a5dde

Dick for president. Keep preaching the truth.

 
Comment by Liviaanaa
Comment by SnkSht
2008-10-07 00:36:34 - IP Man-Hash: a12f1df1174f0

so did women dipshit.
women believe they are worth something.
strange how people believe such ridiculous things sometimes…

 
Comment by Brent
2008-12-21 22:25:02 - IP Man-Hash: 912e9d2a4f982

Exactly and guess what a man found out it wasn’t.

 
 
Comment by John_Petrucci
2008-09-23 17:40:09 - IP Man-Hash: 05de0fd3c213a

Dude, I just realized…the title of this blog is a knock off of Star Trek! HOLY SHIT I LOVE STAR TREK!!!!!!!! <3333333
LMAO idk I’m bored.

Comment by John_Petrucci
2008-09-24 03:39:22 - IP Man-Hash: 05de0fd3c213a

Gah, posted twice. Whutevah.

Comment by deliafcipe
2009-01-15 21:59:34 - IP Man-Hash: 9076f22cf2281

o rry?

 
 
 
Comment by John_Petrucci
2008-09-23 17:38:00 - IP Man-Hash: 05de0fd3c213a

Dude, I just realized…the title of this blog is a knock off of Star Trek! HOLY FUCKING SHIT I LOVE STAR TREK!!!!!!! <333333
LMAO idk I’m bored.

 
Comment by Jack
2008-08-31 12:17:24 - IP Man-Hash: a673977b0d23a

So…like…what about the women who are microbiologists? They are pretty good at technology. As well as my own wife, who is a computer forensic scientist.

Comment by Common Sense
2008-09-12 11:57:46 - IP Man-Hash: 07e94f0a36e1c

Leave this site you vagina. Just because a forensics lab has to hire females because of this “equal opportunity” bullshit doesn’t mean she does a better job than a man would in her place. Now know yours….and never come back.

 
 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-08-15 13:26:11 - IP Man-Hash: 5b21d905c3469

Every single woman on the surface of the planet deserves to have a vial of sulfuric acid thrown in her face.

Comment by Keb
2008-08-15 13:32:22 - IP Man-Hash: e2169bc81d0d0

Even the women who wear burkhas?

Comment by Commander Scott
2008-08-15 13:35:12 - IP Man-Hash: 5b21d905c3469

Piss off, you frigid cunt. Fuck all women.

Comment by Weph
2008-10-22 17:25:32 - IP Man-Hash: 4329a5675531e

I sincerely hope you are raped one day soon, Commander Scott. Maybe then you’ll understand what it’s like to be abused and opressed.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Grimic
2008-11-10 23:35:33 - IP Man-Hash: fe6a624b13305

You’re so great at making stupid assumptions about people you don’t know, it hurts.

I’m so great at making stupid comments about people who make stupid assumtions about people they don’t know, it feels damn good.

 
 
 
 
Comment by John_Petrucci
2008-09-08 18:12:56 - IP Man-Hash: 05de0fd3c213a

Daaaamn, so HARSH! What is with all these sad, sad, lonely men wishing that women would just “go away”?!

Well, my friend, I hope you find peace with yourself and others soon =)

Comment by Nao_Namorado
2009-05-29 18:57:37 - IP Man-Hash: 69562756c1358

“What is it with all these sad, sad, lonely men wishing that women would just ‘go away?’”

Yeah…but here’s a clue why (among billions of other in-your-face clues): Ever notice that women will bust a hump trying to break into a men’s club…and then once in it declares it in her pompous narcissistic manner, as “lame.”

THAT’S WHY WE CAN’T EVEN LOOK AT YOU ANYMORE. We know you’re walking trouble–with the full force of law and the legal system behind you–with chips on your shoulders like giant sequoias…it’s easy to carry chips like that if you never have to fear getting whacked in the puss for making stupid comments and treating people like shit.

 
 
Comment by Dickhead
2009-05-24 03:01:12 - IP Man-Hash: 5fa452ab0c505

Eew! What good would they be if they were ALL ugly?

 
 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-08-11 12:28:00 - IP Man-Hash: ac8d9b24cf015

All women are sex slaves who have been designed by nature to serve and be obedient.

Comment by SexQueen
2008-08-11 17:38:25 - IP Man-Hash: a875e1b533004

Thats me

Comment by Commander Scott
2008-08-17 17:26:17 - IP Man-Hash: 5b21d905c3469

We know you are, sweetie.

 
 
Comment by anon
2008-09-29 09:02:35 - IP Man-Hash: d12cf541f0413

if they didn’t have a pussy there would be a bounty on all their heads

Comment by Weph
2008-10-22 17:23:33 - IP Man-Hash: 4329a5675531e

Actually, if women didn’t have ‘pussies’, and I assume you mean the female reproductive organs, then humans wouldn’t exist. So no, there wouldn’t be bounties on their heads. Because they wouldn’t exist. Why are men so stupid?

 
 
 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-08-11 12:26:31 - IP Man-Hash: ac8d9b24cf015

Women smell like human feces.

Comment by SexQueen
2008-08-11 17:39:11 - IP Man-Hash: a875e1b533004

Have you tried spraying them with Chanel 5 perfume?

Comment by Commander Scott
2008-08-17 17:28:42 - IP Man-Hash: 5b21d905c3469

A woman sprayed with perfume is like a gold ring in a pig’s snout. You can’t change what is already repulsive by nature.

Comment by Bigben
2008-11-10 23:29:27 - IP Man-Hash: c53c75a00a466

proverbs 11:22, but it specifies that only for women who lack discretion. Dick would probably argue that that encompasses all of them.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by SexQueen
2008-08-10 23:32:16 - IP Man-Hash: a875e1b533004

This is why men are shit. Men have only ever been to the fucking moon. Do you realize this universe is 180+ Billion light years wide? These men cock suckers are unable to go anywhere in it (to look for sexier versions of women to fuck). All they are capable of is staying glued firmly to this rock planet Earth and wiz around like headless chickens looking for something to fuck and ever more increasingly new dull ways to collect more and more pointless paper pictures they have been conned into believing are of worth in order to generate more and more opportunities to fuck. Where’s my fucking time machine you arse holes? I wish to attend a Roman Orgy and inspect Caligula’s cock with the inside of my mouth.
Why can’t these hapless men arseholes travel into outer space and bring back men who can satisfy us by giving us 6 week tantric orgasms? Why haven’t these men arseholes developed the perpetual bliss pill yet? And why have we to wait years and years in order to make things invisible by bending light? What the fuck are you mindless arsehole men thinking about? I want my invisibility now.
Where’s the cure for cancer and the guaranteed group orgasm of infinity after death grand theory of everything? And what the fuck happened before the big bang? And who started all this bullshit? And another thing, this GOD Character couldn’t have created Man in his own image, because (amor est vitae essential) he would have been a fucking man. God created Woman to give men something to fuck all day, life would be so bloody dull without fucking. That said I do love men and my ideal Man would have Bill Gate’s Money, A Black guys thick 12 Incher, Peter North’s cum shots, ………you know the drill……and Dick, go and fall in love with a woman for fucks sake you just might find the sex is 99 trillion times better, you know you’re fucking her because she’s drop dead fucking gorgeous and has the mental toolkit to make your cock throb 24/7.
Jump to it Dick you fucking slacker, LOVE YOU!

Comment by David
2008-08-11 00:03:42 - IP Man-Hash: be6f84448ad27

I don’t believe you know what “tantric orgasms” are. Enjoy your vibrator.

 
Comment by David
2008-08-11 00:05:41 - IP Man-Hash: be6f84448ad27

I will not bother commenting on anything else you said because it made absolutely no sense.

Comment by SexQueen
2008-08-11 00:15:01 - IP Man-Hash: a875e1b533004

You didn’t understand you mean? :)

Comment by Arbalest
2008-08-11 00:54:27 - IP Man-Hash: e09aa08620b52

No he means it made as much sense as a fish with a bike.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by SexQueen
2008-08-11 02:01:27 - IP Man-Hash: a875e1b533004

Can either of you apparent pinheaded redneck keyboard Jockey BOZOS ever make sense of anything? If you have such a hard time fathoming a simple block of text, how do you cope with riding your skateboards? This is a Forum for MEN not tadpoles. Why don’t you crawl back under the sub human rock from whence yee came and reconceptualise your none argument you low fore headed arseholes, I suppose anything outside the realms of hearing “large fries to take!” is a complete enigma to the pair of you. The reason why women are not warmly greeted on this site is that they expose cavemen dweebs like you two for the imbecile arseholes you are.
Happy wanking.

 
Comment by sofie
2008-11-19 14:52:08 - IP Man-Hash: be6818bd850a9

well i didn’t understand a word of the top one either… so i’m guessing its not the boys that are at fault here… its you… you probably don’t even know what your writing yourself. You just thought it would sound good… am i getting close?

 
Comment by Jordan
2009-03-13 22:42:38 - IP Man-Hash: a07479b46cad4

looks like run on sentences, where the fuck is a paragraph seperation when you need one

 
 
 
 
Comment by Enigmers
2008-10-22 14:49:22 - IP Man-Hash: 28ff0e685a87d

Even though men haven’t achieved everything there is to achieve in the universe, we’ve done a hell of a lot more than women have.

 
Comment by Rachael
2009-04-04 20:50:01 - IP Man-Hash: 0b61b2cda0ff9

GOOD GOD. WOMAN, stop speaking. You are embarrassing our entire sex with your idiocy and weird attempts at eroticism.

Gentleman, I apologize.

 
 

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis