Space…the Male Frontier

If you’re anything like me, you have never asked yourself why a woman has never been to the moon because the answer is obvious.

Actually, the answer may surprise you.

The male instinct is a good one — it’s solid when the chips are down, and in this case it tells us men that women have never been to the moon because the moon is chalk full of science — like a robot, the natural enemy of womankind (both technology and robots). This is absolutely true, however, only true in the way that there are no unicorns underwater. Yes, unicorns cannot breathe water, but they also do not fucking exist. So what are we talking about here.

The real reason that women have never been to the moon has very little to do with their astounding ability to turn even the simplest of technologies into a catastrophic fucking unsolvable mystery on par with Stonehenge.

Remember the last time you were making some hot-hot jokes around a woman or womans, or the last time you were enjoying a cinematographic masterpiece like Die Hard 3, Payback, or The South Park Movie — or any other time that you were trying to mind your own fucking business?

Well what happened?

That’s right, said woman or womans ruined it with a torrent of shitty comments and/or nay saying. Perhaps something like, “Nicolas Cage thinks he’s so great” (in a sarcastic tone though. Nicholas Cage only thinks he’s so great because he’s fucking awesome), or maybe a “those are fake”, “you only think you’re funny”, or a “cigarettes cause cancer”.

Cigarettes cause cancer? No shit, I didn’t know that. Guess what talking any more during Face Off causes?

Can you imagine this manner of hijink aboard the USS Space Ship to the moon?

That’s why women will never go to the moon, because of their piss-poor, wet-blanket attitudes.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

493 Comments in 492 threads.»

Pages: « 2511 10 9 8 7 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Female
2006-08-13 13:58:26

Sonyad, the reason I post directly is because my accounts are blocked so I can’t login. I understand it’s irritating to you to have my comments suddenly interrupt a sequence but that’s something you’ll have to speak to dickhead about.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-08-13 13:54:35

Female’s posts are moderated because if she’s left on her own, she comes in and just talks about her day or her childhood non-stop. You know, things no one gives any fuck about.

She’s a complete waste of time.

-Dick

 
Comment by Billy
2006-08-13 12:13:17

Female said:

Sonyad, they either get displayed or they don’t, they don’t get edited. In saying that though, you’ve probably unwittingly just given Dick an idea and no doubt he will edit my next post..which is this one.

I don’t see any nasty, explicit words or anything.

That’s because they don’t contain any. Dick’s just an nice guy. Oops.

I am curios how you came about those numbers, though. Both of them.

I’m psychic.
You mean psycho!!!

Thought I would help you out here.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-13 09:46:08

[...]he will edit my next post..which is this one[...]

Messing with the space-time continuum again, are we Female?

I’m psychic.

That would explain your figures being off by 3 and 15 years, respectively.

Regarding your posts being delayed pending moderation. Permit me elaborate. What I meant was that your posts pop up between other posts at a later time and that it’s quite easy to miss them and not reply, inadvertently. The delay is obviously due to their having been moderated and approved for display, with or without editing. Maybe you should try logging in instead of just posting directly.

Now on to Luka.

There is nothing wrong with being twenty three or five, sonyad.

Luka, you are telling me this… why? Thank you for stating the obvious, though.

Seriously now, you 2 ladies can be quite entertaining word sparring partners. Most enjoyable.

 
Comment by Luka
2006-08-13 02:57:26

There is nothing wrong with being twenty three or five, sonyad.

A child of five would understand this.

Send someone to fetch a child of five. (Groucho Marx quote)

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-13 02:00:23

Sonyad, they either get displayed or they don’t, they don’t get edited. In saying that though, you’ve probably unwittingly just given Dick an idea and no doubt he will edit my next post..which is this one.

I don’t see any nasty, explicit words or anything.

That’s because they don’t contain any. Dick’s just an asshole. Oops.

I am curios how you came about those numbers, though. Both of them.

I’m psychic.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-13 01:24:34

Female, your posts have a habbit of springing up on me. Awaiting moderation and all.

I find it baffling how you manage to write so many of your posts in a manner that they’re found to require and be pending moderation. I don’t see any nasty, explicit words or anything. Then again, they’ve been through moderation for me to read.

Who knows what was in there. Wolfe somehow seems to see some merit in them, at least.

I am curios how you came about those numbers, though. Both of them.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-08-12 23:33:39

Sorry for what Wolfe?

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-12 16:04:19

Meh. Luka’s comments here are the least of what she’s contributed to the site, and Female’s are… well, not awful. They’d be extremely good, but for the “2+3=5″ line.

That said, Luka’s “fact” vs “opinion” on mabtw is quite correct as an argument and well within the realm of view of this site.

After very careful consideration I believe her (implied) views to be wrong, and of course Dick argues in concordance.

But she’s succinct and not innaccurate in what she states.

I’ll summarize it fast. The best men are better than the best women. This is fact. The worst men are much, much worse (and much more numerous) than the worst women. This is also fact. Stats show this.

Doesn’t in my own (religious warning alert) view make anyone less beloved before God, or worthy of respect. To the degree I’ve failed to recognize this in my own life, I’m very sorry.

Best,
-wolfe

 
Comment by Billy
2006-08-12 12:13:52

diamatik said:

Women are so ungrateful.

This is one of most truthful statements ever written.

It makes me sad though when I think about how bad women suck as people.

 
Comment by Luka
2006-08-12 10:13:45

Yes.

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-12 02:58:08

then again maybe he’s 2+3=5.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-12 02:34:29

Answer with a question. I shall reciprocate.

Why are you older? Why do you have a fat arse?

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-12 00:17:40

Because he’s 23.

 
Comment by Luka
2006-08-11 17:24:03

Why do you want to know if I date younger guys?

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-11 17:21:42

Stir what? Do you date younger guys?

 
Comment by Luka
2006-08-11 17:20:30

I am not here to stir trouble, Sonyad, I hope you are not either.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-11 10:11:01

Luka, I have a pigeon hole befitting a rumplable plump arse ready for you. Just need a huge pie hole to go with it. What d’you say?

 
Comment by Luka
2006-08-11 07:14:27

diamatik, you can drop this baiting routine now. It is obvious what you are trying to achieve with it. I can tell you now that it is not going to work on me - so it is not worth trying.

 
Comment by diamatik
2006-08-11 07:00:26

Women are so ungrateful.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis