Space…the Male Frontier

If you’re anything like me, you have never asked yourself why a woman has never been to the moon because the answer is obvious.

Actually, the answer may surprise you.

The male instinct is a good one — it’s solid when the chips are down, and in this case it tells us men that women have never been to the moon because the moon is chalk full of science — like a robot, the natural enemy of womankind (both technology and robots). This is absolutely true, however, only true in the way that there are no unicorns underwater. Yes, unicorns cannot breathe water, but they also do not fucking exist. So what are we talking about here.

The real reason that women have never been to the moon has very little to do with their astounding ability to turn even the simplest of technologies into a catastrophic fucking unsolvable mystery on par with Stonehenge.

Remember the last time you were making some hot-hot jokes around a woman or womans, or the last time you were enjoying a cinematographic masterpiece like Die Hard 3, Payback, or The South Park Movie — or any other time that you were trying to mind your own fucking business?

Well what happened?

That’s right, said woman or womans ruined it with a torrent of shitty comments and/or nay saying. Perhaps something like, “Nicolas Cage thinks he’s so great” (in a sarcastic tone though. Nicholas Cage only thinks he’s so great because he’s fucking awesome), or maybe a “those are fake”, “you only think you’re funny”, or a “cigarettes cause cancer”.

Cigarettes cause cancer? No shit, I didn’t know that. Guess what talking any more during Face Off causes?

Can you imagine this manner of hijink aboard the USS Space Ship to the moon?

That’s why women will never go to the moon, because of their piss-poor, wet-blanket attitudes.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

516 Comments in 501 threads.»

Pages: « 2612 11 10 9 8 [7] 6 5 4 3 21 » Show All

Comment by Oldone
2006-11-11 12:41:16

Jane said: “oi u mean_jake, u fukin lil cock, whats all dis, it would be more peaceful, u dik head, cuz of fukin men, there is no peace on earth!! example: wars and fights…”

And through out history men have gone to war most often for women. A simple thank you would have sufficed.

- Oldone

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-11 12:34:32

Yes, mostly only those who fought on the Western Front commemorate it, originally as Armistice Day, later as Veteran’s Day (US) and Remembrance Day (most of Commonwealth). The Kingdom of Romania was certainly a long-suffering ally in the east in the depressingly named ‘Great’ War to end all Wars; you’d know more than I why Armistice Day isn’t commemorated there.

Nevertheless, Jane’s English is sufficiently horrific and incompetent that she is presumably a native speaker; she has no excuse for trashing men and war, on this day of all days.

Adding profound ignorance of her own culture to bigotry does not an excuse make for her.
-wolfe

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-11-11 12:18:42

She has no clue, in all likelyhood. I hadn’t.

- the beloved - sweet harmony

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-11 12:09:14

Ah, it’s lovely to see how Jane commemorates Veteran’s Day/Remembrance Day.

Such grace and class.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Jane
2006-11-11 11:48:58

oi u mean_jake, u fukin lil cock, whats all dis, it would be more peaceful, u dik head, cuz of fukin men, there is no peace on earth!! example: wars and fights, cuz of men, there are innocent people who have died and are dieing cuz ov u!!! it would honestly be more peaceful with out men, cuz woman dont start wars n ballshit!!! men av serously fuked up planet earth and the people. FACE IT, U……AV…FUKED…..UP….EARTH…..AND…..THE….PEAOPLE!!

oh and one last thing, you men moan abou woman moaning, well you are doing exactly the same thing by moaning abou woman moaning!!!!! you really dont realise that!!!

 
Comment by Marcelo Ratz
2006-11-04 01:21:50

women don t need to be good in science and technology, since they are just stupid walking whombs, whose sole purpose is to spread their legs, get pregnant and suck all that males produce with their efforts and intelligence.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-09-21 07:25:23

To each his own. I’m merely awe stricken with the man’s technological accomplishments. I admire technological excellence whatever it’s embodiments. And whatever you’ll say of him, the man truly was an engineering genius. Pity he had to resort to employment under Saddam, and war mongers in general, to merely exercise his formidable talent and passion for the fascinating technology of ballistics.

Though the gun, featuing an ingenious design that allowed constant gradual acceleration of projectile along the full length of the barrel by continuously injecting pressurised gas behind it every so long its length, seems entirely stationary and unmovable/aimable, it might be that it was constructed already facing Israel and as such that course of action was totally appropriate and wise. Though just as well it might not. Don’t know enough to say for certain which is the case.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-09-21 07:02:33

sonyad said:

I dare say that’s what sir Gerald Bull had in mind when he went and built Project Babylon for Saddam. My hat’s off to the man.

Pitty the Jews got spooked and wacked him. Would’ve been interesting to see what even manlier guns he can concoct.

He might even have eventually put NASA out of business.

I hate the ways Jews kill so many people using intelligence aparatus. It’s so passive-agressive and womanly. Is it true that Jewish culture is dominated by cunt? Sad.

When the US kills people, we bomb the fuck out of them, we make it public, we occupy them til we get bored and make an excuse to leave. That’s manly in every way.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-09-21 06:14:10

I find pants’ writing repugnant not so much because of its form so much as because its worthwhile essence. Or rather lack thereof.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-09-21 03:10:56

Sadly, not that common. Gloria Steinem and Jane Fonda seem to dislike it, as they feel it unfairly impugns them.

-wolfe

 
Comment by JD
2006-09-21 02:10:33

That’s tops! Never new that. Is it common nowdays? Dingbat still gets pretty good usage in Oz.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-09-21 01:40:08

‘dingbat’ is also used in the US (pace Archie Bunker).

Could be she just saw lots of All in the Family reruns.
-wolfe

 
Comment by JD
2006-09-20 22:49:12

abaddon_fff, sonyad,

smrtpants is definately an Aussie. It used the word “dingbat” somewhere, aussie slang for idiot (although it’s much more light hearted).

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-09-20 21:52:17

Luka said:

Meh. Another double standard here and something that to me looks to be very strange.

-Not so strange actually.

Sonyad: not a native English speaker = coherent, intelligent, legible, fluid writing. I would mistake him for a native speaker with his command of the English language.

-I agree as as well.

smrtpants: (I am assuming) native English speaker = no paragaphs, terrible use of punctuation, her sentences and ideas are all disjointed and unintelligible - I would mistake her for someone who is not a native speaker at all - either that or someone who hasn’t learnt anything of the English language from school.

-This is another gift from the matriarchy, where we would rather spend more money on women having children, than spend money on children being taught how to be adults (school).

-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by diamatik
2006-09-17 05:26:33

Luka said:

smrtpants: (I am assuming) native English speaker = no paragaphs, terrible use of punctuation, her sentences and ideas are all disjointed and unintelligible - I would mistake her for someone who is not a native speaker at all - either that or someone who hasn’t learnt anything of the English language from school.

Or she could simply be a crack-whore. Do you remember this public service announcement?

 
Comment by Luka
2006-09-16 16:57:21

Meh. Another double standard here and something that to me looks to be very strange.

Sonyad: not a native English speaker = coherent, intelligent, legible, fluid writing. I would mistake him for a native speaker with his command of the English language.

smrtpants: (I am assuming) native English speaker = no paragaphs, terrible use of punctuation, her sentences and ideas are all disjointed and unintelligible - I would mistake her for someone who is not a native speaker at all - either that or someone who hasn’t learnt anything of the English language from school.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-09-16 14:05:23

Also, quite noteworthy how women view taunting a man as womanly as the greatest insult they could possibly render upon his person. Could this possibly denote a form of self loathing on basis of gender, specifically the female one, as mister Masterson contended? I think so. Better still, I believe so.

Long live wisdom and power of observation for they are intrinsic sacrosanct attributes of manhood.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-09-16 13:28:42

There you go, North Bay, Ontario, Canada. Date of Birth: 8 March 1928.

God rest his soul.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-09-16 13:06:40

No. The man was a Canadian, not a born Iraqi. Project Babylon was being built in Iraq under his direct supervision, after his design.

Naturally, at some point in his natural life he must have went to Iraq to do just that. Supervise directly, lest they fuck it up. Don’t you concur, you logically defective birdbrain?

Puss? As in pussy? That’s one thing I can never get enough off. If only it came in gift wrapping complete with sweet loveable bow tie, not bitch package complete with obnoxiousness tartaned with whoredom.

Modern is not necessarily best or even better. Just look at women.

 
Comment by smrtpants
2006-09-16 10:57:09

sonyad said:

I dare say that’s what sir Gerald Bull had in mind when he [went and...this is actually both redundant and repetetive, again] built Project Babylon for Saddam. My hat’s off to the man.

Pit[t; this 't' is yet again redundant and repetitive, and renders the actual word miss. spelled...]y the Jews got spooked and wacked him. Would’ve been interesting to see what even manlier [wtf, 'manlier', puss, you can use much better words than this, maybe not, but i was erring on the side of optimism...] guns he can concoc['k'...i think that a silent 'k' would fit in quite well here...]t.

He might even have [uncle fowler suggests that you switch the order of these words, go on, give it a go and you'll see that it rolls/flows more fluently off of that red car-pet of yours...if you don't believe me you'll have to believe the golden rules of 'modern english usage'; at least you should...] eventually put NASA out of business.

phew…thanks be that this entry of yours wasn’t any longer or i’d have to write-off my time as an exercise in futility, which is all good, but cardio isn’t all there is to having a heart….

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis