http://antimisandry.com/facts-figures/evil-female-rulers-evil-women-ru lers-4151.html

Spaced-TheFemaleFrontier

M.Curie is remembered, we have to give women credit for something now and again, other than giving birth . Stops them nagging for a short time then.

Exactly, on so many levels.

In fact, the U.S. Patent Act of 1790 provided EQUAL opportunity for men and whimmin to submit “inventions” for patent – many of the things you see listed as INVENTIONS were actually just PATENTS given for modifications to design, function, or intended purpose on things which ALREADY existed…OVERWHELMINGLY because of MEN>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
and paper bags, regardless of modifications or improvements to such, exist BECAUSE of MEN>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
in 1852, *SIR* Francis Wolle patented a first-of-its-kind machine for the fabrication of paper bags>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LATER, in 1870, Margret Knight invented a machine for cutting, folding, and pasting paper bag bottoms>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
YES – so many of whimmin’s inventions and patents EXIST because of a MAN’s original ingenuity>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
IN FACT – while few would seriously claim that whimmin haven’t invented anything, the RATIO of male to female invention is so great, and the SOCIETAL SIGNIFICANCE of MEN’s inventions so much greater, that such an assumption hardly constitutes an egregious error.

Poignantly, MEN comprise NINETY-NINE PERCENT of the U.S. Inventors Hall of Fame:
http://www.invent.org/hall_of_fame/1_1_search.asp

The title of this Website isn’t “Men did every great thing; whimmin did nothing.”

It’s “menareBETTERthanwomen.”

Indeed-WhimminAreOutstanding”Fabricators”
WhileMenAreGreatInventors

Invent – “To produce or contrive (something previously unknown) by the use of ingenuity or imagination.” (Source: thefreedictionary.com)

1)The FIRST windshield wipers were brushes, and INVENTED by *MISTER* J.H. Apjohn, in 1903 (LATER that same year, Mary Anderson PATENTED her “invention,” which consisted of materials made possible in their [then] form, because of the capital equipment PREVIOUSLY INVENTED by MEN).

Furthurmore, and in improving the ORIGINAL invention by MISTER J.H. Apjohn, was Dr. Ormand Wall’s creation of our PRESENT and AUTOMATED wiper systems, as HE added an electric motor to it (this made POSSIBLE by MISTER Charles Ketterling’s invention of 1912).

So no; Mary Anderson didn’t INVENT windshield wipers (based on the definition of invent).

She DID conclude that rubber would be a more efficient and effective clearing medium for the glass, but her system required MANUAL operation (so, a MAN conceived the IDEA; and the present system is due to the INGENUITY of MEN).

2)Regarding washing machines – MEN originated the IDEA (invented), and there’s a succession of MEN’S improvements to such WELL BEFORE the first woman to be listed as an “inventor” of them (Josephine Cochran, 1889)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
versus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
various MEN, even before James King, who in 1851 patented the first machine to resemble contemporary units>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
or Hamilton Smith, who patented the rotary washing machine in 1858>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
or William Blackstone, who made the devices convenient for home use, in 1874>>>>>>>>>>>>
or just the fact that>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the CAPITAL EQUIPMENT to fabricate the machine’s parts>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
and the MOTOR to run it>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
and the COMPONENTS themselves>>>>>>>>>>>

all made POSSIBLE and REALITY>>>>>>>>>>>>>

because of MEN.

WhimminDidn’t”Invent”TheseThings

Jj: I could probably write a small book to answer you but the time would likely be wasted. So excuse my lack of education that’ll be evident in my piss poor grammar but I am going to cheat this time so my spelling will be checked at least (pokes his tongue out at snotty). First I’ll let you have this link that the fellas supplied, perhaps you’d take the time to actually read it. http://www.laweekly.com/2008-01-24/news/the-gender-boondoggle/

Second. Are you aware how involved the logistics are to supply any of our nations with the food we need to live. Compared to the WW’s, much more involved. Have you seen women reverse a car? Who’s going to rebuild all the buildings they knock over? Yes I know there are some female lorry drivers, very minimal. What about the shipping and aircraft it takes to help with the supply our nations needs? Again there aren’t nearly enough females to do this. People would be starving very quickly. There are many areas of work the average woman isn’t physically capable of.

Third. Lets talk a little about offices now. A huge portion of the female workforce in any of our nations is right here. I’m guessing now, because I don’t work in an office. What happens when the software gets a bug? Many IT females out there able to fix these problems? Same question with the hardware. So much of the western world is now controlled by the computer. I could sit down and research sciences and other intellectual workplaces. I’m guessing similar could be said. Others here might be more able to answer this already.

Now ignore it if you like, but the fact remains, the vast majority of women work in jobs where their ‘skills’ are best placed. Tapping away at keyboards, sat on their backsides. Often at least half their day will involve talking. If you honestly believe some of the jobs out there that women do are essential to our society you’re deluded. Taxes are simply being wasted on many of the things females do.
Here’s an example from the previous link, Tamara Chick Quote: a woman so key to the department’s goals that she is now in charge of female recruitment.

A job that’s been made purely to try and recruit females. Is there such a position for a man in nursing, to encourage male nurses? My guess would be no. Equality. Really? My view is this is bias, shown in favour of females, which is anything but equality. It’s privilege. I’ve tried to keep it short because I really don’t want to waste any more time on someone that couldn’t see something he/she didn’t want to, even if it was stamped on their forehead so they could see it every morning in the mirror. So I’ll repeat. If ALL men stopped everything they do, our society would fail. Not so if women did the same.